From unknown Sun Jun 15 01:09:07 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#26379: patch for display.texi Resent-From: Tak Kunihiro Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 23:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 26379 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 26379@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Kunihiro Tak X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.149143548024053 (code B ref -1); Wed, 05 Apr 2017 23:38:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2017 23:38:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34181 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cvuUx-0006Ft-NR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 19:37:59 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35892) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cvuUv-0006Fb-9c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 19:37:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cvuUn-00073i-O1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 19:37:50 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:54169) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cvuUn-00073M-Jx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 19:37:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55096) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cvuUm-0001UK-HT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 19:37:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cvuUj-0006z8-Ee for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 19:37:48 -0400 Received: from mxl069v64.mxlogic.net ([208.81.69.64]:34192 helo=s18p02o141.mxlogic.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cvuUi-0006xP-Q1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 19:37:45 -0400 Received: from unknown [42.127.236.175] (EHLO mlsec.cc.okayama-u.ac.jp) by s18p02o141.mxlogic.net(mxl_mta-8.5.0-1675) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 1cf75e85.0.178293.00-394.394217.s18p02o141.mxlogic.net (envelope-from ); Wed, 05 Apr 2017 17:37:38 -0600 (MDT) X-MXL-Hash: 58e57fc20541b849-63736102974397587de5f0e4db2b373707cbd36b Received: from alml002.ouadm.okayama-u.ac.jp (unknown [42.127.236.168]) by mlsec.cc.okayama-u.ac.jp with smtp id 319a_25df_33fdc018_e7e9_4663_9cd0_bf1b159193ea; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 08:37:34 +0900 Received: from [192.168.1.50] (vesta.misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp [150.46.48.154]) by alml002.ouadm.okayama-u.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B4F44C0987; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 08:37:35 +0900 (JST) From: Tak Kunihiro Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_EA9DFBFD-B1B6-44C0-A8C7-D03D6F72771D" Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 08:37:05 +0900 Message-Id: <3818C695-71E8-4522-9574-F1F6AB0C0644@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 11 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 4 Rules triggered EDT_SA_AU_PASS=0, EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, EDT_SA_TS_PASS=0, RV5991=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <5991> : inlines <5784> : streams <1740114> : uri <2404523> X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.2 cv=Iev3YSia c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=8LLPK8U+aGQ6qN8QlyMYtQ==] X-AnalysisOut: [:117 a=8LLPK8U+aGQ6qN8QlyMYtQ==:17 a=AzvcPWV-tVgA:10 a=tR1] X-AnalysisOut: [a3cQgo99CUEhCO9AA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=FousbGfDFmYVM5-uXE] X-AnalysisOut: [UA:9 a=CdiWusdWvyIA:10] X-Spam: [F=0.5000000000; CM=0.500; MH=0.500(2017040514); S=0.200(2015072901)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [42.127.236.175] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) --Apple-Mail=_EA9DFBFD-B1B6-44C0-A8C7-D03D6F72771D Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii My entry point is Info and sometime I think Info needs to be updated. For example, I could not notice existence of line-pixel-height for a = long time. So having it in Info is very useful. Thus I want to send a patch for = display.texi to infer line-pixel-height. However, at the same time, I wonder if sending this kind of patch is = really useful. --Apple-Mail=_EA9DFBFD-B1B6-44C0-A8C7-D03D6F72771D Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=display.texi.patch Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="display.texi.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --- /cygdrive/c/devel/emacs-25.1/doc/lispref/display.texi 2016-07-25 16:08:38.000000000 +0900 +++ /cygdrive/c/Users/dream/Downloads/display.texi 2017-04-06 08:27:57.979688400 +0900 @@ -2067,7 +2067,15 @@ numeric height value specifies the line spacing, rather than the line height. - On text terminals, the line spacing cannot be altered. + On text terminals, the line spacing cannot be altered. On graphical +terminals, for example, the line height you specify can be confirmed by +following function. + +@defun line-pixel-height +This function returns the height of the line at point in pixels. +@end defun + + @node Faces @section Faces --Apple-Mail=_EA9DFBFD-B1B6-44C0-A8C7-D03D6F72771D-- From unknown Sun Jun 15 01:09:07 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Tak Kunihiro Subject: bug#26379: closed (Re: bug#26379: patch for display.texi) Message-ID: References: <831sszl1pn.fsf@gnu.org> <3818C695-71E8-4522-9574-F1F6AB0C0644@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 26379 X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs X-Gnu-PR-Keywords: patch Reply-To: 26379@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 09:43:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1491903782-27313-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1491903782-27313-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #26379: patch for display.texi which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 26379@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 26379: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D26379 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1491903782-27313-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 26379-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Apr 2017 09:42:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41983 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cxsJr-00075y-G5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 05:42:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35772) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cxsJq-00075k-04 for 26379-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 05:42:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cxsJg-0008NV-PT for 26379-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 05:42:32 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:52782) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cxsJg-0008NQ-MJ; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 05:42:28 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4932 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cxsJg-0005Yt-07; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 05:42:28 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 12:42:44 +0300 Message-Id: <831sszl1pn.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Tak Kunihiro In-reply-to: <3818C695-71E8-4522-9574-F1F6AB0C0644@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp> (message from Tak Kunihiro on Thu, 6 Apr 2017 08:37:05 +0900) Subject: Re: bug#26379: patch for display.texi References: <3818C695-71E8-4522-9574-F1F6AB0C0644@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26379-done Cc: 26379-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) > From: Tak Kunihiro > Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 08:37:05 +0900 > Cc: Kunihiro Tak > > My entry point is Info and sometime I think Info needs to be updated. > For example, I could not notice existence of line-pixel-height for a long time. > So having it in Info is very useful. Thus I want to send a patch for display.texi > to infer line-pixel-height. Thanks, I used a slightly different wording and added it in a different node. Pushed to the emacs-25 branch. > However, at the same time, I wonder if sending this kind of patch is really useful. Why not? ------------=_1491903782-27313-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2017 23:38:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34181 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cvuUx-0006Ft-NR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 19:37:59 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35892) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cvuUv-0006Fb-9c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 19:37:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cvuUn-00073i-O1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 19:37:50 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:54169) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cvuUn-00073M-Jx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 19:37:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55096) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cvuUm-0001UK-HT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 19:37:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cvuUj-0006z8-Ee for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 19:37:48 -0400 Received: from mxl069v64.mxlogic.net ([208.81.69.64]:34192 helo=s18p02o141.mxlogic.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cvuUi-0006xP-Q1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 19:37:45 -0400 Received: from unknown [42.127.236.175] (EHLO mlsec.cc.okayama-u.ac.jp) by s18p02o141.mxlogic.net(mxl_mta-8.5.0-1675) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 1cf75e85.0.178293.00-394.394217.s18p02o141.mxlogic.net (envelope-from ); Wed, 05 Apr 2017 17:37:38 -0600 (MDT) X-MXL-Hash: 58e57fc20541b849-63736102974397587de5f0e4db2b373707cbd36b Received: from alml002.ouadm.okayama-u.ac.jp (unknown [42.127.236.168]) by mlsec.cc.okayama-u.ac.jp with smtp id 319a_25df_33fdc018_e7e9_4663_9cd0_bf1b159193ea; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 08:37:34 +0900 Received: from [192.168.1.50] (vesta.misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp [150.46.48.154]) by alml002.ouadm.okayama-u.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B4F44C0987; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 08:37:35 +0900 (JST) From: Tak Kunihiro Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_EA9DFBFD-B1B6-44C0-A8C7-D03D6F72771D" Subject: patch for display.texi Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 08:37:05 +0900 Message-Id: <3818C695-71E8-4522-9574-F1F6AB0C0644@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp> To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 11 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 4 Rules triggered EDT_SA_AU_PASS=0, EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, EDT_SA_TS_PASS=0, RV5991=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <5991> : inlines <5784> : streams <1740114> : uri <2404523> X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.2 cv=Iev3YSia c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=8LLPK8U+aGQ6qN8QlyMYtQ==] X-AnalysisOut: [:117 a=8LLPK8U+aGQ6qN8QlyMYtQ==:17 a=AzvcPWV-tVgA:10 a=tR1] X-AnalysisOut: [a3cQgo99CUEhCO9AA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=FousbGfDFmYVM5-uXE] X-AnalysisOut: [UA:9 a=CdiWusdWvyIA:10] X-Spam: [F=0.5000000000; CM=0.500; MH=0.500(2017040514); S=0.200(2015072901)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [42.127.236.175] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: Kunihiro Tak X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) --Apple-Mail=_EA9DFBFD-B1B6-44C0-A8C7-D03D6F72771D Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii My entry point is Info and sometime I think Info needs to be updated. For example, I could not notice existence of line-pixel-height for a = long time. So having it in Info is very useful. Thus I want to send a patch for = display.texi to infer line-pixel-height. However, at the same time, I wonder if sending this kind of patch is = really useful. --Apple-Mail=_EA9DFBFD-B1B6-44C0-A8C7-D03D6F72771D Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=display.texi.patch Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="display.texi.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --- /cygdrive/c/devel/emacs-25.1/doc/lispref/display.texi 2016-07-25 16:08:38.000000000 +0900 +++ /cygdrive/c/Users/dream/Downloads/display.texi 2017-04-06 08:27:57.979688400 +0900 @@ -2067,7 +2067,15 @@ numeric height value specifies the line spacing, rather than the line height. - On text terminals, the line spacing cannot be altered. + On text terminals, the line spacing cannot be altered. On graphical +terminals, for example, the line height you specify can be confirmed by +following function. + +@defun line-pixel-height +This function returns the height of the line at point in pixels. +@end defun + + @node Faces @section Faces --Apple-Mail=_EA9DFBFD-B1B6-44C0-A8C7-D03D6F72771D-- ------------=_1491903782-27313-1-- From unknown Sun Jun 15 01:09:07 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#26379: patch for display.texi Resent-From: Tak Kunihiro Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 22:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26379 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: eliz@gnu.org Cc: tkk@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp, 26379-done@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 26379-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D26379.149194926328992 (code D ref 26379); Tue, 11 Apr 2017 22:22:02 +0000 Received: (at 26379-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Apr 2017 22:21:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43406 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cy49n-0007XY-DV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 18:21:03 -0400 Received: from mxl065v65.mxlogic.net ([208.81.65.65]:49250 helo=s14p02o142.mxlogic.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cy49j-0007Wl-OK for 26379-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 18:21:01 -0400 Received: from unknown [42.127.236.175] (EHLO mlsec.cc.okayama-u.ac.jp) by s14p02o142.mxlogic.net(mxl_mta-8.5.0-1675) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 1c65de85.0.414377.00-374.888636.s14p02o142.mxlogic.net (envelope-from ); Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:20:51 -0600 (MDT) X-MXL-Hash: 58ed56c31b8e38d2-0120576a5d57de70cbcef6e93e8567a83f0ac5e2 Received: from alml002.ouadm.okayama-u.ac.jp (unknown [42.127.236.168]) by mlsec.cc.okayama-u.ac.jp with smtp id 492c_18fd_7f0d2144_5747_4732_8eba_47d73162385d; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:20:45 +0900 Received: from localhost (p256188-ipngn200208tottori.tottori.ocn.ne.jp [180.36.253.188]) by alml002.ouadm.okayama-u.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 093BD4C0A0E; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:20:44 +0900 (JST) Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:20:43 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20170412.072043.276889204.tkk@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp> From: Tak Kunihiro In-Reply-To: <831sszl1pn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <3818C695-71E8-4522-9574-F1F6AB0C0644@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp> <831sszl1pn.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 11 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.1 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 5 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.1, EDT_SA_AU_PASS=0, EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, EDT_SA_TS_PASS=0, RV5996=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <5996> : inlines <5804> : streams <1740779> : uri <2407986> X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.2 cv=U+7iNaju c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=8LLPK8U+aGQ6qN8QlyMYtQ==] X-AnalysisOut: [:117 a=8LLPK8U+aGQ6qN8QlyMYtQ==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=Azv] X-AnalysisOut: [cPWV-tVgA:10 a=bSkoha_Nh4IIsqU2a08A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10] X-Spam: [F=0.5000000000; CM=0.500; MH=0.500(2017041118); S=0.315(2015072901)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [42.127.236.175] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) >> However, at the same time, I wonder if sending this kind of patch >> is really useful. > > Why not? Writing documentation is not that appreciated in my daily circumstance. Thus I was not sure the revision of a few lines is regarded as `useful'. Now I know!