GNU bug report logs - #26455
Emacs Packaging

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Muto <muto.lachen <at> tutanota.com>

Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:18:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: wontfix

Done: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Forwarded to http://lists.gnu.org/r/emacs-devel/2018-04/msg00507.html

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
To: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Muto <muto.lachen <at> tutanota.com>, 26455 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#26455: Emacs Packaging
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 02:58:09 +0100
Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Muto wrote:
>
>> Although technically not a bug, the "Download" section in the Emacs
>> website is somewhat vague in describing how to install Emacs in
>> GNU/Linux. Rather than the options "build from source" or "use an
>> older version", I believe Emacs should ship packaged with a tool such
>> as
>> AppImage (http://appimage.org)
>> Or FlatPak (http://flatpak.org).
>> This way installation on GNU/Linux systems would be simplified
>> significantly and on top of that users would have easy access to the
>> latest version rather than installing from a repository.
>
> Staying paranoid as requested:
>
> Do these approaches mean that the Emacs developers then become
> responsible for shipping all the required dependent libraries,
> monitoring them for security issues, and updating them when needed,
> rather than relying on the distribution to do that?
>
>> --Stay paranoid, and happy hacking! -Muto

Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org> writes:

> PS If these technologies take off, this perhaps feels like something
> that should be addressed at the GNU level rather than the Emacs level.
> (Perhaps guix already provides some version of this?)

While I think this is not a bad idea in and of itself, I think this is
beyond the scope of the Emacs project at the moment given our scarce
resources.  Or perhaps it's better addressed at the GNU level as Glenn
suggests.

I'd therefore suggest to close this as wontfix.  Any other opinions?

Best regards,
Stefan Kangas




This bug report was last modified 5 years and 192 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.