GNU bug report logs - #27397
[PATCH] New commands for bulk tracing of elisp functions

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Phil Sainty <psainty <at> orcon.net.nz>

Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 13:34:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: moreinfo, patch

Merged with 1343, 6464

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de>
To: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
Cc: Phil Sainty <psainty <at> orcon.net.nz>, 27397 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#27397: [PATCH] New commands for bulk tracing of elisp functions
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 14:08:52 +0200
Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru> writes:

> On 6/19/17 2:36 PM, Michael Albinus wrote:
>
>>> (with-eval-after-load 'tramp
>>>    (trace-package "tramp-"))
>>
>> But this would also trace functions from tramp-sh.el, which I don't want.
>
> What would be the equivalent of your proposal, then?

See my other message.

>>> If we do what you suggest, it should be a new discussion, and it
>>> should improve elp-instrument-package as well.
>>
>> I don't believe it will be too hard to implement; why not doing it just
>> now?
>
> Because we risk stopping now for a while and having two inconsistent
> functions in Emacs. It also adds a burden to the contributor who might
> now have signed up for tackling this particular challenge.
>
> There will also be some nuances to work out, I'm sure.

It's up to Phil to decide what will be implemented. But as a power user
of trace.el, I thought I bring my experience on table.

Best regards, Michael.




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 277 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.