GNU bug report logs - #26650
26.0.50; Protect *Backtrace* from accidental killing

Previous Next

Full log

Message #36 received at 26650 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 26650 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Tino Calancha <tino.calancha <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#26650: 26.0.50; Protect *Backtrace* from accidental killing
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 08:52:26 -0400

Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> >> +  (add-hook 'kill-buffer-hook
>> >> +            (lambda () (if (> (recursion-depth) 0) (top-level))) nil t)
>> >
>> > This will throw to top-level when _any_ buffer is killed, as long as
>> > we are in recursive-edit, no?
>> No, because `add-hook' is called with non-nil LOCAL arg.
>
> Right, sorry for not paying attention.

Maybe I should have written

    (add-hook 'kill-buffer-hook (lambda ...) nil 'local)

to emphasize this?  I'm still undecided on the general style question of
whether to use t or '<symbol> in these cases.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.