Subject: Re: bug#26626: 24.5; doc of `last-command-event' and `last-nonmenu-event'

From: Noam Postavsky <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 10:50:21 -0400

Drew Adams <[email-masked]> writes:

> There's no such thing as a "command key sequence",
> as opposed, one imagines, to a "non-command key
> sequence".

It's just what you said in the OP: "the key sequence that
invoked/initiated a command".

> I still think that the text for this should borrow
> from what is said for `last-nonmenu-event'.  IIUC,
> `last-command-event' is the "last input event read
> as part of a key sequence".

That would be misleading.

(list :last-command-event last-command-event
      :last-input-event last-input-event
      :last-nonmenu-event last-nonmenu-event
      (read-key-sequence "Key seq: ")
      :last-command-event last-command-event
      :last-input-event last-input-event
      :last-nonmenu-event last-nonmenu-event)
; C-x C-e =>
(:last-command-event 5 :last-input-event 5 :last-nonmenu-event 5
 "\^C\^C"
 :last-command-event 5 :last-input-event 3 :last-nonmenu-event 3)