GNU bug report logs - #26334
[PATCH 1/1] system: grub: Enable the use of a non-graphical GRUB menu.

Previous Next

Full log

Message #23 received at 26334 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Cc: 26334 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#26334: [PATCH 1/1] system: grub: Enable the use of a
 non-graphical GRUB menu.
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2017 10:34:01 +0200

Hi Leo!

Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> skribis:

> On Sun, Apr 02, 2017 at 12:15:54AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Would it be possible to detect whether graphical output is available
>> only in GRUB code?
>
> I'm far from a GRUB expert...
>
> Apparently, the terminal input and output devices default to the
> "platform's native terminal {input,output}":
> https://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/html_node/Simple-configuration.html
>
>> Or is the use case a situation where graphical output *is* supported
>> but somehow undesirable?
>
> Yes, that is a potential use case. For example, I have a system based on
> an embedded system-on-a-chip that includes a GPU, but no physical video
> ports; I must use the serial port.
>
> I also have this use case on a laptop as a consequence of
> <https://bugs.gnu.org/24948>.

Oh right.

> For both of those systems, I've been using a different patch that
> has the same effect on the generated grub.cfg.
>
> Perhaps instead of a graphical? toggle, we could expose the different
> values of GRUB_TERMINAL_OUTPUT and GRUB_TERMINAL_INPUT:
>
> https://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/html_node/Simple-configuration.html

Yes, that makes sense to me.  So I’d say add a ‘terminal-output’ field
instead of ‘graphical?’, have that default to "gfxterm" (in which case
it does the current “if loadfont…; setup_gfxterm; fi”).

WDYT?

Thanks!

Ludo’.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.