GNU bug report logs - #27261
guix package -u should warn about non-existent packages

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>

Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 00:50:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #25 received at 27261 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
Cc: 27261 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Subject: Re: bug#27261: guix package -u should warn about non-existent packages
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 15:56:21 +0200
Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com> skribis:

> Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:01:03AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>> Could you check whether “guix package -A syncthing” shows it there?  The
>>> warning should appear as soon as we’re upgrading a package that’s
>>> missing.
>>
>> I get no results when I do `./pre-inst-env guix package -A syncthing`
>> from the repo where I removed qsyncthingtray.
>
> I just came across this today too on a GuixSD system. `guix package -u`
> warned that my not-yet-upstream "icedtea-web" package does not exist,
> but had no problem with "chromium" installed the same way.
>
> No GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH, and ~/.config/guix/latest is a symlink to a `guix
> pull` build. The packages were installed through `./pre-inst-env`.

Hmm it all depends on whether the packages are visible to Guix via
GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH.  Are you using the same Guix in both cases?  No
‘sudo’?

Ludo’.




This bug report was last modified 8 years and 51 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.