From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 22 11:24:56 2017 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Apr 2017 15:24:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34577 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d1wu8-0006e6-BE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 11:24:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34972) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d1shi-0004xz-2d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 06:55:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1shc-0007QY-1A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 06:55:44 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, RECEIVED_FROM_WINDOWS_HOST,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:60637) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1shb-0007QP-To for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 06:55:43 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54158) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1sha-00005d-Me for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 06:55:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1shX-0007Pj-LJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 06:55:42 -0400 Received: from mail-oln040092068035.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.92.68.35]:22252 helo=EUR02-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1shX-0007P9-BT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 06:55:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=dFrAeTL6Ma95OrqomTYzbcua1+zIDL2hJIkWm2Tq/KM=; b=E0xF8SRNDyHYHw5epvib69XutR8Ffit2MzDB4xyKKjh4XA7MaZdx0Hoi8lWa2/bx8uZD8jbJSFSOx8HwyeUIFJg9zUjLOBtoOMhJKL6t3NbwO+cwD/hzhrxBqoZzS/GWOjxutoxXdFWBjT/cN3B/6agmwjSeSRHZmBfZNUfEAwUsfNmFBM0zgUKtEh4FP1qR35y0Kzds9QkSdzsod2GqSl4tChfLh+KsACTFF582pR3YAi4wnrh7r8nNEyS1ZyzfNfkYFHWNuA3+0B7r0e5SH0NZtGOKOZBiI7QeH0dzIWDKCHL0wBi7eStrbbFMMmd9XsYqWHixRScggSFyXw0CWg== Received: from AM5EUR02FT055.eop-EUR02.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.8.51) by AM5EUR02HT163.eop-EUR02.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.9.172) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.1019.14; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 08:18:30 +0000 Received: from AM2PR07MB0612.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.152.8.52) by AM5EUR02FT055.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.9.191) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1019.14 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 08:18:30 +0000 Received: from AM2PR07MB0612.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c8b7:e8b1:7c89:93b2]) by AM2PR07MB0612.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c8b7:e8b1:7c89:93b2%16]) with mapi id 15.01.1047.008; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 08:18:30 +0000 From: Julian H To: "bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org" Subject: 25.1; Installed packages get status 'dependency' after removing obsolete versions. Thread-Topic: 25.1; Installed packages get status 'dependency' after removing obsolete versions. Thread-Index: AQHSunevxdIdaBmy802iOa73zU9Z2A== Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 08:18:30 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: gnu.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gnu.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=outlook.com; x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:8FCDB99D7F545ABFECCA4C0FDAC1A71096B154A7D7063CBC61D6C95A097CD71B; UpperCasedChecksum:5EDB119D5B6E6D481CC861BB0C252C999FCE899F6852ED43AF5BB6FFEDFC96A5; SizeAsReceived:7976; Count:39 x-tmn: [RC/0JkgkSy61VWOc9AMYD0Kp9mOJgSK3] x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; AM5EUR02HT163; 5:6Viwm4XLq/EJcGpER1+cSU61nA0q5tWIt9RgwO9nP1Yn5RPaOA8QUSwonRaOsAAIIjFBUvcWw26z1/inP8RTO+0p9RISzovg/uMixgbsZRWsoMJB12NLk1W3OSLW7nBqusTDJ+R43s+LFpQVG6pyEg==; 24:LsxM59mpzVlE/j4Ry/vgVwLbN8Pgp1gyDOpzte8vSaQO/nxgBjZFlW+ERSVPECaNDuYZfrN/fSICSOjok2ygD4IBH1kIHtYa+J1DeIkKMzI=; 7:B/Lji0wFnWygqmo2fiCU0sBM2CHQPFQgok8ePEX1ajOTASDok151rzs0SdCukJa+GzUTni+jMdp04Cre/Q7WjT2d3a6C/KOtSq/X1DzqgyZK9s4syH+fTFHMNUFNYb38ZnyzrjhNgtbU1JyMZRM7IiAc/tv9iphthqG5O6QLjCDTa3eXKGtf7WWMctIwFWX42j0mP+Pr7lOy+wHN4aG8g6/KbOePhBJMIhpNz2+SzvyIJ+AQ4Pp/rl0OV1/Cr1zOJXLavmUA6okjCiAewX6HEBGU4RQwyScRfdImH95oTvdgBtItcYP9Nf6M+yBAC646 x-incomingheadercount: 39 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-forefront-antispam-report: EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(7070007)(98901004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; SCL:1; SRVR:AM5EUR02HT163; H:AM2PR07MB0612.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: c3c7c3ec-8305-4fd6-57fc-08d4888efee1 x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(201702061074)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031324274)(2017031323274)(2017031322274)(1601125374)(1603101448)(1701031045); SRVR:AM5EUR02HT163; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(444000031); SRVR:AM5EUR02HT163; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:AM5EUR02HT163; x-forefront-prvs: 02843AA9E0 spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 Apr 2017 08:18:30.5884 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM5EUR02HT163 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Windows 7 or 8 [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 11:24:54 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) When updating a package and then deleting the obsolete verion, the current = installed packages don't have the status 'installed' afterwards but the sta= tus 'dependency'. How to replicate: 1. M-x package-list-packages 2. M-x package-menu-mark-obsolete-for-deletion 3. delete marked packages Then the status of the currently installed version becomes 'dependency'. For example, this might be problematic when using M-x package-autoremove, because these packages would be deleted. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 30 06:18:09 2020 Received: (at 26607) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Nov 2020 11:18:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53752 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kjhC5-0002sv-1E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 06:18:09 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:34958) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kjhC2-0002sO-O0 for 26607@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 06:18:07 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=4XzI4EKgweukZJSceMnLGVcS75M66qKueD03RLmfieQ=; b=AVChgC0VjMRHg7brXiOSCxvgHt PhJ56RY5zr8dBut0d8quNZeJ7XZsiPwFrTGKcg11cZtPcfD0mxR4pb1L4SOsNhqCsVn/VczeGYFXs henGlNzvqnMPKbnXqGYRRm/U0rD3SDROXdymirt9RASBm7yK12qvV0aCJzvhOo+tTii8=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kjhBt-00089v-Ma; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 12:18:00 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Julian H Subject: Re: bug#26607: 25.1; Installed packages get status 'dependency' after removing obsolete versions. References: X-Now-Playing: Yukihiro Takahashi's _Saravah!_: "La Rosa" Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 12:17:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Julian H.'s message of "Fri, 21 Apr 2017 08:18:30 +0000") Message-ID: <87pn3vayaj.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Julian H writes: > When updating a package and then deleting the obsolete verion, the > current installed packages don't have the status 'installed' > afterwards but the status 'dependency'. > > How to replicate: > 1. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26607 Cc: 26607@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Julian H writes: > When updating a package and then deleting the obsolete verion, the > current installed packages don't have the status 'installed' > afterwards but the status 'dependency'. > > How to replicate: > 1. M-x package-list-packages > 2. M-x package-menu-mark-obsolete-for-deletion > 3. delete marked packages (This bug report unfortunately got no response at the time.) With 3), do you mean `M-x package-menu-execute' (i.e., `x')? > Then the status of the currently installed version becomes > 'dependency'. For example, this might be problematic when using M-x > package-autoremove, because these packages would be deleted. In any case, I can't reproduce this bug, because I don't seem to have any obsolete packages installed. Anybody else? Are you still seeing this bug in more recent versions of Emacs? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 30 06:18:13 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Nov 2020 11:18:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53755 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kjhC9-0002tA-8L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 06:18:13 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:34974) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kjhC7-0002sj-ET for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 06:18:11 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=uHo0MluaeegM/uWsH4WcH5FxirU4EO0q139EHPOhro4=; b=HDZM/6QUXrb2c+dIBzTbh1KYrJ 2FukAeMBbPVi9U8JYinBFCEIi1mRP65vbFicLA1g9Ee4S2aznLQJTBNC+TZCYB+es2OxvL/LwefVQ GkS8JywRhRxnd+bpmV5Ld+ZbL+SsJrxFMaIMngzh1L8seVXpPXnPi1gVjKZN2b9wpobo=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kjhBz-0008A7-LH for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 12:18:05 +0100 Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 12:18:02 +0100 Message-Id: <87o8jfayad.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #26607 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 26607 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 26607 + moreinfo quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 12 15:30:05 2021 Received: (at 26607) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jan 2021 20:30:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33314 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kzQIm-0006UJ-Mk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 15:30:05 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:39528) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kzQIg-0006RX-Mn for 26607@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 15:30:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=c9843WCXpCiFZHPbHaTtf1AZItYp2oq0IODvrT+2+Gw=; b=EPBaGJu9u+iQpNwAaS1eGI7FNk 4UDgPD6fOjyzRLtoumpuwyO3uTKj6aTeMynMRzs4HCvQdzqtgJ6QYoCRSwXZkC8Sxr3A5VpbKeTt0 qu7R7wKxGDWbQGd7gV9PY96rW8YUB01giggEjhXNhVqw7GnP4Cb0IL3dcaa4IR4F6xSY=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kzQIY-0001tQ-Og; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 21:29:53 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Julian H Subject: Re: bug#26607: 25.1; Installed packages get status 'dependency' after removing obsolete versions. References: <87pn3vayaj.fsf@gnus.org> X-Now-Playing: Merzbow's _Mort Aux Vaches: Locomotive Breath_: "(untitled)" Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 21:29:49 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87pn3vayaj.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 30 Nov 2020 12:17:56 +0100") Message-ID: <87r1mphpaa.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Are you still seeing this bug in more recent versions of Emacs? More information was requested, but no response was given within a month, so I'm closing this bug report. If the problem still exists, please respond to this email and we'll reopen the bug report. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26607 Cc: 26607@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Are you still seeing this bug in more recent versions of Emacs? More information was requested, but no response was given within a month, so I'm closing this bug report. If the problem still exists, please respond to this email and we'll reopen the bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 12 15:30:07 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jan 2021 20:30:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33319 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kzQIp-0006X8-Au for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 15:30:07 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:39542) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kzQIm-0006Rg-J9 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 15:30:05 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=xxygDz9k1ylF8qnzpoLQENukMt3QvopdqshjLEnA8TM=; b=cJHBxXTvNeioGjpS3WMF9jqOD3 diDo5bsjWqSuSPYWP7WGANu6FA48wzBbEQWCrszZUF8wYEF9egw5t//LS3NGZdOleSL6caERE/Ckb 19vdTVLyH0le1m4Q+n51bOVktxf4jtk+F8Nmnpw85hTexf96m64WOvjjEkZtHXj0fRus=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kzQIe-0001tW-U6 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 21:29:59 +0100 Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 21:29:55 +0100 Message-Id: <87pn29hpa4.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #26607 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 26607 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) close 26607 quit From unknown Tue Jun 17 01:43:24 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator