GNU bug report logs -
#27647
26.0.50; Line numbers implemented natively disappear momentarily when frame out of focus
Previous Next
Reported by: Kaushal Modi <kaushal.modi <at> gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 20:55:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Found in version 26.0.50
Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #171 received at 27647 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 19:45:40 +0100
> From: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>
> CC: npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net, agrambot <at> gmail.com,
> 27647 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, kaushal.modi <at> gmail.com
>
> > Not exactly. tip_frame should be nil when GTK pops a native tooltip,
> > then tip_frame will get its simple semantics back.
>
> x_hide_tip uses NILP (tip_frame) to decide whether to hide the tip.
That's non-GTK code which GTK doesn't need, but left it alone. The
whole GTK support in x_hide_tip is patched over the non-GTK code, with
dirty tricks like setting tip_frame to nil just to bypass the non-GTK
part of the function. We will be better off with a separate GTK-only
implementation.
> IIUC GTK doesn't need the original frame.
xg_hide_tooltip needs it, because the GTK tooltip widget is stashed
away in its output->data.x structure.
> But it sets tooltip_frame to it so Fx_show_tip and friends can base
> their decisions on it. Look at occurrences of FRAMEP (tip_frame)
> and FRAME_LIVE_P (XFRAME (tip_frame)). They pass because for GTK
> tip_frame is a live frame associated with the tooltip. Jan tried
> hard to leave the native tooltip code untouched.
Once again, it would be better to have the GTK code completely
separated, IMO.
This bug report was last modified 7 years and 243 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.