GNU bug report logs - #27152
deprecation warnings with Guile 2.2.2

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>

Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 20:32:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: wontfix

Done: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #11 received at 27152 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>, 27152 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#27152: deprecation warnings with Guile 2.2.2
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 17:39:59 -0700
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net> skribis:
>
> > I get a couple of deprecation warnings with Guile 2.2.2, for example
> >
> >     Import (ice-9 threads) to have access to `current-processor-count'.
> >     `_IOFBF' is deprecated.  Use the symbol 'block instead.
>
> We can fix the first one with #:use-module (ice-9 threads).
>
> The second one is just a pain: in 2.2 one is supposed to write
>
>   (setvbuf port 'block)
>
> instead of
>
>   (setvbuf port _IOFBF)
>
> So we could do:
>
>   (cond-expand (guile-2.2 (define _IOFBF 'block))
>                (else #t))
>

in some central place (that doesn’t exist), but really, that’s annoying.
>
> So I’m tempted to do nothing.
>
> Note that normally users do not see these deprecation warnings at all.
>
> Thoughts?
>

Why not let good old sed have a run at it? Seems like a simple find and
replace operation, and 'block looks nicer than _IOFBF to my eyes.

Maxim
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 7 years and 272 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.