GNU bug report logs - #26815
[PATCH 0/3] Hybrid UEFI disk image

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>

Date: Sun, 7 May 2017 14:36:02 UTC

Severity: important

Tags: patch

Done: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #22 received at 26815 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
Cc: 26815 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#26815: [PATCH 3/3] vm: Support EFI boot in base image.
Date: Sun, 7 May 2017 17:18:14 +0200
Hi Marius,

> +      (system* "grub-mkstandalone" "-O" "x86_64-efi" "-o"
> +               (string-append efi-directory "/EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.EFI")
> +               ;; Embed the contents of grubdisk.cfg.
> +               (string-append "boot/grub/grub.cfg=" target
> +                              "/tmp/grubdisk.cfg"))

Check return value of system* ?

>                    (partitions (list (partition
>                                       (size #$(- disk-image-size
> -                                                (* 10 (expt 2 20))))
> +                                                (* 50 (expt 2 20))))

<https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/EFI_System_Partition> says:

>According to a Microsoft note[2], the minimum size for the EFI System Partition (ESP) would be 100 MB, though this is not stated in the UEFI Specification. Note that for Advanced Format 4K Native drives (4-KB-per-sector) drives, the size is at least 256 MiB, because it is the minimum partition size of FAT32 drives (calculated as sector size (4KB) x 65527 = 256 MiB), due to a limitation of the FAT32 file format. 

Is this relevant for us?

Also, <https://gist.github.com/Apsu/4108795> says that F32 is not required for most UEFI firmwares. FAT12, FAT32 usually work.  But better be safe than sorry, I guess.

> +                                     (size (* 40 (expt 2 20)))
> +                                     (label "gnu-esp")
> +                                     (file-system "vfat")

Is it really vfat with long file names and everything? Or only FAT32 (with short file names)?

I ask because a lot of UEFT file names look as if they are for FAT32 with their short all-uppercase names.




This bug report was last modified 8 years and 46 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.