GNU bug report logs - #27243
dired-auto-revert-buffer jumps point to beginning of buffer

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#27243: closed (dired-auto-revert-buffer jumps point to
 beginning of buffer)
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 08:26:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jun 2017 11:24:38 +0300
with message-id <83d1ac6yih.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#27243: dired-auto-revert-buffer jumps point to beginning of buffer
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #27243,
regarding dired-auto-revert-buffer jumps point to beginning of buffer
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
27243: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=27243
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Antoine Levitt <antoine.levitt <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: dired-auto-revert-buffer jumps point to beginning of buffer
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2017 16:45:05 -0700

Tested on git master, the bug is not present on 25.

Recipe from emacs -Q:

(setq dired-auto-revert-buffer t)

open dired, open a folder, C-x b back to the previous dired buffer, open
the same folder again, see point jump back to the beginning of buffer.

I'm not sure why, since dired-auto-revert-buffer just seems to call
revert-buffer, which does not jump point.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: stephen.berman <at> gmx.net
Cc: 27243-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, antoine.levitt <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#27243: dired-auto-revert-buffer jumps point to beginning of
 buffer
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 11:24:38 +0300

> Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 19:20:41 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
> Cc: 27243 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, antoine.levitt <at> gmail.com
> 
> > Your fix is certainly simpler and I think cleaner than mine, so I would
> > say install it.
> 
> OK, thanks.  I will wait for a couple of days to let others a chance
> to chime in, and will install if no further comments come up.

No further comments, so I pushed the change, and I'm marking this bug
done.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.