GNU bug report logs - #27297
[PATCH] doc: Correction of function name.

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 27297 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 27297 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Björn Höfling <bjoern.hoefling <at> bjoernhoefling.de>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] doc: Correction of function name.
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 17:15:24 +0200

From 82405dba978d051eb5ae9614a88f8a07f5fe1e85 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn=20H=C3=B6fling?=
 <bjoern.hoefling <at> bjoernhoefling.de>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 08:57:55 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] doc: Correction of function name.

* doc/guix.texi (Invoking guix package): Correct function name.
---
 doc/guix.texi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
index a5b7875..0b2aed2 100644
--- a/doc/guix.texi
+++ b/doc/guix.texi
@@ -1724,7 +1724,7 @@ In this example we have to know which modules
define the @code{emacs} and @code{guile-2.0} variables to provide the
right @code{use-package-modules} line, which can be cumbersome.  We can
 instead provide regular package specifications and let
-@code{specification->package-output} look up the corresponding package
+@code{specification->package+output} look up the corresponding package
 objects, like this:
 
 @example
-- 
2.7.4

Message #10 received at 27297-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Björn Höfling <bjoern.hoefling <at> bjoernhoefling.de>
Cc: 27297-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#27297: [PATCH] doc: Correction of function name.
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 23:18:11 +0200

Hi Björn,

Björn Höfling <bjoern.hoefling <at> bjoernhoefling.de> skribis:

> From 82405dba978d051eb5ae9614a88f8a07f5fe1e85 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: =?UTF-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn=20H=C3=B6fling?=
>  <bjoern.hoefling <at> bjoernhoefling.de>
> Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 08:57:55 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] doc: Correction of function name.
>
> * doc/guix.texi (Invoking guix package): Correct function name.

Good catch… though the just-pushed commit
c08ea55e7ec25261e4596bf6726a83c1ed056b94 introduces
‘specifications->manifest’ for this particular use case.

Thanks,
Ludo’.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.