From unknown Sat Sep 13 02:52:52 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#26671 <26671@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#26671 <26671@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: serf package (guix dependency) tests fail Reply-To: bug#26671 <26671@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2025 09:52:52 +0000 retitle 26671 serf package (guix dependency) tests fail reassign 26671 guix submitter 26671 Maxim Cournoyer severity 26671 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Apr 26 17:18:41 2017 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Apr 2017 21:18:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42058 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3UKf-0007BV-6K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 17:18:41 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54895) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3UKd-0007BI-Nt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 17:18:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d3UKX-0005ji-Fz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 17:18:34 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:36365) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d3UKX-0005jP-CH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 17:18:33 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45866) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d3UKW-0005QN-6C for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 17:18:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d3UKV-0005iP-8F for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 17:18:32 -0400 Received: from mail-yb0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c09::22d]:33321) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d3UKV-0005iF-3v for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 17:18:31 -0400 Received: by mail-yb0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id 11so3542841yby.0 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 14:18:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=SWGi2jSLeNHA9gNqmdsvkmwUSNkWSEOJZCe8LOCiDL8=; b=gfC7tFgqfGUyrMPv+k367JeWwz6wCRpA2nNcYzoIf55PVZzmBHFKuF9fAHpf08lQWU mW8qHlYXb1V6NoacrSc7J0Aq+GUJl1Le/elT7gnHVQAJiOpamCuqw+QPiR2PWJF1AAXw wZpKa87HWJwqn3/ug3fOhEM+N0+jD9ZKAi+BSLZuzfB28WhdRXf12+IPR58vShlB8lQC Q0aSQd9mefVwWqdllG0qLoG9iO/jmuXulN1XnsVPG8RdDRbwTxx5RFT5/As+M63qQ9yj 7nOeOavWyX0+zb5En+ZZgmj23MnUOST8u3mqHGvelMjZWbZLi3Lrst8GuMuUkBEWL9z3 4wcQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=SWGi2jSLeNHA9gNqmdsvkmwUSNkWSEOJZCe8LOCiDL8=; b=R4Vmes3BHGCl0GAMQcJJ9tPB+Q7YbYDOpGAq/KcUWRRfTmEiC/6FLMHpsyJw12txPO HoPfWnZiaX40hgrW1+8eT3obzVb0LTMQOTfMPJVLk6OJ8uEVEFYwJJ7MQhHd36Al8tNU QkdMc+MVg6quXyL21N2zxXtsHCvVkuRDpfDzzpupmOXxDqGqxEK9DZcaz1B6IQm405KS 2zAQDgWaqot6z6e5ml7DrsNH+wuNakkARG6BgE6AkDUr2n3AeRKtHEyoHS4eenhTcr3p KfN642Pe0iqUudsPwwQqHjFQJLhvlpY0W5HsCSMO2upeV3x9x2huakscNFECW8yILUY1 zOdg== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/6Ax123d2UL6oMPpyqMUC7gldy+P+CCX8UenXjuqbmbeUfHLOta 8O6jipAaagshiw1IqA4J+5QjmN4Az5wgaJk= X-Received: by 10.37.54.4 with SMTP id d4mr1713148yba.106.1493241510341; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 14:18:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.129.72.68 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 14:18:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 14:18:30 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: serf package (guix dependency) tests fail To: bug-guix Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) Hello Guix! While attempting to "guix environment guix" after doing a "git pull" in my guix checkout (master), it attempted to build many packages (bash, gcc, etc.) and failed building `serf' due to test failures: ............F.FFF.FFF.FF.FFFFF................................... There were 14 failures: 1) test_ssl_trust_rootca: test/test_util.c:438: expected <0> but was <120199> 2) test_ssl_certificate_chain_with_anchor: test/test_util.c:438: expected <0> but was <120199> 3) test_ssl_certificate_chain_all_from_server: test/test_util.c:438: expected <0> but was <120199> 4) test_ssl_no_servercert_callback_allok: test/test_util.c:438: expected <0> but was <120170> 5) test_ssl_large_response: test/test_util.c:438: expected <0> but was <120170> 6) test_ssl_large_request: test/test_util.c:438: expected <0> but was <120170> 7) test_ssl_client_certificate: test/test_util.c:438: expected <0> but was <120170> 8) test_ssl_future_server_cert: test/test_util.c:438: expected <0> but was <120199> 9) test_setup_ssltunnel: test/test_util.c:438: expected <0> but was <120170> 10) test_ssltunnel_basic_auth: test/test_context.c:2116: expected <0> but was <120170> 11) test_ssltunnel_basic_auth_server_has_keepalive_off: test/test_context.c:2116: expected <0> but was <120170> 12) test_ssltunnel_basic_auth_proxy_has_keepalive_off: test/test_context.c:2116: expected <0> but was <120170> 13) test_ssltunnel_basic_auth_proxy_close_conn_on_200resp: test/test_context.c:2116: expected <0> but was <120170> 14) test_ssltunnel_digest_auth: test/test_util.c:438: expected <0> but was <120170> !!!FAILURES!!! Runs: 65 Passes: 51 Fails: 14 == Testing test/testcases/simple.response == == Testing test/testcases/chunked.response == == Testing test/testcases/deflate.response == == Testing test/testcases/chunked-trailers.response == == Testing test/testcases/chunked-empty.response == == Running the unit tests == ERROR: test(s) failed in test_all scons: *** [check] Error 1 scons: building terminated because of errors. phase `check' failed after 51.6 seconds builder for `/gnu/store/sgavfd7s3f4xixvfhdqb2nn77fvbf63q-serf-1.3.8.drv' failed with exit code 1 @ build-failed /gnu/store/sgavfd7s3f4xixvfhdqb2nn77fvbf63q-serf-1.3.8.drv - 1 builder for `/gnu/store/sgavfd7s3f4xixvfhdqb2nn77fvbf63q-serf-1.3.8.drv' failed with exit code 1 guix build: error: build failed: build of `/gnu/store/sgavfd7s3f4xixvfhdqb2nn77fvbf63q-serf-1.3.8.drv' failed This particular output was triggered by runnnig "guix build --check serf" on a foreign distro, but I also had serf test failures on GuixSD. Maxim From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 27 09:54:19 2017 Received: (at 26671) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Apr 2017 13:54:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42422 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3js9-0007uG-Hp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 09:54:17 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:58415) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3js8-0007u9-82 for 26671@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 09:54:16 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7744205C4; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 09:54:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 27 Apr 2017 09:54:15 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=zbv9ck9ay6blejGl7UsUbHHNc3yJ9mx+R+IxQ31QT Ko=; b=dEv5FhwjYTUDLQobjOIxDE+y1ZRcgEL4Spg43aoituad/+5mUZorhS/hO XBHfP6iZMEWoTO9KogZoySOW/snRky6zZzYaTv8+EYbdzKEoS8tPJfSbKmt5XbUb xe/7PhWDy7KFRfsL2r31U55xxxK13Y2XyhBcF8dnJn4JfN5iQhwizbGlHl+2e77y ay7Q5c0Te+gloZU6CwVzxMoqwu0XUr+iDG/O0thi1B9wnDqPWA4k5QT3OnWHtw+j 8+QxSXUssMHTuaL6vDy1TZ77WrGvzrb4TK3IS6HEsDX7XBPdD5WHoB8akj0q1ALz DYa1XYH0r9ubyB+j7RlcBkeV3l65w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=zbv9ck9ay6blejGl7U sUbHHNc3yJ9mx+R+IxQ31QTKo=; b=g4v9L0se+bkUA9IICXm3F/ybSuFPF0pfU8 sEXI650yUuzOKn+4K2LpLAZDDvaGWBuaiCB+AXdQ3kjHcDkJ112/3OhmA2xFivd0 bUNzD66EbCPONOYrCmSDTJUc8NdRZceisj4n7xneAhi9D80975BCF/QhheTy6MWs KtSLaPZNSr8OXc91/oCcmNQBqI3Mk4KSstDDqet5n3zYV5aQ9KCxVq8cUE6SvIOy FSfLyHQgxuUe0cMSBGjXWeJaxbn+9FgozVQlYVMl/hNio4a3dN2wJt0SdPEZXwG3 p7/Ib3kG1rNORS/qZam4Fk5XhXiSihO9PmqxS5xoQR0PpWrSsLlQ== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: t+syP2mAZBN7ENe7QXLtVuWvgewKNjss097b1qt8vqTI 1493301255 Received: from localhost (unknown [188.113.81.93]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6FDA07E971; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 09:54:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Marius Bakke To: Maxim Cournoyer , 26671@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#26671: serf package (guix dependency) tests fail In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Notmuch/0.24.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.2.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 15:54:13 +0200 Message-ID: <87bmric5x6.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26671 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Maxim Cournoyer writes: > Hello Guix! > > While attempting to "guix environment guix" after doing a "git pull" > in my guix checkout (master), it attempted to build many packages > (bash, gcc, etc.) and failed building `serf' due to test failures: > > ............F.FFF.FFF.FF.FFFFF................................... > > There were 14 failures: > 1) test_ssl_trust_rootca: test/test_util.c:438: expected <0> but was <120199> > 2) test_ssl_certificate_chain_with_anchor: test/test_util.c:438: > expected <0> but was <120199> > 3) test_ssl_certificate_chain_all_from_server: test/test_util.c:438: > expected <0> but was <120199> > 4) test_ssl_no_servercert_callback_allok: test/test_util.c:438: > expected <0> but was <120170> > 5) test_ssl_large_response: test/test_util.c:438: expected <0> but was <120170> > 6) test_ssl_large_request: test/test_util.c:438: expected <0> but was <120170> > 7) test_ssl_client_certificate: test/test_util.c:438: expected <0> but > was <120170> > 8) test_ssl_future_server_cert: test/test_util.c:438: expected <0> but > was <120199> > 9) test_setup_ssltunnel: test/test_util.c:438: expected <0> but was <120170> > 10) test_ssltunnel_basic_auth: test/test_context.c:2116: expected <0> > but was <120170> > 11) test_ssltunnel_basic_auth_server_has_keepalive_off: > test/test_context.c:2116: expected <0> but was <120170> > 12) test_ssltunnel_basic_auth_proxy_has_keepalive_off: > test/test_context.c:2116: expected <0> but was <120170> > 13) test_ssltunnel_basic_auth_proxy_close_conn_on_200resp: > test/test_context.c:2116: expected <0> but was <120170> > 14) test_ssltunnel_digest_auth: test/test_util.c:438: expected <0> but > was <120170> > > !!!FAILURES!!! > Runs: 65 Passes: 51 Fails: 14 The SSL certificates in "test/server" expired 18/04. https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1792234 I'll try to port this patch, but "viewvc" can't give binary diffs, so will have to clone it locally first. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlkB+AYACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPqhPgf/Qgm19j4uWg96CwilOgTvmInBdQoQa30LP+2Einz7C6OBHoKh6isj+P52 CzwwEwJcbd4JaQrM2QZHrbuRyYzJNzM8bxh6UuJ9SZQgVfORUqG6Hz2iwTJ5mGWi waULi+JCW0qNCSkfq2LZrcOUMlNQT//dgGCiht//4A7h62PnzLXmNtTO9RuE0fFA /zXIPew43gHmdBS8+JNan2WjOqDM9cUstivtwkuO3G+erblNCtplRDUpFFEgKGPR LpRlY6TQgXt9Ru9eRBpNvr3TyP5rT/1I+Gzlsf6Ukx7yr2k57KjODe5ARylzkng4 KM5t5w5Gi0zH+CSZwJ7H/U9ZfZ4a2Q== =V6Qw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 27 10:19:23 2017 Received: (at 26671) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Apr 2017 14:19:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42952 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3kGQ-0000BW-Ni for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 10:19:22 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:47001) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3kGO-0000BN-Ov for 26671@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 10:19:21 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73787204FE; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 10:19:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 27 Apr 2017 10:19:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=1ErF6nIvGZiMLx3LhymU9nQtG/E99YG5Sy95pUrVr uk=; b=qe1ttXNZlW1sMBW3n/DUpLcnOiH+MS3HonIMqlwbkNcWSfkFXKKVv111J gKyiWsV2XXT1jNQ5rQygZ2Vl+fF8vGnHoDUHESYtEOq4j/ia6sRR7orisFKCMl3t hm1rcdO3lqmOwFshkL8UW6vyJQ34OBgIzLW6aqGQpHcUaQOH+FVi1GzO9vG/vRQg AkN/ccT5Vz9Hz7lr7TwHtvY2WW47O0ECWyOHIGohYnMnfOw3XhRYhS3mTT/LdvFI OtWBZiDyT9NNRFUI9TRS2W2uwwPxUDLKzMAyco81yqJbzHC1awLKtvHGyMG/gXJm fbupKPrxn2Rq7eHzN6gMeYr6vkJpQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=1ErF6nIvGZiMLx3Lhy mU9nQtG/E99YG5Sy95pUrVruk=; b=V2Y+aZNshFNhb/vdd/8bd83w0cllBXjGd5 RWHFz/w2crIFz/Ym/jYxuNfl6a/Z9Gz9+TY+FsbGyzh21MV/mMOzNUf6tSQo5omi qNLY8Xu2EP0UFpJoukJfzgJrDXeKCcFhvVkWQLLaShhIt88Bq2dqriMwIdhTed0I eKN2uo/hJYfCgl1Y1grYNX80a+OA6IQZveKS5qSnA0ljXWJW5ApKAxV3HNjagirB EGoxaWUyR+Q/jXHi0n0XmCPTR8njD8ypAkRTGDJoMW5TpOS58i4P0OKAdGcgDw8U GkFCK+tNh8wDf+PSNtITV/FYB+py3T3cCVwwuwQIlYxVSmMaM65A== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: Qa2q2MgUeqtG0emJB9xyEfIkDUlTeVavS34hJFbyZBNK 1493302759 Received: from localhost (unknown [188.113.81.93]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EC74F7E670; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 10:19:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Marius Bakke To: Maxim Cournoyer , 26671@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#26671: serf package (guix dependency) tests fail In-Reply-To: <87bmric5x6.fsf@fastmail.com> References: <87bmric5x6.fsf@fastmail.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.24.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.2.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 16:19:18 +0200 Message-ID: <878tmmc4rd.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26671 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Marius Bakke writes: > Maxim Cournoyer writes: > >> Hello Guix! >> >> While attempting to "guix environment guix" after doing a "git pull" >> in my guix checkout (master), it attempted to build many packages >> (bash, gcc, etc.) and failed building `serf' due to test failures: >> >> ............F.FFF.FFF.FF.FFFFF................................... >> >> There were 14 failures: >> 1) test_ssl_trust_rootca: test/test_util.c:438: expected <0> but was <120199> >> 2) test_ssl_certificate_chain_with_anchor: test/test_util.c:438: >> expected <0> but was <120199> >> 3) test_ssl_certificate_chain_all_from_server: test/test_util.c:438: >> expected <0> but was <120199> >> 4) test_ssl_no_servercert_callback_allok: test/test_util.c:438: >> expected <0> but was <120170> >> 5) test_ssl_large_response: test/test_util.c:438: expected <0> but was <120170> >> 6) test_ssl_large_request: test/test_util.c:438: expected <0> but was <120170> >> 7) test_ssl_client_certificate: test/test_util.c:438: expected <0> but >> was <120170> >> 8) test_ssl_future_server_cert: test/test_util.c:438: expected <0> but >> was <120199> >> 9) test_setup_ssltunnel: test/test_util.c:438: expected <0> but was <120170> >> 10) test_ssltunnel_basic_auth: test/test_context.c:2116: expected <0> >> but was <120170> >> 11) test_ssltunnel_basic_auth_server_has_keepalive_off: >> test/test_context.c:2116: expected <0> but was <120170> >> 12) test_ssltunnel_basic_auth_proxy_has_keepalive_off: >> test/test_context.c:2116: expected <0> but was <120170> >> 13) test_ssltunnel_basic_auth_proxy_close_conn_on_200resp: >> test/test_context.c:2116: expected <0> but was <120170> >> 14) test_ssltunnel_digest_auth: test/test_util.c:438: expected <0> but >> was <120170> >> >> !!!FAILURES!!! >> Runs: 65 Passes: 51 Fails: 14 > > The SSL certificates in "test/server" expired 18/04. > > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1792234 > > I'll try to port this patch, but "viewvc" can't give binary diffs, so > will have to clone it locally first. Apparently "patch" does not yet support binary diffs either: patching file test/test_buckets.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 1232 (offset -91 lines). patching file test/server/serfcacert.pem File test/server/serfclientcert.p12: git binary diffs are not supported. patching file test/server/serfrootcacert.pem patching file test/server/serfserver_expired_cert.pem patching file test/server/serfserver_future_cert.pem patching file test/server/serfservercert.pem patching file test/server/serfserverkey.pem source is under 'serf-1.3.8' applying '/gnu/store/qbh97afjjgkn332f8ncn6k8pg74wfc8w-serf-comment-style-fix.patch'... applying '/gnu/store/vk533j8s56nhlzz2hnqn853xb9yl6b6y-serf-update-test-certificates.patch'... builder for `/gnu/store/3kcz9as8i986fxqj368n6cg3k7nhj7cq-serf-1.3.8.tar.xz.drv' failed to produce output path `/gnu/store/n4479kx0qx8rblzqnwgxg7jnp1x1xyjh-serf-1.3.8.tar.xz' I'll try to run `git apply` in a phase instead, although that will almost double the reverse dependencies of "git". --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlkB/eYACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPpIIQgAlViBBjMmwKkvFWGJ0gm2PyNixswM71BRBZsbIHP5xrA8IIQiL7jKVbj4 5c7HfnSEYCixhWYkEShOHw1qjlU2VZ8z996hDTYNm3IjiNuA8tDKnPggHUp8Aqb8 Y1uitQMyPqU/6tN3J9/JyDvJXrZiqQjIAz8rRGpS7vkKPYUH4tTEyyPxzfb0jEc6 pUKgOdYO9C4ruMwv6PKQpvuB7OW6I1LEHqManNj2nHtXRa2k5atFPCiy9CVdcZim tJZnC07w8XOyqHd1XPEFZWyyz04ErpAiU/pC1DPVUMF/O5V9E2ub4e1AACpZVbeo nqu1wJi6OmdtvXKQBRqhrZ2rFTwqpg== =Q+g9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 27 10:39:56 2017 Received: (at 26671) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Apr 2017 14:39:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42969 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3kaJ-0000fg-O4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 10:39:55 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:42827) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3kaI-0000fZ-Ky for 26671@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 10:39:54 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA5620936; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 10:39:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 27 Apr 2017 10:39:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=iyYzzYP9/JNzLA+1sdXi2MKaDqELbeHHYNf7h/G9B bI=; b=b49O84o18mNrh1z7xiWE5zM5swPrqtJWZEyibVLjsIguoV1McfeqQODRl QSJZxi2cue5WhxAtPL5UWBaeZmYFu1EwdNKjHhqv/5AVCIchhPr+yr2ODo65uULy reILmKVzjWGavtzwFUnweocyO71FEJWHSDagOqPQX7isxL90ybmGWKpbu8eUa8w1 hq/GHKQhQ85sMam5YhWlV9jnQP/WBdPicHzyefalKTzyfS2OXQs80A+G8mmJJ6ES oqwW++OumTwygR+mS5Y0Gu6lQb5dGeTTIPz+WESe3XjScHnB5KrYDM6+7ihr3fze 4cqOyy+le6dCTq9+LxVjjRIep0clw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=iyYzzYP9/JNzLA+1sd Xi2MKaDqELbeHHYNf7h/G9BbI=; b=aZN+YFcI5vRPerPZCHz4Dihr3LJ+AvF8Rq xrzv9EadWl7eKlxTYzRi+uPoY+LDChnpmIB/kUiTeHvX6CslQ0cfNH/dgGbt/UBN JVTisUyBZre8hxnt5Vq9PbApWyhKyLfOSx0e0PO3Bz2mU3pIIR8m5fsQMWlcN5s4 mSDKodDsWp9MkvfA2OGVjxayjIlwtD7HqtrFVQiCvhppMkL14EPcqM2tDma6gjHq 2nl12NjwYVQwvw4C54/raEApRTwKOB5WJdETikZ+ujPatiwtbQXnb5amHaWGOpFz 6d5A0r3TmzPt8c2G057M3qVJxZBPJCtmRBq6M5hzZsa5QeMmbTrw== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: NvzNsb8OvO2zzbDAc+Q/29XEFKQTLQ3/2Ylew8bDdklj 1493303994 Received: from localhost (unknown [188.113.81.93]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1BBC47E442; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 10:39:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Marius Bakke To: Maxim Cournoyer , 26671@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#26671: serf package (guix dependency) tests fail In-Reply-To: <878tmmc4rd.fsf@fastmail.com> References: <87bmric5x6.fsf@fastmail.com> <878tmmc4rd.fsf@fastmail.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.24.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.2.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 16:39:52 +0200 Message-ID: <8760hpdidj.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26671 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Marius Bakke writes: > Marius Bakke writes: > >> Maxim Cournoyer writes: >> >>> Hello Guix! >>> >>> While attempting to "guix environment guix" after doing a "git pull" >>> in my guix checkout (master), it attempted to build many packages >>> (bash, gcc, etc.) and failed building `serf' due to test failures: >>> >>> ............F.FFF.FFF.FF.FFFFF................................... >>> >>> There were 14 failures: >>> 1) test_ssl_trust_rootca: test/test_util.c:438: expected <0> but was <120199> >>> 2) test_ssl_certificate_chain_with_anchor: test/test_util.c:438: >>> expected <0> but was <120199> >>> 3) test_ssl_certificate_chain_all_from_server: test/test_util.c:438: >>> expected <0> but was <120199> >>> 4) test_ssl_no_servercert_callback_allok: test/test_util.c:438: >>> expected <0> but was <120170> >>> 5) test_ssl_large_response: test/test_util.c:438: expected <0> but was <120170> >>> 6) test_ssl_large_request: test/test_util.c:438: expected <0> but was <120170> >>> 7) test_ssl_client_certificate: test/test_util.c:438: expected <0> but >>> was <120170> >>> 8) test_ssl_future_server_cert: test/test_util.c:438: expected <0> but >>> was <120199> >>> 9) test_setup_ssltunnel: test/test_util.c:438: expected <0> but was <120170> >>> 10) test_ssltunnel_basic_auth: test/test_context.c:2116: expected <0> >>> but was <120170> >>> 11) test_ssltunnel_basic_auth_server_has_keepalive_off: >>> test/test_context.c:2116: expected <0> but was <120170> >>> 12) test_ssltunnel_basic_auth_proxy_has_keepalive_off: >>> test/test_context.c:2116: expected <0> but was <120170> >>> 13) test_ssltunnel_basic_auth_proxy_close_conn_on_200resp: >>> test/test_context.c:2116: expected <0> but was <120170> >>> 14) test_ssltunnel_digest_auth: test/test_util.c:438: expected <0> but >>> was <120170> >>> >>> !!!FAILURES!!! >>> Runs: 65 Passes: 51 Fails: 14 >> >> The SSL certificates in "test/server" expired 18/04. >> >> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1792234 >> >> I'll try to port this patch, but "viewvc" can't give binary diffs, so >> will have to clone it locally first. > > Apparently "patch" does not yet support binary diffs either: > > patching file test/test_buckets.c > Hunk #1 succeeded at 1232 (offset -91 lines). > patching file test/server/serfcacert.pem > File test/server/serfclientcert.p12: git binary diffs are not supported. > patching file test/server/serfrootcacert.pem > patching file test/server/serfserver_expired_cert.pem > patching file test/server/serfserver_future_cert.pem > patching file test/server/serfservercert.pem > patching file test/server/serfserverkey.pem > source is under 'serf-1.3.8' > applying '/gnu/store/qbh97afjjgkn332f8ncn6k8pg74wfc8w-serf-comment-style-fix.patch'... > applying '/gnu/store/vk533j8s56nhlzz2hnqn853xb9yl6b6y-serf-update-test-certificates.patch'... > builder for `/gnu/store/3kcz9as8i986fxqj368n6cg3k7nhj7cq-serf-1.3.8.tar.xz.drv' failed to produce output path `/gnu/store/n4479kx0qx8rblzqnwgxg7jnp1x1xyjh-serf-1.3.8.tar.xz' > > I'll try to run `git apply` in a phase instead, although that will > almost double the reverse dependencies of "git". Never mind, "serf" is already a dependency of git (through "subversion"), so this did not work very well.. Perhaps we could have a "git-minimal" for cases like this? I suppose that could be useful for "git-fetch" as well. I'll give that a go shortly, unless there are better suggestions. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlkCArgACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPqehwf/ZrPRuj9LMYGV1VaNUk4L56CWNIrnoeUIw41wBVeSTop4e7T/gZx8MGHi FW/I84yE0m+tdZ0znPMdOeLZvhejl2dUGxHDcA1Iw1+yGxuqGbn0CsL/bR4ke+Ac t9SgwfQf8dpdH8MXZAVzImQcz9HNEz6y7DPqH7jnKlD31W9f1k2Z5sBJAyaLifHU ReHsDMF7EDFoG/qnSw1GSf9TYWRPP/Bk+btml4V4FwJAAiaiKTdCQSebz/YujxBp 2Vs+TZUDPSwzmZ5CL3yfN+0S3WJuVDsKKc+5mkhBMfJ0XdTh+NlLuNB/H4fetLx6 4ka55f/3ukuNnFzOnCQOZ9MSWT2gXg== =MUgr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 27 10:58:21 2017 Received: (at 26671) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Apr 2017 14:58:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42987 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3ks9-00014p-Ko for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 10:58:21 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:37919) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3ks8-00014i-0s for 26671@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 10:58:20 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C77052098A; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 10:58:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 27 Apr 2017 10:58:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=A6aCbBsVX8YohGG4cZNqpJnQpmtCrnHs6EtdnU 42yj0=; b=OysKmeqH2/ku7+SPbzS9JCXTfGt3o2cv+8QvAKaxx1+hf+22+t4viH KPIiKOHColfV9GH8uIDi2tdtUrCph0szSST2KvE7ilWEe9Br+d5zDH8PKoikcxPS 1N7gj5CbKzVelFabVq5d5zrRPELstfX7mVDef9P+YAYvV7owGp1kg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=A6aCbBsVX8YohGG4cZ NqpJnQpmtCrnHs6EtdnU42yj0=; b=PPWenZ1yTBBJEv+Tr31Bz+Hs7tX31I30E9 1tIu4Ey5D59WkrWfUSMcUaHmvBWelWVDogtIShyft+5wJa0f5pdne8n8vVc0Rhgc shl9PLARtOEH1ydG8SuGqUgD2YrqbzRJ2J4NjjYeZKJThfBkdYSnVvdOq+kns3Se NMS7/NtYK7NlRUDQZAPeCLF5U8fQubjXWOK9PSWDU2pMWsmmU8JiAY0naNR6TJb8 n19nFo69FD3p6VQYoBCWQmoRC+zt/5yoEVKIW39YnAOyT0hVkRQDkHXFEhe6IOfz L5NGGkRy/dGpIZV+3wj5Hxdn9iIyUfa6kd/lOfRJHGHhkQR36mtw== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: 4Xf7P4PQydWSyf36zB4mZdY7qOFxdXfewoC/c0AOGfqW 1493305099 Received: from localhost (96-93-23-225-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [96.93.23.225]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 65176248A4; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 10:58:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 10:58:17 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: Marius Bakke Subject: Re: bug#26671: serf package (guix dependency) tests fail Message-ID: <20170427145817.GA32045@jasmine> References: <87bmric5x6.fsf@fastmail.com> <878tmmc4rd.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <878tmmc4rd.fsf@fastmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.2 (2017-04-18) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26671 Cc: 26671@debbugs.gnu.org, Maxim Cournoyer X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 04:19:18PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote: > Apparently "patch" does not yet support binary diffs either: >=20 > patching file test/test_buckets.c > Hunk #1 succeeded at 1232 (offset -91 lines). > patching file test/server/serfcacert.pem > File test/server/serfclientcert.p12: git binary diffs are not supported. Perhaps we should avoid using binary patches in Guix, but I think you could use a patch with a binary diff by passing '--binary' to (patch-flags). I haven't tested it, however. --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlkCBwYACgkQJkb6MLrK fwjDFw//dC3ZHyR8TD3D2SJPEAbrhMTstLWQPId1QYDniVFrWoFRbEaYMkbMNr41 W+tP3F6K+nH9F5n88KnYygJSQf3J5AzrLnLlGdpFvTkf+K5F3jZnIFezRR/Zdqp3 fAO6DxHWVxZeUF6BdqmxqZBiBi14RaScwHpfY4JPPRWdV0gfHBwubqIsqZZ2YZeN w4cMwyCP99iA9lYo9I7BcVJrTx5WMZggSk8rJCGtHxALdF2ws62k8J5nCAjKswRx NyJ8OdLq4h//k9JGJCdsNHh5N6HxhIDDDm/UnNByn38DY7q4RPGwdqQfnxMeuAbW MXxXJOVsvD2Snv0Z5Qlxth0ewkWiaSKabcqhJQR82i33fjOOsCqSJZXFQbmUN5D4 7/CK/nallhDHBtjeYlXVSgjlrlTjclwykfh8/3Zh8naaJcaBhNnucGh1x7l4GPqH LoTKDaYqSCw45FjB1fkz7gMlRE3jzMAWBcUsjgE6orgsh/IqEJoD6EGaY9uIgKEi bevhunGgZRFruv5Gh8cgRwbvi689z9E1lzbPclVnOCkutjyza6UWHjkgRbcc850h ixD55a3bFTxpCwUMf1dfYuwAXPV3t1stR+JZdRBXQxnoIXGmx8N96lDWuSz4gjsn diZKan6UDQVGFZtjUrL/PpDtBe3AIZSZtDMpxnzHQMzGIVqr7xg= =l5+g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 27 11:04:49 2017 Received: (at 26671) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Apr 2017 15:04:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43006 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3kyP-0001FX-5k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 11:04:49 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:43861) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3kyM-0001FE-5q for 26671@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 11:04:46 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA3D2088D; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 11:04:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 27 Apr 2017 11:04:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=Uo+Wflouuw9e7OBFD+omhNELlJA582IeY7jLk6 wVwEY=; b=kPr8kxaHuJhPGh5yvWpFRFbzgNAlf8RtBIt6EB9e6Hv2cyfnw0tFrI zW1fiABGszaOBLgTcZMN3OHOyPg5N7pYP+oFOPm+6lbkrPV6efQTSy7r2PjpC8mh jN+jdH61/LrH+y5VyPl2yvIMJcNKIsPrNhT1jfYbO1OjENq0NfkB4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=Uo+Wflouuw9e7OBFD+ omhNELlJA582IeY7jLk6wVwEY=; b=TWxhbKQfYuybD6jigl7SBjnrpqCxxg6+rh tDUcSFAeHw/FhVpU0++nmWhJAsIC/JugZjlArnjNhi/2t5idQs6m+SxUvDHTXPQo LFuQnmWGmdRSRxwJa8S7qlt6Dh5/NdKRL8+LerU2hc6YLa7bEoS8ATlezaDwv7sa cSS3ewuhqdlA9bpSoiMrlUOvaJME24zvc6cO+asAR8svicij+2VMzg6GDAXQuKm5 WXsRmKEjatg6uKUUtyjYEKIUezT1mTqs5ErFrqVjYuI/+rqQkGD/0zjY4D/7J9yf uMMh8UU1qnE5xgEM2U5q2YWFogcO7TcFhe2PouSknp68TpgAMeJw== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: K1G9t/3QNVaKBqOD7lak3IydBAheb2ZqG96Na3RaqLOH 1493305484 Received: from localhost (96-93-23-225-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [96.93.23.225]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 553E0248A1; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 11:04:44 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 11:04:43 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: Marius Bakke Subject: Re: bug#26671: serf package (guix dependency) tests fail Message-ID: <20170427150443.GB32045@jasmine> References: <87bmric5x6.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mxv5cy4qt+RJ9ypb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87bmric5x6.fsf@fastmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.2 (2017-04-18) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26671 Cc: 26671@debbugs.gnu.org, Maxim Cournoyer X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --mxv5cy4qt+RJ9ypb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 03:54:13PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote: > Maxim Cournoyer writes: > > > > While attempting to "guix environment guix" after doing a "git pull" > > in my guix checkout (master), it attempted to build many packages > > (bash, gcc, etc.) and failed building `serf' due to test failures: > > > > ............F.FFF.FFF.FF.FFFFF................................... [...] > > !!!FAILURES!!! > > Runs: 65 Passes: 51 Fails: 14 >=20 > The SSL certificates in "test/server" expired 18/04. Terrible! This invalidates the entire dependency tree based on serf. In effect, it enforces an expiration date on these packages. > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=3Drevision&revision=3D1792234 Rather than using this workaround, which will stop working 2018-09-19, we should disable this test. We should also file an upstream bug asking them to fudge the date in their tests, so that we can run this test suite forever. GnuTLS uses this technique with the 'datefudge' tool. --mxv5cy4qt+RJ9ypb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlkCCIsACgkQJkb6MLrK fwjaoA//Y2G6hkBeh4xnd9ka0SR+r2ZGG/4S61mx7C5jIraZhZrIVD/+NNSkJv+t O1g8em3uoODmnI1TFs3XY1tRsmTZJttdLpG2/kZ9AZLLFtfF1hmkzuj4ZEfjr/Mn 2Xnzf5W+JpVA4hEDynFFqxBNdztnEr1fjjI/1KrNbZ+Yh2oTqk5pISnwbl8AuiAx eq0bjBdx/2NxkWIUPsqAzovIXLqgO1CQ64vzvta+4VleoTX4MrwZyHQ/Q5W2/Ycu NIVRWm8Hk9h8JRZiJuOdW2uZVBfx+lkllI9/pyM+zOcfpgcRJhwjH5H8l1oigvCV SNDJ72D5FoQ8kyxO0Xz29CZaf82s6s3FqWtCUVs4R2afEEI6swyP2h/dKbK4fjLI xrQRIG4nOib3JIzVuq075riE87sKklPJrQrzX6AK2AiQqFw2h3fhmG0Q1C2ZIRS/ Z5EiP7TipmF0xEDEhfJ+m1hv00yvzYnzUnwgN9QtYudhEXboZvsHdM6YgwsEGZhL wzFZh3xyDKCqAP794RUZ8xa3fik6a3YQkghUzjRcGdmFFItjPguhEXHrk4pAXMot eIivXO34BrZkI9hjAxa7zUQan+yAFWFwM0xxm/Qjcw1IrdBxJ+bSeWjAFt3dCjVx urj2QFJHzVCdiuopQ1alml1xnddixkBYYBW+nYJ0Tjkov2TtmdE= =KoXj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mxv5cy4qt+RJ9ypb-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 27 11:16:15 2017 Received: (at 26671) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Apr 2017 15:16:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43031 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3l9T-0001W7-6J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 11:16:15 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:48989) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3l9Q-0001Vy-78 for 26671@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 11:16:13 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1119420AF3; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 11:16:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 27 Apr 2017 11:16:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=+kiAw17RBIG6phAt2J4XBq/umiF/K/eUVkQ6kzJEC l8=; b=Xv25xT4mdgHW8OjpF4u3s7RuAd24xLm7RIRmpv1RSKo+pxn1dhImO8xvp eUCHuu5DxAUBa5wMOjTNq9VZYK3+5WYPKfwy0WML16HsN8+aJHKtBmjq+WX8EGQz MvuuJ3E9ECzP9HgvjuU6oPUqnMTAWI/V83SHrx+2aR+GQc9LW1G52sB9CAJtyi6o KRd7YyL+vOgsHMRYVAA/radzKKKMJCtWol9CfF9EG6c7ShuLD1QfbJkFW5PYphQN 2qKywsOJdlxc0Wouk0gPx3LvOexSbY81q/L01hRS5tmlslF+frIEt3NtAedHM+bo tIn2ALE8FbGAIarS8hbuAY5fgxjbQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=+kiAw17RBIG6phAt2J 4XBq/umiF/K/eUVkQ6kzJECl8=; b=VN0RoPpKkd0Hnxg5LMOtN5d0WSE4/QUK1s 82GjFF6PeG0xEKcVbLRCpVbGlebmbVIOMqnwCOyQWCdNecML6GszVtH7rDMv+HfA fzLnmWmfjbjg44SnVp9EbMGGkL//9APg+3+wpDaX4ml2sWSr/FavORlEUA3H/26f Okc+d+/zs3fSFHXW+Y6TE/HvjOFQLN5P+qS/gXXD0zzqtsA5ycM7nrzdpaJhRIRQ pjDrp0+Cz8hmnBJTYyyRsQokipdH4z2ZjOP/XVdLNC2H6jnLcg5HhJ4BALv3V4I/ rNiRt4E45f0ksmlKOWSkKmX/TemrGlTxQTkl22aqIy5pPQ8e7lBQ== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: Q+D0Lhr9jdKacohOCHkkvSbOC/XTwljTHbHIoXeW5Qx2 1493306171 Received: from localhost (unknown [188.113.81.93]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 954F87E352; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 11:16:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Marius Bakke To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: bug#26671: serf package (guix dependency) tests fail In-Reply-To: <20170427150443.GB32045@jasmine> References: <87bmric5x6.fsf@fastmail.com> <20170427150443.GB32045@jasmine> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.24.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.2.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 17:16:10 +0200 Message-ID: <8737ctdgp1.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26671 Cc: 26671@debbugs.gnu.org, Maxim Cournoyer X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Leo Famulari writes: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 03:54:13PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote: >> Maxim Cournoyer writes: >> > >> > While attempting to "guix environment guix" after doing a "git pull" >> > in my guix checkout (master), it attempted to build many packages >> > (bash, gcc, etc.) and failed building `serf' due to test failures: >> > >> > ............F.FFF.FFF.FF.FFFFF................................... > > [...] > >> > !!!FAILURES!!! >> > Runs: 65 Passes: 51 Fails: 14 >>=20 >> The SSL certificates in "test/server" expired 18/04. > > Terrible! This invalidates the entire dependency tree based on serf. In > effect, it enforces an expiration date on these packages. Good point. We should definitely avoid this. >> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=3Drevision&revision=3D1792234 > > Rather than using this workaround, which will stop working 2018-09-19, > we should disable this test. We should also file an upstream bug asking > them to fudge the date in their tests, so that we can run this test > suite forever. GnuTLS uses this technique with the 'datefudge' tool. Interesting, I was not aware of "datefudge". I'll disable these tests for now and create an upstream issue once I've learned more about the datefudge tool. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlkCCzoACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPoSlAgA1Wa3EMIvAmn3GYWBu06ASXUkU99ULV3HmdmH6CvDTLAwYqFAjKPxyo7+ K1cGbrCeGPCfMdFE/KmT6fQKtTNJewdVXqen9iW+ehRtkc+tMXV+bkp8EFdfEdly RzB09f18Tk6rjM/B5S5ukRPAnIdQFu8xkNMU8v/BRKd+ip+M4XJRnBAndcZzHjVF ZJbq+9XMbetXvE850qdMuIeUZN9HrpkYX/G7zIU3BJWHt3K0IIPOK6lKnRKu9Pz2 TfuFuc/8yfVFtNK9T7ULNJqg8UUy2vXBUC3JW2G2Q7rsDUcfI6EaJdWgaYLj+Rjl cvZHLH/IxHDI44NrKrwLovBT03fBNw== =PXeO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 27 12:01:42 2017 Received: (at 26671) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Apr 2017 16:01:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43074 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3lrR-0004P3-R3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 12:01:41 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:44097) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3lrP-0004Ou-3S for 26671@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 12:01:40 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D42EC20A33; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 12:01:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 27 Apr 2017 12:01:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=WaSCwEsuzOHn7JAWj+Nn6hIkAgZrJaYPz6cmYLOkY 5I=; b=wKKD6NckjR5tIS0li+O5HvVlPIS2QRnqckzJNf9WmfyyX30lGJKJRHfgb KC4/+cWnzn8eaZzDFMFkD5l/Nkj6gz8bFWJPEIdeodpyzjqPZ887U01fwRpdZ5ps 0mXJ6oJpgVCms4qUvhjG9+ah3h9gRPgWtaSrxmCXJqd4v+hROKCH6Ee72g/pIp+r 3zVKBODg0/K7sEniBgMhvEho+ldDWtSuTQYnHTGcUiPLcD4T7Yan4FxpJGq9swz7 K1i8UmTeP3tmM1SGb0n2CpDRu6O10PVJPRuCkdXZmdwWE4FD+39BOMSrnmb+IywQ /SZQmOUk4Sj7LXlNLH3KEDgW+rRBw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=WaSCwEsuzOHn7JAWj+ Nn6hIkAgZrJaYPz6cmYLOkY5I=; b=ZHOkRwJ9GkKsU4v5qM+CANH6FP8JcQhTy0 xSbsI9pzcnui7Ad/fwji2dGZdixC+9rat2LPlgFFUQE4qc3Ny2ayr5QxN505C58J MQQbE4SPcMHV15rTdE6Q2M36YMdln1GPXCiNnxz2Vda+qGwDlEjLDl/cG4CWyUZn LKzNWgpHcnJZKKCFFEy6zj5Lk2K2NrKJ/QYvqDqyK0iHYnMnJBdbPzS+9Euo9gDX g12KK49pQs/MyIHnScTpzqaDmt17dRfCSPxATeKA2b2gucHAHNgeQJ/ELDdKyFDw y6LHdmeOD1nz31wy5PQnGCCeEeIRk46hF+X3BDvhPS25zhaGXzmg== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: RgyDUWBiwhLN6RM92znu1n7JPDsMjUqikYqHniOXg/V6 1493308897 Received: from localhost (unknown [188.113.81.93]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 507647E8C4; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 12:01:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Marius Bakke To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: bug#26671: serf package (guix dependency) tests fail In-Reply-To: <8737ctdgp1.fsf@fastmail.com> References: <87bmric5x6.fsf@fastmail.com> <20170427150443.GB32045@jasmine> <8737ctdgp1.fsf@fastmail.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.24.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.2.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 18:01:35 +0200 Message-ID: <87zif1c00w.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26671 Cc: 26671@debbugs.gnu.org, Maxim Cournoyer X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Marius Bakke writes: > Leo Famulari writes: >>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1792234 >> >> Rather than using this workaround, which will stop working 2018-09-19, >> we should disable this test. We should also file an upstream bug asking >> them to fudge the date in their tests, so that we can run this test >> suite forever. GnuTLS uses this technique with the 'datefudge' tool. > > Interesting, I was not aware of "datefudge". > > I'll disable these tests for now and create an upstream issue once I've > learned more about the datefudge tool. I disabled these tests in decb4c26fa1c748b118e33495d5493d84a6ca6c9 and also pushed an update for 1.3.9. Leaving this bug open until the upstream issue is created so it can be added here as a reference. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlkCFd8ACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPqRPwf/S8697G+ZP/YDE1vheNC6Aofz/HoEpnm6/GzPHxNkyzf5120esXawSGVN KFlr350BDgGNGuGwbhT78Uzl6kj0IqI+l7KRMKPwXqAtXXvGjlb2VA3gRQhn+sJW /P5O73jO4+bDADaqG3ipguAI17IYolaWo3MzTSJAzC8XBw+OM7f2yl7RGOVdZiqd nTPVdec17bLE/yGkd+9Bg3AMK1n8rermA26kF9nzkUIwub/qj0HAL70BWyUc93Vs x9tBWHYNsDVTNC3EOaK3kmA+GBNWu7+jbrrYCRYNIBYOHJAaoB9e97JBUyXyDX+s ATqpOuIm60oddbyDbnm6pqfK1eGRQg== =TOD8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 27 13:13:35 2017 Received: (at 26671) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Apr 2017 17:13:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43127 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3mz1-0006BU-HI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 13:13:35 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f173.google.com ([209.85.192.173]:34404) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3myy-0006BB-Qk for 26671@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 13:13:34 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-f173.google.com with SMTP id c198so32819163pfc.1 for <26671@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 10:13:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:subject:to:cc:from:message-id; bh=vDAVeCCZN/9J7+OID0QpNmLfxyNdo+IaKX156wz6HVo=; b=eqqWF4gjePWcTMBjpNgvQSBSZ7iNFANRZDk+GMVNw5N63xQ88qLqlbpFplqtj1sPnp l4q6R/EQUnG1ScaVlE++1CT0IjoDvLJzE5S1fjbKIgJk81Vnk2EkuybAKPXZ5/4ArSy2 8sFoO4l1r0IYbaC02hTNrnoIDdDZBs2xg6xWb70b8NexEpcO/YfTP1UU6akPO9yucO1v x9Is9aUxE31I64umZa9p9OO9mMna96H4QRvPNs4h+i0mEn5MDlPHbP0/Wqdo4DbG6Bbv A+koWzgLcKM3jG/w+WGx1+k7htR722kQnCYjEhpx1P05QASMN1z1LHCGWkYqra5RpvcO TEyA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:user-agent:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:subject:to:cc:from :message-id; bh=vDAVeCCZN/9J7+OID0QpNmLfxyNdo+IaKX156wz6HVo=; b=eLJWRU/oE6lvHhALKrn7QY+5dUoCXO74tG/QW+XHVKIkmIXEUMg8kAjCLt1nV4RwUg OXFHPyJf99nedUv+Qb21M6Wv5JL8X5rwHxtIvQ4fDMxjA5Wq5Wi5pwoLOobshhWUIltj iw1aiKRPIdL6jv6k3+Hg3pbDYzgXmqjQRKf+8YZalG+tV6Jnla+1w9dDYG+5LKNfNdcu sC6Es002llfewwKwH3S0eBPCro9r6orkHNHSSydSqgxUqNRACuYUSo8Xcx3EyOAr5TsW 7UJYKJ99Cg5iLTycmgfg6rFsjSejAsVspIvmGByCtr1SCrHXiM9ShPQq5tHDfeXjbZdJ Vj2w== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/4QYKruWFqr35XgPswY9jDi7fmjXML12rZ19N0rGaTE//KUvQcf p874joJ9NNU3Tg== X-Received: by 10.98.198.210 with SMTP id x79mr7114012pfk.224.1493313207013; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 10:13:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2620:15c:2c3:fd00:91a5:74a7:321e:a010? ([2620:15c:2c3:fd00:91a5:74a7:321e:a010]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s83sm6404308pfa.128.2017.04.27.10.13.26 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 27 Apr 2017 10:13:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 10:13:25 -0700 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <87zif1c00w.fsf@fastmail.com> References: <87bmric5x6.fsf@fastmail.com> <20170427150443.GB32045@jasmine> <8737ctdgp1.fsf@fastmail.com> <87zif1c00w.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: bug#26671: serf package (guix dependency) tests fail To: Marius Bakke ,Leo Famulari From: Maxim Cournoyer Message-ID: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26671 Cc: 26671@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) On April 27, 2017 9:01:35 AM PDT, Marius Bakke wrot= e: >Marius Bakke writes: >> Leo Famulari writes: >>>> https://svn=2Eapache=2Eorg/viewvc?view=3Drevision&revision=3D1792234 >>> >>> Rather than using this workaround, which will stop working >2018-09-19, >>> we should disable this test=2E We should also file an upstream bug >asking >>> them to fudge the date in their tests, so that we can run this test >>> suite forever=2E GnuTLS uses this technique with the 'datefudge' tool= =2E >> >> Interesting, I was not aware of "datefudge"=2E >> >> I'll disable these tests for now and create an upstream issue once >I've >> learned more about the datefudge tool=2E > >I disabled these tests in decb4c26fa1c748b118e33495d5493d84a6ca6c9 and >also pushed an update for 1=2E3=2E9=2E > >Leaving this bug open until the upstream issue is created so it can be >added here as a reference=2E Thanks! :) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 08 07:46:06 2017 Received: (at 26671-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 May 2017 11:46:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33006 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d7h78-00021j-AA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2017 07:46:06 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:38911) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d7h75-00021Q-DM for 26671-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2017 07:46:05 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F2620703; Mon, 8 May 2017 07:46:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 08 May 2017 07:46:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=JS95eSfxS3PuCxr3QyYKXWt7i51n005hhg6d1I+CX Is=; b=TBkdwpNzwwSbjhbvEOy2rGJRMwdDEHlhhI3dUIZBFWXpVD32stoAZa53s fOwWg71iN6V2NVORlxjyqrMxOAoauMkaRIBaOZmv1tDCCmY2OF+B09wr3OCYOuaM TnqoOzTzIjaENb6YytJZ6bVOU9iEx5JtKLnPDip1tvulzNlZ6ABJkvtjxAsFO8Wh XAQwXUbaJG8iKp0wUiRFcD8kfO/CeAGGZw6P+Q02Kw+qNuN3/W6ZIlfxYIPzLFM7 V74pHiT9USZuO9IWo24IsLCLhlEfpqUbQqhBw56xPxjqfI0gP5IhVadR5pndG2CG Nek9PQ3/dVOnfDUqAiqDKKDt8E6yA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=JS95eSfxS3PuCxr3Qy YKXWt7i51n005hhg6d1I+CXIs=; b=jG36kqBwy/GqdfK18KGUUGccaLqzELDSAM gY6Q2SaCrIGS/Sy0IsSGAjD47Ee0hTtBPpYY1lFyck/tRzVg/TP+TAkljA09rQMy pvNSHFkX2CdIIjfrNgzADTYMrxN3UFHO/iaexn69MxIUsgq+ZdRWbv0D4DR0fNoA D71krZ3yg712i0R07Nms5Gu2gYPamR3m8MLGkA5aatrY4XTP1M3xaZ6Xg98f5u9w UaoXUlVDNlN9TkckaN5pF8dwQNQ5us3E1y9XuKgKJFu/Mi1XISHHVtJQrKy1xMCb LEtarnLvkSBYxCp5ym1RdfIEIuNRV9QjztX9wfJGBfRIMvDOJHxA== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: t2IU9wqYQQVMGMCU6bqx1zqlMepXr4z7KkB5zaTEDwpj 1494243961 Received: from localhost (unknown [188.113.81.93]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C1D4D7E9F7; Mon, 8 May 2017 07:46:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Marius Bakke To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: bug#26671: serf package (guix dependency) tests fail In-Reply-To: <87zif1c00w.fsf@fastmail.com> References: <87bmric5x6.fsf@fastmail.com> <20170427150443.GB32045@jasmine> <8737ctdgp1.fsf@fastmail.com> <87zif1c00w.fsf@fastmail.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.24.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.2.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 13:46:00 +0200 Message-ID: <87a86ny3k7.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26671-done Cc: 26671-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Maxim Cournoyer X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Marius Bakke writes: > Leaving this bug open until the upstream issue is created so it can be > added here as a reference. Filed here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SERF-184 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlkQWngACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPonvQgAqvWMhfVNVCpGqu22UErwZOGAwHluKy4uccSpRoL7M5pw9w8xH7zyqpI+ YgETPO71mMNTfZ5W5vD/zQje475lgfXAMWXF52TZODpaEs4IFsY0+uHozguoaDio /tY/G3lt9viAfl7MfepmHjZHrcHHmhVxzYA0ujkPjDjY0O10MGmUwqAQ+oJKAeBf vrH6Thfq3d3JW2bP232NNB3tLYvLYRCV5jWg9C+Pnt6vP+LejzzFRH0Oqq3B4VP0 sSW1Y66JLH1XHviIRXm97x5BfYYHTCgaWwVwpnHNoieCIgrRB1L5R1mgyi63gd0+ yHYxWhbZMTT7rHs+Ie2o41w4TAFTOQ== =LRgi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Sat Sep 13 02:52:52 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 11:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator