Subject: bug#27437: Source downloader accepts X.509 certificate for incorrect domain

From: [email-masked] (Ludovic Courtès)
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 11:31:40 +0200

Mike Gerwitz <[email-masked]> skribis:

> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 21:12:27 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> I think only GNU and kernel.org provide signatures, which represents 6%
>> of our packages.  Of the 30% that do not have an updater, surely some
>> have digital signatures, but we’re probably still below 10%.  The
>> situation is bad in general…
>
> What about signed tags/commits?

They’re becoming more widespread, especially now that GitHub’s UI can
make sense of them.  Nevertheless, I don’t think it changes the ratio
much if we look at the whole package set that we have.

Ludo’.