GNU bug report logs -
#26534
[PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1.
Previous Next
Reported by: Roel Janssen <roel <at> gnu.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 13:57:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Meh <marius <at> fastmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #11 received at 26534 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Marius Bakke writes:
> Roel Janssen <roel <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>> From 802c557c95ae9cbe7edeec1ab58fc05ef4c4cd32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Roel Janssen <roel <at> gnu.org>
>> Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 15:53:54 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/glib.scm (glib): Update to 2.52.1.
>> ---
>> gnu/packages/glib.scm | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/glib.scm b/gnu/packages/glib.scm
>> index 6de9cce0b..4e29a550b 100644
>> --- a/gnu/packages/glib.scm
>> +++ b/gnu/packages/glib.scm
>> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ shared NFS home directories.")
>> (define glib
>> (package
>> (name "glib")
>> - (version "2.50.3")
>> + (version "2.52.1")
>> (source (origin
>> (method url-fetch)
>> (uri (string-append "mirror://gnome/sources/"
>> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ shared NFS home directories.")
>> name "-" version ".tar.xz"))
>> (sha256
>> (base32
>> - "16frrwhc1yqkzx6bgh3060g94dr2biab17fb01mrni819jzr9vl2"))
>> + "0vsqrvjwsk2x3mm2i428hpm5vgsi1b384l6xdhm7xmzj2yw2d34l"))
>> (patches (search-patches "glib-tests-timer.patch"))))
>> (build-system gnu-build-system)
>> (outputs '("out" ; everything
>> --
>> 2.12.1
>>
>> Dear Guix,
>>
>> Is it OK to update glib?
>
> I suspect this would require some other GTK updates as well. Maybe we
> can start a new "gnome-updates" branch[0] and try to bring everything up
> to date. "glib" alone has almost 1500 dependent packages which is too
> much for "staging". What do you think?
>
> [0] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg00933.html
This is a good idea. The ultimate purpose is to get the latest GNOME
release in GNU Guix. I cannot carry this task entirely myself, if we
would like to get it in before the next GNOME release.. ;)
So, I am not sure we need to build everything on Hydra, since it's
already under a high load. Maybe it's enough to create a branch in the
Git repository and do the builds locally?
Kind regards,
Roel Janssen
This bug report was last modified 7 years and 346 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.