GNU bug report logs - #27231
regression?: grub-configuration for grub-efi does not return a bootloader-configuration

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Alex Kost <alezost <at> gmail.com>
To: "pelzflorian \(Florian Pelz\)" <pelzflorian <at> pelzflorian.de>
Cc: Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe <at> gmail.com>, 27231 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#27231: regression?: grub-configuration for grub-efi does not return a bootloader-configuration
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2017 22:49:55 +0300

pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) (2017-06-04 16:25 +0200) wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 04:38:11PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote:
>> This is a limitation of 'grub-configuration' macro: that backtrace
>> happened because you have 'grub' field *not* in the first place of your
>> 'grub-configuration'.
>>
>> […]
>>
>> Note that this will work if you put (grub grub-efi) in the first place:
>> 
>>   (grub-configuration (grub grub-efi)
>>                       (device "/dev/sda"))
>>
>
> Ah… Thank you for clarifying.
>
>   (bootloader (grub-configuration (grub grub-efi)
>                                   (device "/dev/sda")))
>
> I just tried and this fails too with the same error. I’m not sure why
> it does not match the syntax rule for grub-configuration.

Hm, strange, it doesn't give me that error when 'grub' is in the first
place.  Anyway, I would use 'bootloader-configuration' instead as you do
it now.

> This macro seems complicated and unintuitive. I don’t like how a
> syntax rule feigns being a record definition but isn’t and therefore
> breaks things… Why not just inherit bootloader-configuration?

I don't know, it's better to ask Mathieu (Cc-ed) who made these changes
in the bootloader code.

-- 
Alex

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.