From unknown Mon Jun 23 23:52:16 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#26588: Add some (non-free?) font licenses. Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 14:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 26588 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 26588@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.1492786005595 (code B ref -1); Fri, 21 Apr 2017 14:47:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2017 14:46:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60943 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d1Zpd-00009X-F8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:46:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49186) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d1Zpc-00009K-5U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:46:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1ZpV-00033n-SM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:46:38 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:39843) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1ZpV-00033j-PL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:46:37 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40156) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1ZpU-00057D-Dy for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:46:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1ZpP-00032q-Ir for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:46:36 -0400 Received: from mail.lassieur.org ([83.152.10.219]:35648) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1ZpP-00032Z-7k for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:46:31 -0400 Received: from rodion (88.191.118.83 [88.191.118.83]) by mail.lassieur.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 1a9bc7ff (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 14:46:28 +0000 (UTC) User-agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.2.1 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 16:46:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87a879zum4.fsf@lassieur.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) The first patch adds Bitstream Vera license, which IMHO is non-free. Feel free to discuss it though, I'm not sure of the comment I wrote. The font could be added even though it is non-free because it could be considered a "Non-fonctional data". See https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html#non-functional-data. The second patch adds Arev license, which is almost like Bitsteam Vera, and is needed by 0ad-data (which I'm working on). The third patch fixes font-bitstream-vera, which IMHO erroneously had X11-style license. From unknown Mon Jun 23 23:52:16 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#26588: [PATCH 1/3] licenses: Add Bitstream Vera. References: <87a879zum4.fsf@lassieur.org> In-Reply-To: <87a879zum4.fsf@lassieur.org> Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 14:49:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26588 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 26588@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 26588-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26588.1492786119795 (code B ref 26588); Fri, 21 Apr 2017 14:49:01 +0000 Received: (at 26588) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2017 14:48:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60949 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d1ZrP-0000Cb-Rl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:48:39 -0400 Received: from mail.lassieur.org ([83.152.10.219]:60260) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d1ZrN-0000CK-TK for 26588@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:48:34 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (88.191.118.83 [88.191.118.83]) by mail.lassieur.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 68b9fa04 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128:NO) for <26588@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 14:48:28 +0000 (UTC) From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 16:48:02 +0200 Message-Id: <20170421144804.10169-1-clement@lassieur.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.12.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) * guix/licenses.scm (bitstream-vera): New variable. --- guix/licenses.scm | 13 ++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/guix/licenses.scm b/guix/licenses.scm index 7b2ac2d31..09a17b8c6 100644 --- a/guix/licenses.scm +++ b/guix/licenses.scm @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ ;;; Copyright © 2016 Fabian Harfert ;;; Copyright © 2016 Rene Saavedra ;;; Copyright © 2016, 2017 ng0 +;;; Copyright © 2017 Clément Lassieur ;;; ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix. ;;; @@ -71,7 +72,7 @@ tcl/tk unlicense vim - x11 x11-style + x11 x11-style bitstream-vera zpl2.1 zlib fsf-free @@ -471,6 +472,16 @@ which may be a file:// URI pointing the package's tree." "Check the URI for details. " comment))) +(define bitstream-vera + (license "Bitstream Vera" + "https://www.gnome.org/fonts/#Final_Bitstream_Vera_Fonts" + "\"The Font Software may be sold as part of a larger software package +but no copy of one or more of the Font Software typefaces may be sold by +itself.\" + +The license is non-free because of the above clause, but a Guix package is a +\"larger software package\".")) + (define zpl2.1 (license "Zope Public License 2.1" "http://directory.fsf.org/wiki?title=License:ZopePLv2.1" -- 2.12.2 From unknown Mon Jun 23 23:52:16 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#26588: [PATCH 2/3] licenses: Add Arev. Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 14:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26588 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 26588@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 26588-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26588.1492786119802 (code B ref 26588); Fri, 21 Apr 2017 14:49:02 +0000 Received: (at 26588) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2017 14:48:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60952 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d1ZrT-0000Cn-Ar for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:48:39 -0400 Received: from mail.lassieur.org ([83.152.10.219]:60260) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d1ZrO-0000CK-Rf for 26588@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:48:35 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (88.191.118.83 [88.191.118.83]) by mail.lassieur.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 6189ac5a (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128:NO) for <26588@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 14:48:28 +0000 (UTC) From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 16:48:03 +0200 Message-Id: <20170421144804.10169-2-clement@lassieur.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.12.2 In-Reply-To: <20170421144804.10169-1-clement@lassieur.org> References: <20170421144804.10169-1-clement@lassieur.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) * guix/licenses.scm (arev): New variable. --- guix/licenses.scm | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/guix/licenses.scm b/guix/licenses.scm index 09a17b8c6..3bf275712 100644 --- a/guix/licenses.scm +++ b/guix/licenses.scm @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ tcl/tk unlicense vim - x11 x11-style bitstream-vera + x11 x11-style bitstream-vera arev zpl2.1 zlib fsf-free @@ -482,6 +482,11 @@ itself.\" The license is non-free because of the above clause, but a Guix package is a \"larger software package\".")) +(define arev + (license "Arev" + "http://tavmjong.free.fr/FONTS/ArevCopyright.txt" + (license-comment bitstream-vera))) + (define zpl2.1 (license "Zope Public License 2.1" "http://directory.fsf.org/wiki?title=License:ZopePLv2.1" -- 2.12.2 From unknown Mon Jun 23 23:52:16 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#26588: [PATCH 3/3] gnu: font-bitstream-vera: Change license to Bitstream Vera. Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 14:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26588 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 26588@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 26588-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26588.1492786119808 (code B ref 26588); Fri, 21 Apr 2017 14:49:02 +0000 Received: (at 26588) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2017 14:48:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60954 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d1ZrT-0000Ct-HA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:48:39 -0400 Received: from mail.lassieur.org ([83.152.10.219]:60260) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d1ZrP-0000CK-Ng for 26588@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:48:36 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (88.191.118.83 [88.191.118.83]) by mail.lassieur.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 0fa908d6 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128:NO) for <26588@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 14:48:29 +0000 (UTC) From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 16:48:04 +0200 Message-Id: <20170421144804.10169-3-clement@lassieur.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.12.2 In-Reply-To: <20170421144804.10169-1-clement@lassieur.org> References: <20170421144804.10169-1-clement@lassieur.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) This license is not X11-style because of its clause that makes it non-free. * gnu/packages/fonts.scm (font-bitstream-vera)[license]: Change to Bitstream Vera. --- gnu/packages/fonts.scm | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/fonts.scm b/gnu/packages/fonts.scm index 6579a66e4..18ddcc6e3 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/fonts.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/fonts.scm @@ -238,9 +238,7 @@ provide serif, sans and monospaced variants.") (synopsis "Bitstream Vera sans-serif typeface") (description "Vera is a sans-serif typeface from Bitstream, Inc. This package provides the TrueType (TTF) files.") - (license - (license:x11-style - "http://www.gnome.org/fonts/#Final_Bitstream_Vera_Fonts")))) + (license (license:bitstream-vera)))) (define-public font-cantarell (package -- 2.12.2 From unknown Mon Jun 23 23:52:16 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#26588: [PATCH 3/3] gnu: font-bitstream-vera: Change license to Bitstream Vera. Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26588 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 26588@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 26588-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26588.149278862011827 (code B ref 26588); Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:31:02 +0000 Received: (at 26588) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2017 15:30:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60998 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d1aVo-00034g-Ke for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:30:20 -0400 Received: from mail.lassieur.org ([83.152.10.219]:60262) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d1aVl-00034X-RN for 26588@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:30:18 -0400 Received: from rodion (88.191.118.83 [88.191.118.83]) by mail.lassieur.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 7d2b948a (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for <26588@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:30:16 +0000 (UTC) References: <20170421144804.10169-1-clement@lassieur.org> <20170421144804.10169-3-clement@lassieur.org> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.2.1 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur In-reply-to: <20170421144804.10169-3-clement@lassieur.org> Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 17:30:15 +0200 Message-ID: <878tmtzsl4.fsf@lassieur.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Clément Lassieur writes: > This license is not X11-style because of its clause that makes it non-free. > > * gnu/packages/fonts.scm (font-bitstream-vera)[license]: Change to Bitstream > Vera. > --- > gnu/packages/fonts.scm | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/fonts.scm b/gnu/packages/fonts.scm > index 6579a66e4..18ddcc6e3 100644 > --- a/gnu/packages/fonts.scm > +++ b/gnu/packages/fonts.scm > @@ -238,9 +238,7 @@ provide serif, sans and monospaced variants.") > (synopsis "Bitstream Vera sans-serif typeface") > (description "Vera is a sans-serif typeface from Bitstream, Inc. This > package provides the TrueType (TTF) files.") > - (license > - (license:x11-style > - "http://www.gnome.org/fonts/#Final_Bitstream_Vera_Fonts")))) > + (license (license:bitstream-vera)))) ^ Extra parenthesis, that I'll remove when I push (if I do). > > (define-public font-cantarell > (package From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 22 21:45:37 2017 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Apr 2017 01:45:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35004 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d26an-0004g5-2G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 21:45:37 -0400 Received: from mail.lassieur.org ([83.152.10.219]:58036) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d26al-0004fx-7l for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 21:45:35 -0400 Received: from rodion (88.191.118.83 [88.191.118.83]) by mail.lassieur.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id fdd6046c (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 01:45:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2017 03:45:33 +0200 Message-Id: <87lgqrvqv6.fsf@lassieur.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: clement@lassieur.org (=?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur) Subject: control message for bug #26618 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) block 26618 by 26588 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 25 05:19:33 2017 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Apr 2017 09:19:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38822 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d2wdB-0004r1-H8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 05:19:33 -0400 Received: from mail.lassieur.org ([83.152.10.219]:58110) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d2wd9-0004qc-On for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 05:19:32 -0400 Received: from newt (46.218.109.88 [46.218.109.88]) by mail.lassieur.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 183b0c3d (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 09:19:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 11:19:30 +0200 Message-Id: <871ssgkfod.fsf@lassieur.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: clement@lassieur.org (=?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur) Subject: control message for bug #26588 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) tags 26588 patch From unknown Mon Jun 23 23:52:16 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#26588: [PATCH 1/3] licenses: Add Bitstream Vera. Resent-From: Marius Bakke Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 09:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26588 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur , 26588@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 26588-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26588.149319800815894 (code B ref 26588); Wed, 26 Apr 2017 09:14:02 +0000 Received: (at 26588) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Apr 2017 09:13:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40555 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3J0p-00048I-Ov for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 05:13:27 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:54329) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3J0n-000488-OL for 26588@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 05:13:26 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6975E21C4D; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 05:13:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 26 Apr 2017 05:13:25 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=TF4LfSW0UTIZBHkvN32T9ZDX04lCGkvaJDJ6FV9xI og=; b=Cp0f2URCgqn3ZlygFXrzNxlHKGdoZkwiMJwzS05MIgBbawWxKAR6Tru6G Dl3422kn/uB70zCpIquoirJqsTdtCAnTcPpGkY2ZWvXYd5fvuWjMNlVRl+8DWLbQ vukaRB2ONMV9FYHPP7TYbsqgmqrN31Yv4rZTPVpvpHPUyBXIZI8GwZBvw+lBnB5t dEnWyw2m8xgwYUfHAW7sPoZaL+6PPn4J4D8z75QiyduTy3ubi2GLduR2FFeA1+73 iwAHNYfExpOBv+4nvHODEDTjRUc5k8aMhF1sBmNYLCp6h5k5RCVSIUv9fgGqlzQk HDhwvfGTi3bac+uv2eds4IxEgZzCQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=TF4LfSW0UTIZBHkvN3 2T9ZDX04lCGkvaJDJ6FV9xIog=; b=D5PMOB2hQEK8dooTnfNKNnk3+v4LrGbu6Q dtwoWC4LTn3YI3+nJQG/UgQDxZDDk3hkq89suUol2Rc6b3j5gLbUNwNmhMIKmw2r wWL/e79RgPM5fSorJDC5WbJE9N2BDzquV3CjjhEgJyqy8CqoQK4bzgfiKXEhZM9x mkVg4BbDsGP8gfwWOFjar3iXiR6E+X/Z/nEMMtMVnHTAuTBJMnivCKZI8pEqK4HN MQJ88eeE7DKEtCrruC70kTDkeqLl8vVDD/8fTW7B/bP5k/CDBFEWPPGQ2fh7B2W/ DQL4gPHBLlIZ9qWRQRYLSlZ26CPPcP1DdYji3rtRzaUndp839sDQ== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: 59zLXpK4b+K3K7qV3RBcLvb6p2+5WRFR/PfjLC6/bpzA 1493198005 Received: from localhost (unknown [188.113.81.93]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 06D897E8C1; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 05:13:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: <20170421144804.10169-1-clement@lassieur.org> References: <87a879zum4.fsf@lassieur.org> <20170421144804.10169-1-clement@lassieur.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.24.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.2.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 11:13:23 +0200 Message-ID: <87zif3cz0s.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello! Thanks for bringing this up. Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur writes: > * guix/licenses.scm (bitstream-vera): New variable. [...] =20=20 > +(define bitstream-vera > + (license "Bitstream Vera" > + "https://www.gnome.org/fonts/#Final_Bitstream_Vera_Fonts" > + "\"The Font Software may be sold as part of a larger software= package > +but no copy of one or more of the Font Software typefaces may be sold by > +itself.\" > + > +The license is non-free because of the above clause, but a Guix package = is a > +\"larger software package\".")) Instead of "officially recognizing" these licenses, which are unlikely to be re-used and ostensibly non-free, perhaps we could have a "fsdg-compatible" license procedure similar to "fsf-free". What do you think? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlkAZLMACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPrjfggAm+WscEPnlK+tEKKdf3q6XH7q+9CO3UhvySuom5bNuELSvTCVnuKKx2Vm mI4ZY8F+fNyqqHJZxid1ScrzHwgUkTMxDGhpWLwPe5T9CM0gq49PYebQOyFCjxm5 iCZm/xR10sE9aJyHK4VtBQ6hvyS3qFwBforaWr2PZwq7XHkZPrA6warBoEJ0sMU2 Gx1lwjNXe33W299vMsSbuTeS/9WNeAMAEsnwfhAMJZVpvKCfsyce9xIqcPd8FW6N pCKhlfpsQLhm2kafGA91vkzZMMD3rn2Nxzfity5sLwoq5NUyZGfhPpv3xvkSKYu1 4grRlPUsFfk6jeFQGLN/RiC5xZxbhA== =tuxK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Mon Jun 23 23:52:16 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#26588: [PATCH 1/3] licenses: Add Bitstream Vera. Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 09:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26588 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Marius Bakke Cc: 26588@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 26588-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26588.14934598247567 (code B ref 26588); Sat, 29 Apr 2017 09:58:01 +0000 Received: (at 26588) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2017 09:57:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45534 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d4P7g-0001xz-GD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 05:57:04 -0400 Received: from mail.lassieur.org ([83.152.10.219]:58238) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d4P7e-0001xp-Kn for 26588@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 05:57:03 -0400 Received: from rodion (88.191.118.83 [88.191.118.83]) by mail.lassieur.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 03b278f4 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Sat, 29 Apr 2017 09:57:01 +0000 (UTC) References: <87a879zum4.fsf@lassieur.org> <20170421144804.10169-1-clement@lassieur.org> <87zif3cz0s.fsf@fastmail.com> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.2.1 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur In-reply-to: <87zif3cz0s.fsf@fastmail.com> Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 11:57:00 +0200 Message-ID: <87y3ujleoj.fsf@lassieur.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Marius Bakke writes: > Hello! Thanks for bringing this up. > > Clément Lassieur writes: > >> * guix/licenses.scm (bitstream-vera): New variable. > > [...] > >> +(define bitstream-vera >> + (license "Bitstream Vera" >> + "https://www.gnome.org/fonts/#Final_Bitstream_Vera_Fonts" >> + "\"The Font Software may be sold as part of a larger software package >> +but no copy of one or more of the Font Software typefaces may be sold by >> +itself.\" >> + >> +The license is non-free because of the above clause, but a Guix package is a >> +\"larger software package\".")) > > Instead of "officially recognizing" these licenses, which are unlikely > to be re-used and ostensibly non-free, perhaps we could have a > "fsdg-compatible" license procedure similar to "fsf-free". What do you > think? Well, bitstream-vera is used twice (if we include 0ad). But anyway that's okay. I should specify in the fsdg-compatible 'comment' argument that it is non-free, right? Or maybe all fsdg-compatible would be non-free? From unknown Mon Jun 23 23:52:16 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#26588: [PATCH 1/3] licenses: Add Bitstream Vera. Resent-From: Marius Bakke Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 14:01:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26588 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Cc: 26588@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 26588-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26588.149347444711640 (code B ref 26588); Sat, 29 Apr 2017 14:01:03 +0000 Received: (at 26588) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2017 14:00:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46450 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d4SvX-00031f-M7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 10:00:47 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:58703) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d4SvV-00031U-0p for 26588@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 10:00:45 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4C362092A; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 10:00:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 29 Apr 2017 10:00:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=8deVt870Fua4EyOJALT2g1xEnV6YggI4gJs/EBxYf OE=; b=Z4WPVSWvZnwTjcTtSeGjtRFumRluTk+0cd8FJ+BKvP4xptAJF9gvQRN3e kQ4UTJhch+MtBcHSn1o1BZHpR/5rlkSII6VwcV8rResumOOgUTPEoeCALfjA/sNm m8noCXgWOrh9P3djnKXLxUdx97UWQtD20rseFlWqH7iSSB78dRZdq7jL23VeJ6Sd Obqx9GD/+WJvY0TXi5V+KBM3hZnDvsnI2RR4ZgMyUE83hmj0t3mAZtojAxdYpixw N+VT+EglStqj35snB2kynf8+ITiVxqvA3qat0aZInQ8wGz64ax71gxOXv2MVEPYm GWDFKFb8diCWYqDQPuRu4UzmPKpkA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=8deVt870Fua4EyOJAL T2g1xEnV6YggI4gJs/EBxYfOE=; b=qovjUPIIJtdIeesYUi9cY+hdTFFAM49ssc N9LkBzwmnd9ax2dBRFCSOqLs5/H4smiyy5pUHxnl5ZGa9VuKEcbLC2zQzI7jyFF3 u6R5am03J5IEVnUbMkOqC6QyxS2jacFSp+EviKIjoKJ0oiiQfyMNUfHrGkYCA/4R w9oyumsL1RwoyGq6RcSub8EIFTEbr/6EvSVPmZf2hAzKh8TbUeAlDiFPILY8/ASG C9L3y5Yl7Xq0pfIgZxYSBnh0O8pZagNlDkZnUDatLdB6Yuu2UO1QSLepWJLrGgYj LPIHNvHh11ibv0M8qLOmlhlmMrMfkWIUYUc50lqcYz38ntkxs6nQ== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: 8fYjgg1llQbTsIcmdyJq/K/oF800z79mf60IG/PLj9iY 1493474444 Received: from localhost (unknown [188.113.81.93]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 369C72475D; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 10:00:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: <87y3ujleoj.fsf@lassieur.org> References: <87a879zum4.fsf@lassieur.org> <20170421144804.10169-1-clement@lassieur.org> <87zif3cz0s.fsf@fastmail.com> <87y3ujleoj.fsf@lassieur.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.24.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.2.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 16:00:42 +0200 Message-ID: <87bmrfb9f9.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur writes: > Marius Bakke writes: > >> Hello! Thanks for bringing this up. >> >> Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur writes: >> >>> * guix/licenses.scm (bitstream-vera): New variable. >> >> [...] >>=20=20=20 >>> +(define bitstream-vera >>> + (license "Bitstream Vera" >>> + "https://www.gnome.org/fonts/#Final_Bitstream_Vera_Fonts" >>> + "\"The Font Software may be sold as part of a larger softwa= re package >>> +but no copy of one or more of the Font Software typefaces may be sold = by >>> +itself.\" >>> + >>> +The license is non-free because of the above clause, but a Guix packag= e is a >>> +\"larger software package\".")) >> >> Instead of "officially recognizing" these licenses, which are unlikely >> to be re-used and ostensibly non-free, perhaps we could have a >> "fsdg-compatible" license procedure similar to "fsf-free". What do you >> think? > > Well, bitstream-vera is used twice (if we include 0ad). But anyway > that's okay. I should specify in the fsdg-compatible 'comment' argument > that it is non-free, right? Or maybe all fsdg-compatible would be > non-free? 0ad could include (package-license font-bitstream-vera) instead. I also came across this font in "Hedgewars", so it's fairly prevalent. The default comment of the "fsdg-compatible" (or fsdg-free as Debian describes it[0]) license procedure should say something about not necessarily being free, but passing FSDG criteria; but it's good to have more specific comments in the actual packages. Anyway, just an opinion, but I think such a procedure would be nice to have :) [0] https://packages.debian.org/sid/ttf-bitstream-vera --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlkEnIoACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPq6tgf+K3dCgNl4l8D2joQ3tuz4MVeXdvRb3oC6tKRw2AfOgIVi/LZ66ypN60Ib Rjdh0g+uyIIovwWIZmDLse6mFocD2iaA5U8ROmYz47m161zCFFelELm7ABUpiEAX crO4XLX16mnuNgHrpFSN6SK6S0zd9ZHhz1uu8zzr5BL7iOlJfB95NXWWjjAv8BkE v/CKhSIJstWWyZD2btbX3SiKhOyjyy++LQBFrr4fNNi5IWMAlJ96ZyMP2AGZUnYd AcMpi1sDLy1S2yOo2h1xlY6qde4JlG0SvDIS65WQnU58RDsjUSKU4APbWNkBkRqO o5FWDdgJVa2qVrLegJyC+YPbdDmzvg== =8atm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Mon Jun 23 23:52:16 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#26588: [PATCH 1/3] licenses: Add Bitstream Vera. Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 11:01:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26588 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Marius Bakke Cc: 26588@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 26588-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26588.149363645228788 (code B ref 26588); Mon, 01 May 2017 11:01:01 +0000 Received: (at 26588) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2017 11:00:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48546 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d594V-0007UF-Vg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2017 07:00:52 -0400 Received: from mail.lassieur.org ([83.152.10.219]:58286) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d594T-0007U5-5T for 26588@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2017 07:00:49 -0400 Received: from rodion (192.168.0.254 [192.168.0.254]) by mail.lassieur.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 2a143428 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Mon, 1 May 2017 11:00:47 +0000 (UTC) References: <87a879zum4.fsf@lassieur.org> <20170421144804.10169-1-clement@lassieur.org> <87zif3cz0s.fsf@fastmail.com> <87y3ujleoj.fsf@lassieur.org> <87bmrfb9f9.fsf@fastmail.com> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.2.1 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur In-reply-to: <87bmrfb9f9.fsf@fastmail.com> Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 13:00:47 +0200 Message-ID: <87a86wdeow.fsf@lassieur.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Marius Bakke writes: > Clément Lassieur writes: > >> Marius Bakke writes: >> >>> Hello! Thanks for bringing this up. >>> >>> Clément Lassieur writes: >>> >>>> * guix/licenses.scm (bitstream-vera): New variable. >>> >>> [...] >>> >>>> +(define bitstream-vera >>>> + (license "Bitstream Vera" >>>> + "https://www.gnome.org/fonts/#Final_Bitstream_Vera_Fonts" >>>> + "\"The Font Software may be sold as part of a larger software package >>>> +but no copy of one or more of the Font Software typefaces may be sold by >>>> +itself.\" >>>> + >>>> +The license is non-free because of the above clause, but a Guix package is a >>>> +\"larger software package\".")) >>> >>> Instead of "officially recognizing" these licenses, which are unlikely >>> to be re-used and ostensibly non-free, perhaps we could have a >>> "fsdg-compatible" license procedure similar to "fsf-free". What do you >>> think? >> >> Well, bitstream-vera is used twice (if we include 0ad). But anyway >> that's okay. I should specify in the fsdg-compatible 'comment' argument >> that it is non-free, right? Or maybe all fsdg-compatible would be >> non-free? > > 0ad could include (package-license font-bitstream-vera) instead. I also > came across this font in "Hedgewars", so it's fairly prevalent. > > The default comment of the "fsdg-compatible" (or fsdg-free as Debian > describes it[0]) license procedure should say something about not > necessarily being free, but passing FSDG criteria; but it's good to have > more specific comments in the actual packages. > > Anyway, just an opinion, but I think such a procedure would be nice to > have :) > > [0] https://packages.debian.org/sid/ttf-bitstream-vera Ok! Here are two patches: one adds fsdg-compatible, and the other updates the font package. I'll also send the 0ad update to the 0ad debbugs thread. From unknown Mon Jun 23 23:52:16 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#26588: [PATCH 1/2] licenses: Add new meta-license fsdg-compatible. Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 11:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26588 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 26588@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 26588-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26588.149363650728896 (code B ref 26588); Mon, 01 May 2017 11:02:02 +0000 Received: (at 26588) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2017 11:01:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48551 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d595P-0007W0-Dy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2017 07:01:47 -0400 Received: from mail.lassieur.org ([83.152.10.219]:58292) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d595N-0007Vs-Hx for 26588@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2017 07:01:46 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (192.168.0.254 [192.168.0.254]) by mail.lassieur.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 03ca202e (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128:NO) for <26588@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 1 May 2017 11:01:44 +0000 (UTC) From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 13:01:25 +0200 Message-Id: <20170501110126.31945-1-clement@lassieur.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.12.2 In-Reply-To: <87a86wdeow.fsf@lassieur.org> References: <87a86wdeow.fsf@lassieur.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) * guix/licenses.scm (fsdg-compatible): New record with constructor. --- guix/licenses.scm | 13 ++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/guix/licenses.scm b/guix/licenses.scm index 7b2ac2d31..830d4e1ec 100644 --- a/guix/licenses.scm +++ b/guix/licenses.scm @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ ;;; Copyright © 2016 Fabian Harfert ;;; Copyright © 2016 Rene Saavedra ;;; Copyright © 2016, 2017 ng0 +;;; Copyright © 2017 Clément Lassieur ;;; ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix. ;;; @@ -75,7 +76,8 @@ zpl2.1 zlib fsf-free - wtfpl2)) + wtfpl2 + fsdg-compatible)) (define-record-type (license name uri comment) @@ -488,4 +490,13 @@ of licenses, approved as free by the FSF. More details can be found at URI." uri comment)) +(define* (fsdg-compatible uri #:optional (comment "")) + "Return a license that does not fit any of the ones above or a collection +of licenses, not necessarily free, but in accordance with FSDG as Non-functional +Data. More details can be found at URI. See also +https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.en.html#non-functional-data" + (license "FSDG-compatible" + uri + comment)) + ;;; licenses.scm ends here -- 2.12.2 From unknown Mon Jun 23 23:52:16 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#26588: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: font-bitstream-vera: Change license to fsdg-compatible. Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 11:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26588 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 26588@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 26588-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26588.149363650928910 (code B ref 26588); Mon, 01 May 2017 11:02:02 +0000 Received: (at 26588) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2017 11:01:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48553 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d595Q-0007WD-LL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2017 07:01:48 -0400 Received: from mail.lassieur.org ([83.152.10.219]:58292) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d595P-0007Vs-3n for 26588@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2017 07:01:47 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (192.168.0.254 [192.168.0.254]) by mail.lassieur.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id d00a45bd (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128:NO) for <26588@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 1 May 2017 11:01:44 +0000 (UTC) From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 13:01:26 +0200 Message-Id: <20170501110126.31945-2-clement@lassieur.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.12.2 In-Reply-To: <20170501110126.31945-1-clement@lassieur.org> References: <87a86wdeow.fsf@lassieur.org> <20170501110126.31945-1-clement@lassieur.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) This license is not X11-style because of its clause that makes it non-free. * gnu/packages/fonts.scm (font-bitstream-vera)[license]: Change to fsdg-compatible Bitstream Vera. --- gnu/packages/fonts.scm | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/fonts.scm b/gnu/packages/fonts.scm index 2452a1c81..1873c7659 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/fonts.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/fonts.scm @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ ;;; Copyright © 2017 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice ;;; Copyright © 2017 José Miguel Sánchez García ;;; Copyright © 2017 Alex Griffin +;;; Copyright © 2017 Clément Lassieur ;;; ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix. ;;; @@ -239,8 +240,11 @@ provide serif, sans and monospaced variants.") (description "Vera is a sans-serif typeface from Bitstream, Inc. This package provides the TrueType (TTF) files.") (license - (license:x11-style - "http://www.gnome.org/fonts/#Final_Bitstream_Vera_Fonts")))) + (license:fsdg-compatible + "https://www.gnome.org/fonts/#Final_Bitstream_Vera_Fonts" + "The Font Software may be sold as part of a larger software package but +no copy of one or more of the Font Software typefaces may be sold by +itself.")))) (define-public font-cantarell (package -- 2.12.2 From unknown Mon Jun 23 23:52:16 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#26588: [PATCH 1/3] licenses: Add Bitstream Vera. Resent-From: Marius Bakke Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 14:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26588 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Cc: 26588@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 26588-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26588.14936504066651 (code B ref 26588); Mon, 01 May 2017 14:54:02 +0000 Received: (at 26588) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2017 14:53:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49765 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d5ChZ-0001jD-TQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2017 10:53:26 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:37877) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d5ChX-0001j5-Rf for 26588@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2017 10:53:24 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 740A920A5A; Mon, 1 May 2017 10:53:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 01 May 2017 10:53:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=2pN5eSatGXKx09bHy96WEvdFfvemKwGmm7tHAAEsl Go=; b=UyBqRhfvzGhmEp4dzHlN0sTh4zA2tAb+xfXx47UwiR08EeOFvdOzphT36 vH3/m1gMWRby4XhVTWaqeoeF3aj8RNaGsHxvf49ha4eoqDVMaFtsAM+sTzg9sxZS ZuJP6Qg6C7A9SA/Cc3HPEsZkV5dV7QeyvR7O9zFDZEvg7FofWZj81GKSGSivvIR1 nU7b3xiAU30rgXD59W/F1VjJtSzIyBBy3SmL4O1EO8hWyjM7KKgFv1LJB5thW8xu b0RSBAvqbINcTmwbsfl3ISA2NPX+Fr2CWzWsQxOtATps80heGBI4cG8YmCA2qoff HW0ror6lgB84dApYPanGzv79zYgGQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=2pN5eSatGXKx09bHy9 6WEvdFfvemKwGmm7tHAAEslGo=; b=md+DrHmeDgbmRtBm+llg94GSREPQbZ8Qe8 VMG39CK2kjbGchQil/EqEO5/aHj3ALZ79TtrIFCEEmKj6g9JBCsuTOdN2PCfh0aK uYDhb5sr/T1+d1Zr5azdwWXlxbaDDNm6NM7aklybT3zi5eqNdvF4YchY12U0gqdE t5Ano7TkBOmPKZQe2y+yphh+tgiRlg+tO+CFZh4+FIpJSpq9eqOmRV14G+HZJHMx 33+0/SJMHJ693+bzUUUUTfKMWXSLWiRC6IqKssAG+PIgsupyBPvIqky6Q7ok8Qtx btr39I6HHfCerZpCREYfn/7seXtKUiTXewWVKnUQI6mB0Aj57UXw== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: MiBEVDg1ntWNB2gagE7H2svCkLDYvxcSWQuWVEPccStw 1493650402 Received: from localhost (unknown [188.113.81.93]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 05D53241ED; Mon, 1 May 2017 10:53:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: <87a86wdeow.fsf@lassieur.org> References: <87a879zum4.fsf@lassieur.org> <20170421144804.10169-1-clement@lassieur.org> <87zif3cz0s.fsf@fastmail.com> <87y3ujleoj.fsf@lassieur.org> <87bmrfb9f9.fsf@fastmail.com> <87a86wdeow.fsf@lassieur.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.24.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.2.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 16:53:20 +0200 Message-ID: <87a86whbmn.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur writes: > Marius Bakke writes: > >> Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur writes: >> >>> Marius Bakke writes: >>> >>>> Hello! Thanks for bringing this up. >>>> >>>> Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur writes: >>>> >>>>> * guix/licenses.scm (bitstream-vera): New variable. >>>> >>>> [...] >>>>=20=20=20 >>>>> +(define bitstream-vera >>>>> + (license "Bitstream Vera" >>>>> + "https://www.gnome.org/fonts/#Final_Bitstream_Vera_Fonts" >>>>> + "\"The Font Software may be sold as part of a larger soft= ware package >>>>> +but no copy of one or more of the Font Software typefaces may be sol= d by >>>>> +itself.\" >>>>> + >>>>> +The license is non-free because of the above clause, but a Guix pack= age is a >>>>> +\"larger software package\".")) >>>> >>>> Instead of "officially recognizing" these licenses, which are unlikely >>>> to be re-used and ostensibly non-free, perhaps we could have a >>>> "fsdg-compatible" license procedure similar to "fsf-free". What do you >>>> think? >>> >>> Well, bitstream-vera is used twice (if we include 0ad). But anyway >>> that's okay. I should specify in the fsdg-compatible 'comment' argument >>> that it is non-free, right? Or maybe all fsdg-compatible would be >>> non-free? >> >> 0ad could include (package-license font-bitstream-vera) instead. I also >> came across this font in "Hedgewars", so it's fairly prevalent. >> >> The default comment of the "fsdg-compatible" (or fsdg-free as Debian >> describes it[0]) license procedure should say something about not >> necessarily being free, but passing FSDG criteria; but it's good to have >> more specific comments in the actual packages. >> >> Anyway, just an opinion, but I think such a procedure would be nice to >> have :) >> >> [0] https://packages.debian.org/sid/ttf-bitstream-vera > > Ok! Here are two patches: one adds fsdg-compatible, and the other > updates the font package. I'll also send the 0ad update to the 0ad > debbugs thread. Thanks! These patches LGTM. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlkHS+AACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPqo+AgAk1HFGZJJIVivsVFIoPHhvaR2q7nPQUx/M6h/1xHkzuFgQULEBf8FZ5Mv +vrfvh+yING1NTwcobbmPjCwBMjOiDkAXSpKe3Bv2EYfALI+9+JIvTASvp0BRkUX f1DwbzTDPVtGDoCrxT33rItVl1V6DmXUAKBQF+YqHO+x1AxvLrjv8iJay4xuhK97 Tt7CzMFffmy2iymiYfTQ1xxmEwM5sWLjkWPsrszhQLHBsFHXTL4yrL7+0FM8geyV Agh/qG3W4Uy/nUvDFfCzfbP/Jpxqhl3r04kgUecL8TdymEt9cxdcuHS0pMu5RmBL YuGXbL+2B1nagag4LFaOIOltczcFiQ== =gzs7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Mon Jun 23 23:52:16 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Subject: bug#26588: closed (Re: bug#26588: [PATCH 1/3] licenses: Add Bitstream Vera.) Message-ID: References: <87efw8l66g.fsf@lassieur.org> <87a879zum4.fsf@lassieur.org> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 26588 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix-patches X-Gnu-PR-Keywords: patch Reply-To: 26588@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 19:38:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1493667482-6708-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1493667482-6708-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #26588: Add some (non-free?) font licenses. which was filed against the guix-patches package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 26588@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 26588: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D26588 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1493667482-6708-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 26588-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2017 19:37:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49970 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d5H8W-0001jX-7d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2017 15:37:32 -0400 Received: from mail.lassieur.org ([83.152.10.219]:58314) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d5H8U-0001jL-8C for 26588-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2017 15:37:30 -0400 Received: from rodion (88.191.118.83 [88.191.118.83]) by mail.lassieur.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id c5e5e1c3 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Mon, 1 May 2017 19:37:28 +0000 (UTC) References: <87a879zum4.fsf@lassieur.org> <20170421144804.10169-1-clement@lassieur.org> <87zif3cz0s.fsf@fastmail.com> <87y3ujleoj.fsf@lassieur.org> <87bmrfb9f9.fsf@fastmail.com> <87a86wdeow.fsf@lassieur.org> <87a86whbmn.fsf@fastmail.com> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.2.1 From: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur To: Marius Bakke Subject: Re: bug#26588: [PATCH 1/3] licenses: Add Bitstream Vera. In-reply-to: <87a86whbmn.fsf@fastmail.com> Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 21:37:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87efw8l66g.fsf@lassieur.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26588-done Cc: 26588-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) >> Ok! Here are two patches: one adds fsdg-compatible, and the other >> updates the font package. I'll also send the 0ad update to the 0ad >> debbugs thread. > > Thanks! These patches LGTM. I pushed them. Thank you for the review :-) ------------=_1493667482-6708-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2017 14:46:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60943 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d1Zpd-00009X-F8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:46:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49186) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d1Zpc-00009K-5U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:46:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1ZpV-00033n-SM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:46:38 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:39843) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1ZpV-00033j-PL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:46:37 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40156) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1ZpU-00057D-Dy for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:46:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1ZpP-00032q-Ir for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:46:36 -0400 Received: from mail.lassieur.org ([83.152.10.219]:35648) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1ZpP-00032Z-7k for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:46:31 -0400 Received: from rodion (88.191.118.83 [88.191.118.83]) by mail.lassieur.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 1a9bc7ff (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 14:46:28 +0000 (UTC) User-agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.2.1 From: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur To: guix-patches@gnu.org Subject: Add some (non-free?) font licenses. Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 16:46:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87a879zum4.fsf@lassieur.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) The first patch adds Bitstream Vera license, which IMHO is non-free. Feel free to discuss it though, I'm not sure of the comment I wrote. The font could be added even though it is non-free because it could be considered a "Non-fonctional data". See https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html#non-functional-data. The second patch adds Arev license, which is almost like Bitsteam Vera, and is needed by 0ad-data (which I'm working on). The third patch fixes font-bitstream-vera, which IMHO erroneously had X11-style license. ------------=_1493667482-6708-1--