GNU bug report logs -
#27238
24.5; Rename `face-spec-set-2' and give it a better doc string
Previous Next
Reported by: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 17:43:01 UTC
Severity: wishlist
Found in version 24.5
Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
> > > > "set one face (`fringe' or whatever), in only a given frame,
> > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > > to the spec of another face (or to a spec that isn't yet used
> > > > for any face)"
> > > >
> > > > I don't see a "higher-level function" that does that. I don't
> > > > see any function that does, apart from `face-spec-2'.
> > >
> > > Doesn't this boil down to setting the attributes of the target face to
> > > the values of the same attributes of the source face?
> >
> > Yes, of course, which is why `face-spec-set-2' does that:
>
> No, it also consults face-x-resources, which is not necessarily what
> the caller wants.
That's not the point. The point is code to "set the attributes of the
target face to the values of the same attributes of the source face".
Do you see another function that does that?
> > Are suggesting that everyone who needs to "set the attributes
> > of the target face to the values of the same attributes of the
> > source face" should just write such an explicit loop (repeat
> > the body of `face-spec-set-2') instead of just calling
> > `face-spec-set-2'?
>
> Are you suggesting that for every loop someone might possibly need at
> some point we should have a documented and public function in Emacs?
Do you think I am? Why?
> > Or are you hinting that there is some other "higher-level
> > function" that already does exactly that?
>
> Well, there's defface with :inherit, and there's copy-face, to name
> just two. You didn't describe enough context of what you want to do,
> so I cannot be sure they are not relevant.
Should I explicitly have mentioned that I don't want to inherit another
face?
But I did forget that `copy-face', where the NEW-FACE arg is an
existing face, does what I was looking for. Thanks for the reminder
about it. That works for my use case.
(Why doesn't `face-spec-recalc' use `copy-face' instead of
`face-spec-set-2'? I guess it's to check the return value of
`face-spec-choose', which it goes to the trouble of calling
for each face that it iterates over.)
BTW, while looking to see if Emacs 22 would support my code, since it
will not use `face-spec-set-2', I (re)discovered that prior to Emacs
24.3 `frame-set-spec' DID let you specify the FRAME. The signature of
`frame-spec-set' was changed incompatibly after Emacs 24.3.
(I still suggest fixing the doc string of `face-spec-set-2', as it is
misleading about its "SPEC" arg.)
This bug report was last modified 7 years and 348 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.