GNU bug report logs - #26650
26.0.50; Protect *Backtrace* from accidental killing

Previous Next

Full log

Message #45 received at 26650 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 26650 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, tino.calancha <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#26650: 26.0.50; Protect *Backtrace* from accidental killing
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 20:18:08 -0400

tags 26650 fixed
close 26650 26.1
quit

Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> >> >> +  (add-hook 'kill-buffer-hook
>> >> >> +            (lambda () (if (> (recursion-depth) 0) (top-level))) nil t)
>> >> >
>> >> > This will throw to top-level when _any_ buffer is killed, as long as
>> >> > we are in recursive-edit, no?
>> >> No, because `add-hook' is called with non-nil LOCAL arg.
>> >
>> > Right, sorry for not paying attention.
>> 
>> Maybe I should have written
>> 
>>     (add-hook 'kill-buffer-hook (lambda ...) nil 'local)
>> 
>> to emphasize this?
>
> It's up to you, but the fact that I didn't see it is not a reason good
> enough to change anything, IMO.

Coming back to this, I found having the "... nil t)" on the same line as
the lambda confusing to read.  So I moved them to the next line; I
didn't change the "t" to "local" [1: ef9f5c672a].

[1: ef9f5c672a]: 2017-05-23 20:11:23 -0400
  Protect *Backtrace* from being killed (Bug#26650)
  http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=ef9f5c672a8e248dd7bd682101c03feb2e527340

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.