GNU bug report logs -
#27470
26.0.50; this-command-keys and interactive input
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Fri, 28 Jul 2017 15:41:46 +0300
with message-id <83bmo44tth.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#27470: 26.0.50; this-command-keys and interactive input
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #27470,
regarding 26.0.50; this-command-keys and interactive input
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
27470: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=27470
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Hello,
Evaluate this:
(defun test (arg)
(interactive (list (read-from-minibuffer "Input: ")))
(message "%S" (cons this-command (this-command-keys)))
arg)
(global-set-key [f12] #'test)
where f12 stands for some random key sequence.
Hit f12 and give any input. I get the following message:
(test . "^M")
I would expect (test . f12).
Obviously, `this-command-keys' returns the key confirming the input
instead of the key that has invoked the command. This contradicts the
descriptions in the documentation (docstring and manual). The docs only
mention an exception when a command calls `read-key-sequence', but this
is not the case here. FWIW, I would prefer fixing this over changing
the docs.
Thanks,
Michael.
In GNU Emacs 26.0.50 (build 3, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.22.11)
of 2017-06-19 built on drachen
Repository revision: 1b75af59b305867c89271905be72a05d06a4eff4
Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11903000
System Description: Debian GNU/Linux 9.0 (stretch)
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
> From: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>
> Cc: 27470 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 17:44:21 +0200
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
> > Michael, any findings so far?
>
> No, everything seems to be fine.
>
> > Do you recommend that we push that change?
>
> It solves my problem, so - yes! But I can't judge whether it could
> potentially cause any trouble. Anyway, it's small and easily
> revertible, so I see no reason to hold it back.
Pushed to master.
Thanks for testing this.
This bug report was last modified 7 years and 354 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.