From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Apr 14 20:04:30 2017 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Apr 2017 00:04:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47587 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1czBCY-000617-ES for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 20:04:30 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45032) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1czBCW-00060u-Jd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 20:04:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1czBCQ-0007PK-Mi for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 20:04:23 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:34627) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1czBCQ-0007PF-K3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 20:04:22 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35991) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1czBCP-00021o-85 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 20:04:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1czBCM-0007NP-19 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 20:04:21 -0400 Received: from mxl065v65.mxlogic.net ([208.81.65.65]:59800 helo=s14p02o142.mxlogic.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1czBCL-0007Lp-FP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 20:04:17 -0400 Received: from unknown [42.127.236.175] (EHLO mlsec.cc.okayama-u.ac.jp) by s14p02o142.mxlogic.net(mxl_mta-8.5.0-1675) with ESMTP id 18361f85.7fcd6ffff700.488007.00-585.1047987.s14p02o142.mxlogic.net (envelope-from ); Fri, 14 Apr 2017 18:04:17 -0600 (MDT) X-MXL-Hash: 58f1638166466704-58a8c5f82cdfea437bacfd1d97446ce62fac1805 Received: from unknown [42.127.236.175] (EHLO mlsec.cc.okayama-u.ac.jp) by s14p02o142.mxlogic.net(mxl_mta-8.5.0-1675) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id c6e51f85.0.487801.00-395.1047598.s14p02o142.mxlogic.net (envelope-from ); Fri, 14 Apr 2017 17:42:36 -0600 (MDT) X-MXL-Hash: 58f15e6c217a6dd1-df2719bc41817c1355ccc8aa95c3a9290ea193cd Received: from alml002.ouadm.okayama-u.ac.jp (unknown [42.127.236.168]) by mlsec.cc.okayama-u.ac.jp with smtp id 62a7_0733_58472b2c_8178_4503_bc1f_330a5ffdd268; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 08:42:30 +0900 Received: from localhost (p256188-ipngn200208tottori.tottori.ocn.ne.jp [180.36.253.188]) by alml002.ouadm.okayama-u.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB8D74C09CD; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 08:42:30 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 08:42:29 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20170415.084229.113177239.tkk@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp> To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: patch for efaq-w32.texi From: Tak Kunihiro X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; boundary="--Next_Part(Sat_Apr_15_08_42_29_2017_737)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 11 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 4 Rules triggered EDT_SA_AU_PASS=0, EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, EDT_SA_TS_PASS=0, RV5999=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <5999> : inlines <5807> : streams <1741216> : uri <2409753> X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.2 cv=U+7iNaju c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=8LLPK8U+aGQ6qN8QlyMYtQ==] X-AnalysisOut: [:117 a=8LLPK8U+aGQ6qN8QlyMYtQ==:17 a=AzvcPWV-tVgA:10 a=HpN] X-AnalysisOut: [1GroCLhltPHEUDx0A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=MbvCZVDqENuhAznjsn] X-AnalysisOut: [0A:9 a=7Zwj6sZBwVKJAoWSPKxL6X1jA+E=:19] X-Spam: [F=0.5000000000; CM=0.500; MH=0.500(2017041406); S=0.200(2015072901)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [42.127.236.175] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: tkk@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) ----Next_Part(Sat_Apr_15_08_42_29_2017_737)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I added a recipe NOT to have the second Emacs. ----Next_Part(Sat_Apr_15_08_42_29_2017_737)-- Content-Type: Text/X-Patch; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="efaq-w32.texi.patch" --- efaq-w32.texi 2017-04-15 07:41:13.130868400 +0900 +++ efaq-w32-b.texi 2017-04-15 08:39:53.665649200 +0900 @@ -706,6 +706,18 @@ defines a number of other keys (C-v, Shift selection), and can be turned on from the @emph{Options} menu. +@node No double Emacs +@subsection No double Emacs + +Emacs should be launched by @command{runemacs.exe} and referred by +@command{emacsclientw.exe}. When you choose Emacs (to be exact, a +shortcut with target @command{C:\emacs-26.1\bin\runemacs.exe}) from +Start menu as if a Window app, you may launch another Emacs. To avoid +having double Emacs, change target of the shortcut to +@code{C:\emacs-26.1\bin\emacsclientw.exe "" --alternate-editor +C:\emacs-26.1\bin\runemacs.exe}. + + @node Window operations @section Window operations @cindex maximize frames from lisp ----Next_Part(Sat_Apr_15_08_42_29_2017_737)---- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 15 03:23:07 2017 Received: (at 26504) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Apr 2017 07:23:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47762 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1czI31-0004kZ-IR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 03:23:07 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49298) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1czI2z-0004jr-TG for 26504@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 03:23:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1czI2r-0000Tc-Gy for 26504@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 03:23:00 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:42083) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1czI2r-0000TU-Dc; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 03:22:57 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4084 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1czI2q-0000UR-PT; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 03:22:57 -0400 Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 10:23:23 +0300 Message-Id: <83d1cegmms.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Tak Kunihiro In-reply-to: <20170415.084229.113177239.tkk@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp> (message from Tak Kunihiro on Sat, 15 Apr 2017 08:42:29 +0900 (JST)) Subject: Re: bug#26504: patch for efaq-w32.texi References: <20170415.084229.113177239.tkk@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26504 Cc: 26504@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) > Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 08:42:29 +0900 (JST) > From: Tak Kunihiro > Cc: tkk@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp > > I added a recipe NOT to have the second Emacs. Thanks. However, I don't think I understand the rationale for this addition. The Emacs User Manual already includes a detailed description of how Emacs can be invoked on MS-Windows, see the node "Windows Startup" there. If something is incorrect or unclear there, we should fix it in the manual, not in the FAQ. > +Emacs should be launched by @command{runemacs.exe} and referred by > +@command{emacsclientw.exe}. When you choose Emacs (to be exact, a > +shortcut with target @command{C:\emacs-26.1\bin\runemacs.exe}) from > +Start menu as if a Window app, you may launch another Emacs. To avoid > +having double Emacs, change target of the shortcut to > +@code{C:\emacs-26.1\bin\emacsclientw.exe "" --alternate-editor > +C:\emacs-26.1\bin\runemacs.exe}. I'm not sure I understand what this says, but if you are saying that the desktop icon should invoke emacsclientw instead of runemacs, I think I disagree. For starters, it's entirely possible that the user actually _wants_ to launch "another Emacs"; one situation where this happens a lot is when you work on developing Emacs and have an older version used for routine work (including Emacs development). So I don't think we should advice users one way or another, we could at most describe the situation and make users aware of the subtleties, so that they could do what's right for their use cases. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 15 04:42:48 2017 Received: (at 26504) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Apr 2017 08:42:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47831 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1czJI8-0006fa-1t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 04:42:48 -0400 Received: from mxl065v65.mxlogic.net ([208.81.65.65]:56204 helo=s14p02o142.mxlogic.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1czJI6-0006fR-Hq for 26504@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 04:42:47 -0400 Received: from unknown [42.127.236.175] (EHLO mlsec.cc.okayama-u.ac.jp) by s14p02o142.mxlogic.net(mxl_mta-8.5.0-1675) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 00dd1f85.0.493628.00-396.1058572.s14p02o142.mxlogic.net (envelope-from ); Sat, 15 Apr 2017 02:42:40 -0600 (MDT) X-MXL-Hash: 58f1dd00397d040d-8788c033ea7bf6580b4fc59281576bd0edf0c32a Received: from alml002.ouadm.okayama-u.ac.jp (unknown [42.127.236.168]) by mlsec.cc.okayama-u.ac.jp with smtp id 62a3_9166_d4d4847e_94a6_4846_878d_0005b7c14aab; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 17:42:35 +0900 Received: from localhost (p256188-ipngn200208tottori.tottori.ocn.ne.jp [180.36.253.188]) by alml002.ouadm.okayama-u.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB7314C0924; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 17:42:34 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 17:42:32 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20170415.174232.139283228.tkk@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp> To: eliz@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#26504: patch for efaq-w32.texi From: Tak Kunihiro In-Reply-To: <83d1cegmms.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20170415.084229.113177239.tkk@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp> <83d1cegmms.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 11 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 4 Rules triggered EDT_SA_AU_PASS=0, EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, EDT_SA_TS_PASS=0, RV5999=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <5999> : inlines <5807> : streams <1741270> : uri <2409952> X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.2 cv=U+7iNaju c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=8LLPK8U+aGQ6qN8QlyMYtQ==] X-AnalysisOut: [:117 a=8LLPK8U+aGQ6qN8QlyMYtQ==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=Azv] X-AnalysisOut: [cPWV-tVgA:10 a=PcbVwA9_5OWFvNgA4iwA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10] X-Spam: [F=0.5000000000; CM=0.500; MH=0.500(2017041502); S=0.423(2015072901)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [42.127.236.175] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26504 Cc: tkk@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp, 26504@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) >> +Emacs should be launched by @command{runemacs.exe} and referred by >> +@command{emacsclientw.exe}. When you choose Emacs (to be exact, a >> +shortcut with target @command{C:\emacs-26.1\bin\runemacs.exe}) from >> +Start menu as if a Window app, you may launch another Emacs. To avoid >> +having double Emacs, change target of the shortcut to >> +@code{C:\emacs-26.1\bin\emacsclientw.exe "" --alternate-editor >> +C:\emacs-26.1\bin\runemacs.exe}. > > I'm not sure I understand what this says, but if you are saying that > the desktop icon should invoke emacsclientw instead of runemacs, I > think I disagree. For starters, it's entirely possible that the user > actually _wants_ to launch "another Emacs"; one situation where this > happens a lot is when you work on developing Emacs and have an older > version used for routine work (including Emacs development). So I > don't think we should advice users one way or another, we could at > most describe the situation and make users aware of the subtleties, so > that they could do what's right for their use cases. I do not insist that the desktop icon should invoke emacsclientw instead of runemacs. On Windows, I suppose user launches App by choosing icon from Start Menu. After a while, spending minutes outside of the App, user wants to switch back to the App. The easiest way is choosing the same icon from Start Menu again (without worrying if App is already running). This works in Emacs on Mac. Q: How do I launch and switch to Emacs by choosing the same icon in Start Menu? The paragraph answers the question and shows recipe. Since Q and A about Windows, I thought it is good to have in FAQ. > emacsclientw.exe "" --alternate-editor runemacs.exe It took me a while to find out solution (that is just giving empty argument). If I am the one who had such a question, this is not frequent, and I agree this should go to nowhere. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 15 05:42:39 2017 Received: (at 26504) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Apr 2017 09:42:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47862 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1czKE3-00083a-Bg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 05:42:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55285) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1czKE2-00083M-8v for 26504@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 05:42:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1czKDt-0001UH-V8 for 26504@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 05:42:33 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:43218) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1czKDt-0001UD-QD; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 05:42:29 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4502 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1czKDs-0001YQ-Ng; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 05:42:29 -0400 Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 12:42:56 +0300 Message-Id: <831ssugg67.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Tak Kunihiro In-reply-to: <20170415.174232.139283228.tkk@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp> (message from Tak Kunihiro on Sat, 15 Apr 2017 17:42:32 +0900 (JST)) Subject: Re: bug#26504: patch for efaq-w32.texi References: <20170415.084229.113177239.tkk@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp> <83d1cegmms.fsf@gnu.org> <20170415.174232.139283228.tkk@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26504 Cc: 26504@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) > Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 17:42:32 +0900 (JST) > Cc: 26504@debbugs.gnu.org, tkk@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp > From: Tak Kunihiro > > On Windows, I suppose user launches App by choosing icon from Start > Menu. That's a possibility, but I think it's a rare one. I personally never use it. The most popular ways, I think, are either by double-clicking on a desktop icon, or by having an Emacs icon pinned to the task bar. > After a while, spending minutes outside of the App, user wants > to switch back to the App. The easiest way is choosing the same icon > from Start Menu again (without worrying if App is already running). > This works in Emacs on Mac. On Windows, each running application that has an open window (a.k.a. "frame" in Emacs parlance) has a corresponding icon on the taskbar, so all one needs to return to the application is to click on that taskbar icon. This is standard Windows usage, not something specific to Emacs, so every Windows user knows about that. > Q: How do I launch and switch to Emacs by choosing the same icon in > Start Menu? > > The paragraph answers the question and shows recipe. Since Q and A > about Windows, I thought it is good to have in FAQ. Like I said, we have Windows-specific issues described in the manual, so any clarifications should be considered for the manual first. > > emacsclientw.exe "" --alternate-editor runemacs.exe > > It took me a while to find out solution (that is just giving empty > argument). If I am the one who had such a question, this is not > frequent, and I agree this should go to nowhere. Given the above information about the taskbar icons, do you still think there's a need to add anything? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 24 12:48:31 2019 Received: (at 26504) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2019 16:48:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57814 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfS8s-0000xR-VK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 12:48:31 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:33402) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfS8r-0000xK-Qd for 26504@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 12:48:30 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hfS8o-0005Qj-Hp; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:48:28 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#26504: patch for efaq-w32.texi References: <20170415.084229.113177239.tkk@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp> <83d1cegmms.fsf@gnu.org> <20170415.174232.139283228.tkk@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp> <831ssugg67.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:48:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: <831ssugg67.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 15 Apr 2017 12:42:56 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > emacsclientw.exe "" --alternate-editor runemacs.exe >> >> It took me a while to find out solution (that is just giving empty >> argument). If I am the one who had such a question, this is not >> [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26504 Cc: Tak Kunihiro , 26504@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > emacsclientw.exe "" --alternate-editor runemacs.exe >> >> It took me a while to find out solution (that is just giving empty >> argument). If I am the one who had such a question, this is not >> frequent, and I agree this should go to nowhere. > > Given the above information about the taskbar icons, do you still > think there's a need to add anything? That was over two years ago, so I'm closing this bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 24 12:48:37 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2019 16:48:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57817 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfS8z-0000xq-Aq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 12:48:37 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:33420) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfS8x-0000xe-KX for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 12:48:35 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hfS8v-0005Qr-1t for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:48:34 +0200 Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:48:32 +0200 Message-Id: To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #26504 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 26504 wontfix close 26504 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 26504 wontfix close 26504 quit From unknown Sat Sep 13 19:18:15 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator