From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 16 09:56:25 2017 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2017 13:56:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50856 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1czkfB-0005UJ-Kf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 09:56:25 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44705) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1czkf9-0005U5-O6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 09:56:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1czkf3-0004ij-PM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 09:56:18 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:48229) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1czkf3-0004iW-MK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 09:56:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35674) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1czkf2-0003OL-Hf for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 09:56:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1czkey-0004bD-LY for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 09:56:16 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:59350) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1czkey-0004b5-IP for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 09:56:12 -0400 Received: from 541e9304.cm-5-7c.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([84.30.147.4]:33628 helo=antelope) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1czkex-0004OQ-Qw for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 09:56:12 -0400 User-agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.1.1 From: Roel Janssen To: guix-patches@gnu.org Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1. Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 15:56:00 +0200 Message-ID: <87a87ga233.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=0001-gnu-Update-glib-to-2.52.1.patch >From 802c557c95ae9cbe7edeec1ab58fc05ef4c4cd32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Roel Janssen Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 15:53:54 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1. * gnu/packages/glib.scm (glib): Update to 2.52.1. --- gnu/packages/glib.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/glib.scm b/gnu/packages/glib.scm index 6de9cce0b..4e29a550b 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/glib.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/glib.scm @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ shared NFS home directories.") (define glib (package (name "glib") - (version "2.50.3") + (version "2.52.1") (source (origin (method url-fetch) (uri (string-append "mirror://gnome/sources/" @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ shared NFS home directories.") name "-" version ".tar.xz")) (sha256 (base32 - "16frrwhc1yqkzx6bgh3060g94dr2biab17fb01mrni819jzr9vl2")) + "0vsqrvjwsk2x3mm2i428hpm5vgsi1b384l6xdhm7xmzj2yw2d34l")) (patches (search-patches "glib-tests-timer.patch")))) (build-system gnu-build-system) (outputs '("out" ; everything -- 2.12.1 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Dear Guix, Is it OK to update glib? Kind regards, Roel Janssen --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 16 15:10:32 2017 Received: (at 26534) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2017 19:10:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50955 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1czpZA-0004EY-5o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 15:10:32 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:48425) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1czpZ7-0004EP-Ut for 26534@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 15:10:30 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52658208D7; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 15:10:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 16 Apr 2017 15:10:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=StilAqkOpPWA/dNVlZg9ogNILVYw3T13Fqg0eT/E/ 14=; b=2G4GLmDMoYsXqMeXYC3KbX8UnBuoSW2/HqIaVED2nc4XgFmz6yKKbC3Om 8XxbtFCkKOF/Fh8pUP2OKoFvQZQ6qd21C4usTyaCNlB7V19NA4YBHQi2SNErk5NU u+yDqISembjzFUx2pHQzTW6RpHMi6hLhY16fiydJWJ7w3GHAXwJOxx7mbL4kLLdn ptDqjszN/ZTjka812GU9Ha6VZ1JpbWrjdbHa3PSGsVzW1gQZRp30hB4Hr0j23iJ2 iJGOLRid0W1IrkRLb3CR3HLCmaUlPJ2az94jeeJJaFPaSejuIGCHmAyr7ZZ7Hwxg +mxuKqbd4zSmVVkmMmWiDkt85ruuQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=StilAqkOpPWA/dNVlZ g9ogNILVYw3T13Fqg0eT/E/14=; b=NQu6xZZTUt/RMYHDiDaiMcM5jQbIeSDjp9 jU5QRth1FV0UX8HhkVxV2BrZaKtY1xms77z6aJ3mnzHa0mCd+LINpaCK018tnljy bCqW6rN4VzxYpnQc6GRTKiqSPcdOGJrC7dsNXcdchCJLQbeg/lSczcAW/fK3W60Q 2eBdXEMLKDQSTM4uExYrzeMpAJUtqUYGOBt6WXHgSk6/oZA2aycTp/yikXgt/K/Q Jbr1VwoVTSkNTydLA3J1iv32xsM1d03AOv7Df/Ao63zwqChn1JDy6BsoV119pBpY CymiP++W4Orwi/MOgV+GuKfYNjQnjys/J0mOuBeyXyHL/Xqz2H4g== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: ZLOYYcd5Bct2Egr5xv5xLX8oeu4uXoBjuumuHZ8Ufdzf 1492369825 Received: from localhost (unknown [188.113.81.93]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E2379244D9; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 15:10:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Marius Bakke To: Roel Janssen , 26534@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#26534: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1. In-Reply-To: <87a87ga233.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a87ga233.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.24.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.1.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:10:24 +0200 Message-ID: <87vaq4kw2n.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26534 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Roel Janssen writes: > From 802c557c95ae9cbe7edeec1ab58fc05ef4c4cd32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Roel Janssen > Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 15:53:54 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1. > > * gnu/packages/glib.scm (glib): Update to 2.52.1. > --- > gnu/packages/glib.scm | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/glib.scm b/gnu/packages/glib.scm > index 6de9cce0b..4e29a550b 100644 > --- a/gnu/packages/glib.scm > +++ b/gnu/packages/glib.scm > @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ shared NFS home directories.") > (define glib > (package > (name "glib") > - (version "2.50.3") > + (version "2.52.1") > (source (origin > (method url-fetch) > (uri (string-append "mirror://gnome/sources/" > @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ shared NFS home directories.") > name "-" version ".tar.xz")) > (sha256 > (base32 > - "16frrwhc1yqkzx6bgh3060g94dr2biab17fb01mrni819jzr9vl2")) > + "0vsqrvjwsk2x3mm2i428hpm5vgsi1b384l6xdhm7xmzj2yw2d34l")) > (patches (search-patches "glib-tests-timer.patch")))) > (build-system gnu-build-system) > (outputs '("out" ; everything > --=20 > 2.12.1 > > Dear Guix, > > Is it OK to update glib? I suspect this would require some other GTK updates as well. Maybe we can start a new "gnome-updates" branch[0] and try to bring everything up to date. "glib" alone has almost 1500 dependent packages which is too much for "staging". What do you think? [0] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg00933.html --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAljzwaAACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPoGwwf9Hzjhy3W9NqapjiOkzN8cWH10ndB+Dg2xWWqo3yka5Obgz/fc12PUiJ6j Thfn02jezjB8wtIr2i63mr4JGAdNZ8UN7MxThIn1FM4XBVtdFfCwbGHHF/LuFIzy llNnl0Lve1Bg6pDP44gq544MXgoq+z083q39054jiUxQGsHU/0NSE8CLSEYvC60e toD7KuFBNrmUpaSXBEA6wGj85udew2IWQH2g/OwAIhhCgwnMvPaBli2fLzvPodbs +t9C5XkgB5SM5JGtU/d9mNjB5I6c0xnBvehlLiHQ8S1HhdNnrShx0OqcSg33M001 tlOT8RZ7adHaja/9MGGlfUTwwXtScQ== =/EHu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 17 08:49:52 2017 Received: (at 26534) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Apr 2017 12:49:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51661 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d066J-00042w-AH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 08:49:52 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50178) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d066H-00042j-Ru for 26534@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 08:49:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d066A-0006n4-54 for 26534@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 08:49:44 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:44266) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d066A-0006mp-1k; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 08:49:42 -0400 Received: from ip112-245-209-87.adsl2.static.versatel.nl ([87.209.245.112]:55483 helo=antelope) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1d0669-0002Ao-EA; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 08:49:41 -0400 References: <87a87ga233.fsf@gnu.org> <87vaq4kw2n.fsf@fastmail.com> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.1.1 From: Roel Janssen To: Marius Bakke Subject: Re: bug#26534: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1. In-reply-to: <87vaq4kw2n.fsf@fastmail.com> Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 14:49:38 +0200 Message-ID: <871ssr2o7x.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26534 Cc: 26534@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Marius Bakke writes: > Roel Janssen writes: > >> From 802c557c95ae9cbe7edeec1ab58fc05ef4c4cd32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Roel Janssen >> Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 15:53:54 +0200 >> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1. >> >> * gnu/packages/glib.scm (glib): Update to 2.52.1. >> --- >> gnu/packages/glib.scm | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/gnu/packages/glib.scm b/gnu/packages/glib.scm >> index 6de9cce0b..4e29a550b 100644 >> --- a/gnu/packages/glib.scm >> +++ b/gnu/packages/glib.scm >> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ shared NFS home directories.") >> (define glib >> (package >> (name "glib") >> - (version "2.50.3") >> + (version "2.52.1") >> (source (origin >> (method url-fetch) >> (uri (string-append "mirror://gnome/sources/" >> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ shared NFS home directories.") >> name "-" version ".tar.xz")) >> (sha256 >> (base32 >> - "16frrwhc1yqkzx6bgh3060g94dr2biab17fb01mrni819jzr9vl2")) >> + "0vsqrvjwsk2x3mm2i428hpm5vgsi1b384l6xdhm7xmzj2yw2d34l")) >> (patches (search-patches "glib-tests-timer.patch")))) >> (build-system gnu-build-system) >> (outputs '("out" ; everything >> -- >> 2.12.1 >> >> Dear Guix, >> >> Is it OK to update glib? > > I suspect this would require some other GTK updates as well. Maybe we > can start a new "gnome-updates" branch[0] and try to bring everything up > to date. "glib" alone has almost 1500 dependent packages which is too > much for "staging". What do you think? > > [0] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg00933.html This is a good idea. The ultimate purpose is to get the latest GNOME release in GNU Guix. I cannot carry this task entirely myself, if we would like to get it in before the next GNOME release.. ;) So, I am not sure we need to build everything on Hydra, since it's already under a high load. Maybe it's enough to create a branch in the Git repository and do the builds locally? Kind regards, Roel Janssen From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 17 12:31:39 2017 Received: (at 26534) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Apr 2017 16:31:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52722 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d09Yv-00012l-Kh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 12:31:37 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:44851) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d09Yt-00012c-B8 for 26534@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 12:31:36 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1790209E8; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 12:31:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 17 Apr 2017 12:31:34 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=l5Pf0Xv4ofBe5PAOHqT7mxiv7ZDxT/K5GkDmylZxi oc=; b=zkCaD6J4e+mtCYtZB7vhfxthSh1NrQ409uJCgAtU5K1cmgXVnpvdFHgEz 61OOVYUZrkgt36VuJFtVmRF2feVHHXvnta7ve+arL4BHM4RDINLtvoNXqN+gD5/H 962CL4Tj4UPpFOO5Csmjz03XLsJE5jDnfdjE5hCvfUZ3fnA/kmDs8hZJX1Qw6GNr yP/kIqyTScbdD5jF6/Ina+UJLlzrIOCP/eldY/DiHy/DS+j8UT0xpmLBM+wLQWdY mLA3FDT3XADbyYRF8Jz3/Ke1NoBS435B/CM4lX1D3DGgyjdXpjN05cccJlIXadKY j4arl4Vnbwz8Lhh7GWJMW/hAPZHMg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=l5Pf0Xv4ofBe5PAOHq T7mxiv7ZDxT/K5GkDmylZxioc=; b=HJ7ubDCYYCdo91wia7ph4PEFKLoSUh4N8G aCmY7R/rrQ67AWZwRQ6hRWRpSBoO+FiUYqjhOb5FFCCk+v4onW43ZhT8J6fKLfuX fYiAvxFy1zrr++q9ZENFrY7N0VAFORFGWn0MHygBpmVTCNTJQVhYgUR0mo9ye7lL sTefSNPAvX2i0wcm4iCQbuKsv4sK3mMJ1+61ADx78K3eC7AfCGxLmUNNpIcRHSdx NngeAdWNRt/uBk9azbXxYjq2cBNOx2EpxfK3ru1EJIonuhJyHLmMU1fvliArFjn5 pipOryKsDoBDWkKrvRaJ+b6/0iPtTMVGIpklmPQMYui6VYFZA1ng== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: cyvAjqkW1IFWefBaEf3plTloMVIkczH4397mvL6BUtQy 1492446694 Received: from localhost (unknown [188.113.81.93]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 76A487E2C3; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 12:31:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Marius Bakke To: Roel Janssen Subject: Re: bug#26534: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1. In-Reply-To: <871ssr2o7x.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a87ga233.fsf@gnu.org> <87vaq4kw2n.fsf@fastmail.com> <871ssr2o7x.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.24.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.1.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 18:31:32 +0200 Message-ID: <87fuh7knbv.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26534 Cc: 26534@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Roel Janssen writes: > Marius Bakke writes: > >> Roel Janssen writes: >> >>> From 802c557c95ae9cbe7edeec1ab58fc05ef4c4cd32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>> From: Roel Janssen >>> Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 15:53:54 +0200 >>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1. >>> >>> * gnu/packages/glib.scm (glib): Update to 2.52.1. >>> --- >>> gnu/packages/glib.scm | 4 ++-- >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/glib.scm b/gnu/packages/glib.scm >>> index 6de9cce0b..4e29a550b 100644 >>> --- a/gnu/packages/glib.scm >>> +++ b/gnu/packages/glib.scm >>> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ shared NFS home directories.") >>> (define glib >>> (package >>> (name "glib") >>> - (version "2.50.3") >>> + (version "2.52.1") >>> (source (origin >>> (method url-fetch) >>> (uri (string-append "mirror://gnome/sources/" >>> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ shared NFS home directories.") >>> name "-" version ".tar.xz")) >>> (sha256 >>> (base32 >>> - "16frrwhc1yqkzx6bgh3060g94dr2biab17fb01mrni819jzr9vl2")) >>> + "0vsqrvjwsk2x3mm2i428hpm5vgsi1b384l6xdhm7xmzj2yw2d34l")) >>> (patches (search-patches "glib-tests-timer.patch")))) >>> (build-system gnu-build-system) >>> (outputs '("out" ; everything >>> --=20 >>> 2.12.1 >>> >>> Dear Guix, >>> >>> Is it OK to update glib? >> >> I suspect this would require some other GTK updates as well. Maybe we >> can start a new "gnome-updates" branch[0] and try to bring everything up >> to date. "glib" alone has almost 1500 dependent packages which is too >> much for "staging". What do you think? >> >> [0] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg00933.html > > This is a good idea. The ultimate purpose is to get the latest GNOME > release in GNU Guix. I cannot carry this task entirely myself, if we > would like to get it in before the next GNOME release.. ;) > > So, I am not sure we need to build everything on Hydra, since it's > already under a high load. Maybe it's enough to create a branch in the > Git repository and do the builds locally? I think pushing a "gnome-updates" branch to Savannah is a good start :) `./pre-inst-env guix refresh -u gnome` appears able to do the grunt of it. Let's start a Hydra evaluation once most packages are updated and see how it goes :) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlj07eUACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPpRKgf/WjSrBcCXHhRAfMuhu38EMFIj/RVVRKJKHH+W7J4UZxYzBL+iHUrRczot gBhfyfBj+LYWxsFnv0Y8gFP2sqTVYR/4XERASj+dPkyOVYmzqOyxsWOUlKtL4zKZ 5Tkmdc4xGhQJmORJz0mDnEGLYe/YfTa9ntLXAHppLHaZ5sS3SN8LF3flJ0jp6Imf wrg2l+AQH1uPQBy2rxx3CtfcFa5NVSgZdTfzpl6qiL7mPYOs1jTv3RLkd4EtK1e/ JFAldPtC5Rc/fbnGCCk+U1XO+TNq6q/LQTncXRlcyv8qBH0ewvkqzzLO2Z00HFkE dWkw/NQAudIL60BPPDg4FTX/5oNYUg== =ZHuY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 17 18:13:18 2017 Received: (at 26534) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Apr 2017 22:13:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53127 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d0EtZ-0004Ny-Tu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 18:13:18 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38448) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d0EtX-0004Nl-Qt for 26534@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 18:13:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d0EtN-0002U4-Id for 26534@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 18:13:10 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:51977) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d0EtN-0002Tz-Fb; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 18:13:05 -0400 Received: from ip112-245-209-87.adsl2.static.versatel.nl ([87.209.245.112]:58228 helo=antelope) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1d0EtM-00051z-Tz; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 18:13:05 -0400 References: <87a87ga233.fsf@gnu.org> <87vaq4kw2n.fsf@fastmail.com> <871ssr2o7x.fsf@gnu.org> <87fuh7knbv.fsf@fastmail.com> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.1.1 From: Roel Janssen To: Marius Bakke Subject: Re: bug#26534: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1. In-reply-to: <87fuh7knbv.fsf@fastmail.com> Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:12:57 +0200 Message-ID: <87shl6r8d2.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26534 Cc: 26534@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Marius Bakke writes: > Roel Janssen writes: > >> Marius Bakke writes: >> >>> Roel Janssen writes: >>> >>>> From 802c557c95ae9cbe7edeec1ab58fc05ef4c4cd32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>>> From: Roel Janssen >>>> Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 15:53:54 +0200 >>>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1. >>>> >>>> * gnu/packages/glib.scm (glib): Update to 2.52.1. >>>> --- >>>> gnu/packages/glib.scm | 4 ++-- >>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/glib.scm b/gnu/packages/glib.scm >>>> index 6de9cce0b..4e29a550b 100644 >>>> --- a/gnu/packages/glib.scm >>>> +++ b/gnu/packages/glib.scm >>>> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ shared NFS home directories.") >>>> (define glib >>>> (package >>>> (name "glib") >>>> - (version "2.50.3") >>>> + (version "2.52.1") >>>> (source (origin >>>> (method url-fetch) >>>> (uri (string-append "mirror://gnome/sources/" >>>> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ shared NFS home directories.") >>>> name "-" version ".tar.xz")) >>>> (sha256 >>>> (base32 >>>> - "16frrwhc1yqkzx6bgh3060g94dr2biab17fb01mrni819jzr9vl2")) >>>> + "0vsqrvjwsk2x3mm2i428hpm5vgsi1b384l6xdhm7xmzj2yw2d34l")) >>>> (patches (search-patches "glib-tests-timer.patch")))) >>>> (build-system gnu-build-system) >>>> (outputs '("out" ; everything >>>> -- >>>> 2.12.1 >>>> >>>> Dear Guix, >>>> >>>> Is it OK to update glib? >>> >>> I suspect this would require some other GTK updates as well. Maybe we >>> can start a new "gnome-updates" branch[0] and try to bring everything up >>> to date. "glib" alone has almost 1500 dependent packages which is too >>> much for "staging". What do you think? >>> >>> [0] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg00933.html >> >> This is a good idea. The ultimate purpose is to get the latest GNOME >> release in GNU Guix. I cannot carry this task entirely myself, if we >> would like to get it in before the next GNOME release.. ;) >> >> So, I am not sure we need to build everything on Hydra, since it's >> already under a high load. Maybe it's enough to create a branch in the >> Git repository and do the builds locally? > > I think pushing a "gnome-updates" branch to Savannah is a good start :) > `./pre-inst-env guix refresh -u gnome` appears able to do the grunt of > it. Let's start a Hydra evaluation once most packages are updated and > see how it goes :) I pushed the branch and put the glib update there. I will push of 'refresh -u gnome' there as well. Kind regards, Roel Janssen From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 17 18:19:39 2017 Received: (at 26534) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Apr 2017 22:19:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53137 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d0Ezi-0004XZ-Tg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 18:19:39 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:57945) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d0Ezh-0004XS-C3 for 26534@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 18:19:37 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4560220873; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 18:19:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 17 Apr 2017 18:19:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=oNnUOeZsA8Ld5OV6t4YVYsBB8HyuK8nFlFBkPLk6z wQ=; b=E36AdGqE7euNHmndhoasSrV1Aaw73bGf3/X+VFm8zsTS8rxB921aeXcIC +I0Ogf6pUBm0evPdmIwTmISAGbkCQK9QyL2GUSsKh6z9yU5sOreCtE+dr083QDYR WVvH1Ouqcpw19Qi107XUai/041HDnA1sDti5jGLFYtQGp4hqBMp5NgZa0sMgb8xt wh/JtJOJYCEQZUMojNc78rmJU8UiMSnhmO8vTPDpY8byihZRUqtL6SlDpkRfFkSU Rt3Yf8FPKu1HRoAeuQHStMDuKYEVI6TcT0Q5Pq6DQnwAm++2BbBjv244eF9ZHtBP JIa9jw0ANO2DKd8dOi9jw/g0HHWJg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=oNnUOeZsA8Ld5OV6t4 YVYsBB8HyuK8nFlFBkPLk6zwQ=; b=Xef/CDr6S4euxgqODZHQvcMiSnr8s0UU8o gjz94AqcTFPdmv9gD1RUAz61sjmzDh/2fFJ7YJ+tzr2R71ybYUpkydJmSoxu/3Kp l5NQ6wzrw4+2J4IRPccMk0invI5UrcIh+8uBBM6X60+XEtAN834dksKjMZfRn+Ji YseBjMqmMBGXpL4a+hLdmrm9Civ+A0y2MP/ADJmL6ujfhUiLhvArqQQKPiGozkHT GbCRO8ncAX41l594ShmOobHKrCYEDJJYCutq/PdUwmWxuOFmaBV0KG3OThyS6+av GfsyFcfigV9nTTkYpAGzbkOrORkukbujs8T4MXrvvS7U0BYpdZ5A== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: kh7YOd3/xNRUsBjlQme2NP3l4+4HyT5xR87FytuJU/u2 1492467576 Received: from localhost (unknown [188.113.81.93]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A97947E6A3; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 18:19:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Marius Bakke To: Roel Janssen Subject: Re: bug#26534: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1. In-Reply-To: <87shl6r8d2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a87ga233.fsf@gnu.org> <87vaq4kw2n.fsf@fastmail.com> <871ssr2o7x.fsf@gnu.org> <87fuh7knbv.fsf@fastmail.com> <87shl6r8d2.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.24.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.1.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:19:34 +0200 Message-ID: <87shl6k77t.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26534 Cc: 26534@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Roel Janssen writes: > Marius Bakke writes: > >> Roel Janssen writes: >> >>> Marius Bakke writes: >>> >>>> Roel Janssen writes: >>>> >>>>> From 802c557c95ae9cbe7edeec1ab58fc05ef4c4cd32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>>>> From: Roel Janssen >>>>> Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 15:53:54 +0200 >>>>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1. >>>>> >>>>> * gnu/packages/glib.scm (glib): Update to 2.52.1. >>>>> --- >>>>> gnu/packages/glib.scm | 4 ++-- >>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/glib.scm b/gnu/packages/glib.scm >>>>> index 6de9cce0b..4e29a550b 100644 >>>>> --- a/gnu/packages/glib.scm >>>>> +++ b/gnu/packages/glib.scm >>>>> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ shared NFS home directories.") >>>>> (define glib >>>>> (package >>>>> (name "glib") >>>>> - (version "2.50.3") >>>>> + (version "2.52.1") >>>>> (source (origin >>>>> (method url-fetch) >>>>> (uri (string-append "mirror://gnome/sources/" >>>>> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ shared NFS home directories.") >>>>> name "-" version ".tar.xz")) >>>>> (sha256 >>>>> (base32 >>>>> - "16frrwhc1yqkzx6bgh3060g94dr2biab17fb01mrni819jzr9vl2"= )) >>>>> + "0vsqrvjwsk2x3mm2i428hpm5vgsi1b384l6xdhm7xmzj2yw2d34l"= )) >>>>> (patches (search-patches "glib-tests-timer.patch")))) >>>>> (build-system gnu-build-system) >>>>> (outputs '("out" ; everything >>>>> --=20 >>>>> 2.12.1 >>>>> >>>>> Dear Guix, >>>>> >>>>> Is it OK to update glib? >>>> >>>> I suspect this would require some other GTK updates as well. Maybe we >>>> can start a new "gnome-updates" branch[0] and try to bring everything = up >>>> to date. "glib" alone has almost 1500 dependent packages which is too >>>> much for "staging". What do you think? >>>> >>>> [0] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg00933.html >>> >>> This is a good idea. The ultimate purpose is to get the latest GNOME >>> release in GNU Guix. I cannot carry this task entirely myself, if we >>> would like to get it in before the next GNOME release.. ;) >>> >>> So, I am not sure we need to build everything on Hydra, since it's >>> already under a high load. Maybe it's enough to create a branch in the >>> Git repository and do the builds locally? >> >> I think pushing a "gnome-updates" branch to Savannah is a good start :) >> `./pre-inst-env guix refresh -u gnome` appears able to do the grunt of >> it. Let's start a Hydra evaluation once most packages are updated and >> see how it goes :) > > I pushed the branch and put the glib update there. I will push of > 'refresh -u gnome' there as well. Oops, I meant "refresh -t gnome -u" here :) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlj1P3YACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPra0AgAscQevLb14/eupyaR2hWEK34xUJb1H+jix1hqgPimmUyU9NMTOMWS49Hf q2EHq7WzfuDjLR8c5aHUMUr56cKjZCSwwp2lwgLnkKFAZKw5m2qLCbsexFZ2XPEE QX4zf2lcJYUUcL9kyrgatCybFXi5Wnixv40a488pc/McVSQWFaQR/4Atl7uRSJ7N Ucxzh4fxBH6RSWWJgIkim+6ZNriOoitcBAi/5b+PK14BW589wPALKtzEFCcu2Wif 5fFbG0wObfUXq6FgYSOySpdf2/fh4eucKh82VuuGG8C9p7tdvBpON3Jwdl1jHJcj 2aMOE26R2GdQwImRjJB3Bn9kOTmNRQ== =Dkai -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 23 13:44:48 2017 Received: (at 26534) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Apr 2017 17:44:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36709 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d2LZ2-0007ZW-7D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 13:44:48 -0400 Received: from lb1.openmailbox.org ([5.79.108.160]:60773 helo=mail.openmailbox.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d2LZ0-0007ZM-Ng for 26534@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 13:44:47 -0400 Received: by mail.openmailbox.org (Postfix, from userid 20002) id 67CBF50982A; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 19:44:45 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=openmailbox.org; s=openmailbox; t=1492969485; bh=RFtgmU2kmDZDeAKBYuERTw9/T+RUdY4iJpajHD4NYGM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=LIWcjRzwi0PN3eWgcRrjo7d3lGpwhr9HxRMGIUo5o4cVrH75lqrZ1pdUCj+6T5B45 QrcSVAD288JbqeBIJSjNHV6MLlM/+cY68F8QQHxVbXErFVVxsKMMRaAkqOsn26qm6C EDaQovTa49sRccBtvmUHiDUO09Z87Ty/ajjh09Gk= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on ZDZR002 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RECEIVED,NO_RELAYS, T_DKIM_INVALID,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 From: Kei Kebreau DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=openmailbox.org; s=openmailbox; t=1492969484; bh=RFtgmU2kmDZDeAKBYuERTw9/T+RUdY4iJpajHD4NYGM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=d29m/A1f4KbwwEHNmEXk/55ucWulu4kj3PKPXbTSxBHtvhqFL9jXBKvLaFl1VDjAj rRzwdUkfCdVGn10JVWSLvNC8WgLP+45VPW2OeschuM61Te532Z4p/eno9hbsEFgyO+ i+eFtnFZwDcyW5W/w+HPRiMv0G7xa+aEsBOFcxlw= To: Roel Janssen Subject: Re: bug#26534: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1. References: <87a87ga233.fsf@gnu.org> <87vaq4kw2n.fsf@fastmail.com> <871ssr2o7x.fsf@gnu.org> <87fuh7knbv.fsf@fastmail.com> <87shl6r8d2.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2017 13:44:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87shl6r8d2.fsf@gnu.org> (Roel Janssen's message of "Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:12:57 +0200") Message-ID: <87wpabj9x4.fsf@openmailbox.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26534 Cc: Marius Bakke , 26534@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Roel Janssen writes: > Marius Bakke writes: > >> Roel Janssen writes: >> >>> Marius Bakke writes: >>> >>>> Roel Janssen writes: >>>> >>>>> From 802c557c95ae9cbe7edeec1ab58fc05ef4c4cd32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>>>> From: Roel Janssen >>>>> Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 15:53:54 +0200 >>>>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1. >>>>> >>>>> * gnu/packages/glib.scm (glib): Update to 2.52.1. >>>>> --- >>>>> gnu/packages/glib.scm | 4 ++-- >>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/glib.scm b/gnu/packages/glib.scm >>>>> index 6de9cce0b..4e29a550b 100644 >>>>> --- a/gnu/packages/glib.scm >>>>> +++ b/gnu/packages/glib.scm >>>>> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ shared NFS home directories.") >>>>> (define glib >>>>> (package >>>>> (name "glib") >>>>> - (version "2.50.3") >>>>> + (version "2.52.1") >>>>> (source (origin >>>>> (method url-fetch) >>>>> (uri (string-append "mirror://gnome/sources/" >>>>> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ shared NFS home directories.") >>>>> name "-" version ".tar.xz")) >>>>> (sha256 >>>>> (base32 >>>>> - "16frrwhc1yqkzx6bgh3060g94dr2biab17fb01mrni819jzr9vl2"= )) >>>>> + "0vsqrvjwsk2x3mm2i428hpm5vgsi1b384l6xdhm7xmzj2yw2d34l"= )) >>>>> (patches (search-patches "glib-tests-timer.patch")))) >>>>> (build-system gnu-build-system) >>>>> (outputs '("out" ; everything >>>>> --=20 >>>>> 2.12.1 >>>>> >>>>> Dear Guix, >>>>> >>>>> Is it OK to update glib? >>>> >>>> I suspect this would require some other GTK updates as well. Maybe we >>>> can start a new "gnome-updates" branch[0] and try to bring everything = up >>>> to date. "glib" alone has almost 1500 dependent packages which is too >>>> much for "staging". What do you think? >>>> >>>> [0] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg00933.html >>> >>> This is a good idea. The ultimate purpose is to get the latest GNOME >>> release in GNU Guix. I cannot carry this task entirely myself, if we >>> would like to get it in before the next GNOME release.. ;) >>> >>> So, I am not sure we need to build everything on Hydra, since it's >>> already under a high load. Maybe it's enough to create a branch in the >>> Git repository and do the builds locally? >> >> I think pushing a "gnome-updates" branch to Savannah is a good start :) >> `./pre-inst-env guix refresh -u gnome` appears able to do the grunt of >> it. Let's start a Hydra evaluation once most packages are updated and >> see how it goes :) > > I pushed the branch and put the glib update there. I will push of > 'refresh -u gnome' there as well. > > Kind regards, > Roel Janssen Hi Roel, I'm looking at updating GNOME packages as well. When I tried building the most recent version of Eye of GNOME, glib gave me two test failures. Do you think these failures could be a result of glib dependencies needing to be updated, or is this fixable on its own? Thanks in advance, Kei --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEg7ZwOtzKO2lLzi2m5qXuPBlGeg0FAlj86AcACgkQ5qXuPBlG eg0y2BAAs4ZUKppGXqVpwYFSbrozbj/3Gn5iqapLS/kyufTFAE+d9DLxPr4Odz15 yT5hg+OQAzNFg+Wi9VpTs2dwh5UNO3NqDiF27VQRSry5kMmWG1RytmY8ScKTBkJx 3SvbOMx/c2TH72CRkd0UQDiU1JC4RR8+AGIHCskG1rpiSA0HkILSjPjdkv6Oplkb m+RplGFaJz5X14uVdgTj81ou7X8eHyk2frG9HHA83UDipN9ItuD8VnbpLvBT26fL KMaNU672zjv5HlF6CsLW/l3t1BQhPX6SGpXjPtK59IFEoUXqR8qKFZlxcsi7XjCy 3zClpKI/OLM+EmKKci9VUw7g73SN+RrNQ8WbKibjAnLFMFjyg4p0XgSgAhmp53Gk UjdQBvgN1c6Rqb83G2cnc/uQ75nYhc56sLTLFhDHwcHxgR+ZH+kagRahZ5BD93B5 GnwPI7/boPJ/tiQETOCHGjSTPHzxtCYds3gFK4nS9RZ4yQFPSlbKNbH39Vc6Qaj4 KivcjDxAWj5eCvA04zeUa3EM7zU4gILh3Nh+HeDhYmH3P9pNgQhwvAx+OyFYnIA4 SPpsCUUsRzdmR+52y887PN+FWuL1wJRnDn+6189Js1oBgyE9+RRJLLFIWaUIDoS7 sJjb0fc9tEdoNUZtppKRSzG8mKRkGqvfUP+OO9n0VCdPj8UtQWw= =HQ3u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 24 08:06:15 2017 Received: (at 26534) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Apr 2017 12:06:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37219 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d2ckw-00051W-TE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 08:06:15 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47163) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d2cku-00051J-FI for 26534@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 08:06:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d2ckk-0003Ze-E5 for 26534@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 08:06:06 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:46153) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d2ckk-0003Za-Ag; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 08:06:02 -0400 Received: from [143.121.198.177] (port=43482 helo=cog147) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1d2ckj-0000F3-NT; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 08:06:02 -0400 References: <87a87ga233.fsf@gnu.org> <87vaq4kw2n.fsf@fastmail.com> <871ssr2o7x.fsf@gnu.org> <87fuh7knbv.fsf@fastmail.com> <87shl6r8d2.fsf@gnu.org> <87wpabj9x4.fsf@openmailbox.org> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.1.1 From: Roel Janssen To: Kei Kebreau Subject: Re: bug#26534: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1. In-reply-to: <87wpabj9x4.fsf@openmailbox.org> Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 14:05:59 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26534 Cc: Marius Bakke , 26534@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Kei Kebreau writes: > Roel Janssen writes: > >> Marius Bakke writes: >> >>> Roel Janssen writes: >>> >>>> Marius Bakke writes: >>>> >>>>> Roel Janssen writes: >>>>> >>>>>> From 802c557c95ae9cbe7edeec1ab58fc05ef4c4cd32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>>>>> From: Roel Janssen >>>>>> Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 15:53:54 +0200 >>>>>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1. >>>>>> >>>>>> * gnu/packages/glib.scm (glib): Update to 2.52.1. >>>>>> --- >>>>>> gnu/packages/glib.scm | 4 ++-- >>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/glib.scm b/gnu/packages/glib.scm >>>>>> index 6de9cce0b..4e29a550b 100644 >>>>>> --- a/gnu/packages/glib.scm >>>>>> +++ b/gnu/packages/glib.scm >>>>>> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ shared NFS home directories.") >>>>>> (define glib >>>>>> (package >>>>>> (name "glib") >>>>>> - (version "2.50.3") >>>>>> + (version "2.52.1") >>>>>> (source (origin >>>>>> (method url-fetch) >>>>>> (uri (string-append "mirror://gnome/sources/" >>>>>> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ shared NFS home directories.") >>>>>> name "-" version ".tar.xz")) >>>>>> (sha256 >>>>>> (base32 >>>>>> - "16frrwhc1yqkzx6bgh3060g94dr2biab17fb01mrni819jzr9vl2")) >>>>>> + "0vsqrvjwsk2x3mm2i428hpm5vgsi1b384l6xdhm7xmzj2yw2d34l")) >>>>>> (patches (search-patches "glib-tests-timer.patch")))) >>>>>> (build-system gnu-build-system) >>>>>> (outputs '("out" ; everything >>>>>> -- >>>>>> 2.12.1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Dear Guix, >>>>>> >>>>>> Is it OK to update glib? >>>>> >>>>> I suspect this would require some other GTK updates as well. Maybe we >>>>> can start a new "gnome-updates" branch[0] and try to bring everything up >>>>> to date. "glib" alone has almost 1500 dependent packages which is too >>>>> much for "staging". What do you think? >>>>> >>>>> [0] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg00933.html >>>> >>>> This is a good idea. The ultimate purpose is to get the latest GNOME >>>> release in GNU Guix. I cannot carry this task entirely myself, if we >>>> would like to get it in before the next GNOME release.. ;) >>>> >>>> So, I am not sure we need to build everything on Hydra, since it's >>>> already under a high load. Maybe it's enough to create a branch in the >>>> Git repository and do the builds locally? >>> >>> I think pushing a "gnome-updates" branch to Savannah is a good start :) >>> `./pre-inst-env guix refresh -u gnome` appears able to do the grunt of >>> it. Let's start a Hydra evaluation once most packages are updated and >>> see how it goes :) >> >> I pushed the branch and put the glib update there. I will push of >> 'refresh -u gnome' there as well. >> >> Kind regards, >> Roel Janssen > > Hi Roel, > > I'm looking at updating GNOME packages as well. When I tried building > the most recent version of Eye of GNOME, glib gave me two test > failures. Do you think these failures could be a result of glib > dependencies needing to be updated, or is this fixable on its own? > > Thanks in advance, > Kei Hi Kei, I don't know. I did: $ guix refresh -t gnome -u Do you have the build output log for the failed GLib? Kind regards, Roel Janssen From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 24 15:21:58 2017 Received: (at 26534) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Apr 2017 19:21:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38275 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d2jYb-00029r-Re for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 15:21:58 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56368) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d2jYZ-00029f-Ub for 26534@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 15:21:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d2jYP-0003wr-UY for 26534@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 15:21:50 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:52743) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d2jYP-0003wh-R5; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 15:21:45 -0400 Received: from ip112-245-209-87.adsl2.static.versatel.nl ([87.209.245.112]:54527 helo=antelope) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1d2jYP-00022T-9o; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 15:21:45 -0400 References: <87a87ga233.fsf@gnu.org> <87vaq4kw2n.fsf@fastmail.com> <871ssr2o7x.fsf@gnu.org> <87fuh7knbv.fsf@fastmail.com> <87shl6r8d2.fsf@gnu.org> <87wpabj9x4.fsf@openmailbox.org> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.2.1 From: Roel Janssen To: Kei Kebreau Subject: Re: bug#26534: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1. In-reply-to: <87wpabj9x4.fsf@openmailbox.org> Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 21:21:42 +0200 Message-ID: <87mvb5ligp.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26534 Cc: Marius Bakke , 26534@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Kei Kebreau writes: > Roel Janssen writes: > >> Marius Bakke writes: >> >>> Roel Janssen writes: >>> >>>> Marius Bakke writes: >>>> >>>>> Roel Janssen writes: >>>>> >>>>>> From 802c557c95ae9cbe7edeec1ab58fc05ef4c4cd32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>>>>> From: Roel Janssen >>>>>> Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 15:53:54 +0200 >>>>>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1. >>>>>> >>>>>> * gnu/packages/glib.scm (glib): Update to 2.52.1. >>>>>> --- >>>>>> gnu/packages/glib.scm | 4 ++-- >>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/glib.scm b/gnu/packages/glib.scm >>>>>> index 6de9cce0b..4e29a550b 100644 >>>>>> --- a/gnu/packages/glib.scm >>>>>> +++ b/gnu/packages/glib.scm >>>>>> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ shared NFS home directories.") >>>>>> (define glib >>>>>> (package >>>>>> (name "glib") >>>>>> - (version "2.50.3") >>>>>> + (version "2.52.1") >>>>>> (source (origin >>>>>> (method url-fetch) >>>>>> (uri (string-append "mirror://gnome/sources/" >>>>>> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ shared NFS home directories.") >>>>>> name "-" version ".tar.xz")) >>>>>> (sha256 >>>>>> (base32 >>>>>> - "16frrwhc1yqkzx6bgh3060g94dr2biab17fb01mrni819jzr9vl2")) >>>>>> + "0vsqrvjwsk2x3mm2i428hpm5vgsi1b384l6xdhm7xmzj2yw2d34l")) >>>>>> (patches (search-patches "glib-tests-timer.patch")))) >>>>>> (build-system gnu-build-system) >>>>>> (outputs '("out" ; everything >>>>>> -- >>>>>> 2.12.1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Dear Guix, >>>>>> >>>>>> Is it OK to update glib? >>>>> >>>>> I suspect this would require some other GTK updates as well. Maybe we >>>>> can start a new "gnome-updates" branch[0] and try to bring everything up >>>>> to date. "glib" alone has almost 1500 dependent packages which is too >>>>> much for "staging". What do you think? >>>>> >>>>> [0] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg00933.html >>>> >>>> This is a good idea. The ultimate purpose is to get the latest GNOME >>>> release in GNU Guix. I cannot carry this task entirely myself, if we >>>> would like to get it in before the next GNOME release.. ;) >>>> >>>> So, I am not sure we need to build everything on Hydra, since it's >>>> already under a high load. Maybe it's enough to create a branch in the >>>> Git repository and do the builds locally? >>> >>> I think pushing a "gnome-updates" branch to Savannah is a good start :) >>> `./pre-inst-env guix refresh -u gnome` appears able to do the grunt of >>> it. Let's start a Hydra evaluation once most packages are updated and >>> see how it goes :) >> >> I pushed the branch and put the glib update there. I will push of >> 'refresh -u gnome' there as well. >> >> Kind regards, >> Roel Janssen > > Hi Roel, > > I'm looking at updating GNOME packages as well. When I tried building > the most recent version of Eye of GNOME, glib gave me two test > failures. Do you think these failures could be a result of glib > dependencies needing to be updated, or is this fixable on its own? > > Thanks in advance, > Kei Dear Kei, I think I have found what fixes the two failing tests.. I run the tests in parallel. When I disabled running them in parallel, two tests fail related to 'gdbus'. Kind regards, Roel Janssen From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 27 13:35:59 2017 Received: (at 26534) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Apr 2017 17:35:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43135 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3nKh-0006if-FT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 13:35:59 -0400 Received: from lb1.openmailbox.org ([5.79.108.160]:59280 helo=mail.openmailbox.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3nKf-0006iW-PG for 26534@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 13:35:58 -0400 Received: by mail.openmailbox.org (Postfix, from userid 20002) id 78E1E512676; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 19:35:55 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=openmailbox.org; s=openmailbox; t=1493314556; bh=sbofu216TWC8fWuhDUzR0pXzwkEIZqsRkY22Bftwsjo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=SOGvOdrqLuytlBmrqArM8P+jP1z3T52Ta+Gy21N1mUxNKmgiHvB1kdpzPrYwqqTeF OQz1Maid3Pl9yZJVMoz0ltiDim8Wiz6ywzJEjN6Rc2bEDWE/Bqs4VcoV852TA3mSxa QK9/SxJ2jQRT1nVByad6Gf2cg0Mipr87mdKC5wvQ= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on ZDZR002 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RECEIVED,NO_RELAYS, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 From: Kei Kebreau DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=openmailbox.org; s=openmailbox; t=1493314555; bh=sbofu216TWC8fWuhDUzR0pXzwkEIZqsRkY22Bftwsjo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=NJ/7rfWLYMGxjE42X1kYmPa/uBs0NjzYdVfU56U/960+GJaRiEHbCyaFDh9uQCl08 4B6NSlXrNeKpBTTP3VWIJk3+pODvA7Kb00JSlZ8zGrKlKWVtA0MQjX9lKLReGP7pgm bvzRj606p6h0B5sViC4ZQZj6ke0KOLLtgsmPd4D4= To: Roel Janssen Subject: Re: bug#26534: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1. References: <87a87ga233.fsf@gnu.org> <87vaq4kw2n.fsf@fastmail.com> <871ssr2o7x.fsf@gnu.org> <87fuh7knbv.fsf@fastmail.com> <87shl6r8d2.fsf@gnu.org> <87wpabj9x4.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87mvb5ligp.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 13:35:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87mvb5ligp.fsf@gnu.org> (Roel Janssen's message of "Mon, 24 Apr 2017 21:21:42 +0200") Message-ID: <87k26569ea.fsf@openmailbox.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26534 Cc: Marius Bakke , 26534@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Roel Janssen writes: > Kei Kebreau writes: > >> Roel Janssen writes: >> >>> Marius Bakke writes: >>> >>>> Roel Janssen writes: >>>> >>>>> Marius Bakke writes: >>>>> >>>>>> Roel Janssen writes: >>>>>> >>>>>>> From 802c557c95ae9cbe7edeec1ab58fc05ef4c4cd32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2= 001 >>>>>>> From: Roel Janssen >>>>>>> Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 15:53:54 +0200 >>>>>>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * gnu/packages/glib.scm (glib): Update to 2.52.1. >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> gnu/packages/glib.scm | 4 ++-- >>>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/glib.scm b/gnu/packages/glib.scm >>>>>>> index 6de9cce0b..4e29a550b 100644 >>>>>>> --- a/gnu/packages/glib.scm >>>>>>> +++ b/gnu/packages/glib.scm >>>>>>> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ shared NFS home directories.") >>>>>>> (define glib >>>>>>> (package >>>>>>> (name "glib") >>>>>>> - (version "2.50.3") >>>>>>> + (version "2.52.1") >>>>>>> (source (origin >>>>>>> (method url-fetch) >>>>>>> (uri (string-append "mirror://gnome/sources/" >>>>>>> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ shared NFS home directories.") >>>>>>> name "-" version ".tar.xz")) >>>>>>> (sha256 >>>>>>> (base32 >>>>>>> - "16frrwhc1yqkzx6bgh3060g94dr2biab17fb01mrni819jzr9vl= 2")) >>>>>>> + "0vsqrvjwsk2x3mm2i428hpm5vgsi1b384l6xdhm7xmzj2yw2d34= l")) >>>>>>> (patches (search-patches "glib-tests-timer.patch")))) >>>>>>> (build-system gnu-build-system) >>>>>>> (outputs '("out" ; everything >>>>>>> --=20 >>>>>>> 2.12.1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dear Guix, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is it OK to update glib? >>>>>> >>>>>> I suspect this would require some other GTK updates as well. Maybe we >>>>>> can start a new "gnome-updates" branch[0] and try to bring everythin= g up >>>>>> to date. "glib" alone has almost 1500 dependent packages which is too >>>>>> much for "staging". What do you think? >>>>>> >>>>>> [0] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg00933.h= tml >>>>> >>>>> This is a good idea. The ultimate purpose is to get the latest GNOME >>>>> release in GNU Guix. I cannot carry this task entirely myself, if we >>>>> would like to get it in before the next GNOME release.. ;) >>>>> >>>>> So, I am not sure we need to build everything on Hydra, since it's >>>>> already under a high load. Maybe it's enough to create a branch in t= he >>>>> Git repository and do the builds locally? >>>> >>>> I think pushing a "gnome-updates" branch to Savannah is a good start :) >>>> `./pre-inst-env guix refresh -u gnome` appears able to do the grunt of >>>> it. Let's start a Hydra evaluation once most packages are updated and >>>> see how it goes :) >>> >>> I pushed the branch and put the glib update there. I will push of >>> 'refresh -u gnome' there as well. >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Roel Janssen >> >> Hi Roel, >> >> I'm looking at updating GNOME packages as well. When I tried building >> the most recent version of Eye of GNOME, glib gave me two test >> failures. Do you think these failures could be a result of glib >> dependencies needing to be updated, or is this fixable on its own? >> >> Thanks in advance, >> Kei > > Dear Kei, > > I think I have found what fixes the two failing tests.. I run the tests > in parallel. When I disabled running them in parallel, two tests fail > related to 'gdbus'. > > Kind regards, > Roel Janssen I have good news! Your original patch works when I upgrade dbus to its latest version, 1.10.18. So now we just need to update dbus and get the update merged into gnome-updates. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJZAivtAAoJEOal7jwZRnoNYGUP+wWgtDzQKKScvu3V2sW9MC6G S9izHvz8xTU23LusJMDr5UK0c3aH359eKKR6Pi+8GffXOfOMuUndn5vCOpW0sKZy yQQA/JCLrc4XkUAr7zLGzS4S7jMyR4YZwiyKmpvfVn+W15eiICwKvfDian5v8pQu cmON8fi+4D5UjMiEnZVSfncerREU8RlhMyslvVVY2FMwxmpnjIgbVoZwNxE/DrC/ d/AXQhrvPYnG1E07j/yicyOhyyNEJIQCGsdhYYk8qIXnszpWjFoA9KXPBmc9c69q CbvKVWPvGXnQ8hcWO20SrNorHfzf51vqJB6MBTGuyWnsGuZuUY8x8LE9t9dvaqKV S9offICBUwcD+RCe6H0aDCaM93YXdquldK0cSYJOhwXEQWW+Skr3U0dXgWSkFQnZ z4AYtEbR4wChmH3Yj99AmvyB4AHOI8tkHcCyyQBtB9S77DvznPZ9XNV4YiHYj8EY cexftYMIruU9eTRmqSJfzMgOFQL7EDReeu+XcjjSTO7rCJwpFVq+X9+JkmNlPWJ5 8X05FmgougAHNOILVLb4gDPuV68QzyHl7G5puk06WPl04VikiDvE9CMyo0x64Dn/ OPG7kKUMNX3h9wDa6LTqDtuty6J3zQ14bQ02HcWgrcXarqaRnu+VXvjlukP/x5h+ cgGhDQ7DxQEh6HyJrv1K =/Bbs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 27 13:50:23 2017 Received: (at 26534) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Apr 2017 17:50:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43149 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3nYd-00074e-6O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 13:50:23 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:54791) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3nYa-00074W-Tk for 26534@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 13:50:21 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACFBC206F6; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 13:50:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 27 Apr 2017 13:50:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=12GZxjM6kwBofJonkrQX6tD/vrKO94pEwYQltywWZ Kc=; b=T0WNVQVVkWtgYPt5s7uFdBk5PplTRSyyAjH6/OkRwxeFxjnqo9kLBC4cA PjsdfUseOSLQxBI4NeDBpYXQOZCceqE8GczR5vp7QBKzQblBHiF5cPYtldZClD3p vnM/qJErMfxQP0v8j0XUbKBDNcefMEhQu18cU2l8Btj+K4fu5YexJpPYYiTn9QQ7 NkTNRdUKUAXRRMiTs75zczHZs8dsnLzes3yyMe9aq7t5W5kT0XmMP3hUSwzx5L86 jCRaAfV1CcKvOJTAK5EDKh6bkvbXe8dOTvDx7JwZH608eQd6mYAc8qrsZWGGwUR6 s3UGxGME8xusUKi+ifFuDFbipMdjg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=12GZxjM6kwBofJonkr QX6tD/vrKO94pEwYQltywWZKc=; b=B1WguJtANSU68vx40WrvfJ/1fyV4s31wBu mIAsf2mUC4G8JFub4JRLeRilLSY0jRXz1i8G+eI0few0rkiJLWO6bWFeHeDwQjgj vyV2Xp3s4Tht2g0SgAfxyvddo1qF4pUzDAxm+EWBota+QzmrsJ8cSIAloVkFWDqq 0cNk80MqpkU83tSZL+8fGU8qiPuITkg2b88vzcpq/fIhZIAtc/rYtPFioP51zU+a Ho98y+PlEIOBkZic9UPm6J2flIMDeNuy0b5NGrRtb5fK1fhx2jqkj8zr8/Nov2QI tITrHIer/P4dvxOx+pE3Qquv1PbS4fGGdhsUGk1x2UV58nuvov0Q== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: cq77J3v6N5hRKgGZZKVqS9WMkYnIPlMLbYcGjVr1yHq7 1493315420 Received: from localhost (unknown [188.113.81.93]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 367B87E8B9; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 13:50:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Marius Bakke To: Kei Kebreau , Roel Janssen Subject: Re: bug#26534: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1. In-Reply-To: <87k26569ea.fsf@openmailbox.org> References: <87a87ga233.fsf@gnu.org> <87vaq4kw2n.fsf@fastmail.com> <871ssr2o7x.fsf@gnu.org> <87fuh7knbv.fsf@fastmail.com> <87shl6r8d2.fsf@gnu.org> <87wpabj9x4.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87mvb5ligp.fsf@gnu.org> <87k26569ea.fsf@openmailbox.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.24.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.2.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 19:50:18 +0200 Message-ID: <87r30dbuzp.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26534 Cc: 26534@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Kei Kebreau writes: >>> Hi Roel, >>> >>> I'm looking at updating GNOME packages as well. When I tried building >>> the most recent version of Eye of GNOME, glib gave me two test >>> failures. Do you think these failures could be a result of glib >>> dependencies needing to be updated, or is this fixable on its own? >>> >>> Thanks in advance, >>> Kei >> >> Dear Kei, >> >> I think I have found what fixes the two failing tests.. I run the tests >> in parallel. When I disabled running them in parallel, two tests fail >> related to 'gdbus'. >> >> Kind regards, >> Roel Janssen > > I have good news! Your original patch works when I upgrade dbus to its > latest version, 1.10.18. So now we just need to update dbus and get the > update merged into gnome-updates. If "glib" depends on a newer "dbus", I think it should be added in 'gnome-updates' as well. Otherwise it will have to wait until the next 'core-updates' cycle slated for end of next month. Thanks for working on this! Let's try to start building this branch on Hydra next week, how does that sound? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlkCL1oACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPph8Qf+LzdViIPy6GfeQnF6QKKC0wn7ccPwg6rw/q3pe/CBHiPoF4um9MHNB0Nt WWzjF6adAGZyrKrKWTo8xTY2v36FRVx+2F53Vi4+2nEFdH8GMRnj9vGRhRqlrMiM o6Ttx0IKPDsz65S8gJnXJWak2Xv0bABCEWhAasYTDcE6WwmyfTTK/s8W1AvOBmM3 Yaj0eM795RxeuwPU4lIN/tHP9T9S22oJJIXTg98PW/EQkjAFMWfyXzo06rYWZPRZ 68tC2H42CleTD0wR6sJCjsfycrMPhwiANnBQ/UEht3ALRslaMxVNjXVRmAuL0HxO AXygJ/4YW7EQBVDi3kTk0781xLM6FA== =cg8Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 27 16:27:10 2017 Received: (at 26534) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Apr 2017 20:27:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43307 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3q0M-0004H9-F7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 16:27:10 -0400 Received: from lb1.openmailbox.org ([5.79.108.160]:47879 helo=mail.openmailbox.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3q0L-0004H1-35 for 26534@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 16:27:09 -0400 Received: by mail.openmailbox.org (Postfix, from userid 20002) id AD225512790; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 22:27:07 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=openmailbox.org; s=openmailbox; t=1493324827; bh=ltVKRYQBSfr+h01Juau4hY28zHRfiXpYHzrKWGeJw/U=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=lR4oNtnsvrIoidMsqcXTZUU2xUVQr47czeie9aQwCGSL6/m038FVnVrlXIHdpTgU7 mznPDpwU6tDp/LKRnqaXTofg0A73TifmTAGn4yGuQX/hpadH4xrUw3onqW1bF4WKzy FZC2j36V4d6lTTXs4tt5iEH710zlFEp7SRSGxrfw= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on ZDZR003 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RECEIVED,NO_RELAYS, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 From: Kei Kebreau DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=openmailbox.org; s=openmailbox; t=1493324827; bh=ltVKRYQBSfr+h01Juau4hY28zHRfiXpYHzrKWGeJw/U=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=lR4oNtnsvrIoidMsqcXTZUU2xUVQr47czeie9aQwCGSL6/m038FVnVrlXIHdpTgU7 mznPDpwU6tDp/LKRnqaXTofg0A73TifmTAGn4yGuQX/hpadH4xrUw3onqW1bF4WKzy FZC2j36V4d6lTTXs4tt5iEH710zlFEp7SRSGxrfw= To: Marius Bakke Subject: Re: bug#26534: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1. References: <87a87ga233.fsf@gnu.org> <87vaq4kw2n.fsf@fastmail.com> <871ssr2o7x.fsf@gnu.org> <87fuh7knbv.fsf@fastmail.com> <87shl6r8d2.fsf@gnu.org> <87wpabj9x4.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87mvb5ligp.fsf@gnu.org> <87k26569ea.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87r30dbuzp.fsf@fastmail.com> Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 16:26:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87r30dbuzp.fsf@fastmail.com> (Marius Bakke's message of "Thu, 27 Apr 2017 19:50:18 +0200") Message-ID: <87d1bx61gy.fsf@openmailbox.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26534 Cc: Roel Janssen , 26534@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Marius Bakke writes: > Kei Kebreau writes: > >>>> Hi Roel, >>>> >>>> I'm looking at updating GNOME packages as well. When I tried building >>>> the most recent version of Eye of GNOME, glib gave me two test >>>> failures. Do you think these failures could be a result of glib >>>> dependencies needing to be updated, or is this fixable on its own? >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance, >>>> Kei >>> >>> Dear Kei, >>> >>> I think I have found what fixes the two failing tests.. I run the tests >>> in parallel. When I disabled running them in parallel, two tests fail >>> related to 'gdbus'. >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Roel Janssen >> >> I have good news! Your original patch works when I upgrade dbus to its >> latest version, 1.10.18. So now we just need to update dbus and get the >> update merged into gnome-updates. > > If "glib" depends on a newer "dbus", I think it should be added in > 'gnome-updates' as well. Otherwise it will have to wait until the next > 'core-updates' cycle slated for end of next month. > > Thanks for working on this! Let's try to start building this branch on > Hydra next week, how does that sound? Provided that the rest of the package upgrades go smoothly, this is a good idea. If someone could review the dbus upgrade patch I submitted to the guix-patches mailing list, I can push it to gnome-updates. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJZAlQOAAoJEOal7jwZRnoNKAwP/j5nVgkTl8birO1QrA+ue736 gQT8mtL3OMxwUOlAAoSeJiqm4ekQXnqnX9gsqtm4r6Bqd8TPCysB0OjXnLwVstAx Y7XV8G8cyvECfH/CrtpJyJQ/g2+2i0uEfa8WgR1NyclPOwav1eoK6o40Ro1yPkZQ PwVwoucrd+VIg9+QZZvNOffWVJIuYqqwTio/0hyLkzKTykq2G5/bHN+bepQegKiN w6gvhlgezgQr1HAGGq8m21mB2WbaODm3WrEoHvrna1i/FvmJJMcf42O+dARjWBmA foTGH9dL3JXD0FS3tPoUOE2FzIhCOBGCTPfOgcjCO1w8SvxZfJaAzOd7n1E6fIPm eYlRlFd+UA4aV4AuiXo1JE07/VNFGjlf295dORScwm5N+LKw3mUErTl10g+2GKTQ pEX0r52TdviFhHTr0Fle1rhz5s/FSXRbDZ+TFHuHOv5xsW16bWDMzIbXEtjipnnM Ou1/6uIb5xNm6fEZ6UsrRJOkXqGWg+gjNZuqWw2qiUgXk0ONE5U9wWdP5jCvOVeG Vi6Ww7XimsZzCPxGlaNk2VTyoOQrdZvw91Tgfo7dU8tjhnhlM28rTe19kABetpcO sxnecIYZVCRB8f2XmfLHqJ43xbI15l2XsM1asl3hTa5TO7LTcZgOmWd8crDZnNuv tO5Lcjga0bHowyRnuYUw =8K5W -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Apr 28 06:37:03 2017 Received: (at 26534) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Apr 2017 10:37:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43650 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d43Gp-0007qo-JE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 06:37:03 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56147) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d43Gn-0007qJ-Dg for 26534@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 06:37:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d43Gd-00088W-HR for 26534@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 06:36:56 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:35208) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d43Gd-00088Q-Eh; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 06:36:51 -0400 Received: from [143.121.198.177] (port=59740 helo=cog147) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1d43Gc-00077o-Lm; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 06:36:51 -0400 References: <87a87ga233.fsf@gnu.org> <87vaq4kw2n.fsf@fastmail.com> <871ssr2o7x.fsf@gnu.org> <87fuh7knbv.fsf@fastmail.com> <87shl6r8d2.fsf@gnu.org> <87wpabj9x4.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87mvb5ligp.fsf@gnu.org> <87k26569ea.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87r30dbuzp.fsf@fastmail.com> <87d1bx61gy.fsf@openmailbox.org> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.2.1 From: Roel Janssen To: Kei Kebreau Subject: Re: bug#26534: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1. In-reply-to: <87d1bx61gy.fsf@openmailbox.org> Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 12:36:47 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26534 Cc: Marius Bakke , 26534@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Kei Kebreau writes: > Marius Bakke writes: > >> Kei Kebreau writes: >> >>>>> Hi Roel, >>>>> >>>>> I'm looking at updating GNOME packages as well. When I tried building >>>>> the most recent version of Eye of GNOME, glib gave me two test >>>>> failures. Do you think these failures could be a result of glib >>>>> dependencies needing to be updated, or is this fixable on its own? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks in advance, >>>>> Kei >>>> >>>> Dear Kei, >>>> >>>> I think I have found what fixes the two failing tests.. I run the tests >>>> in parallel. When I disabled running them in parallel, two tests fail >>>> related to 'gdbus'. >>>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> Roel Janssen >>> >>> I have good news! Your original patch works when I upgrade dbus to its >>> latest version, 1.10.18. So now we just need to update dbus and get the >>> update merged into gnome-updates. >> >> If "glib" depends on a newer "dbus", I think it should be added in >> 'gnome-updates' as well. Otherwise it will have to wait until the next >> 'core-updates' cycle slated for end of next month. >> >> Thanks for working on this! Let's try to start building this branch on >> Hydra next week, how does that sound? > > Provided that the rest of the package upgrades go smoothly, this is a > good idea. If someone could review the dbus upgrade patch I submitted > to the guix-patches mailing list, I can push it to gnome-updates. I cannot seem to find the patch message you are referring to, or is it from 10 Oct 2016, titled "Dbus update 1.10.12 for core-updates"? Kind regards, Roel Janssen From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Apr 28 10:21:13 2017 Received: (at 26534) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Apr 2017 14:21:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44817 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d46ll-00071H-Eu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 10:21:13 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:50131) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d46lk-000717-9d for 26534@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 10:21:12 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A84F7208BD; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 10:21:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 28 Apr 2017 10:21:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=aAa9CMZPGcWh+hptacjfuBMUnsfy2s1GyejsCI/D/ sY=; b=tT2hzzbzJjw0/nkn27imOH14avVqB3piAVv3aJoJfaqsJFMrPzM4Vsi1J tILOdc6B0DFZmJM6Dwg3sz/FAI7VI95f8x6zG6LZnIgt5wpcYrcZ1WcBiINKPqIH jl+hF5qMgIoVeAI/tVbnFJ+hNg83p4jLuZ1GUXZViZUvQrWq2LcqpFzUSCnN7ZC0 HAF5y+AKHejOG8VKXKkgtiJ619zSNvbt5ohhuaeh0waGXSgConf+cJVkpQmu0Ow8 0Khastl8339viv7lujvxePNnyVRE1a3MaeGdlMq1x9J4qGVtLtyN307USxCK7C4k m2+I1bNR6FgrVlrlt6w139JGJL/XA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=aAa9CMZPGcWh+hptac jfuBMUnsfy2s1GyejsCI/D/sY=; b=sSxsd4DehYL3PWKHC32NO1RTXgKUi+B3xH H44Lb/u1lw+ntyL0j2TdPoVa2A0+OSF8e5XI79Tt+fv/OqbxF1Hd2Qu2zobo/6c4 1XHIqETiJvZK4+21QO+p0LbAZFDjPjaFjTJBoOYVvFZymuPhs2TqPuyb+YB9d4X1 PJf4HSIQ8xsGyoXOyoDx6zdmfsgsrrovDToCIHR1eEw51TOj7Ys4IPU2BPXa67DQ bVZEs5KRmWumE7GjrjmEdCaOun5Xxl5m0jjKgsc8O0bLogr37ei9zoNILrc/L53H YR8g6pfGXpsABl8t/CFpBq/3MW7NjJNug/HOto0Euwi3X5SMtVyA== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: qvcPYMl35WgBSeNjsCGxSLrFVaPbqk082wC9yI3Ixg9C 1493389268 Received: from localhost (unknown [188.113.81.93]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 38B0C240A5; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 10:21:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Marius Bakke To: Kei Kebreau Subject: Re: bug#26534: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1. In-Reply-To: <87d1bx61gy.fsf@openmailbox.org> References: <87a87ga233.fsf@gnu.org> <87vaq4kw2n.fsf@fastmail.com> <871ssr2o7x.fsf@gnu.org> <87fuh7knbv.fsf@fastmail.com> <87shl6r8d2.fsf@gnu.org> <87wpabj9x4.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87mvb5ligp.fsf@gnu.org> <87k26569ea.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87r30dbuzp.fsf@fastmail.com> <87d1bx61gy.fsf@openmailbox.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.24.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.2.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 16:21:06 +0200 Message-ID: <87mvb0bokt.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26534 Cc: Roel Janssen , 26534@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Kei Kebreau writes: > Marius Bakke writes: > >> Kei Kebreau writes: >> >>>>> Hi Roel, >>>>> >>>>> I'm looking at updating GNOME packages as well. When I tried building >>>>> the most recent version of Eye of GNOME, glib gave me two test >>>>> failures. Do you think these failures could be a result of glib >>>>> dependencies needing to be updated, or is this fixable on its own? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks in advance, >>>>> Kei >>>> >>>> Dear Kei, >>>> >>>> I think I have found what fixes the two failing tests.. I run the tests >>>> in parallel. When I disabled running them in parallel, two tests fail >>>> related to 'gdbus'. >>>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> Roel Janssen >>> >>> I have good news! Your original patch works when I upgrade dbus to its >>> latest version, 1.10.18. So now we just need to update dbus and get the >>> update merged into gnome-updates. >> >> If "glib" depends on a newer "dbus", I think it should be added in >> 'gnome-updates' as well. Otherwise it will have to wait until the next >> 'core-updates' cycle slated for end of next month. >> >> Thanks for working on this! Let's try to start building this branch on >> Hydra next week, how does that sound? > > Provided that the rest of the package upgrades go smoothly, this is a > good idea. If someone could review the dbus upgrade patch I submitted > to the guix-patches mailing list, I can push it to gnome-updates. I believe such simple updates are OK to just push, provided it builds and you've verified the GPG signature and checked the code and changelog for e.g. obsolete inputs or arguments (also see HACKING). Obviously at 1500 dependents dbus can't be updated in 'master', but it's okay for 'gnome-updates' since most of the dependent packages comes from "glib" anyway: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg00933.html --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlkDT9IACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPoMLgf/YacI4fjGxstjWJWn1SlVsXO+jxsU+8mcBWHCx0bwiAYGCwuGW9K26UUr b9WGonQle3g7IgGrWqKkKztoPYhEfZ9hsDEEz0s0JmifMEYhTtD29SsjHRsHBCq+ vNsXTnfaXqPb+WEY6hT3XR8IIQp0Gf8lgJ9VsloQasXrO0qsLAAvF0Kf93NyJzii JuEgAZSwPa43uyvKuxU+Y4X6RsNkADO2kHTg3MXOHRMDRHdWqI94PRmv2UUkbU8x Rz0+w/W+Fhv6/PU45mt9/nrvr9unIwbWYOEyWKqxwb3/gm5EuFzycNVLxJRvZAWN JDaRz5I7ZcbKOKP3N6MxxngK9nIcpA== =0gB3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Apr 28 11:44:47 2017 Received: (at 26534) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Apr 2017 15:44:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44887 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d484d-0000eY-DL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 11:44:47 -0400 Received: from lb1.openmailbox.org ([5.79.108.160]:57552 helo=mail.openmailbox.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d484b-0000eP-Pt for 26534@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 11:44:46 -0400 Received: by mail.openmailbox.org (Postfix, from userid 20002) id 8B411515FA4; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:44:44 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=openmailbox.org; s=openmailbox; t=1493394284; bh=n61VyndgTK6LhwYHbZpuifjyZ59+ZMbEYThYbllw1yg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=1DWWqZ2+cnn5F5egeaOz5xicKnto7r9862R5d6GhidrbpKV0N5HI9aRENbAvPrXvF xxBk/e5bwAnJx2ZLir8F1cCQPTnimfhVnX1L1nkbHqOuII3vRz2+WQBdiV+YrmCwlN E7tFpy0UYWjKGzPOllnH3BP5vBNga7zdF1MnFJcg= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on ZDZR003 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RECEIVED,NO_RELAYS, T_DKIM_INVALID,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 From: Kei Kebreau DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=openmailbox.org; s=openmailbox; t=1493394283; bh=n61VyndgTK6LhwYHbZpuifjyZ59+ZMbEYThYbllw1yg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=V0HEm638YPdPC85ebZMXApGuJHUelK2cgQufkEbalZrI7l4xi8sFBmULg1EDHeleS 6ftyAOlKgKM9yWFbF9UCyIL7GlCmdvES9Tv6naerYM7JMNlC3yB4oO1d+MFQiv11kY fwumkPFQ3Nv3leJ2JLZBsV2+9EELhczAPYbfCq7M= To: Roel Janssen Subject: Re: bug#26534: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1. References: <87a87ga233.fsf@gnu.org> <87vaq4kw2n.fsf@fastmail.com> <871ssr2o7x.fsf@gnu.org> <87fuh7knbv.fsf@fastmail.com> <87shl6r8d2.fsf@gnu.org> <87wpabj9x4.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87mvb5ligp.fsf@gnu.org> <87k26569ea.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87r30dbuzp.fsf@fastmail.com> <87d1bx61gy.fsf@openmailbox.org> Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 11:44:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Roel Janssen's message of "Fri, 28 Apr 2017 12:36:47 +0200") Message-ID: <8737cs5yga.fsf@openmailbox.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26534 Cc: Marius Bakke , 26534@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Roel Janssen writes: > Kei Kebreau writes: > >> Marius Bakke writes: >> >>> Kei Kebreau writes: >>> >>>>>> Hi Roel, >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm looking at updating GNOME packages as well. When I tried building >>>>>> the most recent version of Eye of GNOME, glib gave me two test >>>>>> failures. Do you think these failures could be a result of glib >>>>>> dependencies needing to be updated, or is this fixable on its own? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks in advance, >>>>>> Kei >>>>> >>>>> Dear Kei, >>>>> >>>>> I think I have found what fixes the two failing tests.. I run the tests >>>>> in parallel. When I disabled running them in parallel, two tests fail >>>>> related to 'gdbus'. >>>>> >>>>> Kind regards, >>>>> Roel Janssen >>>> >>>> I have good news! Your original patch works when I upgrade dbus to its >>>> latest version, 1.10.18. So now we just need to update dbus and get the >>>> update merged into gnome-updates. >>> >>> If "glib" depends on a newer "dbus", I think it should be added in >>> 'gnome-updates' as well. Otherwise it will have to wait until the next >>> 'core-updates' cycle slated for end of next month. >>> >>> Thanks for working on this! Let's try to start building this branch on >>> Hydra next week, how does that sound? >> >> Provided that the rest of the package upgrades go smoothly, this is a >> good idea. If someone could review the dbus upgrade patch I submitted >> to the guix-patches mailing list, I can push it to gnome-updates. > > I cannot seem to find the patch message you are referring to, or is it > from 10 Oct 2016, titled "Dbus update 1.10.12 for core-updates"? > > Kind regards, > Roel Janssen It's bug #26683 (it might not have shown up so quickly, as I had just sent it). FWIW, I'm just going to push it to gnome-updates since it's okay with Marius. Thanks for debugging the tests. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJZA2NWAAoJEOal7jwZRnoNBbAQALZKoXHInkGnM51ZGvtO7Ed8 IylYwNTk8RBniLDZYixHlKIrMnP9o1keSQs7ICf9doZpCkCyBm6ebD79kBPOARaO bMdLl+0z/leHR1dHoPqmRTdn8Z6PUzqP8TIXeJXCVHewuU4SYMoLHFwm+SnG38hQ DUAWptC6ByZqkYIecVh9jHB9FWC3rFfQc6y4GDOly1G0LwESzCCtOlcyIF0+SqEK DbMZl7rV+fFotPxn+brcPyuGw9r2C3w1JVJiP1M4BxsafcgPvusC2EUzwSYQpa0r q2DZ+zQaR61Y5SGeWzEJkESyRylKsk98pbq6H1aKPsbftCMmkeZv6kpt6RZI6uFR s9mJEd1b4upTe8V8LEs2GUOXP72GuVpJ8mJ7kPzO4amajkJTzr+7fGfFyLb+wEgw TaCvY8PFZX7XfYOaemsaW4c1dO4DqjxN/W5wQ15pNV6ximHVewPHQQKyrVwAglYS c/m/8pcHE2BJq8tdMqrz8NqifXffR93tywwJ9vhoJE/uP3RmdGIGGPwLHUN504tp 57aG8wVioFqW2O2qLgwtqkGDhrJriHHIEUsLO2wwEVSUVsjvA4cLyu6YUWOCdde/ dlx1AMjtP/5w/wjgNgB5ohzHRexPxxmVPYiFDogHumD0IQnrKTQeDyLZSk1aQPPG r9fOpqS+NAo6O0jr4lzL =witf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 06 16:43:18 2017 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jun 2017 20:43:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59946 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dILJu-0004CR-Av for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jun 2017 16:43:18 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:36799) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dILBJ-0003yj-H6 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jun 2017 16:34:25 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2226920AAF for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 16:34:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 06 Jun 2017 16:34:25 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= date:from:message-id:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=qkAYVTzaRUJbbkm5fAwhrpJ9kOju4l M3Lo0GIsWLGnQ=; b=kvwfhMAtu1irFvdxdMw/jlYNzMS58CSfdWKBYRT9tz+Rmg vQv484m2Td3HOurkQA01t3aAcQv260bBDXteQJzBZiiq//IlEeCbUubVwJBkLk5V unG1KA6xXyVw7DIDHB2CqrcHOJPLEITY3xfGqkANP4pyNheSS2JgrSRzUpeeVqHx X05Wtoa2BVcAc9yORC6AXA0+xs/GD3qNbb8cZSPktYFGy/AaYqmPYhCW6utjSjTQ PQ4cTOrS7XYL881Q5WZY5x5vqXHY00FBZSxlHZENYdk+qQml2VuG2zkxtNmkKgqf mwqDm5POCEJHAd5fiBGwCLEzr4y5mA3CIlQ534Kw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:from:message-id:subject:to :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=qkAYVT zaRUJbbkm5fAwhrpJ9kOju4lM3Lo0GIsWLGnQ=; b=Q3AUGk9SDH5Uj7sDnX+2fZ q+Y0aKiEz5SAOkDWO1zQkBHRtH3wWi1bmOrw6vI0hZETt/aIcyhaQIGPQTZ2ehgY AyFZQaWvMoJVkmkfHLbJj+o+4vTh3vIyxkZibTJr1j4GcdIp50NjKXLiOwMcB7dK e/sodK2toYFiOSHSiXo3e23LnMDYy6U/2923kxkIfTUdO3tRXuzkmZtPyeDPE8ua o4RhKfPMh1MsTsM6Ldcp84sr7US4cv58Pg54sWucWmG0qnq4cL4ZsjKf9GE66vfG kbzi1I6GpO34a8K00ayCQ2TE2nKs8WFihJYuqfXL8D8ZBbptAW983P6aikhBH5gQ == X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: hhYCYW+NVDx7K/spXTBuQWES2rzowLYOOBUt98yoTasz 1496781264 Received: from localhost (unknown [188.113.81.93]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 953957E7AA for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 16:34:24 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 22:34:23 +0200 To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Meh Subject: control message for bug #26534 Message-Id: <20170606203424.953957E7AA@mailuser.nyi.internal> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 16:43:16 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) close 26534 From unknown Sat Jun 14 18:37:22 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 11:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator