GNU bug report logs -
#26802
Single source file emacs packages get a ".el.el" extension
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
I've pushed the other uncontroversial patches.
> It would be a linter only for *.el files, is that what you mean? AFAIK
> we do not have such specific linters, but yeah, why not, I think it's a
> good idea.
No, it will be a linter for all packages, not just emacs packages.
The following is the current linter for checking source file names. I
have a couple of issues with it, in addition to the new linter feature I
am suggesting. Let me explain.
> (define (check-source-file-name package)
> "Emit a warning if PACKAGE's origin has no meaningful file name."
> (define (origin-file-name-valid? origin)
> ;; Return #t if the source file name contains only a version or is #f;
> ;; indicates that the origin needs a 'file-name' field.
Isn't this logic somehow backward? Should'nt a predicate called
`file-name-valid?' return #t if the file name is valid, and #f
otherwise? This seems to be doing the opposite of that, returning #f if
the file name is valid, and #t otherwise.
> (let ((file-name (origin-actual-file-name origin))
> (version (package-version package)))
> (and file-name
> (not (or (string-prefix? version file-name)
> ;; Common in many projects is for the filename to start
> ;; with a "v" followed by the version,
> ;; e.g. "v3.2.0.tar.gz".
> (string-prefix? (string-append "v" version) file-name))))))
I think this check can be done by matching against a single regexp like
so:
(string-match (string-append "^v?" version) file-name)
In addition to this logic, we add an extra condition that makes sure the
version is some substring of the source file name, like so:
(string-match version file-name)
With this new check, single source file packages like
emacs-transpose-frame, etc. which did not have file-name fields would
have raised a lint warning.
> (let ((origin (package-source package)))
> (unless (or (not origin) (origin-file-name-valid? origin))
> (emit-warning package
> (G_ "the source file name should contain the package name")
> 'source))))
> P.S. Could you please keep my email in Cc? It would be easier to
> follow the discussion for me, thanks.
Sorry, I thought debbugs does some magic to send out mails to everybody
involved in a specific bug. Didn't realize it was only using Cc. Will
keep you in Cc for this and future mails.
This bug report was last modified 8 years and 87 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.