GNU bug report logs - #26713
[PATCH] gnu: Move netsurf to web-browsers.scm.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Kei Kebreau <kei <at> openmailbox.org>

Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 22:11:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Kei Kebreau <kei <at> openmailbox.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #22 received at 26713 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Kei Kebreau <kei <at> openmailbox.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Cc: 26713 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#26713: [PATCH] gnu: Move netsurf to web-browsers.scm.
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 18:17:30 -0400
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Kei Kebreau <kei <at> openmailbox.org> writes:

> Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> writes:
>
>> On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 06:09:42PM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote:
>>> * gnu/packages/web.scm: Move netsurf...
>>> * gnu/packages/web-browsers.scm: ...here.
>>
>> This caused building Guix to fail because the glib-or-gtk build-system
>> module was not imported in (gnu packages web-browsers).
>>
>
> Oh no! :(
>
>> I planned to add that module in a followup commit, but I realized that
>> several other variables from (gnu packages web) need to be imported in
>> (gnu packages web-browsers) along with this change, and I decided to
>> revert the change for now.
>>
>> Can you take another look at moving this package?
>
> Will do. I'll have to adjust the qutebrowser patch for corrections to
> this one.

Try the attached patch. I'm not sure that copying the definition of
netsurf-buildsystem is the best way to handle the move, but I'm not sure
this is worth making netsurf-buildsystem a publicly-defined package.

Thoughts?

[0001-gnu-Move-netsurf-to-web-browsers.scm.patch (text/plain, attachment)]
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 8 years and 95 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.