GNU bug report logs -
#26908
Fwd: Trimming strings, /emacs/lisp/emacs-lisp/subr-x.el modification
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 26908 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 26908 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#26908
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 13 May 2017 13:37:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Jean-Christophe Helary <jean.christophe.helary <at> gmail.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Sat, 13 May 2017 13:37:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Since nobody reacted in the last 3 days, I guess that means there is nothing to change, so I'm sending the patch here.
Jean-Christophe
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Jean-Christophe Helary <jean.christophe.helary <at> gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Trimming strings, /emacs/lisp/emacs-lisp/subr-x.el modification
> Date: May 10, 2017 23:26:04 GMT+9
> To: Emacs developers <emacs-devel <at> gnu.org>
>
> Hopefully last fixes.
>
> I've added the \\(?: ... \\) parens to make sure we capture any potential issue with \|.
>
> Is there anything else I've missed ?
>
> Jean-Christophe
>
>
> ===========================
> Add optional regexps for subr-x.el trimming functions
>
> * lisp/emacs-lisp/subr-x.el (string-trim-left, string-trim-right, string-trim): add optional regexps that default on the original behavior.
> ===========================
>
>
>
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
[subr-x.el.diff (application/octet-stream, attachment)]
[Message part 4 (text/html, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#26908
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 16 May 2017 22:22:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 26908 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Nobody is interested in checking/commiting that ? If it's something I should not have touched in the first place, please somebody tell me to drop it...
Jean-Christophe
> On May 13, 2017, at 22:36, Jean-Christophe Helary <jean.christophe.helary <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Since nobody reacted in the last 3 days, I guess that means there is nothing to change, so I'm sending the patch here.
>
> Jean-Christophe
>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>> From: Jean-Christophe Helary <jean.christophe.helary <at> gmail.com <mailto:jean.christophe.helary <at> gmail.com>>
>> Subject: Re: Trimming strings, /emacs/lisp/emacs-lisp/subr-x.el modification
>> Date: May 10, 2017 23:26:04 GMT+9
>> To: Emacs developers <emacs-devel <at> gnu.org <mailto:emacs-devel <at> gnu.org>>
>>
>> Hopefully last fixes.
>>
>> I've added the \\(?: ... \\) parens to make sure we capture any potential issue with \|.
>>
>> Is there anything else I've missed ?
>>
>> Jean-Christophe
>>
>>
>> ===========================
>> Add optional regexps for subr-x.el trimming functions
>>
>> * lisp/emacs-lisp/subr-x.el (string-trim-left, string-trim-right, string-trim): add optional regexps that default on the original behavior.
>> ===========================
>>
>>
> <subr-x.el.diff>
>>
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#26908
; Package
emacs
.
(Wed, 17 May 2017 02:27:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 26908 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Jean-Christophe Helary <jean.christophe.helary <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 07:21:19 +0900
> Cc: emacs-devel <emacs-devel <at> gnu.org>
>
> Nobody is interested in checking/commiting that ?
I usually wait for a week at least, to let people comment. So please
be a bit more patient.
Thanks for working on this.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#26908
; Package
emacs
.
(Wed, 17 May 2017 03:42:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 26908 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Thank you Eli. I was not aware of the procedure. I have no problem waiting :)
JC
> On May 17, 2017, at 11:26, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> From: Jean-Christophe Helary <jean.christophe.helary <at> gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 07:21:19 +0900
>> Cc: emacs-devel <emacs-devel <at> gnu.org>
>>
>> Nobody is interested in checking/commiting that ?
>
> I usually wait for a week at least, to let people comment. So please
> be a bit more patient.
>
> Thanks for working on this.
Reply sent
to
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Fri, 19 May 2017 11:31:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Jean-Christophe Helary <jean.christophe.helary <at> gmail.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Fri, 19 May 2017 11:31:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #19 received at 26908-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Jean-Christophe Helary <jean.christophe.helary <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 13 May 2017 22:36:11 +0900
>
> Since nobody reacted in the last 3 days, I guess that means there is nothing to change, so I'm sending the patch here.
Thanks, pushed.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sat, 17 Jun 2017 11:24:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 7 years and 364 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.