From unknown Sat Aug 16 14:30:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#27556: libpng has wrong hash. Resent-From: ng0 Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2017 20:15:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 27556 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 27556@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.149902645621740 (code B ref -1); Sun, 02 Jul 2017 20:15:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jul 2017 20:14:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49080 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dRlG4-0005ea-58 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2017 16:14:16 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37861) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dRlG2-0005eO-NR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2017 16:14:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dRlFw-0001S8-Hm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2017 16:14:09 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:34854) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dRlFw-0001Rm-Ey for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2017 16:14:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57058) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dRlFr-0007cz-CU for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2017 16:14:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dRlFo-0001LJ-1x for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2017 16:14:03 -0400 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:49000) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dRlFn-0001KN-Rm for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2017 16:14:00 -0400 Received: from [10.9.9.210] (helo=mailfront10.runbox.com) by mailtransmit02.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dRlFm-0001Hv-LZ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2017 22:13:58 +0200 Received: from 178-17-174-14.ip.as43289.net ([178.17.174.14] helo=localhost) by mailfront10.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:892961 ) (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) id 1dRlFl-0006oA-J7 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2017 22:13:58 +0200 Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2017 20:13:44 +0000 From: ng0 Message-ID: <20170702201344.dvqpopouvpbzr4c2@abyayala> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yub7vqtplnu6thvi" Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -7.8 (-------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -7.8 (-------) --yub7vqtplnu6thvi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I don't know if they moved the file around, renamed it or whatever, but the hash is now "0m5nv70n9903x3xzxw9qqc6sgf2rp106ha0x6gix0xf8wcrljaab". We should use this in icecat as intended (I use it for firefox nightly I work on) so that these errors get attention. @ build-started /gnu/store/l2ajzgighkr23qhyrqzy3qm64gy7v75y-libpng-1.6.28-a= png.patch.gz.drv - x86_64-linux /var/log/guix/drvs/l2//ajzgighkr23qhyrqzy3q= m64gy7v75y-libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz.drv.bz2 Starting download of /gnu/store/lsgx25nk7cg24hn6cn898jrkhs8aily3-libpng-1.6= =2E28-apng.patch.gz =46rom http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/libpng-apng/libpng16/1.6.28= /libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz... following redirection to `https://netix.dl.sourceforge.net/project/libpng-a= png/libpng16/1.6.28/libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz'... ...-apng.patch.gz 11KiB 1.2MiB/s 00:00 [####################] 1= 00.0% sha256 hash mismatch for output path `/gnu/store/lsgx25nk7cg24hn6cn898jrkhs= 8aily3-libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz' expected: 026r0gbkf6d6v54wca02cdxln8sj4m2c1yk62sj2aasv2ki2ffh5 actual: 0m5nv70n9903x3xzxw9qqc6sgf2rp106ha0x6gix0xf8wcrljaab @ build-failed /gnu/store/l2ajzgighkr23qhyrqzy3qm64gy7v75y-libpng-1.6.28-ap= ng.patch.gz.drv - 1 sha256 hash mismatch for output path `/gnu/store/lsgx25= nk7cg24hn6cn898jrkhs8aily3-libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz' expected: 026r0gbkf6d6v54wca02cdxln8sj4m2c1yk62sj2aasv2ki2ffh5 actual: 0m5nv70n9903x3xzxw9qqc6sgf2rp106ha0x6gix0xf8wcrljaab cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/x1dqpvyjz4v25z4al6kll6i3n3whv9h3-libpng= -apng-1.6.28.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built guix build: error: build failed: build of `/gnu/store/x1dqpvyjz4v25z4al6kll= 6i3n3whv9h3-libpng-apng-1.6.28.drv' failed --=20 ng0 GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org --yub7vqtplnu6thvi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEqIyK3RKYKNfqwC5S4i+bv+40hYgFAllZU/gACgkQ4i+bv+40 hYgkjg/9GpVxOzJ2a1I6yzrRsyxNkWPrhCoypI4tAxYvE46JJBLRfyroRTweFmF6 8RbUNh/Nst6UdDo2R4bi6n8Hprjn1nYqd6t44PDpZZYMaSXHO3zPOh/JUT8F/KxD KLk7i3rWjsXa+RLshlXDoC6XZWvSaK0boXTFl6gMjxVZHA5MDz+g2Iskl+O4HDmI 8K/uVlq7YOioavBrj+AqJd/jvWCoXylZxA4Q0mNhfofVo+Xd/MVDxaedUaFB5rx7 jvEM5uQKQ+wZHmxfKRwrzInvBGo4l9ixyJuwm/w1rN8dWVoFRrD5nkqy8NQoeoEU epqk/l8tegO60BpBYd7b6dZhOnue0rsl0rPhbMU/JtoG6GKwGyuvtt4LtZ+v6jZ2 eVcjIa9/2r4c1hsi+E2REX9JBtwnm73JfOt/x/oWH5m5GKG76jZ1kUQ7rpcPcLhU S/PG9ojA+VUEizBaSbdY3UKIppKN9Dtb693ODzWWrbHSPHN+HPKfF2ExF/O3Vd6x 4YXwCEkoKbrz6UTBeeirIgSLzNRAqM3uCYpyGh91nfLyqGqSoXodc2j7jfW4a8MN mxQXZK2wKXkn7xvtsT3xFRhR7uKHOJbg2HbvbXekRwgjz0eMh/Tp91ffJ5NHrBFR BH9ji5MiHmVfpV7Rr1BOlW2YFYTADAtANTd8xlw9kkeifqnGInM= =o1Ku -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yub7vqtplnu6thvi-- From unknown Sat Aug 16 14:30:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#27556: libpng has wrong hash. Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 00:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27556 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: ng0 Cc: 27556@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 27556-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27556.14992128003786 (code B ref 27556); Wed, 05 Jul 2017 00:00:02 +0000 Received: (at 27556) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52693 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dSXjc-0000yz-Bg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 20:00:00 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:44571) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dSXjb-0000ys-AN for 27556@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 19:59:59 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 266AC206CF; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 19:59:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 04 Jul 2017 19:59:59 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=z5ixqpp90M8EOIQHJqy/exoHS/0sICpIARzd15 QA3jo=; b=u4uL1NspU5e4oY8RIm//RcvflSMQ/xMHcMmrrSzS0MDUBzewBk2gLT 1E22Al2aBhEoytgkjQMgWOwdHI68xCF6MKSWqIY0L726ml1UItYwp03oD+Cj4l64 xRlBmhCoDJOkPq6SCalBpn1BFv6LG/bbNR7gouBklwgMEzUVWdoQQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=z5ixqpp90M8EOIQHJq y/exoHS/0sICpIARzd15QA3jo=; b=bovzODjOWycoqDleOV08E1nihZHH+LDoic lsHwMlmcVLz3MgklOzMq3wwr4HQFZyPSM3tznOSZRLHIin7WDn/7l7zWTixBAg8G JuzJYQiFYFGss8xsUVVOR93Dbkti63odxd1WI/E/b+NNdODpnHGlnMGJObceszzS YEkbnrMFHvu6hJNLjwZCWQP0scXkBLrs8M8Yo13W4ZN4F4MBdIXH3tVWRsgn2ynh IoMdXO4FrACnQm7/6TUAEclt4RJN/ne6LnvYswAMq4MHU67u17b4rqSU419J6P2y H/0U3GSQp2/27FMl/p9ONVRBnVL4ub/1a/E2L+GGgqliQEyDhD8Q== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: Ojy+4qF1NpQisCqI2Qk0fQRD1K4poZgINQEk6Cp8EOHP 1499212798 Received: from localhost (pool-108-26-246-73.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [108.26.246.73]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DC9947E7A5; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 19:59:58 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 19:59:58 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20170704235958.GB31303@jasmine.lan> References: <20170702201344.dvqpopouvpbzr4c2@abyayala> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3lcZGd9BuhuYXNfi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170702201344.dvqpopouvpbzr4c2@abyayala> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --3lcZGd9BuhuYXNfi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 08:13:44PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > I don't know if they moved the file around, renamed it or > whatever, but the hash is now > "0m5nv70n9903x3xzxw9qqc6sgf2rp106ha0x6gix0xf8wcrljaab". > We should use this in icecat as intended (I use it for > firefox nightly I work on) so that these errors get > attention. >=20 > @ build-started /gnu/store/l2ajzgighkr23qhyrqzy3qm64gy7v75y-libpng-1.6.28= -apng.patch.gz.drv - x86_64-linux /var/log/guix/drvs/l2//ajzgighkr23qhyrqzy= 3qm64gy7v75y-libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz.drv.bz2 >=20 > Starting download of /gnu/store/lsgx25nk7cg24hn6cn898jrkhs8aily3-libpng-1= =2E6.28-apng.patch.gz > From http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/libpng-apng/libpng16/1.6.28= /libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz... > following redirection to `https://netix.dl.sourceforge.net/project/libpng= -apng/libpng16/1.6.28/libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz'... > ...-apng.patch.gz 11KiB 1.2MiB/s 00:00 [####################]= 100.0% > sha256 hash mismatch for output path `/gnu/store/lsgx25nk7cg24hn6cn898jrk= hs8aily3-libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz' > expected: 026r0gbkf6d6v54wca02cdxln8sj4m2c1yk62sj2aasv2ki2ffh5 > actual: 0m5nv70n9903x3xzxw9qqc6sgf2rp106ha0x6gix0xf8wcrljaab > @ build-failed /gnu/store/l2ajzgighkr23qhyrqzy3qm64gy7v75y-libpng-1.6.28-= apng.patch.gz.drv - 1 sha256 hash mismatch for output path `/gnu/store/lsgx= 25nk7cg24hn6cn898jrkhs8aily3-libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz' > expected: 026r0gbkf6d6v54wca02cdxln8sj4m2c1yk62sj2aasv2ki2ffh5 > actual: 0m5nv70n9903x3xzxw9qqc6sgf2rp106ha0x6gix0xf8wcrljaab > cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/x1dqpvyjz4v25z4al6kll6i3n3whv9h3-libp= ng-apng-1.6.28.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built > guix build: error: build failed: build of `/gnu/store/x1dqpvyjz4v25z4al6k= ll6i3n3whv9h3-libpng-apng-1.6.28.drv' failed Clarification: This is libpng-apng, not libpng. --3lcZGd9BuhuYXNfi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAllcK/4ACgkQJkb6MLrK fwgenhAAniL87+9fUHlX4+3RzJDgq/bshz6KNvThcs/twxqpBYCjpKZyATz2Wds8 jMlvUxD4xEnum7UK17UuQ1JhuF4oUxz8MjAEFeUZCrsC7Dj45mr+tF/8lEFhijsu NJ33QmrxKa3eVvAJInU2BNV8h2Ah3OKdF+SKVzl6VXgUyLDmjEKNQqPi+hRcHwib BTISDKLTznahypdIQHfFx4gqih204PJhMMuQmtVi/V7WjO2v/7Lw5w+BiZIoqbfw SaSufmCb860eZNOupeu8pbTrGIj3RFjsa32ZpaEly1ZLrnT9nayqexCaLcaeZdDS 9Wv7KFWA7ULGbADGmFkt2bzc0b0gRdbAl3SguVnpkvg0E1NuTCwtE0ukjb8u8myP viYXAwuXGMWDmgsOzTobh4UXYWbuic10j3Adqz0O4MWf+qCNwdhEIGfnQC8/S9Dk 1IWODucOUI3ra+sAW+Axy/imbVohyeoJAZ0OVELabkqPojEILOyCsP1YmFTy+z3k MvZ/gqb+lEnt3XIqjU/YIt/nLV/KClXQ4f22JCH8QlzJ8g7jSliFNO+tDRT0wJT3 8dHaPZB1di8VAtv+lPwZ/W0W8jiaOTO2RDos0KPtfv6W5QMsCWhMeIWX7goIhZIq QNX/krDyhZHrcFNbT5R6qnvzNGMIuYhk+nO+n4fS5gUO/OwVtBU= =ZoKo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3lcZGd9BuhuYXNfi-- From unknown Sat Aug 16 14:30:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#27556: libpng has wrong hash. Resent-From: ng0 Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 07:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27556 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Famulari Cc: 27556@debbugs.gnu.org, ng0 Received: via spool by 27556-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27556.149924147022679 (code B ref 27556); Wed, 05 Jul 2017 07:58:01 +0000 Received: (at 27556) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jul 2017 07:57:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52877 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dSfC1-0005tj-Og for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 03:57:49 -0400 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:59794) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dSfC0-0005ta-2R for 27556@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 03:57:48 -0400 Received: from [10.9.9.212] (helo=mailfront12.runbox.com) by mailtransmit03.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dSfBx-0001D6-D5; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 09:57:45 +0200 Received: from [91.223.82.156] (helo=localhost) by mailfront12.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:892961 ) (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) id 1dSfBe-000696-Pc; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 09:57:27 +0200 Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 07:57:25 +0000 From: ng0 Message-ID: <20170705075725.yhhg5iexeksl76oh@abyayala> Mail-Followup-To: Leo Famulari , 27556@debbugs.gnu.org References: <20170702201344.dvqpopouvpbzr4c2@abyayala> <20170704235958.GB31303@jasmine.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="opwkca5w4df5po4q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170704235958.GB31303@jasmine.lan> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --opwkca5w4df5po4q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Leo Famulari transcribed 2.9K bytes: > On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 08:13:44PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > > I don't know if they moved the file around, renamed it or > > whatever, but the hash is now > > "0m5nv70n9903x3xzxw9qqc6sgf2rp106ha0x6gix0xf8wcrljaab". > > We should use this in icecat as intended (I use it for > > firefox nightly I work on) so that these errors get > > attention. > >=20 > > @ build-started /gnu/store/l2ajzgighkr23qhyrqzy3qm64gy7v75y-libpng-1.6.= 28-apng.patch.gz.drv - x86_64-linux /var/log/guix/drvs/l2//ajzgighkr23qhyrq= zy3qm64gy7v75y-libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz.drv.bz2 > >=20 > > Starting download of /gnu/store/lsgx25nk7cg24hn6cn898jrkhs8aily3-libpng= -1.6.28-apng.patch.gz > > From http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/libpng-apng/libpng16/1.6.= 28/libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz... > > following redirection to `https://netix.dl.sourceforge.net/project/libp= ng-apng/libpng16/1.6.28/libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz'... > > ...-apng.patch.gz 11KiB 1.2MiB/s 00:00 [###################= #] 100.0% > > sha256 hash mismatch for output path `/gnu/store/lsgx25nk7cg24hn6cn898j= rkhs8aily3-libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz' > > expected: 026r0gbkf6d6v54wca02cdxln8sj4m2c1yk62sj2aasv2ki2ffh5 > > actual: 0m5nv70n9903x3xzxw9qqc6sgf2rp106ha0x6gix0xf8wcrljaab > > @ build-failed /gnu/store/l2ajzgighkr23qhyrqzy3qm64gy7v75y-libpng-1.6.2= 8-apng.patch.gz.drv - 1 sha256 hash mismatch for output path `/gnu/store/ls= gx25nk7cg24hn6cn898jrkhs8aily3-libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz' > > expected: 026r0gbkf6d6v54wca02cdxln8sj4m2c1yk62sj2aasv2ki2ffh5 > > actual: 0m5nv70n9903x3xzxw9qqc6sgf2rp106ha0x6gix0xf8wcrljaab > > cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/x1dqpvyjz4v25z4al6kll6i3n3whv9h3-li= bpng-apng-1.6.28.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built > > guix build: error: build failed: build of `/gnu/store/x1dqpvyjz4v25z4al= 6kll6i3n3whv9h3-libpng-apng-1.6.28.drv' failed >=20 > Clarification: This is libpng-apng, not libpng. Right, my mistake. It still is wrong, and that's been the case for at least 3 weeks. --=20 ng0 GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org --opwkca5w4df5po4q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEqIyK3RKYKNfqwC5S4i+bv+40hYgFAllcm+UACgkQ4i+bv+40 hYglJhAAnDSttAtwhzfze8t2DtrrQpj7Y4JsBcVF74eEcTfZwoeAM17dXJsWA8KR yJLvygJnncy0sqFBKEU7huM01srjewsg241HB2SCHVOsUFeIQMKByfFFW8tobXSh D47qGv373rrp3PamtlK/La7TJoaMQr3MWz29ml09eOb6gA137NbgM56QHMZf8pv8 ZFwczriKpP2HeinVHJEKySChcbcBEIlHCx7tI74l5qzGwTyRWkKstYmC4BwtfZan OgD/Ly2K67JYiYyE9ABTD7o30zdjkNgc9os4HaSfLKIqyf83fyfri3Dnvmi8PaYV YthH9Vc+wPSvBcQ5j7wYN5PRp63L6UCdFDyo960RWeYLFF+AIp65zk2qoGk/fQ+K d/grDMKqkZyi0hT6UOTJaYTfZbqsKetUeS8VuqhDoiktw3mW87eWzYrVlM6rEst3 NyabEjcYAC13N2rnBUqUegbFHoZqGX0eAnf3iakjagYm+OmC9XmwVzkmb5b51ms3 d2Jh0mUsB2qbjqYGMMnrol0Wt7j4ctY5RtEAYNHHVwJ0t5UZ0EILiO1+GDr7KfKy +ySuIF6T43R5dU6G3+EMkjFm7ry/vG+o479q9sNEm1gDWUUNre3FfZpTpelRB3uA ep3IeJMV8p8gydKDXbBBYqM7f/YCEJYWDyfy61oqk6kP5qEXGcc= =jQW8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --opwkca5w4df5po4q-- From unknown Sat Aug 16 14:30:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#27556: Fix for bug#27556 References: <20170702201344.dvqpopouvpbzr4c2@abyayala> In-Reply-To: <20170702201344.dvqpopouvpbzr4c2@abyayala> Resent-From: ng0 Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 15:28:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27556 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: guix-patches@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.149987322226536 (code B ref -1); Wed, 12 Jul 2017 15:28:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jul 2017 15:27:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35568 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dVJXT-0006tW-3Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:27:02 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60122) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dVJXM-0006tD-No for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:26:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVJXG-0006G6-I3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:26:43 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:58550) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVJXG-0006FY-EL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:26:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51085) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVJXF-0003r7-04 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:26:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVJXB-0006AB-SP for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:26:40 -0400 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:33322) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVJXB-00067J-Kc for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:26:37 -0400 Received: from [10.9.9.212] (helo=mailfront12.runbox.com) by mailtransmit03.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dVJX9-0004lf-9G for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 17:26:35 +0200 Received: from tollana.enn.lu ([85.248.227.164] helo=localhost) by mailfront12.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:892961 ) (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) id 1dVJWU-0007Xb-LK for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 17:25:55 +0200 Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 15:25:51 +0000 From: ng0 Message-ID: <20170712152551.mxo3toaurzcolfgh@abyayala> Mail-Followup-To: guix-patches@gnu.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jyao2lu42o726tbr" Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) --jyao2lu42o726tbr Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="qnpswwr5sv3lhlkj" Content-Disposition: inline --qnpswwr5sv3lhlkj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Appended. I haven't asked upstream why it changed all I know is that I am currently packaging software which depends on this library and I'd like to drop my local correction. --=20 ng0 GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org --qnpswwr5sv3lhlkj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0001-gnu-libpng-apng-Correct-the-hash.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =46rom 40764bb662ff7534f6e7afa55bfb709bfef19e49 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 =46rom: ng0 Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 15:20:36 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: libpng-apng: Correct the hash. Fixes . * gnu/packages/image.scm (libpng-apng)[source]: Correct the hash. --- gnu/packages/image.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/image.scm b/gnu/packages/image.scm index 139be6281..3ae1072e2 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/image.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/image.scm @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ ;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2016 Eric Bavier ;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2016 Arun Isaac ;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2016, 2017 Kei Kebreau -;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2017 ng0 +;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2017 ng0 ;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2017 Hartmut Goebel ;;; ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix. @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ library. It supports almost all PNG features and is ex= tensible.") version "/libpng-" version "-apng.patch.= gz")) (sha256 (base32 - "026r0gbkf6d6v54wca02cdxln8sj4m2c1yk62sj2aasv2ki2ffh5"= )))))) + "0m5nv70n9903x3xzxw9qqc6sgf2rp106ha0x6gix0xf8wcrljaab"= )))))) (native-inputs `(("libtool" ,libtool))) (synopsis "APNG patch for libpng") --=20 2.13.2 --qnpswwr5sv3lhlkj-- --jyao2lu42o726tbr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEqIyK3RKYKNfqwC5S4i+bv+40hYgFAllmP38ACgkQ4i+bv+40 hYgfVhAAgVmhQ28owR/dvdXLBUNMQpfD6+BXFrP+ZUm7kQTOpuAd8MnKNrHErvpq 1wygCA8lyl7PwFtA0hkHh25AVC5h8wywVm+0RTrnXMf1M/Xs7u+0MZ1chX7h6lAC MJEUoF5prtiYB8bncQ76ovXRVK1JkYkCUebeQZCFlWnPcGxuxhunsEVk82fnL9K2 yuTYsP2NClfUpJOt9btP93PEY5SiJu7gwjmD09LGOMjzYpIqMy3MFOanCZs+7EAL 4sS7UfbM3QVDbVuI7ZBjhkrIMfOF+AJ2Zgf4cCnroIrXBmmacTPsYKztYuRJkR2H /wQCGM82bZqlmha1tIAkCa//iOaBOjLwf797Pug3UCbOOhGneZyYZq480oehATWf FvnWCFLc5FtOeZj6GKTERha+YuyOlFbE3YEDP7Q4sGLnWm37TyU/b1XehMWFByBi hcFHUP5xabYwktIdUg0tj2n5IHotlM2mnu0zXp4TDt10gtdwlqaogUsw0lHgMoFB 9XMR5lQlJ7k2KFEgjfWh7UyAvArFCldP6UNUb655iGnAGQjhk9P+U+5UWQu03yRo BHqXLbdyk50aBQdtmFmV1WF+zFcHJLgoeeq76posR5ymAzTxVl4dQMpUcyP1le2G XmwdV448PkHuxQTwA5itWdSx96Tifz1S9Zf460xIqyBuwo1mTac= =5Gmj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jyao2lu42o726tbr-- From unknown Sat Aug 16 14:30:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#27556: Fix for bug#27556 Resent-From: ng0 Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 09:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27556 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: guix-patches@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.150071496529353 (code B ref -1); Sat, 22 Jul 2017 09:17:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jul 2017 09:16:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51889 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dYqW5-0007dN-0i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 05:16:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42293) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dYqW3-0007cd-R3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 05:16:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dYqVx-0007Xm-RE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 05:15:58 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:53275) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dYqVx-0007Xg-NS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 05:15:57 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33260) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dYqVw-0003v1-IY for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 05:15:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dYqVt-0007V9-Dj for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 05:15:56 -0400 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:50510) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dYqVt-0007UE-6M for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 05:15:53 -0400 Received: from [10.9.9.211] (helo=mailfront11.runbox.com) by mailtransmit02.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dYqVq-00018v-Bu for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 11:15:50 +0200 Received: from [95.141.35.15] (helo=localhost) by mailfront11.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:892961 ) (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) id 1dYqVm-0004EC-4y for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 11:15:46 +0200 Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 09:15:44 +0000 From: ng0 Message-ID: <20170722091544.ja7qv3qvqxt6pbxf@abyayala> Mail-Followup-To: guix-patches@gnu.org References: <20170702201344.dvqpopouvpbzr4c2@abyayala> <20170712152551.mxo3toaurzcolfgh@abyayala> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5lf6gudjljtsq7gl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170712152551.mxo3toaurzcolfgh@abyayala> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -7.8 (-------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -7.8 (-------) --5lf6gudjljtsq7gl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ng0 transcribed 3.1K bytes: > Appended. I haven't asked upstream why it changed > all I know is that I am currently packaging software > which depends on this library and I'd like to drop > my local correction. I have sent an email to the upstream maintainer, asking why the hash has been changed in place. --=20 ng0 GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org --5lf6gudjljtsq7gl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEqIyK3RKYKNfqwC5S4i+bv+40hYgFAllzF8AACgkQ4i+bv+40 hYiFtg//Su7J6W5HMAkjhwUNUxDzfRzxgc9cLK/FHsRNlOWANV/zNc+q1fuaV3co 9kW36k+zskFY6ypy8EoFWlBs2A8OXZ2NeO/J/jB1syFT+oM/oBCa+vJIz9E/HZM+ uTwx2ZVEC+E3zqDCufTs6zD8mxjA3prsuy36uzsgiZPl0gX5eQGzodZgeG7TcPXQ CIGV073CeT4gN9qV26xDjsy0yj2v/Tj+5DbwQ0IZxRoGqm6kluA9Ul0ErJJEaT14 ZepLkBdj9YRAjvEWenlRbItulIesji7SRY1d+VAN4R07aGz41K+2+komiEEs5kRQ c2kEJfLNUctDZgU96VKR0LepHjCXOOvGDB/FKKOia3/v5upM209QTd1NbPyL7tJY VfJdjdnUr3DYr4IW3AuPc3TabhMHqjt9gsxuIKaqZbmi8jkPcP0Ao6EjcwX0f3J2 U6l9xaf1tCFss5IKqi3Iy2oPknoPgJ7LaO+LcGtoxI/pTDkG4CumUWrBWzjDXj7i OX3r0phMvYOEzgDKlrePRbLVzdjnzXAmzocQ3RhxmasyuiuPkPjgnppGLBPSxM+s 2mnKxTkJ0lk43yebS8ff9M/Xd5aE7QTtM+JWdVsuOTRvIO0dAkfFJ4Oht8ju5gxf FZRVZxgHMBqxabt4ZJ218mwqmbcPlBQ+MJKC3++MIaxhdaTs82M= =dKgp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5lf6gudjljtsq7gl-- From unknown Sat Aug 16 14:30:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#27556: libpng has wrong hash. [Fwd: Re: why has the hash for libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed?] References: <20170702201344.dvqpopouvpbzr4c2@abyayala> In-Reply-To: <20170702201344.dvqpopouvpbzr4c2@abyayala> Resent-From: ng0 Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 10:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27556 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 27556@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 27556-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27556.150080496722134 (code B ref 27556); Sun, 23 Jul 2017 10:17:01 +0000 Received: (at 27556) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jul 2017 10:16:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52888 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dZDvj-0005kw-7l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2017 06:16:07 -0400 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:47932) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dZDvh-0005kn-5B for 27556@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2017 06:16:05 -0400 Received: from [10.9.9.211] (helo=mailfront11.runbox.com) by mailtransmit02.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dZDve-0002Yi-OK for 27556@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2017 12:16:02 +0200 Received: from [46.183.221.231] (helo=localhost) by mailfront11.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:892961 ) (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) id 1dZDvR-0005Wd-63 for 27556@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2017 12:15:49 +0200 Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 10:15:47 +0000 From: ng0 Message-ID: <20170723101547.3oi5uu2xhi625njp@abyayala> Mail-Followup-To: 27556@debbugs.gnu.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ubriisq25ky4h3as" Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --ubriisq25ky4h3as Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ----- Forwarded message ----- > Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 18:21:19 +0900 (JST) > To: ng0 > Cc: daisuken@users.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: why has the hash for libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed? >=20 > Hi, >=20 > I calculated the hash for libpng-apng files on my local orignals. >=20 > md5sum > 9f2b36bccf89c5f4097111f0f73c1798 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.README.txt > fca7c6d87c8352e645facefc2e1dd153 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz >=20 > sha1sum > cb620589ecf9c28a4ecc00e6225dd41ca660a959 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.README= =2Etxt > 4fa952f5ad374fce8d478b7e54ee4298a0b8d159 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz >=20 > Local file time stamps are > 2017-01-06 21:02:10.938833896 +0900 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.README.txt > 2017-01-06 21:02:10.938833896 +0900 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz >=20 > That values equals on sourceforge.net. > https://sourceforge.net/projects/libpng-apng/files/libpng16/1.6.28/ >=20 > I don't really understand what happend, but it look just fine. >=20 > Cheers, > --- > daisuken@users.sourceforge.net >=20 >=20 > From: ng0 > Subject: why has the hash for libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed? > Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 09:06:28 +0000 > Message-ID: <20170722090628.rvnmyvafhkgrnl7t@abyayala> >=20 > ng0> Hi, > ng0>=20 > ng0> I noticed that the hash for libpng-apng at the source changed, for v= ersion 1.6.28. > ng0>=20 > ng0> Can you tell me what happened? As libpng-apng is a recent addition i= n our > ng0> system (GNU Guix) I'm not yet aware of any bad or good practices or = the > ng0> lack of them libpng-apng applies. > ng0> My current guess is that you changed the tarball in place, or that > ng0> Sourceforge changed it in place. We'll diff the tarball contents and= see > ng0> what changed, but a maintainers reply will also be good. > ng0>=20 > ng0> Greetings, > ng0> --=20 > ng0> ng0 > ng0> GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 > ng0> GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys > ng0> https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org >=20 ----- End forwarded message ----- --=20 ng0 GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org --ubriisq25ky4h3as Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEqIyK3RKYKNfqwC5S4i+bv+40hYgFAll0d1MACgkQ4i+bv+40 hYiK/g/8CM2sPikpy36inKNaW2YS5+oxDKg3QlE5+bLV/ET28RTgHiKJO6LcR5NV zZ7QH+BtLAz1LhsgqtMESsQLBeQTGL4uBHe3bNAb+a9SAH/ZFMFLZD6s/TVCkRiK Irit6oRpfD1v2mniQfL9SZHXturTAQNhicCx7/L/Dbczu0Bvfjts1RO/WSBHcJXh h+mPs7w+5NnHTO8pHXcJDvacx1QnCMykgiGnrsCWjE+KSMJvYyGaGECAEYP87aE8 +R69EFXnSFxRmMTgUxJ3rbGtPrO2z5gqMNvDinWbioTM/U7AjF07oNzqBQ/9IRbu I+4oo3INKmIERJsWbAXQ7mUOBFP9J/+q6RZIyY+Pzupqhsh9jLuVVP7hwSMsWoGd dbVarUxI/nsma08YZO9FN2iAf/myFnGuqzrB0u+Ti/CLsKDfEltk9OWT8XboINac h9jjiC594pPsoaaRU5asnlM93+bcIfU2h+fm4ATzo+HgO1h7wW1NvP1bmP4z/5Ag ew8T92+VpET+SyBE7yCiM9h+0Idc/K9Ud3wmMnpT2r02ShO+zCmDUz26rCG1Jqyu 2ZvcuebpXg5KCf3UayizegJcYPtU8bOg5YJB45If9Su1ePWz5mEn0WL+joLw9SLj Y2GomKX7pZkGW3ISOYBVfIHOCCDUOY82YUn20iUYnhoNnLHwwmg= =TgKM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ubriisq25ky4h3as-- From unknown Sat Aug 16 14:30:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#27556: libpng has wrong hash. [Fwd: Re: why has the hash for libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed?] Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27556 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 27556@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 27556-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27556.150100857922323 (code B ref 27556); Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:50:02 +0000 Received: (at 27556) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jul 2017 18:49:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56280 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1da4tn-0005nz-AT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 14:49:39 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:32893) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1da4tm-0005ns-94 for 27556@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 14:49:38 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFB2B20E9E; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 14:49:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 25 Jul 2017 14:49:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=BTDEkvncy4q/UW9wk6xFnhuzhp/S2winmJyBx9 ZNGw0=; b=S6S2nte0KaL15XXBca7SVdjeabIF96zqwu4pm2bBbCRXpIsCeUBqt9 jUc44edI+zNZn59n5DvJktuy7Neil6nRakBDvgpyYlugWt2eBjWP3FfJdLe1orrx hGKIXmsczJrwKz7sGiCgqAz28k5O4SEV4IAFv98xJW4R72Aldt35w= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=BTDEkvncy4q/UW9wk6 xFnhuzhp/S2winmJyBx9ZNGw0=; b=WvXfRZJ4n5kw3vWMbg7NbLcTN60Z5X/MdM eUhulKbiKcUUFJ/HN43172xCBZeItTs8SZ4XpV/If9MAE+zfhRuRT2o+pUVojuvj KZrNIiEGjRAxdcwZZVZmX8gg068f+ofNEsCl1293YcX5BiUmWEN8AYN3PxIS5GWI A/8rOPzrdwQaeI3x4Vg5giAXj4KtckumvTdtpZ0M077IFge8VFB8H2cRO5C9mjUF LNyA6gEMYzzNUjxfUW6BTVQiEq04V6T4msgAguS+2ZBTQrFviYKwNd3UFJqKTpI/ yjzX9GuBXPA/QTjmDqpIXCdugAZjRaZ/vFlOpdVqn8zez9MGgDww== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: hax/6QnSG7Xu44WTQWH3XfIzM4+EsOzYZ2J4Sk/FtGSZ 1501008577 Received: from localhost (c-73-165-108-70.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.165.108.70]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9816C7E2E6 for <27556@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 14:49:37 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 14:49:36 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20170725184936.GA32001@jasmine.lan> References: <20170702201344.dvqpopouvpbzr4c2@abyayala> <20170723101547.3oi5uu2xhi625njp@abyayala> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/04w6evG8XlLl3ft" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170723101547.3oi5uu2xhi625njp@abyayala> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 10:15:47AM +0000, ng0 wrote: > ----- Forwarded message ----- >=20 > > Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 18:21:19 +0900 (JST) > > To: ng0 > > Cc: daisuken@users.sourceforge.net > > Subject: Re: why has the hash for libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed? > >=20 > > Hi, > >=20 > > I calculated the hash for libpng-apng files on my local orignals. > >=20 > > md5sum > > 9f2b36bccf89c5f4097111f0f73c1798 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.README.txt > > fca7c6d87c8352e645facefc2e1dd153 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz > >=20 > > sha1sum > > cb620589ecf9c28a4ecc00e6225dd41ca660a959 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.READ= ME.txt > > 4fa952f5ad374fce8d478b7e54ee4298a0b8d159 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz > >=20 > > Local file time stamps are > > 2017-01-06 21:02:10.938833896 +0900 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.README.txt > > 2017-01-06 21:02:10.938833896 +0900 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz > >=20 > > That values equals on sourceforge.net. > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/libpng-apng/files/libpng16/1.6.28/ > >=20 > > I don't really understand what happend, but it look just fine. > >=20 > > Cheers, > > --- > > daisuken@users.sourceforge.net Okay, this doesn't help us, so we need to inspect the different tarballs ourselves. Do you have an old copy of the patch you can share? --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAll3ksAACgkQJkb6MLrK fwjnthAArilFxdbi8a87Yz+8/6fTejoWf5zBjFxmR3V4003GrqlBoLvYrrcdI8/4 Tgyiov4WT99Ns1DuVrXfRESoReb9bnpWVD6X/dU4+d/L+ECNHfRFAye1ygBgOzsm 5TPWyQJFAl+kqthEG+vy1RKDiysfN+B4JLRvSGwvjBlSg9pll7VhlKawzAIGznFx v78yoqvHtuaEjf1WI7BypHPMfwCGSEoBju2wGlE/iIl9F4sanDTgIqrxFhYa8zbr dcMnEVg4PhtTaxOZoQz5B/5WFdmUffW9tVH1c0kG79m9AeCsFFhLpy33Dihb/Io5 9LXiYW2NCQOi2zjmpWDptlXLF3//Cmdcp9Hu/2HdrifttXLGn0w6ouX9Bu+ThqdS t/KVwXkawYDubmE9d+HU48euHjCKSS22V4xtd/lcFShnZcuRjb7wQBIQuLinKF2g 6AmLOdjQwHEwD09vXhcMJnvstF7P1QV5Rw4W+NZoRh+PvqaHQDHWZnufnR1f1Ofe qkn1as2VsGUye6CkzLZjc+EM0HOT1tMkWu3WKJJFmbaAq5Vi2oksGdTOSupPtqxX K3uEe65yYzobe3nFuJppB2GclVthG+UIsxSpq0oNxYvqD9t3P7kM4MZn2HsuG/1Y I6jLvnpCbWybqm8BrJ2/eHdFMANTHd0Qt/MS3SXZs65SKNiaWXU= =E+P+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft-- From unknown Sat Aug 16 14:30:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#27556: libpng has wrong hash. [Fwd: Re: why has the hash for libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed?] Resent-From: ng0 Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 06:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27556 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Famulari Cc: 27556@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 27556-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27556.150105223817396 (code B ref 27556); Wed, 26 Jul 2017 06:58:01 +0000 Received: (at 27556) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jul 2017 06:57:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56659 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1daGFo-0004WL-Q9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 02:57:18 -0400 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:40552) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1daGFl-0004WB-Ry for 27556@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 02:57:07 -0400 Received: from [10.9.9.211] (helo=mailfront11.runbox.com) by mailtransmit02.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1daGFi-00056Z-EQ; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 08:57:02 +0200 Received: from tor-exit6-readme.dfri.se ([171.25.193.132] helo=localhost) by mailfront11.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:892961 ) (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) id 1daGFY-0003uk-VW; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 08:56:53 +0200 Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 06:56:51 +0000 From: ng0 Message-ID: <20170726065651.qvsz25b44txl6et7@abyayala> Mail-Followup-To: Leo Famulari , 27556@debbugs.gnu.org References: <20170702201344.dvqpopouvpbzr4c2@abyayala> <20170723101547.3oi5uu2xhi625njp@abyayala> <20170725184936.GA32001@jasmine.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="p7nzagfjnixs3tlc" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170725184936.GA32001@jasmine.lan> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) --p7nzagfjnixs3tlc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Leo Famulari transcribed 2.3K bytes: > On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 10:15:47AM +0000, ng0 wrote: > > ----- Forwarded message ----- > >=20 > > > Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 18:21:19 +0900 (JST) > > > To: ng0 > > > Cc: daisuken@users.sourceforge.net > > > Subject: Re: why has the hash for libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed? > > >=20 > > > Hi, > > >=20 > > > I calculated the hash for libpng-apng files on my local orignals. > > >=20 > > > md5sum > > > 9f2b36bccf89c5f4097111f0f73c1798 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.README.txt > > > fca7c6d87c8352e645facefc2e1dd153 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz > > >=20 > > > sha1sum > > > cb620589ecf9c28a4ecc00e6225dd41ca660a959 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.RE= ADME.txt > > > 4fa952f5ad374fce8d478b7e54ee4298a0b8d159 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz > > >=20 > > > Local file time stamps are > > > 2017-01-06 21:02:10.938833896 +0900 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.README.= txt > > > 2017-01-06 21:02:10.938833896 +0900 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz > > >=20 > > > That values equals on sourceforge.net. > > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/libpng-apng/files/libpng16/1.6.28/ > > >=20 > > > I don't really understand what happend, but it look just fine. > > >=20 > > > Cheers, > > > --- > > > daisuken@users.sourceforge.net >=20 > Okay, this doesn't help us, so we need to inspect the different tarballs > ourselves. Do you have an old copy of the patch you can share? Yes. I mean no. I am not sure. I have libpng-apng git checkout and also the 1.6.25 extracted tarball directory (but not sure when I got it), and the tarballs for 1.6.5 and 1.6.28. But I think I found our problem: user@shadownet ~/re-src$ guix hash tarballs/libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz 0m5nv70n9903x3xzxw9qqc6sgf2rp106ha0x6gix0xf8wcrljaab user@shadownet ~/re-src$ guix hash tarballs/libpng-1.6.25-apng.patch.gz 026r0gbkf6d6v54wca02cdxln8sj4m2c1yk62sj2aasv2ki2ffh5 (inputs `(("apng" ,(origin (method url-fetch) (uri (string-append "mirror://sourceforge/libpng-apng/libpng16/" version "/libpng-" version "-apng.patch.gz")) (sha256 (base32 "026r0gbkf6d6v54wca02cdxln8sj4m2c1yk62sj2aasv2ki2ffh5")))))) My really strong guess is that we never updated the hash for libpng-apng when the libpng was updated fron which libpng-apng inherits its version. I don't have the time to look at our git history right now, but you could do that, look at wether libpng-apng was touched since 1.6.25->1.6.28 update of libpng. user@shadownet ~/re-src$ ls -al *png* ; ls -al tarballs/*png* libpng-1.6.25: total 3416 drwxr-xr-x 8 user users 4096 Mar 24 14:51 ./ drwxr-xr-x 282 user users 12288 Jul 22 09:39 ../ -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 44739 Sep 1 2016 aclocal.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 1207 Sep 1 2016 ANNOUNCE drwxr-xr-x 2 user users 4096 Mar 24 14:51 arm/ -rwxr-xr-x 1 user users 7979 Aug 3 2015 autogen.sh -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 285838 Sep 1 2016 CHANGES -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 30349 Sep 1 2016 CMakeLists.txt -rwxr-xr-x 1 user users 7333 Feb 21 2015 compile -rwxr-xr-x 1 user users 42938 Feb 21 2015 config.guess -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 3307 Sep 1 2016 config.h.in -rwxr-xr-x 1 user users 35987 Feb 21 2015 config.sub -rwxr-xr-x 1 user users 477565 Sep 1 2016 configure -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 14688 Sep 1 2016 configure.ac drwxr-xr-x 15 user users 4096 Mar 24 14:51 contrib/ -rwxr-xr-x 1 user users 23566 Feb 21 2015 depcomp -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 40303 Sep 1 2016 example.c -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 17971 Sep 1 2016 INSTALL -rwxr-xr-x 1 user users 14675 Feb 21 2015 install-sh -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 270700 Sep 1 2016 libpng.3 -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 2396 Sep 1 2016 libpng-config.in -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 228244 Sep 1 2016 libpng-manual.txt -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 293 Sep 1 2016 libpng.pc.in -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 764 Sep 1 2016 libpngpf.3 -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 4937 Sep 1 2016 LICENSE -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 324089 Sep 1 2016 ltmain.sh -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 13620 Sep 1 2016 Makefile.am -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 89190 Sep 1 2016 Makefile.in drwxr-xr-x 2 user users 4096 Mar 24 14:51 mips/ -rwxr-xr-x 1 user users 6872 Feb 21 2015 missing -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 2432 Sep 1 2016 png.5 -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 2498 Jul 12 2000 pngbar.jpg -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 2399 Jul 12 2000 pngbar.png -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 155048 Sep 1 2016 png.c -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 22842 Sep 1 2016 pngconf.h -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 5368 Sep 1 2016 pngdebug.h -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 29224 Sep 1 2016 pngerror.c -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 33379 Sep 1 2016 pngget.c -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 143481 Sep 1 2016 png.h -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 12343 Sep 1 2016 pnginfo.h -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 8353 Sep 1 2016 pngmem.c -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 2069 Aug 26 2004 pngnow.png -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 31617 Sep 1 2016 pngpread.c -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 83266 Sep 1 2016 pngpriv.h -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 141254 Sep 1 2016 pngread.c -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 3956 Sep 1 2016 pngrio.c -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 168573 Sep 1 2016 pngrtran.c -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 142873 Sep 1 2016 pngrutil.c -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 49969 Sep 1 2016 pngset.c -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 20036 Sep 1 2016 pngstruct.h -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 61255 Sep 1 2016 pngtest.c -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 8695 Jan 6 2013 pngtest.png -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 25150 Sep 1 2016 pngtrans.c -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 497 Sep 1 2016 pngusr.dfa -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 5655 Sep 1 2016 pngwio.c -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 76028 Sep 1 2016 pngwrite.c -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 15391 Sep 1 2016 pngwtran.c -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 80139 Sep 1 2016 pngwutil.c drwxr-xr-x 5 user users 4096 Mar 24 14:51 projects/ -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 11403 Sep 1 2016 README drwxr-xr-x 2 user users 4096 Mar 24 14:51 scripts/ -rwxr-xr-x 1 user users 4640 Feb 21 2015 test-driver drwxr-xr-x 2 user users 4096 Mar 24 14:51 tests/ -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 1252 Aug 15 2016 TODO libpng-apng-code: total 2764 drwxr-xr-x 6 user users 4096 Jul 22 08:53 ./ drwxr-xr-x 282 user users 12288 Jul 22 09:39 ../ -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 322880 Jul 22 08:53 aclocal.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 1728 Jul 22 08:53 ANNOUNCE -rwxr-xr-x 1 user users 877 Jul 22 08:53 autogen.sh -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 141161 Jul 22 08:53 CHANGES -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 12406 Jul 22 08:53 CMakeLists.txt -rwxr-xr-x 1 user users 44941 Jul 22 08:53 config.guess -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 2218 Jul 22 08:53 config.h.in -rwxr-xr-x 1 user users 34423 Jul 22 08:53 config.sub -rwxr-xr-x 1 user users 411663 Jul 22 08:53 configure -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 3862 Jul 22 08:53 configure.ac drwxr-xr-x 7 user users 4096 Jul 22 08:53 contrib/ -rwxr-xr-x 1 user users 18615 Jul 22 08:53 depcomp -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 30668 Jul 22 08:53 example.c drwxr-xr-x 8 user users 4096 Jul 22 08:53 .git/ -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 5175 Jul 22 08:53 INSTALL -rwxr-xr-x 1 user users 13663 Jul 22 08:53 install-sh -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 141280 Jul 22 08:53 libpng-1.4.8.txt -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 184598 Jul 22 08:53 libpng.3 -rwxr-xr-x 1 user users 2379 Jul 22 08:53 libpng-config.in -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 293 Jul 22 08:53 libpng.pc.in -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 19036 Jul 22 08:53 libpngpf.3 -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 4192 Jul 22 08:53 LICENSE -rwxr-xr-x 1 user users 253153 Jul 22 08:53 ltmain.sh -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 4541 Jul 22 08:53 Makefile.am -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 60025 Jul 22 08:53 Makefile.in -rwxr-xr-x 1 user users 11419 Jul 22 08:53 missing -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 2408 Jul 22 08:53 png.5 -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 2498 Jul 22 08:53 pngbar.jpg -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 2399 Jul 22 08:53 pngbar.png -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 26634 Jul 22 08:53 png.c -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 47082 Jul 22 08:53 pngconf.h -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 12267 Jul 22 08:53 pngerror.c -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 28616 Jul 22 08:53 pngget.c -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 124654 Jul 22 08:53 png.h -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 16821 Jul 22 08:53 pngmem.c -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 2069 Jul 22 08:53 pngnow.png -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 54513 Jul 22 08:53 pngpread.c -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 37962 Jul 22 08:53 pngpriv.h -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 45779 Jul 22 08:53 pngread.c -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 5313 Jul 22 08:53 pngrio.c -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 141155 Jul 22 08:53 pngrtran.c -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 107313 Jul 22 08:53 pngrutil.c -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 39242 Jul 22 08:53 pngset.c -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 54601 Jul 22 08:53 pngtest.c -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 8608 Jul 22 08:53 pngtest.png -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 20655 Jul 22 08:53 pngtrans.c -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 7648 Jul 22 08:53 pngwio.c -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 47855 Jul 22 08:53 pngwrite.c -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 16934 Jul 22 08:53 pngwtran.c -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 89100 Jul 22 08:53 pngwutil.c drwxr-xr-x 6 user users 4096 Jul 22 08:53 projects/ -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 13273 Jul 22 08:53 README drwxr-xr-x 2 user users 4096 Jul 22 08:53 scripts/ -rwxr-xr-x 1 user users 43 Jul 22 08:53 test-pngtest.sh -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 1443 Jul 22 08:53 TODO -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 10720 Jan 10 2017 tarballs/libpng-1.6.25-apng.pat= ch.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 982204 Jan 10 2017 tarballs/libpng-1.6.25.tar.xz -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 819 Jan 10 2017 tarballs/libpng-1.6.25.tar.xz.a= sc -rw-r--r-- 1 user users 10766 Jan 10 2017 tarballs/libpng-1.6.28-apng.pat= ch.gz --=20 ng0 GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org --p7nzagfjnixs3tlc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEqIyK3RKYKNfqwC5S4i+bv+40hYgFAll4PTMACgkQ4i+bv+40 hYjYgg//fHJe+IoBoHeRXcK2lL4ZGUCYDknNjaXbVgp9E8MGke8AVYDZD+BaevOU 9JZhorW/fS57dhK0DiDnldjErlZiDa5T0aaYP3C6naQCUdRrCAQNU3Utna0reePg JONDPDcL31alzN/T1UJ4Ox7MvIdOheJYUvFAbRZgxp+EEvB+6ZcYSygyPauh0YK7 m7U1lynB6+htKJcuQvvdOic3zZIQWCJKxAZdBv/bgcZwFxSAtBUpql+oNidJMr8y EQgdgo//Oi3TV15QC8sRux3Rwdajmb2nkLpSc/48DHmaXnDFtJHJxYx5vtdbX3GB 4yeY18zCFX+UTSdJfw0goxF4gxMpza7gnzUlp1razByAjBzegCF+qIxMO2IqGuT1 cGO18QZ2yh6ntxKKKpalfBQxq5OkMpx4GEAqxoY8eNKI0wfnGBh7sohQFW8TVZWZ hnfr3bpO6bwVxdO5zZUYZBXyBgNqW+zPUERlSi6x91bYa9hKIGfMZ/YihbIiqLXw wO5G3LYWxsY49G914rNgawHcfeijRBjjvHwdA5GmnuWvdLY0mn7tstNUWJvdZS+3 JNdH3n0C6AKw1+caMFtkXFgNyYL23rokGOSBChKRKqnkEoupj85vBrfYgx684R3m CZSYYflaMM5djNUiU1EQgHnm91h4TLB927ZUima1phA2BvRv0eg= =MBNk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --p7nzagfjnixs3tlc-- From unknown Sat Aug 16 14:30:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#27556: libpng has wrong hash. [Fwd: Re: why has the hash for libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed?] Resent-From: Efraim Flashner Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 08:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27556 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Famulari , 27556@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 27556-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27556.150105845826644 (code B ref 27556); Wed, 26 Jul 2017 08:41:02 +0000 Received: (at 27556) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jul 2017 08:40:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56718 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1daHsI-0006vg-7D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 04:40:58 -0400 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:34045) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1daHsE-0006vF-Bc for 27556@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 04:40:55 -0400 Received: from localhost (46-117-130-79.bb.netvision.net.il [46.117.130.79]) by flashner.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3BA35400C3; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 08:40:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 11:40:41 +0300 From: Efraim Flashner Message-ID: <20170726084040.GE12553@macbook42.flashner.co.il> References: <20170702201344.dvqpopouvpbzr4c2@abyayala> <20170723101547.3oi5uu2xhi625njp@abyayala> <20170725184936.GA32001@jasmine.lan> <20170726065651.qvsz25b44txl6et7@abyayala> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="O8XZ+2Hy8Kj8wLPZ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170726065651.qvsz25b44txl6et7@abyayala> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) --O8XZ+2Hy8Kj8wLPZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 06:56:51AM +0000, ng0 wrote: > Leo Famulari transcribed 2.3K bytes: > > On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 10:15:47AM +0000, ng0 wrote: > > > ----- Forwarded message ----- > > >=20 > > > > Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 18:21:19 +0900 (JST) > > > > To: ng0 > > > > Cc: daisuken@users.sourceforge.net > > > > Subject: Re: why has the hash for libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed? > > > >=20 > > > > Hi, > > > >=20 > > > > I calculated the hash for libpng-apng files on my local orignals. > > > >=20 > > > > md5sum > > > > 9f2b36bccf89c5f4097111f0f73c1798 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.README.t= xt > > > > fca7c6d87c8352e645facefc2e1dd153 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz > > > >=20 > > > > sha1sum > > > > cb620589ecf9c28a4ecc00e6225dd41ca660a959 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.= README.txt > > > > 4fa952f5ad374fce8d478b7e54ee4298a0b8d159 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.= gz > > > >=20 > > > > Local file time stamps are > > > > 2017-01-06 21:02:10.938833896 +0900 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.READM= E.txt > > > > 2017-01-06 21:02:10.938833896 +0900 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz > > > >=20 > > > > That values equals on sourceforge.net. > > > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/libpng-apng/files/libpng16/1.6.28/ > > > >=20 > > > > I don't really understand what happend, but it look just fine. > > > >=20 > > > > Cheers, > > > > --- > > > > daisuken@users.sourceforge.net > >=20 > > Okay, this doesn't help us, so we need to inspect the different tarballs > > ourselves. Do you have an old copy of the patch you can share? >=20 > Yes. I mean no. I am not sure. I have libpng-apng git checkout > and also the 1.6.25 extracted tarball directory (but not sure > when I got it), and the tarballs for 1.6.5 and 1.6.28. >=20 > But I think I found our problem: >=20 > user@shadownet ~/re-src$ guix hash tarballs/libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz > 0m5nv70n9903x3xzxw9qqc6sgf2rp106ha0x6gix0xf8wcrljaab > user@shadownet ~/re-src$ guix hash tarballs/libpng-1.6.25-apng.patch.gz > 026r0gbkf6d6v54wca02cdxln8sj4m2c1yk62sj2aasv2ki2ffh5 >=20 > (inputs > `(("apng" ,(origin > (method url-fetch) > (uri > (string-append "mirror://sourceforge/libpng-apng/libpng16/" > version "/libpng-" version "-apng.patch.gz")) > (sha256 > (base32 > "026r0gbkf6d6v54wca02cdxln8sj4m2c1yk62sj2aasv2ki2ffh5")))))) >=20 > My really strong guess is that we never updated the hash for > libpng-apng when the libpng was updated fron which libpng-apng > inherits its version. >=20 > I don't have the time to look at our git history right now, > but you could do that, look at wether libpng-apng was touched > since 1.6.25->1.6.28 update of libpng. >=20 git blame shows that back in February I updated libpng to 1.6.28 from 1.6.25, but that the last time libpng-apng was touched was by ng0 back in January. commit: 864738baaa7bb75c08647ccfc684736479e67f7f --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --O8XZ+2Hy8Kj8wLPZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAll4VXAACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1GFlRAAmPXFzikT6+M+ZQRFSwGRiyEm2T7dErKgRf73RqJjnm48BVGd+j3R6FPX 6O8JPjJWiOkjlaIFWOx1SO7i3rciX9cpyuXdzWEkvO62FewhOgW9+TrMpCosVrJc fOFBFi8Lejd0Q7Pox+ChCcC4G226KzDfUjI8QkFxOmweF0jAFhnQH3/05/bYX4ys Y0fC1pfyxxn27ROK9ITWjvfapvaw86HYVyOhv2Rr1Kiy80nhihFTEfWkGhg9bSn+ ax5ZBI1kZzhG0+vRvP1aC79TuOqWeQ6JKuI4FvKjn0fA9ORACNnyGdkF9yH5jLtX /Tk+09lrsu/B1KYS2N3UPjUYFRSS3jjmoiMNNDpu+eHeALgLoynnwNxsKlzd68+s m6/BtsucwxfioBlcxkb93tHaGA1/6wcX4JW7Ejhw2UnTkcFxGKuZsw2+LT74ECVD XZnSyQdGxmBQNzRqo4DJL9BAUpvOfK2bD/XVDGntr9D98gEgI/AlofMv+iD9DR11 1jJMJsQhNnlpfBFAB2OfC0KD02PS9SbM1QClN/4lErLvrfIas2w0HL+5SjIKzHVR mqE1BDcfdDmgE7YkV91ycXM4NZIL8fPKOpmwnFuNWbt79v0E145ERKvgVUIyw4t3 fBc/ZMmb83TXk5ROlbtTLanadTRCKMxWYGWoS1wP6i6Jkgp5vA0= =odzH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --O8XZ+2Hy8Kj8wLPZ-- From unknown Sat Aug 16 14:30:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#27556: libpng has wrong hash. [Fwd: Re: why has the hash for libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed?] Resent-From: ng0 Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2017 09:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27556 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Efraim Flashner Cc: 27556@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari Received: via spool by 27556-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27556.150140747215221 (code B ref 27556); Sun, 30 Jul 2017 09:38:01 +0000 Received: (at 27556) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jul 2017 09:37:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33611 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dbkfX-0003xR-UW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jul 2017 05:37:52 -0400 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:43862) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dbkfW-0003xG-28 for 27556@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jul 2017 05:37:50 -0400 Received: from [10.9.9.212] (helo=mailfront12.runbox.com) by mailtransmit02.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dbkfT-00013h-U8; Sun, 30 Jul 2017 11:37:48 +0200 Received: from lumumba.torservers.net ([77.247.181.163] helo=localhost) by mailfront12.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:892961 ) (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) id 1dbkf6-0006JN-86; Sun, 30 Jul 2017 11:37:25 +0200 Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2017 09:37:22 +0000 From: ng0 Message-ID: <20170730093722.xqhesfpmbpmussag@abyayala> Mail-Followup-To: Efraim Flashner , Leo Famulari , 27556@debbugs.gnu.org References: <20170702201344.dvqpopouvpbzr4c2@abyayala> <20170723101547.3oi5uu2xhi625njp@abyayala> <20170725184936.GA32001@jasmine.lan> <20170726065651.qvsz25b44txl6et7@abyayala> <20170726084040.GE12553@macbook42.flashner.co.il> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zsmt7duisyuzvz5h" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170726084040.GE12553@macbook42.flashner.co.il> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --zsmt7duisyuzvz5h Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Efraim Flashner transcribed 4.1K bytes: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 06:56:51AM +0000, ng0 wrote: > > Leo Famulari transcribed 2.3K bytes: > > > On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 10:15:47AM +0000, ng0 wrote: > > > > ----- Forwarded message ----- > > > >=20 > > > > > Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 18:21:19 +0900 (JST) > > > > > To: ng0 > > > > > Cc: daisuken@users.sourceforge.net > > > > > Subject: Re: why has the hash for libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed? > > > > >=20 > > > > > Hi, > > > > >=20 > > > > > I calculated the hash for libpng-apng files on my local orignals. > > > > >=20 > > > > > md5sum > > > > > 9f2b36bccf89c5f4097111f0f73c1798 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.README= =2Etxt > > > > > fca7c6d87c8352e645facefc2e1dd153 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz > > > > >=20 > > > > > sha1sum > > > > > cb620589ecf9c28a4ecc00e6225dd41ca660a959 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patc= h.README.txt > > > > > 4fa952f5ad374fce8d478b7e54ee4298a0b8d159 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patc= h.gz > > > > >=20 > > > > > Local file time stamps are > > > > > 2017-01-06 21:02:10.938833896 +0900 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.REA= DME.txt > > > > > 2017-01-06 21:02:10.938833896 +0900 libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz > > > > >=20 > > > > > That values equals on sourceforge.net. > > > > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/libpng-apng/files/libpng16/1.6.2= 8/ > > > > >=20 > > > > > I don't really understand what happend, but it look just fine. > > > > >=20 > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > --- > > > > > daisuken@users.sourceforge.net > > >=20 > > > Okay, this doesn't help us, so we need to inspect the different tarba= lls > > > ourselves. Do you have an old copy of the patch you can share? > >=20 > > Yes. I mean no. I am not sure. I have libpng-apng git checkout > > and also the 1.6.25 extracted tarball directory (but not sure > > when I got it), and the tarballs for 1.6.5 and 1.6.28. > >=20 > > But I think I found our problem: > >=20 > > user@shadownet ~/re-src$ guix hash tarballs/libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz > > 0m5nv70n9903x3xzxw9qqc6sgf2rp106ha0x6gix0xf8wcrljaab > > user@shadownet ~/re-src$ guix hash tarballs/libpng-1.6.25-apng.patch.gz > > 026r0gbkf6d6v54wca02cdxln8sj4m2c1yk62sj2aasv2ki2ffh5 > >=20 > > (inputs > > `(("apng" ,(origin > > (method url-fetch) > > (uri > > (string-append "mirror://sourceforge/libpng-apng/libpng16/" > > version "/libpng-" version "-apng.patch.gz")) > > (sha256 > > (base32 > > "026r0gbkf6d6v54wca02cdxln8sj4m2c1yk62sj2aasv2ki2ffh5")))))) > >=20 > > My really strong guess is that we never updated the hash for > > libpng-apng when the libpng was updated fron which libpng-apng > > inherits its version. > >=20 > > I don't have the time to look at our git history right now, > > but you could do that, look at wether libpng-apng was touched > > since 1.6.25->1.6.28 update of libpng. > >=20 >=20 > git blame shows that back in February I updated libpng to 1.6.28 from > 1.6.25, but that the last time libpng-apng was touched was by ng0 back > in January. >=20 > commit: 864738baaa7bb75c08647ccfc684736479e67f7f Okay, so I will send the update for libpng-apng (which due to its inheritance of libpng is just the hash) and I will also add a second commit which adds a comment above libpng that we must update libpng-apng when we update libpng, if that's already possible (libpng-apng might not immediately be up to date, but we don't update libpng immediately aswell due to it being a core-updates candidate). >=20 > --=20 > Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7= =9D =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 > GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 > Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypt= ed --=20 ng0 GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org --zsmt7duisyuzvz5h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEqIyK3RKYKNfqwC5S4i+bv+40hYgFAll9qNEACgkQ4i+bv+40 hYj4bA/+IaDCJRaSVwuEBefMYVlLYj14sVWc8LI9VsYRSKpr4c4u/dQmxwt+Kplp QbPg6CWaPSoxfZ/9ClXoRI8zeQKdKvCPkUZ6gYsAv6aEqMU0r4bzzdVzubpwxQgT L4Q9jAXlP0ujACk5w6KNCs52ODSZyy+tXNnntmwXyPhrE/nd7CixJsWKDyPXrwUB U00TBKUtmr5WCtbJjFhOiy7ujySYHqnYm2+neG/WOEJas7Y3U9ljEqeCzw9m0Gon zazWckIGzgq16Z92G0KNq4ZGx8H0KG82nvTs/Nx1o5xTCi5Q37KWM46+hjYo/p2q VmSFlv9oMc+nCt0381SOXB2Br49YvTND9NUtiIDMiU1E2x1SBJeJUXjTorXOG0ya RDRJAVU7XwOefmZyD0nscMinCcxEywYeqIip+IhHR02OpUnre1JNvy8mZxe5wtk3 fP5/9bLNb4xZYDQkCYYQpNKf1CjdFGBZpDqMYJPo2ZOM7/9eORiywNLs5i2RGF6t cUjEc3rf8rf5DoSBpJxZvxNwQdMJA4ws7ZuRsaXL8okLbg5y4YEXgwulGkXO34x7 yjPg7t8NeKdzg6TBnCRwYzGN4BWQJKTKNOobJptOK8xdoPJRE0IC2FC3Fijbjgxv ZdrN0YTLZ4Be5gY7M4CHMaIRv2XOKpQWkflI21atlaUwg2QoWyw= =ecpr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zsmt7duisyuzvz5h-- From unknown Sat Aug 16 14:30:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#27556: libpng has wrong hash. [Fwd: Re: why has the hash for libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed?] Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:35:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27556 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Efraim Flashner , 27556@debbugs.gnu.org, ng0 Received: via spool by 27556-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27556.150151166513609 (code B ref 27556); Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:35:01 +0000 Received: (at 27556) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jul 2017 14:34:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35475 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dcBm4-0003XQ-Mm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 10:34:24 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:45317) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dcBm2-0003XH-Ce for 27556@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 10:34:22 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78CF120B5E; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 10:34:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 31 Jul 2017 10:34:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=9Ju63oaCEAIfRNT1iqwVcbc+Yzjcqrfez+tlk2 9REAU=; b=1pPNyMiID/X7U2ktGy21bcJUuXNecA4m/kklgmvmBDqgXqC9DEC641 ISsRI2AOQ/2dS/hH0d4JcK+OpXKsvfiFwxmjc3DwpMWBZdYcXaH7BcbmNiXK/w/2 DzhrkA2XhOrUHxiBO3WEleSO+2OvNiv/N1oyjbIu5LqS8iszIHWgQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=9Ju63oaCEAIfRNT1iq wVcbc+Yzjcqrfez+tlk29REAU=; b=L/Om69Ku6f7IMptQMZeuQAbyZYs4AWH9jS o/6pLNxZgZziBxNrTl2m561tUEbjxzOlxpMu2GlpH5XgCrXlu0V7Aclskt7RlpEz zL5lmtbwhAZlKRacAIX0Se/eNdm0whHE/MUIIK2XLvBycSY9qwAQPH+98XnTplGs 1b0JfdsSTvqAh0kqPPD/l6K8wkl7IVKdnnZ4URynHN9OovjywtpVLi7owH/uudbR 8RgnK0M0w7vbd3sNUx8W0AW5zdBaZn55x9ljGu8T+MDPmj162DPzRRCLhZ1HAI9f /Up8xzukHLB93RFwFliSCCusWAgmuLdMTU8mqvq3d6n7NbsZ8uRQ== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: MSqbtJ2xvr0i1t0wvVYDgHYxWPAl0ixy+SZxjlX7jrDI 1501511661 Received: from localhost (c-73-165-108-70.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.165.108.70]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3477A7E335; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 10:34:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 10:34:20 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20170731143420.GA10829@jasmine.lan> References: <20170702201344.dvqpopouvpbzr4c2@abyayala> <20170723101547.3oi5uu2xhi625njp@abyayala> <20170725184936.GA32001@jasmine.lan> <20170726065651.qvsz25b44txl6et7@abyayala> <20170726084040.GE12553@macbook42.flashner.co.il> <20170730093722.xqhesfpmbpmussag@abyayala> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170730093722.xqhesfpmbpmussag@abyayala> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 09:37:22AM +0000, ng0 wrote: > Efraim Flashner transcribed 4.1K bytes: > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 06:56:51AM +0000, ng0 wrote: > > > My really strong guess is that we never updated the hash for > > > libpng-apng when the libpng was updated fron which libpng-apng > > > inherits its version. [...] > > git blame shows that back in February I updated libpng to 1.6.28 from > > 1.6.25, but that the last time libpng-apng was touched was by ng0 back > > in January. > >=20 > > commit: 864738baaa7bb75c08647ccfc684736479e67f7f Aha, that must be it! > Okay, so I will send the update for libpng-apng (which due to its > inheritance of libpng is just the hash) and I will also add a second > commit which adds a comment above libpng that we must update libpng-apng > when we update libpng, if that's already possible (libpng-apng might not > immediately be up to date, but we don't update libpng immediately aswell > due to it being a core-updates candidate). I think we should give libpng-apng its own version because, as you said, libpng-apng may not be developed at the same pace as libpng. This way, we won't end up with a broken libpng-apng again. --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAll/P+gACgkQJkb6MLrK fwh9RRAAkLmtfbip2r2N911bkZM4PQgcsbUF6eMrXAPBDgQ9Ia8pVjSp/bxqfvFk zR0y7aF1CeMCdjtdyin/h/8we5Ip9XJ2XiJV66pJGBrt3aMpFVjXLiRbZrnvj4ME 5lZICM+QefuiPyOQsb6BX14Xm9gu8nKvx8RpuXgJPDpMlUZ44kG6qAsXO2tHd8wO s/4RL7Tm3wWSS7g9YNQsENrQxsevfbi86+yG+jJR4I6qWEj5m14J/Hp2A32ZWJBI EQO4SktmIhhjezo9uhN4dnbrOTkW0eYJuPV4KX98H8hgl7nkRC7DovbmuoGv8tox E3jRpuZAE/JxFJv24vJi/Yh/CoQWaSgRliGVYLUbecffhaw2clmRGOd5k0z+fSww 7J46Juyt5LWgWrl7RzRQZeIBfrPeWPe92e9AGKNmcE42W+EHqY89H1+xy29SnlL7 CwnxMyqq1a6G4QcIZG2L384Jmhru0ydEK+rEY9Ziy6vWXxflV9nBauiSLn0A4sMp 7nUE3cxNznIb2/wPpdVbnTES6TnWw6xD4tS3ldmnVufEQZJzlr1XXR0PDFxxr0ph ndAnqrnELogcSrgE6nGEQPhiZSL7H5nhR1YPg6qjNOKYoaK9/AyMPKIKdQWtggys tG4swrtU8+Wys7Z/X2qydO2RNQEfXhbuDAp6Z4DkNi7QeGLMxAc= =8PYs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH-- From unknown Sat Aug 16 14:30:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#27556: libpng has wrong hash. [Fwd: Re: why has the hash for libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed?] Resent-From: ng0 Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:41:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27556 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Famulari Cc: 27556@debbugs.gnu.org, Efraim Flashner , ng0 Received: via spool by 27556-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27556.150151203214120 (code B ref 27556); Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:41:01 +0000 Received: (at 27556) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jul 2017 14:40:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35479 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dcBs0-0003fg-DQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 10:40:32 -0400 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:48006) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dcBrw-0003fW-Ms for 27556@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 10:40:29 -0400 Received: from [10.9.9.211] (helo=mailfront11.runbox.com) by mailtransmit02.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dcBrt-0001Fy-ML; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 16:40:25 +0200 Received: from [193.90.12.86] (helo=localhost) by mailfront11.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:892961 ) (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) id 1dcBr5-0005aC-JS; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 16:39:36 +0200 Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:39:32 +0000 From: ng0 Message-ID: <20170731143932.lvd6q4sbccg5tpbp@abyayala> Mail-Followup-To: Leo Famulari , Efraim Flashner , 27556@debbugs.gnu.org References: <20170702201344.dvqpopouvpbzr4c2@abyayala> <20170723101547.3oi5uu2xhi625njp@abyayala> <20170725184936.GA32001@jasmine.lan> <20170726065651.qvsz25b44txl6et7@abyayala> <20170726084040.GE12553@macbook42.flashner.co.il> <20170730093722.xqhesfpmbpmussag@abyayala> <20170731143420.GA10829@jasmine.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yj7ljltopna2fgt3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170731143420.GA10829@jasmine.lan> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --yj7ljltopna2fgt3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Leo Famulari transcribed 2.2K bytes: > On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 09:37:22AM +0000, ng0 wrote: > > Efraim Flashner transcribed 4.1K bytes: > > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 06:56:51AM +0000, ng0 wrote: > > > > My really strong guess is that we never updated the hash for > > > > libpng-apng when the libpng was updated fron which libpng-apng > > > > inherits its version. >=20 > [...] >=20 > > > git blame shows that back in February I updated libpng to 1.6.28 from > > > 1.6.25, but that the last time libpng-apng was touched was by ng0 back > > > in January. > > >=20 > > > commit: 864738baaa7bb75c08647ccfc684736479e67f7f >=20 > Aha, that must be it! >=20 > > Okay, so I will send the update for libpng-apng (which due to its > > inheritance of libpng is just the hash) and I will also add a second > > commit which adds a comment above libpng that we must update libpng-apng > > when we update libpng, if that's already possible (libpng-apng might not > > immediately be up to date, but we don't update libpng immediately aswell > > due to it being a core-updates candidate). >=20 > I think we should give libpng-apng its own version because, as you said, > libpng-apng may not be developed at the same pace as libpng. This way, > we won't end up with a broken libpng-apng again. I agree. Does someone of you want to make the patches and commits, or should I prepare and send some? --=20 ng0 GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org --yj7ljltopna2fgt3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEqIyK3RKYKNfqwC5S4i+bv+40hYgFAll/QSQACgkQ4i+bv+40 hYg/MA/+NiqcRHkDIivsr6GDPm5YsoNnq7X8mokxFoBDLyMZycdowC64L1AqKDR7 tyJh5GBlCWIZkZgFF0y+syESMX5+Gg/1kiNrRcK+N+okbHoLs6xjOvQurQsOgvOS /xNiZ6YpjRvmlVNlwbRmaP8L8ch4HD5dIqh4jg4y4VPuoQDLIZtUQOssEjqIfqKW S+0c7lXmveCMWLPvgazchg43B/8qvuDaB1op1Yp8n9u3ltblGV97qz+kYHgtxrFP CWa1467WlBNqvfPQNOdLj4MfsPuFyBWLpfZHZGy4w+Ai30fduCWWna2zDQwCfn1f xcBSzP0ZwKTrX56E4nOiTmkUZDjRp+IiSEebWl8oZ1ubLsW6ea5H124UpnRVTgV2 BL1tIeesegN1pWXGqjO/H1GO+OGW1HjgPiaJw/l0PW17rh8qpYX5KaQZppwd4RwL Lyym9+Gp0JjmIe67XSKx6kvbxM05QTtaMqdI9U8F6CthYXYqXamUFRK1+UTXcfy8 iApv3Fy4HRJzRsx06niTcZQwi9355fl/eQtGp92QBvJlhD0ZguUioKErRQcqVRca EPSlWlmD0PIG14FTm3NjF/Nl9exppfZYN3fbraeW3QJMqAbp8BFzCVI+AN1HB3la btUyxlDRGNcBUU1GbQd40dv6d1D1AcTXetokS4dtYCj2vqt38dg= =CwVD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yj7ljltopna2fgt3-- From unknown Sat Aug 16 14:30:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#27556: libpng has wrong hash. [Fwd: Re: why has the hash for libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed?] Resent-From: ng0 Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 15:48:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27556 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Famulari , Efraim Flashner , 27556@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 27556-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27556.15016024598982 (code B ref 27556); Tue, 01 Aug 2017 15:48:02 +0000 Received: (at 27556) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Aug 2017 15:47:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37136 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dcZOL-0002Ke-EP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 11:47:39 -0400 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:39792) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dcZOJ-0002KS-5d for 27556@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 11:47:27 -0400 Received: from [10.9.9.210] (helo=mailfront10.runbox.com) by mailtransmit03.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dcZOG-0000vQ-0j; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 17:47:24 +0200 Received: from 62-210-105-116.rev.poneytelecom.eu ([62.210.105.116] helo=localhost) by mailfront10.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:892961 ) (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) id 1dcZO2-0004SL-Gf; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 17:47:10 +0200 Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 15:47:08 +0000 From: ng0 Message-ID: <20170801154708.z7jyfjyoaqyr5ucw@abyayala> Mail-Followup-To: Leo Famulari , Efraim Flashner , 27556@debbugs.gnu.org References: <20170702201344.dvqpopouvpbzr4c2@abyayala> <20170723101547.3oi5uu2xhi625njp@abyayala> <20170725184936.GA32001@jasmine.lan> <20170726065651.qvsz25b44txl6et7@abyayala> <20170726084040.GE12553@macbook42.flashner.co.il> <20170730093722.xqhesfpmbpmussag@abyayala> <20170731143420.GA10829@jasmine.lan> <20170731143932.lvd6q4sbccg5tpbp@abyayala> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="avnfvwe2u5x4m6yt" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170731143932.lvd6q4sbccg5tpbp@abyayala> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) --avnfvwe2u5x4m6yt Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="u4ggowfh5treyhep" Content-Disposition: inline --u4ggowfh5treyhep Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ng0 transcribed 2.5K bytes: > Leo Famulari transcribed 2.2K bytes: > > On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 09:37:22AM +0000, ng0 wrote: > > > Efraim Flashner transcribed 4.1K bytes: > > > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 06:56:51AM +0000, ng0 wrote: > > > > > My really strong guess is that we never updated the hash for > > > > > libpng-apng when the libpng was updated fron which libpng-apng > > > > > inherits its version. > >=20 > > [...] > >=20 > > > > git blame shows that back in February I updated libpng to 1.6.28 fr= om > > > > 1.6.25, but that the last time libpng-apng was touched was by ng0 b= ack > > > > in January. > > > >=20 > > > > commit: 864738baaa7bb75c08647ccfc684736479e67f7f > >=20 > > Aha, that must be it! > >=20 > > > Okay, so I will send the update for libpng-apng (which due to its > > > inheritance of libpng is just the hash) and I will also add a second > > > commit which adds a comment above libpng that we must update libpng-a= png > > > when we update libpng, if that's already possible (libpng-apng might = not > > > immediately be up to date, but we don't update libpng immediately asw= ell > > > due to it being a core-updates candidate). > >=20 > > I think we should give libpng-apng its own version because, as you said, > > libpng-apng may not be developed at the same pace as libpng. This way, > > we won't end up with a broken libpng-apng again. I appended a patch how I understood your idea. --=20 ng0 GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org --u4ggowfh5treyhep Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0001-gnu-libpng-apng-Update-to-1.6.28.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =46rom 4326cad38700df43909eb6f430217fdfa4eca89f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 =46rom: ng0 Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 15:37:28 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: libpng-apng: Update to 1.6.28. Fixes . * gnu/packages/image.scm (libpng-apng): Update to 1.6.28. Remove inherit of 'libpng'. (version): Use own version, remove 'package-version libpng'. (source): Add it. (arguments): Update hash of libpng-apng source. --- gnu/packages/image.scm | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/image.scm b/gnu/packages/image.scm index 139be6281..3be675fc2 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/image.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/image.scm @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ ;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2016 Eric Bavier ;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2016 Arun Isaac ;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2016, 2017 Kei Kebreau -;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2017 ng0 +;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2017 ng0 ;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2017 Hartmut Goebel ;;; ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix. @@ -91,11 +91,27 @@ library. It supports almost all PNG features and is ex= tensible.") (license license:zlib) (home-page "http://www.libpng.org/pub/png/libpng.html"))) =20 +;; libpng-apng could be not in sync with libpng, +;; reference bug: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D27556 (define-public libpng-apng (package - (inherit libpng) (name "libpng-apng") - (version (package-version libpng)) + (version "1.6.28") + (source + (origin + (method url-fetch) + (uri (list (string-append "mirror://sourceforge/libpng/libpng16/" + version "/libpng-" version ".tar.xz") + (string-append + "ftp://ftp.simplesystems.org/pub/libpng/png/src" + "/libpng16/libpng-" version ".tar.xz") + (string-append + "ftp://ftp.simplesystems.org/pub/libpng/png/src/history" + "/libpng16/libpng-" version ".tar.xz"))) + (sha256 + (base32 + "0ylgyx93hnk38haqrh8prd3ax5ngzwvjqw5cxw7p9nxmwsfyrlyq")))) + (build-system gnu-build-system) (arguments `(#:phases (modify-phases %standard-phases @@ -111,7 +127,7 @@ library. It supports almost all PNG features and is ex= tensible.") (and (apply-patch "the-patch") (for-each apply-patch (find-files "\\.patch")))) - #t)) + #t)) (add-before 'configure 'no-checks (lambda _ (substitute* "Makefile.in" @@ -126,15 +142,19 @@ library. It supports almost all PNG features and is = extensible.") version "/libpng-" version "-apng.patch.= gz")) (sha256 (base32 - "026r0gbkf6d6v54wca02cdxln8sj4m2c1yk62sj2aasv2ki2ffh5"= )))))) + "0m5nv70n9903x3xzxw9qqc6sgf2rp106ha0x6gix0xf8wcrljaab"= )))))) (native-inputs `(("libtool" ,libtool))) + ;; libpng.la says "-lz", so propagate it. + (propagated-inputs + `(("zlib" ,zlib))) (synopsis "APNG patch for libpng") (description "APNG (Animated Portable Network Graphics) is an unofficial extension of the APNG (Portable Network Graphics) format. APNG patch provides APNG support to libpng.") - (home-page "https://sourceforge.net/projects/libpng-apng/"))) + (home-page "https://sourceforge.net/projects/libpng-apng/") + (license license:zlib))) =20 (define-public libpng-1.2 (package --=20 2.13.3 --u4ggowfh5treyhep-- --avnfvwe2u5x4m6yt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEqIyK3RKYKNfqwC5S4i+bv+40hYgFAlmAonwACgkQ4i+bv+40 hYhRRA/8C+FYyNJ1fNfW6fz8brWVyvYvD4sleRE+hINV0Wra2LFF/cUvLvaTSHRo wIYrCjPrzt2zmfZ7zxxXZPIjaq7uBBFqIhP2hrgi9BIy64bRn1U6tUh0uZSOF/84 bWF/4CA9ank4LfC7ZevHRrchsQYlGsQUPbHr1uygIOTmIPYg3H8k2xi2XAqQ7nDz yVRsliDPkbrWFZIOla04Ch01n6FYCDtw8ottaYbLeUWROgeN9xGxqtuKRE4VY6d1 XPFOBPWPrpVhYumEUXEq6PUXzsGm7rOagCRLJW9JeTySPr4WclCDi7FJi0td8Vip VanYHUnhCgfv/zhPfCdanKZEYrLMi4QV+OTUh13cFIzZpDk7/7aKBO4GXFYlpcYg CnaWow4y77nrZydeGWjy/ZkYBViOE4Uuhm7h/vCmD0Em7ScD2RWbrtB05DCfYaYI Bl5LoyTzzae8GggMkUuY5/DoNHAHR9k0WpbLNRaNo0zR2dp95h9pQnr6W75TPluJ /KAIpMOBTcNgLETWI26c7v9k7ikvcNnBsPh7YWow8hqiPX+X+MJFO/tOijreurnm 9AbZIfgCeQcHJtenQk3GxLSf2y7oAF+rVzN4YegoiYY/FUZiK4tjCHy2cyN/FAti 9UWKeF54GYL5yPUedEcKnQTeaH9grueZvDDPC0w6slZlk/UB+YA= =qTeO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --avnfvwe2u5x4m6yt-- From unknown Sat Aug 16 14:30:37 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: ng0 Subject: bug#27556: closed (Re: bug#27556: libpng has wrong hash. [Fwd: Re: why has the hash for libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed?]) Message-ID: References: <20170802152551.GA17404@jasmine.lan> <20170702201344.dvqpopouvpbzr4c2@abyayala> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 27556 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix Reply-To: 27556@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2017 15:26:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1501687562-24928-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1501687562-24928-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #27556: libpng has wrong hash. which was filed against the guix package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 27556@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 27556: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D27556 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1501687562-24928-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 27556-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Aug 2017 15:25:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38582 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dcvX1-0006Tl-4s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Aug 2017 11:25:55 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:50157) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dcvWz-0006Td-8b for 27556-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Aug 2017 11:25:53 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA9A42078C; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 11:25:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 02 Aug 2017 11:25:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=bNMoojV5CfTu97jOmupdmpM7TaiS4nfOqktVpF Z8vU4=; b=xWi+XhNYdluLqZnDd69rgrn/H0LPBaX1nI/6Br5/Mx9iIXeFrWriMN j9UlWU2i6z/wFhIaRomFc81BhpPkDL1TAcKOTZZYmZVgQqaA9KHNKpmIgMIumMIM 5CahFeMKf3CedkQffXw5yaVi8FnMbcPYs1SJhzaoYmiZiekEIWJ6c= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=bNMoojV5CfTu97jOmu pdmpM7TaiS4nfOqktVpFZ8vU4=; b=Bc+e2Z8DTLOP0MUgkNZtXEoTvZtgc3nDk/ ks2SLJclq7zvaQ3R4z9RLyyGFvbhW1qoxjB1BLS354RZAtZJlGXNc/bl4eGpNzXl jFgYnGeczwnD/zBYe+3M76TUONagM+5ih/yLf9Mg3hSx3kOAAUvqndrWf6/W3CJy cMTu8hjxwacTDvVQpeB03CjfXR+t34E+OwdcR+AsFIHFtFGDC1B3ddqJ6+rR0p3Y sLyX61StMZWa9PHmswzHwIE9IIBR8+IFX7Rx6xb/1boZOfF6zzY0cceiuKMCgz+D 5rUQ87jZ8AqdIy7Xyv/S6OnslKm0vjI7u0P4R6a7KtSrqn4yzzZQ== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: vYi5RDNzwUB1Wqu6M+dyoZfq9/Jw079eWI/dscrW71Ht 1501687552 Received: from localhost (c-73-165-108-70.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.165.108.70]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6EDC37E51F for <27556-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 11:25:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 11:25:51 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: 27556-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#27556: libpng has wrong hash. [Fwd: Re: why has the hash for libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed?] Message-ID: <20170802152551.GA17404@jasmine.lan> References: <20170702201344.dvqpopouvpbzr4c2@abyayala> <20170723101547.3oi5uu2xhi625njp@abyayala> <20170725184936.GA32001@jasmine.lan> <20170726065651.qvsz25b44txl6et7@abyayala> <20170726084040.GE12553@macbook42.flashner.co.il> <20170730093722.xqhesfpmbpmussag@abyayala> <20170731143420.GA10829@jasmine.lan> <20170731143932.lvd6q4sbccg5tpbp@abyayala> <20170801154708.z7jyfjyoaqyr5ucw@abyayala> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jRHKVT23PllUwdXP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170801154708.z7jyfjyoaqyr5ucw@abyayala> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 27556-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 03:47:08PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > From 4326cad38700df43909eb6f430217fdfa4eca89f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: ng0 > Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 15:37:28 +0000 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: libpng-apng: Update to 1.6.28. >=20 > Fixes . >=20 > * gnu/packages/image.scm (libpng-apng): Update to 1.6.28. > Remove inherit of 'libpng'. > (version): Use own version, remove 'package-version libpng'. > (source): Add it. > (arguments): Update hash of libpng-apng source. Thanks! Pushed as e0958c2df833a5eb3b6ecfb66f8d971cd44dd49b --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlmB7v4ACgkQJkb6MLrK fwg4SQ//bc9wssxGr5Tq6T1JJU/qhp8vTr0XUweH/vE5vml97phc4QQLgWvZmoYU la5L2BLJlWCeY/QfK85/BhGO0CrTe6FXhirw6n0ThzG0KrQzESK6zXJV9xktxWYt A33VIPuisRi/LT2K52e7btQ9hdnOCLd3Xk3+AcUextvU9sEUHhBCKylUE34dRrP3 zobn6o4E1h5lDOpi5yav1FdjbnNIrM4Z8cWk+numSS6GmuuBUfB/p+YhssM3jAy9 6PSWBC4VvZAqRhG/gRYcteCPTdjA8rLeB1QdtWE9eQ/F5tGFaTte3R/Ei1xvOF+j iPjxUa5W/5NWRfJD0R3mC3dNyNfYah9DgIEXcKO6eqmU3F+h8pCkYRiZB8yXxRJB VdzQc/d8AwBr9HOnl92e4cor/yyxf5yJKS5Df2csXXHnxNiW8NqEzwwSe7QcM7fk M5uBp1xYG/IXTnkZf5kHvtbxAzlrkaoocTzMZDYYFsJlwp433DaIa1Aq5I8f/ROt 3oqlSgGW63vbDY7mta02mQ22O9D0fIokSAHikg1y3GrnMGCZaBSTHvGj7joznmhY cjBm0W5DTen/AqXIVz+Bmx6Hzjbuf7VgqfIMJ+Jb4192xJwr6cTBRrWWBvjyXv9Y CJ9K9kCmVTi2icWVnolkolFZieG6gkHtD8It7d0IZw2kS04DW4w= =jbTi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP-- ------------=_1501687562-24928-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jul 2017 20:14:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49080 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dRlG4-0005ea-58 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2017 16:14:16 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37861) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dRlG2-0005eO-NR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2017 16:14:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dRlFw-0001S8-Hm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2017 16:14:09 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:34854) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dRlFw-0001Rm-Ey for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2017 16:14:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57058) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dRlFr-0007cz-CU for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2017 16:14:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dRlFo-0001LJ-1x for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2017 16:14:03 -0400 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:49000) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dRlFn-0001KN-Rm for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2017 16:14:00 -0400 Received: from [10.9.9.210] (helo=mailfront10.runbox.com) by mailtransmit02.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dRlFm-0001Hv-LZ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2017 22:13:58 +0200 Received: from 178-17-174-14.ip.as43289.net ([178.17.174.14] helo=localhost) by mailfront10.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:892961 ) (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) id 1dRlFl-0006oA-J7 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2017 22:13:58 +0200 Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2017 20:13:44 +0000 From: ng0 To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: libpng has wrong hash. Message-ID: <20170702201344.dvqpopouvpbzr4c2@abyayala> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yub7vqtplnu6thvi" Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -7.8 (-------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -7.8 (-------) --yub7vqtplnu6thvi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I don't know if they moved the file around, renamed it or whatever, but the hash is now "0m5nv70n9903x3xzxw9qqc6sgf2rp106ha0x6gix0xf8wcrljaab". We should use this in icecat as intended (I use it for firefox nightly I work on) so that these errors get attention. @ build-started /gnu/store/l2ajzgighkr23qhyrqzy3qm64gy7v75y-libpng-1.6.28-a= png.patch.gz.drv - x86_64-linux /var/log/guix/drvs/l2//ajzgighkr23qhyrqzy3q= m64gy7v75y-libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz.drv.bz2 Starting download of /gnu/store/lsgx25nk7cg24hn6cn898jrkhs8aily3-libpng-1.6= =2E28-apng.patch.gz =46rom http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/libpng-apng/libpng16/1.6.28= /libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz... following redirection to `https://netix.dl.sourceforge.net/project/libpng-a= png/libpng16/1.6.28/libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz'... ...-apng.patch.gz 11KiB 1.2MiB/s 00:00 [####################] 1= 00.0% sha256 hash mismatch for output path `/gnu/store/lsgx25nk7cg24hn6cn898jrkhs= 8aily3-libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz' expected: 026r0gbkf6d6v54wca02cdxln8sj4m2c1yk62sj2aasv2ki2ffh5 actual: 0m5nv70n9903x3xzxw9qqc6sgf2rp106ha0x6gix0xf8wcrljaab @ build-failed /gnu/store/l2ajzgighkr23qhyrqzy3qm64gy7v75y-libpng-1.6.28-ap= ng.patch.gz.drv - 1 sha256 hash mismatch for output path `/gnu/store/lsgx25= nk7cg24hn6cn898jrkhs8aily3-libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz' expected: 026r0gbkf6d6v54wca02cdxln8sj4m2c1yk62sj2aasv2ki2ffh5 actual: 0m5nv70n9903x3xzxw9qqc6sgf2rp106ha0x6gix0xf8wcrljaab cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/x1dqpvyjz4v25z4al6kll6i3n3whv9h3-libpng= -apng-1.6.28.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built guix build: error: build failed: build of `/gnu/store/x1dqpvyjz4v25z4al6kll= 6i3n3whv9h3-libpng-apng-1.6.28.drv' failed --=20 ng0 GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org --yub7vqtplnu6thvi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEqIyK3RKYKNfqwC5S4i+bv+40hYgFAllZU/gACgkQ4i+bv+40 hYgkjg/9GpVxOzJ2a1I6yzrRsyxNkWPrhCoypI4tAxYvE46JJBLRfyroRTweFmF6 8RbUNh/Nst6UdDo2R4bi6n8Hprjn1nYqd6t44PDpZZYMaSXHO3zPOh/JUT8F/KxD KLk7i3rWjsXa+RLshlXDoC6XZWvSaK0boXTFl6gMjxVZHA5MDz+g2Iskl+O4HDmI 8K/uVlq7YOioavBrj+AqJd/jvWCoXylZxA4Q0mNhfofVo+Xd/MVDxaedUaFB5rx7 jvEM5uQKQ+wZHmxfKRwrzInvBGo4l9ixyJuwm/w1rN8dWVoFRrD5nkqy8NQoeoEU epqk/l8tegO60BpBYd7b6dZhOnue0rsl0rPhbMU/JtoG6GKwGyuvtt4LtZ+v6jZ2 eVcjIa9/2r4c1hsi+E2REX9JBtwnm73JfOt/x/oWH5m5GKG76jZ1kUQ7rpcPcLhU S/PG9ojA+VUEizBaSbdY3UKIppKN9Dtb693ODzWWrbHSPHN+HPKfF2ExF/O3Vd6x 4YXwCEkoKbrz6UTBeeirIgSLzNRAqM3uCYpyGh91nfLyqGqSoXodc2j7jfW4a8MN mxQXZK2wKXkn7xvtsT3xFRhR7uKHOJbg2HbvbXekRwgjz0eMh/Tp91ffJ5NHrBFR BH9ji5MiHmVfpV7Rr1BOlW2YFYTADAtANTd8xlw9kkeifqnGInM= =o1Ku -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yub7vqtplnu6thvi-- ------------=_1501687562-24928-1--