GNU bug report logs - #27503
26.0.50; Not lining up Javascript arguments

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: James Nguyen <jamesn <at> fastmail.com>

Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 05:35:01 UTC

Severity: minor

Found in version 26.0.50

Fixed in version 26.1

Done: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #38 received at 27503 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
To: Ingo Lohmar <i.lohmar <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 27503 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, James Nguyen <jamesn <at> fastmail.com>,
 james <at> jojojames.com
Subject: Re: bug#27503: 26.0.50; Not lining up Javascript arguments
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 05:11:30 +0300
On 7/1/17 2:23 PM, Ingo Lohmar wrote:

> I hope I understood the manual/indent idea correctly.  Below is the
> updated patch including a test file.

Looks good, thanks.

> I changed the variable name to `js-indent-cont-nonempty-aligned' now
> (with "flipped" boolean meaning, as discussed before).  This is more
> succinct and starts with `js-indent-...' to convey the feature area to
> which this setting belongs.

OK, it seems better. Still requires effort to decipher the meaning, 
though. I don't have any better suggestions, so might as well commit 
this name.

> What's the procedure for patches arising from a bug report --- should I
> add a NEWS entry (for 26.1, marked +++) and just commit this to master
> myself?

When a reviewer says "Looks good, please install", or you're feeling 
confident yourself, yes. On that note, LGTM, please install. :)

A NEWS entry for the new variable is a good idea. But "+++" means "all 
necessary documentation updates are complete". "---", meaning "no change 
in the manuals is needed", seems more appropriate.




This bug report was last modified 7 years and 328 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.