GNU bug report logs -
#26610
python-gpg broke; python-gpg 1.9.0 does not exist
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Thu, 1 Jun 2017 23:22:42 -0400
with message-id <20170602032242.GA19312 <at> jasmine>
and subject line Re: bug#26610: python-gpg broke; python-gpg 1.9.0 does not exist
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #26610,
regarding python-gpg broke; python-gpg 1.9.0 does not exist
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
26610: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=26610
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Commit 8439c9c05e upgraded gpgme to 1.9.0.
Unfortunately, python-gpg's version is tied to gpgme:
(define-public python-gpg
(package
(name "python-gpg")
(version (package-version gpgme))
;; [...]
This is a problem, because upgrading gpgme "automatically" upgraded
python-gpg, and there is no python-gpg release of 1.9.0. The latest
release is 1.8.0:
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/gpg/1.8.0
I'm not sure it makes sense to tie the package version to python-gpg's
package version anyway... if upgrading gpgme does trigger the upgrade of
python-gpg "automatically", then that would mean that even if there was
a pythong-gpg available with the new version, the hash would be
incorrect.
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 10:43:33AM +0200, Ivan Vilata i Balaguer wrote:
> 0. Apply the patch.
>
> 1. Add ``python-gpg`` at the end of ``gnu/packages/gnupg.scm`` (sorry
> for my poor Scheme habilities).
>
> 2. Run ``guix environment --ad-hoc -l gnu/packages/gnupg.scm python
> assword coreutils``.
>
> 3. Import ``gpg`` in Python and check ``gpg.version.versionstr``, dump
> ``assword`` program to verify that it uses the same build of
> ``python-gnupg``.
>
> 4. Run ``assword`` and check that everything works.
>
> Probably many steps can be done better/more easily, but my knowledge is
> very limited. Links for improving that are welcome.`;)`
Sounds like a good test :)
> From bef8ccca58150ad4714cfa65472d5f2e9ae7b283 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ivan Vilata-i-Balaguer <ivan <at> selidor.net>
> Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 10:33:09 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: python-gpg: Use explicit version 1.8.0 instead of
> GPGME's.
>
> GPGME defines version 1.9.0, which isn't yet available for python-gnupg, whose
> latest version is 1.8.0, so we use that explicitly instead. Fixes #26610.
>
> * gnu/packages/gnupg.scm (python-gpg): Use explicit version 1.8.0 instead of GPGME's.
Thank you! Pushed as 99c63f3f072e73540a65d4a7b5dac9aaeb3ed50d.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 7 years and 351 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.