Subject: bug#27544: 25.1; Visualization of Unicode bidirectional marks

From: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 19:53:54 +0200

> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
> Cc: [email-masked],  [email-masked]
> Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 18:36:56 +0100
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]> writes:
> 
> > Thanks.  But wouldn't glyphless-hex-display-mode be a better name?
> > glyphless-display-mode doesn't really say what it does to glyphless
> > characters.
> 
> It doesn't hexify the glyphs, it uses `acronym'.  But I thought we might
> allow that to be customised if somebody asks for it, which is why it's
> not called `glyphless-acronym-display-mode'.

But glyphless-display-mode has no mnemonic value.  We already display
glyphless characters, so this name doesn't help at all.

Does anyone have suggestions for a better name?