GNU bug report logs - #26243
25.1; `dired-pop-to-buffer' warning

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>

Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 18:22:02 UTC

Severity: minor

Tags: fixed

Found in version 25.1

Fixed in version 27.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #18 received at 26243 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
To: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>
Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>, 26243 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Subject: Re: bug#26243: 25.1; `dired-pop-to-buffer' warning
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 01:41:50 +0300
>> It was added with a reference to bug 1806, which is a 170 message long
>> thread which I've not read.  I've Cc'd Juri (who made the change) in
>> case the reference makes sense anyway, in which case I'll revert my
>> change.
>
> I think the declaration should say to use 'pop-to-buffer' instead of
> 'dired-pop-to-buffer'.  But let's wait for Juri.

Yes, either 'pop-to-buffer' or 'dired-mark-pop-up'.  If 'dired-mark-pop-up'
doesn't suit the needs due to its narrow applicability, then a more general
'pop-to-buffer' should be used.  'dired-pop-to-buffer' was an ugly wrapper
around 'pop-to-buffer' with some additions that now should be specified
as ACTION args of 'display-buffer' (an example is in 'dired-mark-pop-up').
I don't understand why Drew still uses 'dired-pop-to-buffer'.




This bug report was last modified 5 years and 299 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.