Subject: Re: bug#26947: Preserve read-only when debugger with let-bound inhibit-read-only t.

From: Keith David Bershatsky <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 11:05:59 -0700

Yes, let-binding is indeed better than using `setq`.  Thank you.

Keith

;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

DATE:  [05-17-2017 06:34:15] <17 May 2017 09:34:15 -0400>
FROM:  Stefan Monnier <[email-masked]>
> 
> ***
> 
> Actually, the better option is probably to
> 
>     (let ((inhibit-read-only nil))
> 
> around debug, like we already do with various other variables.
> 
> ***