GNU bug report logs -
#27145
document GuixSD system recovery process + document bournish and recovery/guile repl
Previous Next
Reported by: ng0 <ng0 <at> pragmatique.xyz>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 12:03:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: moreinfo
Done: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Thu, 03 Dec 2020 00:18:07 +0100
with message-id <867dpz23ww.fsf <at> gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#27145: document GuixSD system recovery process + document bournish and recovery/guile repl
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #27145,
regarding document GuixSD system recovery process + document bournish and recovery/guile repl
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
27145: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=27145
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
Currently neither bournish nor the guile recovery repl are documented
in a way which is helpful for a person which isn't technical
knowledged running into the unhappy case of a system which doesn't
boot. In fact both are not even mentioned in our documentation
and the built in help is not sufficient.
--
ng0
OpenPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Hi,
Since I get:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
** Delivery incomplete **
There was a temporary problem while delivering your message to ng0 <at> pragmatique.xyz.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
and the initial submitter wrote:
<http://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2020-12-01.log#230743>
<http://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2020-12-01.log#235356>
and it is tagged moreinfo with the message…
On Tue, 01 Dec 2020 at 19:49, zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 30 May 2017 at 12:02, ng0 <ng0 <at> pragmatique.xyz> wrote:
>> Currently neither bournish nor the guile recovery repl are documented
>> in a way which is helpful for a person which isn't technical
>> knowledged running into the unhappy case of a system which doesn't
>> boot. In fact both are not even mentioned in our documentation
>> and the built in help is not sufficient.
>
> Could you explain more what you are expecting?
…so I conclude: closing!
All the best,
simon
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 227 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.