GNU bug report logs - #27231
regression?: grub-configuration for grub-efi does not return a bootloader-configuration

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian <at> pelzflorian.de>

Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 10:47:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: notabug

Done: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian <at> pelzflorian.de>
To: Alex Kost <alezost <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 27231 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#27231: regression?: grub-configuration for grub-efi does not return a bootloader-configuration
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 16:25:13 +0200
On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 04:38:11PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote:
> This is a limitation of 'grub-configuration' macro: that backtrace
> happened because you have 'grub' field *not* in the first place of your
> 'grub-configuration'.
>
> […]
>
> Note that this will work if you put (grub grub-efi) in the first place:
> 
>   (grub-configuration (grub grub-efi)
>                       (device "/dev/sda"))
>

Ah… Thank you for clarifying.

  (bootloader (grub-configuration (grub grub-efi)
                                  (device "/dev/sda")))

I just tried and this fails too with the same error. I’m not sure why
it does not match the syntax rule for grub-configuration.

This macro seems complicated and unintuitive. I don’t like how a
syntax rule feigns being a record definition but isn’t and therefore
breaks things… Why not just inherit bootloader-configuration?

Regards,
Florian




This bug report was last modified 7 years and 344 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.