From unknown Sat Sep 13 07:33:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#27261: guix package -u should warn about non-existent packages Resent-From: Mark H Weaver Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 00:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 27261 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 27261@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.149671016029485 (code B ref -1); Tue, 06 Jun 2017 00:50:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jun 2017 00:49:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58308 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dI2gS-0007fV-Hc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 20:49:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44449) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dI2gP-0007fH-2I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 20:49:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dI2gJ-0007ws-1I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 20:49:11 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:52861) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dI2gI-0007we-UJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 20:49:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35417) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dI2gI-0008Sd-11 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 20:49:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dI2gE-0007to-Uj for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 20:49:10 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([50.252.239.5]:57508) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dI2gE-0007o4-Q6 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 20:49:06 -0400 Received: from pool-72-93-32-114.bstnma.east.verizon.net ([72.93.32.114] helo=jojen) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dI2g2-0004ts-Pz; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 20:48:55 -0400 From: Mark H Weaver Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 20:48:43 -0400 Message-ID: <878tl654b8.fsf@netris.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) In order to guard against users unwittingly using old software with unpatched security flaws, "guix package -u" should issue a warning if any packages in the profile that match the provided patterns are not found in the set of available packages. Mark From unknown Sat Sep 13 07:33:29 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Mark H Weaver Subject: bug#27261: closed (Re: bug#27261: guix package -u should warn about non-existent packages) Message-ID: References: <87wp7z95f1.fsf@gnu.org> <878tl654b8.fsf@netris.org> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 27261 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix Reply-To: 27261@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2017 20:31:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1498422662-16355-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1498422662-16355-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #27261: guix package -u should warn about non-existent packages which was filed against the guix package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 27261@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 27261: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D27261 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1498422662-16355-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 27261-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2017 20:30:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37670 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dPEAo-0004Ex-Pp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jun 2017 16:30:22 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38008) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dPEAn-0004Ek-Du for 27261-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jun 2017 16:30:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dPEAf-0002vn-9h for 27261-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jun 2017 16:30:16 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:50720) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dPEAf-0002vj-6S; Sun, 25 Jun 2017 16:30:13 -0400 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:40366 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dPEAe-0003aQ-FY; Sun, 25 Jun 2017 16:30:12 -0400 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: bug#27261: guix package -u should warn about non-existent packages References: <878tl654b8.fsf@netris.org> Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2017 22:30:10 +0200 In-Reply-To: <878tl654b8.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Mon, 05 Jun 2017 20:48:43 -0400") Message-ID: <87wp7z95f1.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 27261-done Cc: 27261-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Mark H Weaver skribis: > In order to guard against users unwittingly using old software with > unpatched security flaws, "guix package -u" should issue a warning if > any packages in the profile that match the provided patterns are not > found in the set of available packages. Fixed in a1b46bdc069e6e3bbc5b171fafbc40213611ff1f, thanks! Ludo=E2=80=99. ------------=_1498422662-16355-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jun 2017 00:49:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58308 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dI2gS-0007fV-Hc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 20:49:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44449) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dI2gP-0007fH-2I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 20:49:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dI2gJ-0007ws-1I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 20:49:11 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:52861) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dI2gI-0007we-UJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 20:49:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35417) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dI2gI-0008Sd-11 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 20:49:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dI2gE-0007to-Uj for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 20:49:10 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([50.252.239.5]:57508) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dI2gE-0007o4-Q6 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 20:49:06 -0400 Received: from pool-72-93-32-114.bstnma.east.verizon.net ([72.93.32.114] helo=jojen) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dI2g2-0004ts-Pz; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 20:48:55 -0400 From: Mark H Weaver To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: guix package -u should warn about non-existent packages Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 20:48:43 -0400 Message-ID: <878tl654b8.fsf@netris.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) In order to guard against users unwittingly using old software with unpatched security flaws, "guix package -u" should issue a warning if any packages in the profile that match the provided patterns are not found in the set of available packages. Mark ------------=_1498422662-16355-1-- From unknown Sat Sep 13 07:33:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#27261: guix package -u should warn about non-existent packages Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2017 23:54:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27261 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 27261@debbugs.gnu.org, ludo@gnu.org, mhw@netris.org Received: via spool by 27261-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27261.14984348121661 (code B ref 27261); Sun, 25 Jun 2017 23:54:01 +0000 Received: (at 27261) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2017 23:53:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37783 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dPHLQ-0000Qi-Ca for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jun 2017 19:53:32 -0400 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:35943) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dPHLO-0000Qa-Ig for 27261@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jun 2017 19:53:31 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D266D20C2C; Sun, 25 Jun 2017 19:53:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 25 Jun 2017 19:53:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=vBUwOlKrP7YO8aikfsvDJwOna/PT6HbvNZI+VG CQkNg=; b=OPMlBDDymnfaZ6DRtzepuGJkztsTUFs9/paB6i/3cb4TVzzEqvViko JctyCyyPznfBQ9Jjp7QwYA77zO6O7M40mfL/K4GvNg1tY/MxyDS7QR9TniSlvWlz +bH9Jfz2ArWtq0dbN3qGgzqGwCJwJSrBsdGSOwKOyhmE/yDuCmkAw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=vBUwOlKrP7YO8aikfs vDJwOna/PT6HbvNZI+VGCQkNg=; b=kqyHV2xsCAR7VzxFrtd0kzHLgNNV6qSIyS 5yECGfi6IPrvMa9w9kpMvQyYzgbDQW4yYiQI5MTOiiVXiThQy4vdkNtU6B+QbtCk np8rr/ixvkrTPwsXRu2W0TryQL2Rwq/bmjqp/SN9LUwN3xg+w66zF6v54pJ4mYLq 0ol4V/jYaZxY0puQUBlkDbxXgxty7b19kHmLODHNiBMGLgKVzFrjtvi5ZGusUqNE Or+iSEb0LOZFInMcHPw4Ynh7uV17ohGpgSH7JlLt2logYFBVpwhYS5U3d7C91DBA 7Y+O7f6xXnpgtv/MNO8Ctb/JCkcJscJPZ/aRIlHbR56zbnZp34gw== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: AtD0i9z0vvKDdj/GcncZUkTCEt7HjAMKl402ku/TbFzD 1498434809 Received: from localhost (c-73-165-108-70.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.165.108.70]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8E65124370; Sun, 25 Jun 2017 19:53:29 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2017 19:53:26 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20170625235326.GA24268@jasmine.lan> References: <878tl654b8.fsf@netris.org> <87wp7z95f1.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87wp7z95f1.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 10:30:10PM +0200, Ludovic Court=E8s wrote: > Mark H Weaver skribis: > > In order to guard against users unwittingly using old software with > > unpatched security flaws, "guix package -u" should issue a warning if > > any packages in the profile that match the provided patterns are not > > found in the set of available packages. >=20 > Fixed in a1b46bdc069e6e3bbc5b171fafbc40213611ff1f, thanks! I noticed this doesn't work in some cases, although I'm not sure exactly when it will work and when it won't. I ran `guix pull` after this missing package warning was implemented, but before I pushed afc9d8ec2b724b67f (gnu: Add jmtpfs). I installed jmtpfs from a Git checkout, and then ran `guix package -u .` As expected, Guix complained that the jmtpfs package does not exist. However, it did not complain about the syncthing package in my profile, even though syncthing is not available in Guix. The syncthing package is on a branch that's not checked out, and there is no stray 'gnu/packages/syncthing.go' file. I thought it might be caused by the presence of the qsyncthingtray package in Guix (not in my profile), but even after I deleted that package and rebuilt Guix from a fresh checkout, I still had this problem. --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAllQTPMACgkQJkb6MLrK fwiSrRAAqQMbR3OCQTdQNa0jFKme6WmzYOxF2OYyR6uOhIxq3kIu0jJM+hglzCBC D7gH+YxCOjhonfLGk6Rti82rFDTwH1+/TplmKln6PHgxvHpJG4rrSPotpT4lESDk KjkEOLV8JIL+4AW+F708/ne08C7hkqmdv5r1/xgyR2ArUeZ7L2HhYMZt4YNUS4yA 2RQx4DrxW7EPLi22/rFAvd3bhROts2UVrrpz1w7GZtFYvMUlFYcJnaMmxH5FwniN XQaE1zqonyBEdXqm04+c1ckkSLxsJmrG6pEpM1UxBZK9CIcV+qY/0st0t5bM/CsC xiOM37KELDvueZq9ukySAn2w2EpLlYenMnq1fRWLG6nWHoDwipLmmDrPlLQrXlUs zKaJebNThQERkSdo9sbbkXP7VsZxeMtgH1yrXNXSkNM7diEFXm79Zuel2OSKyCK7 nB+KSy7lxAy8XCLFGIy9XD8qlZ423ryDIyMi08l6l9zSUizsGAyHidOu4H5FYz8z YhHKYLUC9yDv82XTmFMSaQ6Yyp6GNl8wd6FNPCwlfd/9BgORFsAdreZCu+jE4dEC MZE45j99CEwvuePWg2bH/Dv9C2xY/pSF1TGbcV2SbGnT6/N4eLzsnC2MwY7Pc1/Z eQ0KpXB0ffMdc8TCLo8CFHwADhVMvHPHlmCKmbnMFMZRKdlFQug= =zqMn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr-- From unknown Sat Sep 13 07:33:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#27261: guix package -u should warn about non-existent packages Resent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 08:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27261 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Famulari Cc: 27261@debbugs.gnu.org, mhw@netris.org Received: via spool by 27261-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27261.149846409213333 (code B ref 27261); Mon, 26 Jun 2017 08:02:02 +0000 Received: (at 27261) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jun 2017 08:01:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37926 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dPOxf-0003Sz-LF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 04:01:31 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41989) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dPOxd-0003Sn-ML for 27261@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 04:01:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dPOxV-00081Z-Dc for 27261@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 04:01:24 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:57429) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dPOxG-0007wh-MK; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 04:01:06 -0400 Received: from [193.50.110.179] (port=35696 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dPOxF-0005RX-Qp; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 04:01:06 -0400 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <878tl654b8.fsf@netris.org> <87wp7z95f1.fsf@gnu.org> <20170625235326.GA24268@jasmine.lan> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 8 Messidor an 225 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 10:01:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20170625235326.GA24268@jasmine.lan> (Leo Famulari's message of "Sun, 25 Jun 2017 19:53:26 -0400") Message-ID: <87zicv89fk.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Hello, Leo Famulari skribis: > I ran `guix pull` after this missing package warning was implemented, > but before I pushed afc9d8ec2b724b67f (gnu: Add jmtpfs). > > I installed jmtpfs from a Git checkout, and then ran `guix package -u .` > > As expected, Guix complained that the jmtpfs package does not exist. > > However, it did not complain about the syncthing package in my profile, > even though syncthing is not available in Guix. The syncthing package is > on a branch that's not checked out, and there is no stray > 'gnu/packages/syncthing.go' file. Could you check whether =E2=80=9Cguix package -A syncthing=E2=80=9D shows i= t there? The warning should appear as soon as we=E2=80=99re upgrading a package that=E2= =80=99s missing. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Sat Sep 13 07:33:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#27261: guix package -u should warn about non-existent packages Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 18:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27261 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 27261@debbugs.gnu.org, mhw@netris.org Received: via spool by 27261-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27261.149850201820057 (code B ref 27261); Mon, 26 Jun 2017 18:34:01 +0000 Received: (at 27261) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jun 2017 18:33:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39421 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dPYpN-0005DR-IE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 14:33:37 -0400 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:43087) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dPYpM-0005DJ-2Q for 27261@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 14:33:36 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D997420C51; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 14:33:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 26 Jun 2017 14:33:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=1lXdFlr+gUR1GW53fsyGaAfcrqPRNzKh+4Ggf7 uqFf4=; b=PonT5gJysI9pE/IsO6WhSxjbLpN6MaYhhrLT4X+OjABbG9X+NRg0mD ghqkFXtEnsJeUmC+1hBwj9/QF4ztTnxxnDz9XBtJxq9JC8i4nPxIJw8ZGe8aT7B9 uT3iwiuNbFdEH2VHtZUKDbnM/mxiQIm7wrg/xTR/z7m9vSuHjCg2M= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=1lXdFlr+gUR1GW53fs yGaAfcrqPRNzKh+4Ggf7uqFf4=; b=ML58mdHrUI6A/sPamPfYdaqAZk8iGb5JuY P4sqw2Y+2duai21bGyfWyZUzzJg+mTFSZ2E0xRi+LFn5tvrBnnbCBfGtcEjIWxy7 kcePeoKtWknBv9kafdWLb6DGiFznlgMxg2gJhKxfbvXox3OX/Vvk8X+XXucpsppz 1QnCQSxe60RZWuLWmhh+epvwwUi7iknkEPKhOTLvEynmTy814YCereczN1l3Z2Li uL5krE0lG/oixeysYcI1IMdsd9wHWb1VfLpr1iUU86CQusgSoBwl8mgXE3LE5+ka n0i2Yd/xeBnJp0HTgY1qek3Xmeh82RUWFT3UOBr6ZbHE6os6bSpw== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: gV0RQivmFB+nyuhMxNMfnl5sZ6mfDZ7CNPoB3E/eUZka 1498502015 Received: from localhost (c-68-84-77-42.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [68.84.77.42]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9C4AC7E760; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 14:33:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 14:32:54 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20170626183254.GA14748@jasmine.lan> References: <878tl654b8.fsf@netris.org> <87wp7z95f1.fsf@gnu.org> <20170625235326.GA24268@jasmine.lan> <87zicv89fk.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AqsLC8rIMeq19msA" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87zicv89fk.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --AqsLC8rIMeq19msA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:01:03AM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Could you check whether =E2=80=9Cguix package -A syncthing=E2=80=9D shows= it there? The > warning should appear as soon as we=E2=80=99re upgrading a package that= =E2=80=99s > missing. I get no results when I do `./pre-inst-env guix package -A syncthing` =66rom the repo where I removed qsyncthingtray. `guix package -A syncthing` shows a result for qsyncthingtray, because that is a "plain" Guix, from `guix pull`, set up as described in Binary Installation: $ ls -l $(which guix) lrwxrwxrwx 1 root staff 54 Aug 14 2015 /usr/local/bin/guix -> /var/guix/pr= ofiles/per-user/root/guix-profile/bin/guix $ ls -l ~/.config/guix/latest=20 lrwxrwxrwx 1 leo leo 55 Jun 25 19:19 /home/leo/.config/guix/latest -> /gnu/= store/jbrn4pixmrqmqk8jmx533cnqhjhm17sb-guix-latest But, that's not the Guix that I expect to be queried for packages. Maybe there is some unexpected interaction between the various copies of Guix? I'll try this on GuixSD today or tomrrow. --AqsLC8rIMeq19msA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAllRU1IACgkQJkb6MLrK fwgKyQ//aPZhc8qXPMV9Ck7pEvmak5qfheryQwq8CdE0mknkyeddrPJWynNH9fo7 O+chrpP/P4GSLsBw+RE0mT9RpkEXqGkDA3SqoTt4baUDqgmhg1+Jn4+fnPsq+MhO RaBRxOwv4cPYe2K36p0rIUe0tIPAAsy+wW+Iyu1DXGDZpe6wJYo+82KyzzqFT+Kv 4spy8NmPcQtf6iBr2cb4VGs9G6ZjnqkN+tWFzvmNXoZ2m4wKXpd33P2YNCYYD+7b 865OuQ6KYSAY88v41LlhwJi/nhh2ms4kT4jBn0OzU/0f9E6NCchMKffjjblmfs9K cnoDPt9VvvZPD+5jUDwBGRhkcByrEtBihDNmO4E6+dViSqJLMxZR8kq68/egp7oA gvxjnzYpa5CRwuXhAkzbknpDQHUWeuv74BAM/RjNI25iyQz+/LFioyUBvkEJg9MO aQlYyM4ifJ271mtw0QJcT9N8DtsNEf/AFvNDj0pmdKyCHwIRihDtRd5tmZfcuF7k DlRO84T+LfMwArvcEJPIrfHm5JmEm5tCINfRZz8XIGFssqLUAaAsDULaIiKM5Nk4 FFb/1+5sW8lcEnuwJ7rYSEligUhYy+WPZTt8iEqJiSJUE8cjWHYPp/gXGcrPY6sZ Z89vkJKxKMF7cuW7p0vAU5uStsz2Bue/NxxnrWY1FGPDaBOaz+o= =LgWm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AqsLC8rIMeq19msA-- From unknown Sat Sep 13 07:33:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#27261: guix package -u should warn about non-existent packages Resent-From: Marius Bakke Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 18:52:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27261 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Famulari , Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 27261@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 27261-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27261.149850311321647 (code B ref 27261); Mon, 26 Jun 2017 18:52:01 +0000 Received: (at 27261) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jun 2017 18:51:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39450 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dPZ73-0005d4-0d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 14:51:53 -0400 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:33849) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dPZ71-0005cw-M2 for 27261@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 14:51:51 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C0520B73; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 14:51:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 26 Jun 2017 14:51:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=pCxfJYnJeWGYbr5Qh/kIctiK30EGg+At0CkUNy/QM RM=; b=CYHp3IQDuxvwEB+qjFjzkNfEjOuRfeJlYw+YZk3rRkjQmSQKCGgLOppFr QeHWexqmLcix/iQL11m1GR1pZKsdYnKH8JSR/w9vija9IgHhap2y8vSh79Z7Kaje TpVbKbFQ0UZJQK+cgqr8yOBJiKWmjbqVqwJwbyJ7XWrkyLW3WUladoLetUFOg9Ge 6UOTqSXJVV4x04InlMOeslcMfLP8LEetMhmMKVKmPW4ATG+V87Z1LUcQqrPGJ9nL xWiQa4JB9HvDW+xsgpAog4H0l1hWEEf9WoAdBKPkhXkhjl01EPjCnMvFXQOKVYzq 4+xuE9YEc1fEXMFkoSWd2T32Yic/Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=pCxfJYnJeWGYbr5Qh/ kIctiK30EGg+At0CkUNy/QMRM=; b=aK+TGOoJnfwMtEq9Kbrsan80UksRrr9KwB 0NjN+rthW9fqyJcu05sBNewa3gY/cEncYOezTXsKlr5rUzbMkKBbdcDWsxvZ7e21 kVPEkvayEc80KKcwdiNHXI6hi8PwRlxZdGjuUUl2BvuD8HNFisvfrVpAuUNrm7OJ pBpwCFoRvtEl5Ot8rH6WABgzscehiHg8FYYrE79cO8D+zWYWAL7I42fxB8yZKdFI rGSDBhigaEdbkBEhYTJdfsY/vplz1JnaotBwAqBKpOHDYsnOdxU/w4bZDShcfnhI a+kDfsLC8xI/Wy39HYXfhU9m+WFyzcK8U6cPcBVfrNAxT3tM1X5w== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: onloWqQj32XoG5x4qDdhszzbTqPMAGzoewiEXAMEfhF4 1498503110 Received: from localhost (unknown [188.113.81.93]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EFBBB24776; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 14:51:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: <20170626183254.GA14748@jasmine.lan> References: <878tl654b8.fsf@netris.org> <87wp7z95f1.fsf@gnu.org> <20170625235326.GA24268@jasmine.lan> <87zicv89fk.fsf@gnu.org> <20170626183254.GA14748@jasmine.lan> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.24.2 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.2.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 20:51:49 +0200 Message-ID: <87zicumvju.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Leo Famulari writes: > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:01:03AM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> Could you check whether =E2=80=9Cguix package -A syncthing=E2=80=9D show= s it there? The >> warning should appear as soon as we=E2=80=99re upgrading a package that= =E2=80=99s >> missing. > > I get no results when I do `./pre-inst-env guix package -A syncthing` > from the repo where I removed qsyncthingtray. I just came across this today too on a GuixSD system. `guix package -u` warned that my not-yet-upstream "icedtea-web" package does not exist, but had no problem with "chromium" installed the same way. No GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH, and ~/.config/guix/latest is a symlink to a `guix pull` build. The packages were installed through `./pre-inst-env`. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAllRV8UACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPrNeQf+MttwXl3GjBXbihg8x4it/JJCZ2Hx1cbS9jmmohguS/qhYVPA6dnAwcnk 56xj1uDVQNuYjiEmedr/r3mHtsjh8YTpPZI8hUWBrDMG5gH6qL5a/2AWiEWTMpm8 4+MkEOONyzhQRa2/Vi/TRdN8N5mWVtDTF4ZLAcVKknkJbXNxcXXuEIgZSnfHKxvX JzwUvnuhiBdxrJtCrjTMUR44lokIDModDZR78g5YnyI5eTV2Oe7NjjJRxMAq6KMS Pb8tm7AOuWuivNujqrbOW7c+CesqFYZf5Ay+r8w1HOw1L1l3UMYOTWHTpF/XQLFA QnyVeiDkM/ZrT2ryjTtpWO/EH4RMGw== =jL20 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Sat Sep 13 07:33:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#27261: guix package -u should warn about non-existent packages Resent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 13:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27261 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Marius Bakke Cc: 27261@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari Received: via spool by 27261-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27261.149857179828678 (code B ref 27261); Tue, 27 Jun 2017 13:57:01 +0000 Received: (at 27261) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jun 2017 13:56:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40932 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dPqyr-0007ST-MZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 09:56:37 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46689) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dPqyq-0007SF-45 for 27261@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 09:56:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dPqyf-0006YB-6D for 27261@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 09:56:30 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:52796) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dPqyf-0006Xu-2l; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 09:56:25 -0400 Received: from lstlambert-656-1-273-89.w90-63.abo.wanadoo.fr ([90.63.181.89]:41569 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dPqye-0007sC-9a; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 09:56:24 -0400 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <878tl654b8.fsf@netris.org> <87wp7z95f1.fsf@gnu.org> <20170625235326.GA24268@jasmine.lan> <87zicv89fk.fsf@gnu.org> <20170626183254.GA14748@jasmine.lan> <87zicumvju.fsf@fastmail.com> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 9 Messidor an 225 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 15:56:21 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87zicumvju.fsf@fastmail.com> (Marius Bakke's message of "Mon, 26 Jun 2017 20:51:49 +0200") Message-ID: <87zict4jqy.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Marius Bakke skribis: > Leo Famulari writes: > >> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:01:03AM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >>> Could you check whether =E2=80=9Cguix package -A syncthing=E2=80=9D sho= ws it there? The >>> warning should appear as soon as we=E2=80=99re upgrading a package that= =E2=80=99s >>> missing. >> >> I get no results when I do `./pre-inst-env guix package -A syncthing` >> from the repo where I removed qsyncthingtray. > > I just came across this today too on a GuixSD system. `guix package -u` > warned that my not-yet-upstream "icedtea-web" package does not exist, > but had no problem with "chromium" installed the same way. > > No GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH, and ~/.config/guix/latest is a symlink to a `guix > pull` build. The packages were installed through `./pre-inst-env`. Hmm it all depends on whether the packages are visible to Guix via GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH. Are you using the same Guix in both cases? No =E2=80=98sudo=E2=80=99? Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Sat Sep 13 07:33:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#27261: guix package -u should warn about non-existent packages Resent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 19:42:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27261 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Famulari Cc: 27261@debbugs.gnu.org, mhw@netris.org Received: via spool by 27261-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27261.149859250727758 (code B ref 27261); Tue, 27 Jun 2017 19:42:01 +0000 Received: (at 27261) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jun 2017 19:41:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41173 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dPwMt-0007De-5H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 15:41:47 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56931) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dPwMr-0007DR-Lg for 27261@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 15:41:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dPwMh-0005Kh-NM for 27261@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 15:41:40 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:58287) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dPwMS-0005GM-Br; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 15:41:20 -0400 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:52714 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dPwMR-0004PM-LF; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 15:41:20 -0400 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <878tl654b8.fsf@netris.org> <87wp7z95f1.fsf@gnu.org> <20170625235326.GA24268@jasmine.lan> <87zicv89fk.fsf@gnu.org> <20170626183254.GA14748@jasmine.lan> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 9 Messidor an 225 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 21:41:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20170626183254.GA14748@jasmine.lan> (Leo Famulari's message of "Mon, 26 Jun 2017 14:32:54 -0400") Message-ID: <878tkd43s3.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Hi Leo, Leo Famulari skribis: > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:01:03AM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> Could you check whether =E2=80=9Cguix package -A syncthing=E2=80=9D show= s it there? The >> warning should appear as soon as we=E2=80=99re upgrading a package that= =E2=80=99s >> missing. > > I get no results when I do `./pre-inst-env guix package -A syncthing` > from the repo where I removed qsyncthingtray. So does =E2=80=9C./pre-inst-env guix package -u syncthing=E2=80=9D raise a = warning? It should. > `guix package -A syncthing` shows a result for qsyncthingtray, because > that is a "plain" Guix, from `guix pull`, set up as described in Binary > Installation: > > $ ls -l $(which guix) > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root staff 54 Aug 14 2015 /usr/local/bin/guix -> /var/guix/= profiles/per-user/root/guix-profile/bin/guix > $ ls -l ~/.config/guix/latest=20 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 leo leo 55 Jun 25 19:19 /home/leo/.config/guix/latest -> /gn= u/store/jbrn4pixmrqmqk8jmx533cnqhjhm17sb-guix-latest > > But, that's not the Guix that I expect to be queried for packages. Maybe > there is some unexpected interaction between the various copies of Guix? I don=E2=80=99t think so. But maybe I=E2=80=99m missing something! Ludo=E2=80=99.