GNU bug report logs - #26502
[PATCH] gnu: racket: Update to 6.8.

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 26502 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 26502 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Cc: Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net>
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: racket: Update to 6.8.
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 01:54:35 +0530

* gnu/packages/scheme.scm (racket): Update to 6.8.
---
 gnu/packages/scheme.scm | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/scheme.scm b/gnu/packages/scheme.scm
index 1ccf62586..f6aee005c 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/scheme.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/scheme.scm
@@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ implementation techniques and as an expository tool.")
 (define-public racket
   (package
     (name "racket")
-    (version "6.6")
+    (version "6.8")
     (source (origin
              (method url-fetch)
              (uri (list (string-append "http://mirror.racket-lang.org/installers/"
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ implementation techniques and as an expository tool.")
                          version "/racket/racket-" version "-src-unix.tgz")))
              (sha256
               (base32
-               "1kzdi1n6h6hmz8zd9k8r5a5yp2ryi4w3c2fjm1k6cqicn18cwaxz"))))
+               "1l9z1a0r5zydr50cklx9xjw3l0pwnf64i10xq7112fl1r89q3qgv"))))
     (build-system gnu-build-system)
     (arguments
      '(#:phases
-- 
2.12.2

Message #8 received at 26502 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
To: Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net>, 26502 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#26502: [PATCH] gnu: racket: Update to 6.8.
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 18:55:07 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net> writes:

> * gnu/packages/scheme.scm (racket): Update to 6.8.
> ---
>  gnu/packages/scheme.scm | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

LGTM. Trivial changes like these are generally OK to push without going
through this list as outlined in HACKING.

Just be mindful about the amount of rebuilds it will cause. If `guix
refresh -l <package>` prints more than ~300 dependents, it should go
through the "staging" or "core-updates" branch. See this thread for the
branching strategy:

https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg00933.html

Thanks a lot for your contributions!

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #13 received at 26502-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net>
To: 26502-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#26502: [PATCH] gnu: racket: Update to 6.8.
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 02:53:08 +0530

Pushed!

Marius Bakke writes:

> LGTM. Trivial changes like these are generally OK to push without going
> through this list as outlined in HACKING.
>
> Just be mindful about the amount of rebuilds it will cause. If `guix
> refresh -l <package>` prints more than ~300 dependents, it should go
> through the "staging" or "core-updates" branch. See this thread for the
> branching strategy:
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg00933.html

Sure, will keep that in mind!

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.