From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 23 12:39:02 2017 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 May 2017 16:39:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34964 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dDCpq-0006Jk-4H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2017 12:39:02 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43231) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dDCpn-0006JG-Tp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2017 12:39:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDCph-0004wI-P9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2017 12:38:54 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:44054) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDCph-0004wC-Ly for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2017 12:38:53 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34183) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDCpg-000803-By for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2017 12:38:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDCpc-0004tl-GP for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2017 12:38:52 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:39125) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDCpc-0004tI-CF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2017 12:38:48 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB7E020A23; Tue, 23 May 2017 12:38:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 23 May 2017 12:38:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=content-type:date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=lEX IV7xKLI1Lhx4Cd6THWHYNx7kjFCwM2qGSlW5TUwU=; b=RtYnShOQCPQsCrZXiCW zlZzVekRuIu9YgccKfLNXduhcdu7RKYefOvfm7fTxY6jyJ0I3gSNLxTYUffraki1 xXb+Ht99bAKUXnzqnGQAtv5szD4UmM0n6XTiSRtfXhn+AoqV169UD/RgbpkE9/HU Saap9UpEnCH6C++7ZPSKqusY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=lEXIV7xKLI1Lhx4Cd6THWHYNx7kjFCwM2qGSlW5TU wU=; b=WDYiDajYL8ZnwXiePScJPAA2C0lbRb/1Kv17L1ggjnAWRsmrHF6/hWiAf fjTDUNuSkhZYq658rUrx2ZNqgTGnapFpXl2vQhL2wDXb4PtDDotjXLvzs95Q7Avg TKikDMEdOEICrkl0H9QEmqQOZ2SvQ1zuRx7x7MzLbD6DZWJ904f9bOKCRSiPaNm3 DoFcx4wnbFsAOYprHo+R0V1XorUmvynFERVb20uC+oU3CKmpslyiM8EI5vtbRtg/ w+SpDGriAMJn/QvFTlChV1bXs5mS6sySYUrmOuKU8J0bAAw8i5kQEvGm36ppNPa0 NMw2htZsgAwpiOF1lQ8N6WmyI+Y9g== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: LHcsB6XHkSlDGO2MLetzK4Kqcu75sWPrXRJGH76jZQwA 1495557527 Received: from localhost (50-254-163-34-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.254.163.34]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9A93C7E1D7 for ; Tue, 23 May 2017 12:38:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 12:24:31 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: (tests guix-download) fails when DNS is bogus Message-ID: <20170523162431.GB15379@jasmine> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="eJnRUKwClWJh1Khz" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.2 (2017-04-18) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) --eJnRUKwClWJh1Khz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline The guix-download test includes this snippet: ------ # Make sure it fails here. if guix download http://does.not/exist then false; else true; fi ------ Unfortunately, many ISPs (such as T-Mobile) return bogus results for otherwise unclaimed domain names, causing this test to fail. Does anyone know if there is some domain that is designed to fail as a "standard", as is intended to be used for examples of good domains? --eJnRUKwClWJh1Khz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlkkYj8ACgkQJkb6MLrK fwixsRAAowCZvG4EZxxG9nGCKgmSANAgAbj/1Iq7veLFc6S/MCTTgSDW7hpnQPpy iOIILkHuKEDdMXbgcadncmdvOXZ0DZMw8ywSPkfkr5vPWr05W8HKIWRatvyYX0kd bqAyF4SsVa24+ZfOlvy51YADRmweu2d+h+wxp+x2b8UPauW5HgS0IOdEAC57C86j Zy6rgOirYh7p+FJWnhpVEPqQR9LaZmhUejBV3VZacU5UrMd5QwWnnH6hu5m6RiN6 dU5E7UB0DIFEfYojirFFdMj9zKRIMNeD0mXzFld8j4+q3g+NZhLg15hnOORlYzgS jUGDO25xDxQORVQaH1KjBqU3XJvg5C7kpDNMGoO7c7za54t4rVndxOlS3w5OCNf8 ck+XNNvqFNgdFiJfJTbar5zrsKBQsDswi2wtcfPg6RqSeFBXnBkrhzLwN+xSpvXZ I44YkC2jxmOK+DjSNo3u1bFkzVOW8fd90XdO3UtfIYGVh2466ySHSzmh1AM01oom P22BrPdIgF6ZdbW87DNSyD/uZIRy5y1yRnmGCUtub/pQekF4kxStNOaYaQKRZSnx 8ohlIoFizwKuJAup03j8GzqwXiPS5V5cDgtcrFaypzz99MqHkfF2upSLfJcdEPpu ajy96H8gK/Y1j1j4N+3nNVRrs6bNLZgjKjMVj6j8PQK+2eFu1AM= =H/x/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --eJnRUKwClWJh1Khz-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 23 12:47:12 2017 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 May 2017 16:47:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34976 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dDCxk-0006W9-7L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2017 12:47:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45233) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dDCxj-0006Vj-IN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2017 12:47:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDCxd-00008g-JB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2017 12:47:06 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:43405) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDCxd-00008Y-Fb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2017 12:47:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36192) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDCxc-0000UN-E6 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2017 12:47:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDCxb-00007E-Kh for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2017 12:47:04 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-x244.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::244]:34384) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDCxb-00006x-Ev for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2017 12:47:03 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-x244.google.com with SMTP id w69so28782175pfk.1 for ; Tue, 23 May 2017 09:47:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :subject:to:from:message-id; bh=qFoLKRz91YdzEAuX9S/Cd1i+kaHsw9vBiK4zFIcAW1A=; b=R5USLXhy1v00WZv6yr9MV2e02hsP//04Cea+aTdWg/hbidPlY41wOH3Bw60sjQ73E6 qt2S0IFZgqtQa6yTgZTbwOuu7O5l8CRnqjmHz96CNma58jdvER2knl7/++30SqdM8M5X jgBGl+UKmPrz6IEhCIkZXsDZHjZqP1ubh3wZ9NuE5TwiHq0CEVmeI59jGLBHCRFun6Lz 3ViVA4/0A9Bo1eTIsyJVdOCAq37/IZBvH0lrL68NTz2dAHUyM6iUezm2HUUxle5OPUFb D8mAbXxjaIJmYAW/zU5B6aNug2XM9HyF/s+wZSfWRdEmlJ826VV7AY2Jk4Hg3zUbtajZ hoCw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:subject:to:from:message-id; bh=qFoLKRz91YdzEAuX9S/Cd1i+kaHsw9vBiK4zFIcAW1A=; b=cvlK2hRVnzL6g4HUvS+T6tXJMh2yG819FUfYIbTPqD4Vol8lcKCthpwie8RrlAm8vc yJ4FQa3dY9NN2bMvmEi3iHte1X4L43fTLVOB2go0BpY9UyAqMOGY20+nTcybYuF88EE+ pyVm0fAez1GY5R5rxb8gDjFGWGIKAHEu6OKzrFx2jiqnTx2N3VdZJGsWN1LhX5XsxId6 KHrWAODgYeDTo6XkbegOdVX7Faay8iZ6klfmU37A7Osqwee/jw3+xdpHo0qAojcPviTN qQvALAJsh7wligrHALb3xh8ngpWIZBWjKiMvGYc0JFaTkg49/8zK3zRGM9IG6j5Zmb+y dxFg== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcC+a2IS/6RrupWB4Nej9lo4Ua9bug3z6C0jvRCDXuFi+iy6mdT8 DiPYi+eRPnIkYlz+ X-Received: by 10.84.141.36 with SMTP id 33mr36288137plu.99.1495558022094; Tue, 23 May 2017 09:47:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2620:15c:2c3:fd00:5584:e076:3f13:ebb4? ([2620:15c:2c3:fd00:5584:e076:3f13:ebb4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e76sm2297449pfh.121.2017.05.23.09.47.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 23 May 2017 09:47:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 16:47:02 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20170523162431.GB15379@jasmine> References: <20170523162431.GB15379@jasmine> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: bug#27039: (tests guix-download) fails when DNS is bogus To: bug-guix@gnu.org,Leo Famulari ,27039@debbugs.gnu.org From: Maxim Cournoyer Message-ID: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) On May 23, 2017 9:24:31 AM PDT, Leo Famulari wrote: >The guix-download test includes this snippet: > >------ ># Make sure it fails here=2E >if guix download http://does=2Enot/exist >then false; else true; fi >------ > >Unfortunately, many ISPs (such as T-Mobile) return bogus results for >otherwise unclaimed domain names, causing this test to fail=2E > >Does anyone know if there is some domain that is designed to fail as a >"standard", as is intended to be used for examples >of good domains? Could we simply mock the expected response? Maxim From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 23 13:07:27 2017 Received: (at 27039) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 May 2017 17:07:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34991 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dDDHK-0006zC-Vf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2017 13:07:27 -0400 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:45954) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dDDHJ-0006z4-Bb for 27039@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2017 13:07:26 -0400 Received: from [10.9.9.127] (helo=rmmprod05.runbox) by mailtransmit03.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dDDHH-00070q-Vf for 27039@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2017 19:07:24 +0200 Received: from mail by rmmprod05.runbox with local (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dDDHH-0002gK-UV for 27039@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2017 19:07:23 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from [Authenticated user (892961)] by runbox.com with http (RMM6); for <27039@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 23 May 2017 17:07:23 GMT From: To: "27039" <27039@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Re: bug#27039: (tests guix-download) fails when DNS is bogus Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 19:07:23 +0200 (CEST) X-Mailer: RMM6 In-Reply-To: <20170523162431.GB15379@jasmine> Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 27039 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Tue, 23 May 2017 12:24:31 -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > The guix-download test includes this snippet: >=20 > ------ > # Make sure it fails here. > if guix download http://does.not/exist > then false; else true; fi > ------ >=20 > Unfortunately, many ISPs (such as T-Mobile) return bogus results for > otherwise unclaimed domain names, causing this test to fail. >=20 > Does anyone know if there is some domain that is designed to fail as a > "standard", as is intended to be used for examples > of good domains? http://fail.0 fails to resolve with "ping: bad address 'fail.0'. This was run on an OpenN= IC connected computer.= From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 23 17:03:29 2017 Received: (at 27039) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 May 2017 21:03:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35159 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dDGxk-00045I-QU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2017 17:03:29 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33856) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dDGxj-000455-51 for 27039@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2017 17:03:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDGxY-0002xI-W7 for 27039@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2017 17:03:21 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:39309) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDGxY-0002xD-TK; Tue, 23 May 2017 17:03:16 -0400 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:41268 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dDGxY-0006NS-AZ; Tue, 23 May 2017 17:03:16 -0400 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: bug#27039: (tests guix-download) fails when DNS is bogus References: <20170523162431.GB15379@jasmine> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 4 Prairial an 225 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 23:03:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20170523162431.GB15379@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Tue, 23 May 2017 12:24:31 -0400") Message-ID: <87shjv70by.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 27039 Cc: 27039@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Leo Famulari skribis: > The guix-download test includes this snippet: > > ------ > # Make sure it fails here. > if guix download http://does.not/exist > then false; else true; fi > ------ > > Unfortunately, many ISPs (such as T-Mobile) return bogus results for > otherwise unclaimed domain names, causing this test to fail. Yes, this has been reported several times in the past and marked as =E2=80=9Cwontfix=E2=80=9D. :-) > Does anyone know if there is some domain that is designed to fail as a > "standard", as is intended to be used for examples > of good domains? There=E2=80=99s an RFC defining example.org et al. These domain names are guaranteed to exist, so we=E2=80=99d be testing something different; also, I don=E2=80=99t know if the RFC defines pages guaranteed to be 404, for insta= nce. Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jun 04 17:04:51 2017 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jun 2017 21:04:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56179 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dHchf-0000n9-1D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 17:04:51 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41210) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dHchd-0000mt-DG for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 17:04:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHchV-0007TW-Ax for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 17:04:44 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:58328) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHchV-0007TQ-7R for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 17:04:41 -0400 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:56284 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dHchU-0005fb-Ib for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 17:04:41 -0400 Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2017 23:04:38 +0200 Message-Id: <87vaobh3bt.fsf@gnu.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: control message for bug #27039 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) tags 27039 wontfix close 27039 From unknown Wed Jun 18 00:21:38 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator