GNU bug report logs -
#27044
[PATCH 1/3] gnu: video: Add libzen.
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
"Ethan R. Jones" <doubleplusgood23 <at> gmail.com> writes:
> * gnu/packages/video.scm (libzen): New variable.
> ---
> gnu/packages/video.scm | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/video.scm b/gnu/packages/video.scm
> index b7c26a042..bc3fa48b8 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/video.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/video.scm
> @@ -2052,3 +2052,39 @@ file format that has been used as a multimedia file format in a variety of platf
> applications. It is a very powerful and extensible format that can accommodate
> practically any type of media.")
> (license license:mpl1.1)))
> +
> +(define-public libzen
> + (package
> + (name "libzen")
> + (version "0.4.35")
> + (source (origin
> + (method url-fetch)
> + (uri (string-append "https://mediaarea.net/download/source/"
> + name "/" version "/"
> + name "_" version ".tar.bz2"))
> + (file-name (string-append name "-" version ".tar.bz2"))
Is it necessary to set a file-name here? IMO $name_$version is fine, but
the linter may have a different opinion.
> + (sha256
> + (base32
> + "12a1icgcffgv503ii2k1453kxg5hfly09mf4zjcc80aq8a6rf8by"))))
> + (native-inputs
> + `(("autoconf" ,autoconf)
> + ("automake" ,automake)
> + ("libtool" ,libtool)))
> + (build-system gnu-build-system)
> + (arguments
> + '(#:phases
> + ;; build scripts not in root of archive
> + (modify-phases %standard-phases
> + (add-before
> + 'configure 'pre-configure
> + (lambda _
> + (chdir "Project/GNU/Library")))
> + (add-before 'configure 'autogen
> + (lambda _
> + (zero? (system* "./autogen.sh")))))))
> + (home-page "https://github.com/MediaArea/ZenLib")
> + (synopsis "C++ utility library")
> + (description "ZenLib is a C++ utility library. It includes classes for handling
> +strings, configuration, bit streams, threading, translation, and cross-platform
> +operating system functions.")
> + (license license:bsd-2)))
I don't think video.scm is a good location for this package definition.
Though I'm not sure which module is most appropriate. Maybe 'code.scm'?
Or perhaps create a "cpp.scm" for these generic C++ libraries?
PS: No need to open separate bugs, you can just send the updated patches
here. Bonus points if you add a subject prefix like "PATCH v2" for the
next batch.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 8 years and 51 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.