GNU bug report logs - #26899
bbs100

Previous Next

Full log

Message #19 received at 26899 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 26899 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#26899] bbs100
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 18:57:28 +0200

zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> writes:

> On Fri, 12 May 2017 at 17:34, ng0 <ng0 <at> pragmatique.xyz> wrote:
>> This adds bbs100. For possible past reviews search the guix-devel <at> gnu.org archive.
>> -- 
>> https://pragmatique.xyz
>> PGP: https://people.pragmatique.xyz/ng0/
>>
>> From 09746bd8021235c7c27bae10b4574011ea4e7f2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: ng0 <ng0 <at> we.make.ritual.n0.is>
>> Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 00:37:52 +0000
>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add bbs100.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/bbs.scm: New file.
>> * gnu/local.mk (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add bbs.scm.
>> ---
>>  gnu/local.mk         |  1 +
>>  gnu/packages/bbs.scm | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 76 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 gnu/packages/bbs.scm
>
> What is the status of this old patch?  Does it make to review it?

The source code has disappeared and the home page says that it’s
deprecated.

I’m not opposed to adding it, though perhaps not in its own module.
But if the only person interested in adding it no longer cares about it,
I think we can close this issue.

-- 
Ricardo

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.