GNU bug report logs -
#26645
guix potluck
Previous Next
Reported by: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 20:54:02 UTC
Severity: important
Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report
#26645: guix potluck
which was filed against the guix-patches package, has been closed.
The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 26645 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
--
26645: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=26645
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Hi,
Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net> writes:
> Hi Brice,
>
>> Reading through the initial email[0] by Andy the potlock feature seems
>> to be way more extensive than channels: it allows one to create simple
>> packages in an interactive manner and centralize the discoverability of
>> such packages. Channels provide us a way to create package outise of
>> Guix proper but finding channels containing the package you are looking
>> for is still an unsolved problem.
>
> One of the objectives was to provide a simpler and more robust way to
> define packages that would not break when package variables in Guix
> proper are moved around:
>
>> +Guix's @dfn{potluck} facility fills this gap. A @dfn{potluck package}
>> +is like a normal Guix package, except it expresses its inputs in the
>> +form of package specifications instead of direct references.
>> +@xref{potluck-package Reference}. Potluck packages also have a simpler
>> +package structure with fewer fields; compared to normal Guix packages,
>> +they are less expressive but more isolated from details of upstream
>> +Guix.
>
> We have the same facilities in JSON package definitions such as this one:
>
> [
> {
> "name": "myhello",
> "version": "2.10",
> "source": "mirror://gnu/hello/hello-2.10.tar.gz",
> "build-system": "gnu",
> "arguments": {
> "tests?": false
> }
> "home-page": "https://www.gnu.org/software/hello/",
> "synopsis": "Hello, GNU world: An example GNU package",
> "description": "GNU Hello prints a greeting.",
> "license": "GPL-3.0+",
> "native-inputs": ["gettext"]
> },
> {
> "name": "greeter",
> "version": "1.0",
> "source": "https://example.com/greeter-1.0.tar.gz",
> "build-system": "gnu",
> "arguments": {
> "test-target": "foo",
> "parallel-build?": false,
> },
> "home-page": "https://example.com/",
> "synopsis": "Greeter using GNU Hello",
> "description": "This is a wrapper around GNU Hello.",
> "license": "GPL-3.0+",
> "inputs": ["myhello", "hello"]
> }
> ]
>
> Since this can be fed to “guix build -f” directly, there doesn’t seem to
> be a need for “guix potluck init” any more.
>
> While I think it would be very convenient to be able to publish package
> definitions with “guix potluck update <url> <branch>”, it would require
> maintenance of the host-channel service that accepts possibly hostile
> user input. To prevent denial of service it should probably require
> authentication and enforce quotas.
>
> Since users can also push packages for non-free software we cannot host
> this on Guix project infrastructure. (I guess this was why the proposed
> domain was guix-potluck.org.)
OK. I'm closing the issue since it's been opened for 6 years with no
sign of it being driven home. Do send a refreshed version again if it's
still relevant/desired.
--
Thanks,
Maxim
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Hi,
The attached patches add a "guix potluck" facility, as described on
guix-devel:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-04/msg00250.html
Cheers,
Andy
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 308 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.