From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jun 04 13:28:04 2017 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jun 2017 17:28:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56055 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dHZJr-0002RC-Pm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 13:28:03 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58315) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dHZJr-0002Qk-2r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 13:28:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHZJk-0005rm-W4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 13:27:57 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:49102) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHZJk-0005rS-Sk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 13:27:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49286) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHZJj-00065Y-U3 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 13:27:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHZJf-0005lU-Qk for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 13:27:55 -0400 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:47752) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHZJf-0005hs-Im for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 13:27:51 -0400 Received: from [10.9.9.210] (helo=mailfront10.runbox.com) by mailtransmit02.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dHZJc-0007KU-IJ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 19:27:48 +0200 Received: from tor-exit.dhalgren.org ([46.165.230.5] helo=localhost) by mailfront10.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:892961 ) (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) id 1dHZJP-0005h2-ND for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 19:27:36 +0200 Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 17:27:33 +0000 From: ng0 To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: wicd-curses: `urwid' is not available Message-ID: <20170604172733.yjynd7zsgasvsjsw@abyayala> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) On a minimal, Xless system when you install wicd through your system configuration and try to start wicd-curses, you get a traceback: File "/gnu/store/aaaaaaaa-wicd-1.7.4/share/wicd/curses/wicd-curses.py", line 44, in import urwid ImportError: No mouled named urwid Which is strange since it is in the inputs, so I'm thinking maybe it needs to be wrapped? I haven't put much though to a solution yet. -- ng0 OpenPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 18 15:13:59 2020 Received: (at 27237) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Dec 2020 20:14:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40060 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kqM8V-0003Bn-A5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 15:13:59 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f45.google.com ([209.85.221.45]:46020) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kqM8Q-0003Am-NG for 27237@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 15:13:55 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f45.google.com with SMTP id d26so3571374wrb.12 for <27237@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 12:13:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=A6e7ZanMlRM365befgmUrQe9ZhVYdzbEv+cdACwHPKU=; b=alyr28TQDvc1DkbVjzV5lt8RtZC6PS17uxhDCVm1BMn1S8ochgM+j2jNJtIYoFeJzc h4zuu911gTLtluTnYUSanYtwmiosCq50bfJ6BOjD112/cxN7tnGBd1zzhmk/lOhZhMeX ND6vVY+jfmxjI1nxNuw+C7A7M0tawl+yWcRJvq/4G6ig3KJ+khRLc1UVJU7V+mrnKlbi QfFT34UFWZsf5G/wMAwSJyiH9bRlujiTfQPHvJKv/S+cRmRtxJyu9Tz0cjASw381iRkK MS+v4rrXKOSZhe77KSxH7UoOBLsFJodFy1YtZGuB5rG1FZYEO/0NVEaCM9x4lsBAw+Bx djsA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=A6e7ZanMlRM365befgmUrQe9ZhVYdzbEv+cdACwHPKU=; b=SroqTn88JqPbjEHBmgmNo9UqMWivaZpGR8crbRR2XR1XQfoNokk4qTRN/roWSTyh+o PVh6RFa7PHxnTejlX1plRbNY7UjkxzF85Rja72d3m2ywF/b1+duIsxmitUhvHqI5Ji6i Vci6VKlVOuMEsqw51CiNlxgm8hI7aDQ+wDutJfcOmIf+MeVL0ezbNNNZ2usAQtUh6WcC m+jJ9qncJXXEF+XNSMY3mLapGPAKd8BMlYFq+17nE/AYmS8hWJbNAiZhqrrcZuFyKzkR wL8KRLtOZ7lUhvEMK74g42lPfykNsC/6L6h+WTycMSeF0NrgamVxtZPZeQFMorg9TPV1 73uQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530sgS1KOH+3uOTAr7da6BYY/qprQV8fAyTSSeg5+84fkMFMs0DE ppnjRcKKWLisIysRRIa9QkSyohPZSQo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwzsf3doMTJb5Aivd6niIo8dc/anFREzcGo16FbegI/CSEVG7UzvCx25j2yxE38hCy1k0edlQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:bb0e:: with SMTP id r14mr6354142wrg.159.1608322429162; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 12:13:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9sm16328701wrc.87.2020.12.18.12.13.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 18 Dec 2020 12:13:48 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun To: ng0 Subject: Re: bug#27237: wicd-curses: `urwid' is not available References: <20170604172733.yjynd7zsgasvsjsw@abyayala> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 21:09:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20170604172733.yjynd7zsgasvsjsw@abyayala> (ng0@pragmatique.xyz's message of "Sun, 4 Jun 2017 17:27:33 +0000") Message-ID: <86bleqvpun.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, On Sun, 04 Jun 2017 at 17:27, ng0 wrote: > On a minimal, Xless system when you install wicd through your > system configuration and try to start wicd-curses, > you get a traceback: > > File "/gnu/st [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: pragmatique.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (zimon.toutoune[at]gmail.com) -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.221.45 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.221.45 listed in wl.mailspike.net] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 27237 Cc: 27237@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Hi, On Sun, 04 Jun 2017 at 17:27, ng0 wrote: > On a minimal, Xless system when you install wicd through your > system configuration and try to start wicd-curses, > you get a traceback: > > File "/gnu/store/aaaaaaaa-wicd-1.7.4/share/wicd/curses/wicd-curses.py", line 44, in import urwid > ImportError: No mouled named urwid > > Which is strange since it is in the inputs, so I'm thinking > maybe it needs to be wrapped? I haven't put much though to > a solution yet. Is it still relevant? If yes, someone could provide moreinfo? All the best, simon From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 18 17:41:50 2020 Received: (at 27237-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Dec 2020 22:41:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40396 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kqORa-0000ri-Ee for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 17:41:50 -0500 Received: from sender4-of-o50.zoho.com ([136.143.188.50]:21027) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kqORY-0000rZ-Ek for 27237-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 17:41:49 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1608331306; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=iXHjPBs92iHkKBvErK8/AZqNGozFmtJk5IOoTc7AUW0SMRE4wpdKPj9QRIUD78FVLzTiCDW7mit1bvZgfJazqGQ+E/9aGwepeh0Gtq3c564u8oxd1hMWZIUg+48KeWo/gwmNVTaXQX6uyOPKTcbqxi+PWP/9MX2J8doswzTleqQ= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1608331306; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=wMX+djySGSFqG21J4rJtwzO1HWhpDhsV1DdlPKtIegU=; b=F5llAZWIKH+NtTliu8v5dJpgkOKSYANoFCtd7Q2en5xevp/whTmVfQ/pA3omJC0uRsopzKC6zxomtQ91O7MFLq76BY5tErl0AM4rfy/rKJ7Gl/1IU2kakofPppsbjdwuhFk13eF1n3j77BwhBe1j5XpJqRReuSK3gl5+kHc+GEA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1608331306; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=wMX+djySGSFqG21J4rJtwzO1HWhpDhsV1DdlPKtIegU=; b=gJZm5H20PtnPIdMBUW3o5DLhuMsVQJAGsaIkYIaBBh4TcAsJUAHngCK+U7y4RcYp 4exqpbGq8Hni/x6B/gy/R5Q2NxSZjI+Wq6QFN8y3DI5l0KfEZo+GgxdITLoePiPmOX1 5Yj+gH00QlJvTKmmBQ0mg0rUCPxs7NMgcCi/WKRk= Received: from localhost (p54ad49ce.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.73.206]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1608331304887956.890421954585; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 14:41:44 -0800 (PST) References: <20170604172733.yjynd7zsgasvsjsw@abyayala> <86bleqvpun.fsf@gmail.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: zimoun Subject: Re: bug#27237: wicd-curses: `urwid' is not available In-reply-to: <86bleqvpun.fsf@gmail.com> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 23:41:41 +0100 Message-ID: <87k0ten3dm.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: zimoun writes: > Hi, > > On Sun, 04 Jun 2017 at 17:27, ng0 wrote: >> On a minimal, Xless system when you install wicd through your >> system configuration and try to start wicd-curses, >> you g [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: pragmatique.xyz (xyz)] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [136.143.188.50 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [136.143.188.50 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 27237-done Cc: 27237-done@debbugs.gnu.org, ng0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) zimoun writes: > Hi, > > On Sun, 04 Jun 2017 at 17:27, ng0 wrote: >> On a minimal, Xless system when you install wicd through your >> system configuration and try to start wicd-curses, >> you get a traceback: >> >> File "/gnu/store/aaaaaaaa-wicd-1.7.4/share/wicd/curses/wicd-curses.py", = line 44, in import urwid >> ImportError: No mouled named urwid >> >> Which is strange since it is in the inputs, so I'm thinking >> maybe it needs to be wrapped? I haven't put much though to >> a solution yet. > > Is it still relevant? If yes, someone could provide moreinfo? > > I cannot reproduce this: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix environment --ad-hoc --pure wicd -- wicd-curses /gnu/store/68pb6kcqfc38xk8rn7whmplfq77viwva-wicd-1.7.4/bin/.wicd-curses-rea= l: line 3: mkdir: command not found Can't connect to the daemon, trying to start it automatically... Can't automatically start the daemon, this error is fatal... Error connecting to wicd via D-Bus. Please make sure the wicd service is ru= nning. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- While wicd-curses fails for unrelated reasons, it does *not* fail to load urwid. I=E2=80=99m closing this issue. --=20 Ricardo From unknown Fri Aug 15 22:18:09 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 12:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator