GNU bug report logs - #26588
Add some (non-free?) font licenses.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Clément Lassieur <clement <at> lassieur.org>

Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 14:47:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Clément Lassieur <clement <at> lassieur.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
To: Clément Lassieur <clement <at> lassieur.org>, 26588 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#26588: [PATCH 1/3] licenses: Add Bitstream Vera.
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 11:13:23 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello! Thanks for bringing this up.

Clément Lassieur <clement <at> lassieur.org> writes:

> * guix/licenses.scm (bitstream-vera): New variable.

[...]
  
> +(define bitstream-vera
> +  (license "Bitstream Vera"
> +           "https://www.gnome.org/fonts/#Final_Bitstream_Vera_Fonts"
> +           "\"The Font Software may be sold as part of a larger software package
> +but no copy of one or more of the Font Software typefaces may be sold by
> +itself.\"
> +
> +The license is non-free because of the above clause, but a Guix package is a
> +\"larger software package\"."))

Instead of "officially recognizing" these licenses, which are unlikely
to be re-used and ostensibly non-free, perhaps we could have a
"fsdg-compatible" license procedure similar to "fsf-free". What do you
think?
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 8 years and 26 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.