Subject: Re: bug#27016: possible bug in `defsetf'

From: [email-masked]
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 21:50:55 -0400

tags 27016 wontfix
close 27016
quit

> Can't you just `defsetf' unconditionally to a named function, and change
> that function's definition when appropriate (in a conditional)?

Or just

    (eval-and-compile
      (unless t
        (defsetf foobar setcar)))

Anyway, I don't see any likely solutions to make this work exactly as
before, so I'm going to close this as wontfix, but feel free to continue
discussing (and/or say that I'm wrong).