GNU bug report logs - #26650
26.0.50; Protect *Backtrace* from accidental killing

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha <at> gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 12:03:02 UTC

Severity: minor

Tags: fixed, patch

Found in version 26.0.50

Fixed in version 26.1

Done: npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net
Cc: 26650 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, tino.calancha <at> gmail.com
Subject: bug#26650: 26.0.50; Protect *Backtrace* from accidental killing
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 13:07:53 +0300
> From: npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net
> Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 08:50:00 -0400
> Cc: 26650 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/debug.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/debug.el
> index 94b683dcb9..0aef94f1d2 100644
> --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/debug.el
> +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/debug.el
> @@ -753,6 +753,8 @@ debugger-mode
>  \\{debugger-mode-map}"
>    (setq truncate-lines t)
>    (set-syntax-table emacs-lisp-mode-syntax-table)
> +  (add-hook 'kill-buffer-hook
> +            (lambda () (if (> (recursion-depth) 0) (top-level))) nil t)

This will throw to top-level when _any_ buffer is killed, as long as
we are in recursive-edit, no?  Is that a good idea?  Shouldn't this
hook do that only for *Backtrace*?




This bug report was last modified 8 years and 2 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.