GNU bug report logs - #26299
24.5; Use of `…' in Info

Previous Next

Full log

Message #43 received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: 26299 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: bug#26299: 24.5; Use of `…' in Info
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 05:21:28 +0200

tags 26299 + notabug
close 26299
quit

Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com> writes:

>> > Maybe Emacs needs to work around the problem (if it can't be
>> > fixed).  Maybe if Emacs uses `. . .' instead of `...' that
>> > will stop Texinfo from messing with it.
>> >
>> > (Why would Texinfo have a blanket treatment of ... as …?
>> > That makes no sense at all.  What if the occurrence of ...
>> > is part of code, and NEEDS to be 3 period chars?)
>>
>> Emacs' .texi files use @dots{} in these cases, as (strongly)
>> recommended by the texinfo manual:
>>
>>     An ellipsis (a sequence of dots) would be spaced wrong when typeset as
>>     a string of periods, so a special command is used in Texinfo: use the
>>     @dots{} command to generate a normal ellipsis, which is three dots in
>>     a row, appropriately spaced … like so. To emphasize: do not simply
>>     write three periods in the input file; that would work for the Info
>>     file output, but would produce the wrong amount of space between the
>>     periods in the printed manual.
>>
>> I found this thread [1] requesting plain "..." for @dots{} in makeinfo
>> output; there seemed to be no opposition, but I guess it didn't
>> happen. Perhaps try pinging bug-texinfo <at> gnu.org?
>
> Thanks for checking on this, Noam.  I will leave it to Emacs
> maintainers to decide whether to ping bug-texinfo.  I reported
> the complaint as one Emacs user.  Dunno what Emacs Dev will
> decide is the desired behavior.  I know what I prefer.

Info displays three dots ("...") rather than ellipsis in the manual on
my system, which has texinfo 6.5.0.  So it would seem like texinfo has
reverted this change?

In any case, this is not an Emacs bug, so I'm closing this as notabug.

Best regards,
Stefan Kangas

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.