From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Apr 05 19:38:00 2017 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2017 23:38:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34181 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cvuUx-0006Ft-NR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 19:37:59 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35892) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cvuUv-0006Fb-9c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 19:37:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cvuUn-00073i-O1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 19:37:50 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:54169) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cvuUn-00073M-Jx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 19:37:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55096) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cvuUm-0001UK-HT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 19:37:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cvuUj-0006z8-Ee for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 19:37:48 -0400 Received: from mxl069v64.mxlogic.net ([208.81.69.64]:34192 helo=s18p02o141.mxlogic.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cvuUi-0006xP-Q1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 19:37:45 -0400 Received: from unknown [42.127.236.175] (EHLO mlsec.cc.okayama-u.ac.jp) by s18p02o141.mxlogic.net(mxl_mta-8.5.0-1675) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 1cf75e85.0.178293.00-394.394217.s18p02o141.mxlogic.net (envelope-from ); Wed, 05 Apr 2017 17:37:38 -0600 (MDT) X-MXL-Hash: 58e57fc20541b849-63736102974397587de5f0e4db2b373707cbd36b Received: from alml002.ouadm.okayama-u.ac.jp (unknown [42.127.236.168]) by mlsec.cc.okayama-u.ac.jp with smtp id 319a_25df_33fdc018_e7e9_4663_9cd0_bf1b159193ea; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 08:37:34 +0900 Received: from [192.168.1.50] (vesta.misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp [150.46.48.154]) by alml002.ouadm.okayama-u.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B4F44C0987; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 08:37:35 +0900 (JST) From: Tak Kunihiro Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_EA9DFBFD-B1B6-44C0-A8C7-D03D6F72771D" Subject: patch for display.texi Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 08:37:05 +0900 Message-Id: <3818C695-71E8-4522-9574-F1F6AB0C0644@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp> To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 11 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 4 Rules triggered EDT_SA_AU_PASS=0, EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, EDT_SA_TS_PASS=0, RV5991=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <5991> : inlines <5784> : streams <1740114> : uri <2404523> X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.2 cv=Iev3YSia c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=8LLPK8U+aGQ6qN8QlyMYtQ==] X-AnalysisOut: [:117 a=8LLPK8U+aGQ6qN8QlyMYtQ==:17 a=AzvcPWV-tVgA:10 a=tR1] X-AnalysisOut: [a3cQgo99CUEhCO9AA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=FousbGfDFmYVM5-uXE] X-AnalysisOut: [UA:9 a=CdiWusdWvyIA:10] X-Spam: [F=0.5000000000; CM=0.500; MH=0.500(2017040514); S=0.200(2015072901)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [42.127.236.175] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: Kunihiro Tak X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) --Apple-Mail=_EA9DFBFD-B1B6-44C0-A8C7-D03D6F72771D Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii My entry point is Info and sometime I think Info needs to be updated. For example, I could not notice existence of line-pixel-height for a = long time. So having it in Info is very useful. Thus I want to send a patch for = display.texi to infer line-pixel-height. However, at the same time, I wonder if sending this kind of patch is = really useful. --Apple-Mail=_EA9DFBFD-B1B6-44C0-A8C7-D03D6F72771D Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=display.texi.patch Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="display.texi.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --- /cygdrive/c/devel/emacs-25.1/doc/lispref/display.texi 2016-07-25 16:08:38.000000000 +0900 +++ /cygdrive/c/Users/dream/Downloads/display.texi 2017-04-06 08:27:57.979688400 +0900 @@ -2067,7 +2067,15 @@ numeric height value specifies the line spacing, rather than the line height. - On text terminals, the line spacing cannot be altered. + On text terminals, the line spacing cannot be altered. On graphical +terminals, for example, the line height you specify can be confirmed by +following function. + +@defun line-pixel-height +This function returns the height of the line at point in pixels. +@end defun + + @node Faces @section Faces --Apple-Mail=_EA9DFBFD-B1B6-44C0-A8C7-D03D6F72771D-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 11 05:42:39 2017 Received: (at 26379-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Apr 2017 09:42:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41983 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cxsJr-00075y-G5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 05:42:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35772) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cxsJq-00075k-04 for 26379-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 05:42:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cxsJg-0008NV-PT for 26379-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 05:42:32 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:52782) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cxsJg-0008NQ-MJ; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 05:42:28 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4932 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cxsJg-0005Yt-07; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 05:42:28 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 12:42:44 +0300 Message-Id: <831sszl1pn.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Tak Kunihiro In-reply-to: <3818C695-71E8-4522-9574-F1F6AB0C0644@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp> (message from Tak Kunihiro on Thu, 6 Apr 2017 08:37:05 +0900) Subject: Re: bug#26379: patch for display.texi References: <3818C695-71E8-4522-9574-F1F6AB0C0644@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26379-done Cc: 26379-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) > From: Tak Kunihiro > Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 08:37:05 +0900 > Cc: Kunihiro Tak > > My entry point is Info and sometime I think Info needs to be updated. > For example, I could not notice existence of line-pixel-height for a long time. > So having it in Info is very useful. Thus I want to send a patch for display.texi > to infer line-pixel-height. Thanks, I used a slightly different wording and added it in a different node. Pushed to the emacs-25 branch. > However, at the same time, I wonder if sending this kind of patch is really useful. Why not? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 11 18:21:03 2017 Received: (at 26379-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Apr 2017 22:21:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43406 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cy49n-0007XY-DV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 18:21:03 -0400 Received: from mxl065v65.mxlogic.net ([208.81.65.65]:49250 helo=s14p02o142.mxlogic.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cy49j-0007Wl-OK for 26379-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 18:21:01 -0400 Received: from unknown [42.127.236.175] (EHLO mlsec.cc.okayama-u.ac.jp) by s14p02o142.mxlogic.net(mxl_mta-8.5.0-1675) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 1c65de85.0.414377.00-374.888636.s14p02o142.mxlogic.net (envelope-from ); Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:20:51 -0600 (MDT) X-MXL-Hash: 58ed56c31b8e38d2-0120576a5d57de70cbcef6e93e8567a83f0ac5e2 Received: from alml002.ouadm.okayama-u.ac.jp (unknown [42.127.236.168]) by mlsec.cc.okayama-u.ac.jp with smtp id 492c_18fd_7f0d2144_5747_4732_8eba_47d73162385d; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:20:45 +0900 Received: from localhost (p256188-ipngn200208tottori.tottori.ocn.ne.jp [180.36.253.188]) by alml002.ouadm.okayama-u.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 093BD4C0A0E; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:20:44 +0900 (JST) Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:20:43 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20170412.072043.276889204.tkk@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp> To: eliz@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#26379: patch for display.texi From: Tak Kunihiro In-Reply-To: <831sszl1pn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <3818C695-71E8-4522-9574-F1F6AB0C0644@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp> <831sszl1pn.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 11 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.1 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 5 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.1, EDT_SA_AU_PASS=0, EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, EDT_SA_TS_PASS=0, RV5996=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <5996> : inlines <5804> : streams <1740779> : uri <2407986> X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.2 cv=U+7iNaju c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=8LLPK8U+aGQ6qN8QlyMYtQ==] X-AnalysisOut: [:117 a=8LLPK8U+aGQ6qN8QlyMYtQ==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=Azv] X-AnalysisOut: [cPWV-tVgA:10 a=bSkoha_Nh4IIsqU2a08A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10] X-Spam: [F=0.5000000000; CM=0.500; MH=0.500(2017041118); S=0.315(2015072901)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [42.127.236.175] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26379-done Cc: tkk@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp, 26379-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) >> However, at the same time, I wonder if sending this kind of patch >> is really useful. > > Why not? Writing documentation is not that appreciated in my daily circumstance. Thus I was not sure the revision of a few lines is regarded as `useful'. Now I know! From unknown Sun Jun 15 01:08:32 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator