GNU bug report logs - #27485
[PATCH] gnu: nyacc: Update to 0.80.3.

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 27485 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 27485 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: nyacc: Update to 0.80.3.
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2017 18:20:09 +0200

* gnu/packages/mes.scm (nyacc): Update to 0.80.3.
---
 gnu/packages/mes.scm | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/mes.scm b/gnu/packages/mes.scm
index 2cef77406..1516e526d 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/mes.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/mes.scm
@@ -34,14 +34,14 @@
 (define-public nyacc
   (package
     (name "nyacc")
-    (version "0.79.4")
+    (version "0.80.3")
     (source (origin
               (method url-fetch)
               (uri (string-append "mirror://savannah/nyacc/"
                                   name "-" version ".tar.gz"))
               (sha256
                (base32
-                "14rhr9nv1022r7m94agb3299y0k093aq1ps22zgii3aa7cf9h1w4"))))
+                "0sdvkahnz6k9i4kf1i1ljl20220n3wk3gy6zmz0ggbbdgg4mfka0"))))
     (build-system gnu-build-system)
     (native-inputs
      `(("guile" ,guile-2.2)))
-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com

Message #8 received at 27485 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net>
To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 27485 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#27485] [PATCH] gnu: nyacc: Update to 0.80.3.
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2017 23:04:42 +0530

The build is successful. But...

In the intall phase, I get several warnings/errors similar to:

;;; note: auto-compilation is enabled, set GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0
;;;       or pass the --no-auto-compile argument to disable.
;;; compiling /gnu/store/5zx29y44nrqj0s8h3jlvlj82k8hj4dxs-guile-2.2.2/bin/guild
;;; WARNING: compilation of /gnu/store/5zx29y44nrqj0s8h3jlvlj82k8hj4dxs-guile-2.2.2/bin/guild failed:
;;; ERROR: failed to create path for auto-compiled file "/gnu/store/5zx29y44nrqj0s8h3jlvlj82k8hj4dxs-guile-2.2.2/bin/guild"
wrote `/gnu/store/nf0wk6cl2fpj4cl39lvfwsxsaxwqgqwm-nyacc-0.80.3/lib/guile/2.2/site-ccache/nyacc/lang/c99/util2.go'

And, in the strip phase, I get several warnings similar to:

strip: Unable to recognise the format of the input file `/gnu/store/nf0wk6cl2fpj4cl39lvfwsxsaxwqgqwm-nyacc-0.80.3/lib/guile/2.2/site-
ccache/nyacc/bison.go'                                                                                                              
Are these ok?

Message #11 received at 27485 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org>
To: Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net>
Cc: 27485 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#27485] [PATCH] gnu: nyacc: Update to 0.80.3.
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2017 20:09:33 +0200

Arun Isaac writes:

> The build is successful. But...
>
> In the intall phase, I get several warnings/errors similar to:
>
> ;;; note: auto-compilation is enabled, set GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0
> ;;;       or pass the --no-auto-compile argument to disable.
> ;;; compiling /gnu/store/5zx29y44nrqj0s8h3jlvlj82k8hj4dxs-guile-2.2.2/bin/guild
> ;;; WARNING: compilation of /gnu/store/5zx29y44nrqj0s8h3jlvlj82k8hj4dxs-guile-2.2.2/bin/guild failed:
> ;;; ERROR: failed to create path for auto-compiled file
> "/gnu/store/5zx29y44nrqj0s8h3jlvlj82k8hj4dxs-guile-2.2.2/bin/guild"
> wrote `/gnu/store/nf0wk6cl2fpj4cl39lvfwsxsaxwqgqwm-nyacc-0.80.3/lib/guile/2.2/site-ccache/nyacc/lang/c99/util2.go'

I wondered what to do here.  I could add a `setenv' phase and set
GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0...but do we really want to do that for each
individual guile package?

> And, in the strip phase, I get several warnings similar to:
>
> strip: Unable to recognise the format of the input file
> `/gnu/store/nf0wk6cl2fpj4cl39lvfwsxsaxwqgqwm-nyacc-0.80.3/lib/guile/2.2/site-
> ccache/nyacc/bison.go'
> Are these ok?

I don't know about a workaround here, but also: should we add an
exception for all Guile packages that install .go files, or can we
somehow handle this in Guix?

Greetings,
janneke

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com

Message #14 received at 27485 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net>
To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 27485 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#27485] [PATCH] gnu: nyacc: Update to 0.80.3.
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 02:22:08 +0530

>> In the intall phase, I get several warnings/errors similar to:
>>
>> ;;; note: auto-compilation is enabled, set GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0
>> ;;;       or pass the --no-auto-compile argument to disable.
>> ;;; compiling /gnu/store/5zx29y44nrqj0s8h3jlvlj82k8hj4dxs-guile-2.2.2/bin/guild
>> ;;; WARNING: compilation of /gnu/store/5zx29y44nrqj0s8h3jlvlj82k8hj4dxs-guile-2.2.2/bin/guild failed:
>> ;;; ERROR: failed to create path for auto-compiled file
>> "/gnu/store/5zx29y44nrqj0s8h3jlvlj82k8hj4dxs-guile-2.2.2/bin/guild"
>> wrote `/gnu/store/nf0wk6cl2fpj4cl39lvfwsxsaxwqgqwm-nyacc-0.80.3/lib/guile/2.2/site-ccache/nyacc/lang/c99/util2.go'
>
> I wondered what to do here.  I could add a `setenv' phase and set
> GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0...but do we really want to do that for each
> individual guile package?

I think we should have a guile-build-system that handles this sort of
thing. WDYT?

>> And, in the strip phase, I get several warnings similar to:
>>
>> strip: Unable to recognise the format of the input file
>> `/gnu/store/nf0wk6cl2fpj4cl39lvfwsxsaxwqgqwm-nyacc-0.80.3/lib/guile/2.2/site-
>> ccache/nyacc/bison.go'
>> Are these ok?
>
> I don't know about a workaround here, but also: should we add an
> exception for all Guile packages that install .go files, or can we
> somehow handle this in Guix?

Some similar fix at the build-system level...

Other than that, this patch is ok. Please push!

Message #19 received at 27485-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org>
To: Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net>
Cc: Ludovic Courtès  <ludo <at> gnu.org>,
 27485-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#27485] [PATCH] gnu: nyacc: Update to 0.80.3.
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 07:06:41 +0200

Arun Isaac writes:

>>> In the intall phase, I get several warnings/errors similar to:
>>>
>>> ;;; note: auto-compilation is enabled, set GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0

>> I wondered what to do here.  I could add a `setenv' phase and set
>> GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0...but do we really want to do that for each
>> individual guile package?
>
> I think we should have a guile-build-system that handles this sort of
> thing. WDYT?

Ask Ludo'?
Sounds interesting though...would that combine with the gnu-build-system?

>>> And, in the strip phase, I get several warnings similar to:
>>>
>>> strip: Unable to recognise the format of the input file
>>> `/gnu/store/nf0wk6cl2fpj4cl39lvfwsxsaxwqgqwm-nyacc-0.80.3/lib/guile/2.2/site-
>>> ccache/nyacc/bison.go'
>>> Are these ok?
>>
>> I don't know about a workaround here, but also: should we add an
>> exception for all Guile packages that install .go files, or can we
>> somehow handle this in Guix?
>
> Some similar fix at the build-system level...

Ah!

> Other than that, this patch is ok. Please push!

Pushed to master as 7182442a636ffff05f2fa3a86df7d50693cbd440

Thanks,
janneke

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com

Message #22 received at 27485-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net>, 27485-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#27485] [PATCH] gnu: nyacc: Update to 0.80.3.
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 10:02:39 +0200

Hello!

Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org> skribis:

> Arun Isaac writes:
>
>>>> In the intall phase, I get several warnings/errors similar to:
>>>>
>>>> ;;; note: auto-compilation is enabled, set GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0
>
>>> I wondered what to do here.  I could add a `setenv' phase and set
>>> GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0...but do we really want to do that for each
>>> individual guile package?
>>
>> I think we should have a guile-build-system that handles this sort of
>> thing. WDYT?
>
> Ask Ludo'?
> Sounds interesting though...would that combine with the gnu-build-system?

There are several packages in (gnu packages guile) that use
‘trivial-build-system’ and have a very similar body.  I’m sure we could
factorize part of it in, say, (guix build guile-compilation) and, if
they are similar enough, come up with ‘guile-build-system’.

How does that sound?

Ludo’.

Message #25 received at 27485-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 27485-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [bug#27485] [PATCH] gnu: nyacc: Update to 0.80.3.
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 15:44:00 +0530

Ludovic Courtès writes:

> Hello!
>
> Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org> skribis:
>
>> Arun Isaac writes:
>>
>>>>> In the intall phase, I get several warnings/errors similar to:
>>>>>
>>>>> ;;; note: auto-compilation is enabled, set GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0
>>
>>>> I wondered what to do here.  I could add a `setenv' phase and set
>>>> GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0...but do we really want to do that for each
>>>> individual guile package?
>>>
>>> I think we should have a guile-build-system that handles this sort of
>>> thing. WDYT?
>>
>> Ask Ludo'?
>> Sounds interesting though...would that combine with the gnu-build-system?
>
> There are several packages in (gnu packages guile) that use
> ‘trivial-build-system’ and have a very similar body.  I’m sure we could
> factorize part of it in, say, (guix build guile-compilation) and, if
> they are similar enough, come up with ‘guile-build-system’.
>
> How does that sound?

Yes, that is a good idea. I don't think I'll be able to work on it
immediately. But, if somebody else picks it up, it'll be good.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.