GNU bug report logs -
#26570
GC_is_heap_ptr() dep for 2.2.1
Previous Next
Reported by: Zefram <zefram <at> fysh.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 23:21:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Thu, 20 Apr 2017 10:44:09 +0200
with message-id <87y3uv4gfa.fsf <at> pobox.com>
and subject line Re: bug#26570: GC_is_heap_ptr() dep for 2.2.1
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #26570,
regarding GC_is_heap_ptr() dep for 2.2.1
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
26570: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=26570
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Compilation of 2.2.1 fails for me, producing a lot of warnings about
implicit declaration of GC_is_heap_ptr(), and ultimately
CCLD guile
./.libs/libguile-2.2.so: undefined reference to `GC_is_heap_ptr'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Makefile:2439: recipe for target 'guile' failed
make[3]: *** [guile] Error 1
At a guess, maybe this is supposed to be supplied by libgc. But I have
the version of libgc that README says is required (7.2), and configure
was happy with it. Maybe a higher version is now required, and README
and configure need updating?
-zefram
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
On Thu 20 Apr 2017 01:19, Zefram <zefram <at> fysh.org> writes:
> Compilation of 2.2.1 fails for me, producing a lot of warnings about
> implicit declaration of GC_is_heap_ptr(), and ultimately
>
> CCLD guile
> ./.libs/libguile-2.2.so: undefined reference to `GC_is_heap_ptr'
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> Makefile:2439: recipe for target 'guile' failed
> make[3]: *** [guile] Error 1
>
> At a guess, maybe this is supposed to be supplied by libgc. But I have
> the version of libgc that README says is required (7.2), and configure
> was happy with it. Maybe a higher version is now required, and README
> and configure need updating?
I think I fixed this in Git. Please take a look. Cheers :)
Andy
This bug report was last modified 8 years and 33 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.