GNU bug report logs - #27145
document GuixSD system recovery process + document bournish and recovery/guile repl

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: ng0 <ng0 <at> pragmatique.xyz>
Subject: bug#27145: closed (Re: bug#27145: document GuixSD system recovery
 process + document bournish and recovery/guile repl)
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 23:20:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#27145: document GuixSD system recovery process + document bournish and recovery/guile repl

which was filed against the guix package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 27145 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
27145: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=27145
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: ng0 <ng0 <at> pragmatique.xyz>
Cc: 27145-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#27145: document GuixSD system recovery process + document
 bournish and recovery/guile repl
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 00:18:07 +0100

Hi,

Since I get:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
 ** Delivery incomplete **

 There was a temporary problem while delivering your message to ng0 <at> pragmatique.xyz.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

and the initial submitter wrote:

  <http://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2020-12-01.log#230743>
  <http://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2020-12-01.log#235356>

and it is tagged moreinfo with the message…

On Tue, 01 Dec 2020 at 19:49, zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 30 May 2017 at 12:02, ng0 <ng0 <at> pragmatique.xyz> wrote:
>> Currently neither bournish nor the guile recovery repl are documented
>> in a way which is helpful for a person which isn't technical
>> knowledged running into the unhappy case of a system which doesn't
>> boot. In fact both are not even mentioned in our documentation
>> and the built in help is not sufficient.
>
> Could you explain more what you are expecting?

…so I conclude: closing!


All the best,
simon

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: ng0 <ng0 <at> pragmatique.xyz>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: document GuixSD system recovery process + document bournish and
 recovery/guile repl
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 12:02:23 +0000

[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]

Currently neither bournish nor the guile recovery repl are documented
in a way which is helpful for a person which isn't technical
knowledged running into the unhappy case of a system which doesn't
boot. In fact both are not even mentioned in our documentation
and the built in help is not sufficient.
-- 
ng0
OpenPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.