GNU bug report logs -
#27156
smu
Previous Next
Reported by: ng0 <ng0 <at> pragmatique.xyz>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 01:05:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 27156 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 27156 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#27156
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Wed, 31 May 2017 01:05:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
ng0 <ng0 <at> pragmatique.xyz>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
.
(Wed, 31 May 2017 01:05:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
This adds smu (simple markup).
I've been using this in production for a while.
Does it belong in markdown.scm? Technicaly it is not markdown,
but it's the closest I could find when I moved it from my
package repo to the guix repo.
--
ng0
OpenPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
[0001-gnu-Add-smu.patch (text/plain, attachment)]
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#27156
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Fri, 02 Jun 2017 22:36:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 27156 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
ng0 <ng0 <at> pragmatique.xyz> writes:
> This adds smu (simple markup).
> I've been using this in production for a while.
>
> Does it belong in markdown.scm? Technicaly it is not markdown,
> but it's the closest I could find when I moved it from my
> package repo to the guix repo.
I think we can rename 'markdown.scm' to 'markup.scm' to make it more
generic. There doesn't appear to be any users of this module in the tree.
Would you like to give it a go? Also, I'm sure you can get commit access
if you ask for it, we could use more reviewers ;-)
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#27156
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sat, 03 Jun 2017 19:56:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 27156 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
Marius Bakke transcribed 1.1K bytes:
> ng0 <ng0 <at> pragmatique.xyz> writes:
>
> > This adds smu (simple markup).
> > I've been using this in production for a while.
> >
> > Does it belong in markdown.scm? Technicaly it is not markdown,
> > but it's the closest I could find when I moved it from my
> > package repo to the guix repo.
>
> I think we can rename 'markdown.scm' to 'markup.scm' to make it more
> generic. There doesn't appear to be any users of this module in the tree.
Okay.
> Would you like to give it a go?
I would prefer if someone else did this, I have to work on other
tasks. I could do it if no one else picks it up in a while.
> Also, I'm sure you can get commit access
> if you ask for it, we could use more reviewers ;-)
As I'm currently preparing to get commit access to ftp.gnu.org
for gnURL in the scope of GNUnet, I will have an savannah account soon.
However I don't see the gain in having commit access to Guix.
My work is around Guix and based on Guix and I know how to follow
the standards etc, but any way works for me. If Ricardo or Ludovic
want to give me commit access, it'll happen sooner or later. Last
time we spoke about this 1 year ago I think.
As for reviewing, I'm pretty much busy with my own work. I have the
set of packages I maintain more or less, but I only have time to review
very rarely.
--
ng0
OpenPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#27156
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Thu, 08 Jun 2017 18:35:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 27156 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Appended v2.
--
ng0
OpenPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
[0001-gnu-Rename-gnu-packages-markdown-to-gnu-packages-mar.patch (text/plain, attachment)]
[0002-gnu-Add-smu.patch (text/plain, attachment)]
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Reply sent
to
Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Fri, 09 Jun 2017 22:16:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
ng0 <ng0 <at> pragmatique.xyz>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Fri, 09 Jun 2017 22:16:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #19 received at 27156-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
ng0 <ng0 <at> pragmatique.xyz> writes:
> Appended v2.
Pushed, thanks!
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sat, 08 Jul 2017 11:24:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 8 years and 33 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.