GNU bug report logs -
#27397
[PATCH] New commands for bulk tracing of elisp functions
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru> writes:
> On 6/19/17 2:36 PM, Michael Albinus wrote:
>
>>> (with-eval-after-load 'tramp
>>> (trace-package "tramp-"))
>>
>> But this would also trace functions from tramp-sh.el, which I don't want.
>
> What would be the equivalent of your proposal, then?
See my other message.
>>> If we do what you suggest, it should be a new discussion, and it
>>> should improve elp-instrument-package as well.
>>
>> I don't believe it will be too hard to implement; why not doing it just
>> now?
>
> Because we risk stopping now for a while and having two inconsistent
> functions in Emacs. It also adds a burden to the contributor who might
> now have signed up for tackling this particular challenge.
>
> There will also be some nuances to work out, I'm sure.
It's up to Phil to decide what will be implemented. But as a power user
of trace.el, I thought I bring my experience on table.
Best regards, Michael.
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 277 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.